Should I smile?

Pennsylvania court says undated ballots won't be counted as RNC claims 'massive' legal victory

It depends on your perspective. Is it plausible that a ballot recieved before election day was actually fraudulently sent from the future, or did a voter just forget to write the date on a legitimate return envelope?

They being the FBI, right.

I see WP doesn't understand how the block function works.

We fixed the keg said:

---

Whistle Pig said:

---

It depends on your perspective. Is it plausible that a ballot recieved before election day was actually fraudulently sent from the future, or did a voter just forget to write the date on a legitimate return envelope?

---

Ever know of anyone getting a zero on homework for not putting their name, subject, and date on the paper? If someone's vote is invalidated because they cannot follow instructions, I am 100% on board.

---

This is a dishonest question from the pig. The real question should be how do we jeep that ballot separated and where it's the proof during a full and cilomplete audit that demonstrates that ballot did not arrive late.

Typical approach of the libdems is to claim everything is legit without having to prove it. Then gum up the legal process so it never is reviewed or audited, and then bury it in the media and life goes on.

In contrast, we need to review all the procedures and make sure they are secure, which we all are well aware now that they most definitely are not!

These ballots in question would have a postmark and election department scan to prove the date. This is an attempt to throw out ballots just for the hell of it. I'm not so sure this wouldn't favor dems, the olds forget to do stuff.

Holy bleeping bleep. CBS and @macfarlane assert without reason or sense here that if you want election audits, or use your right to object to a state's electors, or even if you oppose *unconstitutional* changes to election laws, that makes you an "election denier." INSANE. https://t.co/NtVHQYCpx3 pic.twitter.com/oV5KqbgQBZ

— Mollie (@MZHemingway) November 3, 2022

Holocaust deniers
Climate change deniers
Now election deniers

All lumped together with same label.

Biden already denying the results next week, and Hillary in 2024.

I'm over here waiting on CBS to talk about that.

HOLY S***: Kimberly Zapata, the deputy director of the City of Milwaukee Election Commission has just been fired for committing election fraud by obtaining fake military ballots and sending them to Assembly Elections Committee chairwoman Janel Brandtjen.

— Dan O'Donnell (@DanODonnellShow) November 3, 2022

Milwaukee Elections Commission Director Claire Woodall-Vogg says she believes that Zapata was attempting to point out that military ballots can be requested and sent out without a photo ID or even voter registration through the public https://t.co/D6Nnq5tHWd website.

— Dan O'Donnell (@DanODonnellShow) November 3, 2022

Milwaukee Elections Commission Director Claire Woodall-Vogg says she believes that Zapata was attempting to point out that military ballots can be requested and sent out without a photo ID or even voter registration through the public https://t.co/D6Nnq5tHWd website.

— Dan O'Donnell (@DanODonnellShow) November 3, 2022

That third tweet is disingenuous at best. Why send them to her home and not office? Why not a cover letter alerting that this is a huge problem?

Yeah, that dog won't hunt.

You aren't buying the "oh, I was trying to point out how insecure it was" defense?

You can bet your ass they are lining up to defend her and the talking points are out.

eta: enter humming swine in 3.....2.....1

Nevada and Georgia seats will go R. Wisconsin will hold R even if PA cheats and Oz loses Rs will have 51 seats minimum. Arizona should go R and NH might. CO and WA will be closer then the last few elections but should stay d.

aggiehawg said:

---

Quote:

---

"When private citizens form 'ballot security forces' and attempt to take over the State's legitimate role of overseeing and policing elections,

---

Then why is nearly 99% of Arizona's election apparatus run by private entities like Dominion and Runbeck?

---

James Clapper would call your statement the "head shot". The state has already forfeited their "legitimate role of overseeing and policing elections". The question now remains why did they?

Democracy dies in darkness

We fixed the keg said:

---

Whistle Pig said:

---

It depends on your perspective. Is it plausible that a ballot recieved before election day was actually fraudulently sent from the future, or did a voter just forget to write the date on a legitimate return envelope?

---

Ever know of anyone getting a zero on homework for not putting their name, subject, and date on the paper? If someone's vote is invalidated because they cannot follow instructions, I am 100% on board.

---

This is the correct answer, but some posters don't care about laws and regulations.

will25u said:

---

Holy bleeping bleep. CBS and @macfarlane assert without reason or sense here that if you want election audits, or use your right to object to a state's electors, or even if you oppose *unconstitutional* changes to election laws, that makes you an "election denier." INSANE. https://t.co/NtVHQYCpx3 pic.twitter.com/oV5KqbgQBZ

— Mollie (@MZHemingway) November 3, 2022

---

It would have been nice if they had provided a list so I'd know who to send campaign contributions to.

Over half the Republicans in various races in 48 states have concerns about the legitimacy of the 2020 election? That's a lot of far-right conspiracy nuts. How many people have to believe something for it not to be a conspiracy?

HumpitPuryear said:

---

Over half the Republicans in various races in 48 states have concerns about the legitimacy of the 2020 election? That's a lot of far-right conspiracy nuts. How many people have to believe something for it not to be a conspiracy?

---

when does the number of "election deniers" create enough interest in the media to actually cause one of them to take a look at the reasons why so many people have questions or doubts about that election instead of simply vilifying them?

The fraud deniers in the media might one day have to stop and think for a moment that all-out censoring proof of corruption before the election and colluding to call that proof russian disinformation might have been the biggest piece of election interference in history. They might have to examine one day that using the fear pr0n of the scamdemic to introduce unprecedented ez fraud mailing campaigns might have opened the possibility for ez fraud to keep finding/counting enough ballots long after election day until there was enough in certain precincts to change the outcome. ..at least acknowledge the appearance of such warrants valid questions. If it's the most secure election ever, don't just say it; allow it to be proven.

aggiehawg said:

---

Milwaukee Elections Commission Director Claire Woodall-Vogg says she believes that Zapata was attempting to point out that military ballots can be requested and sent out without a photo ID or even voter registration through the public https://t.co/D6Nnq5tHWd website.

— Dan O'Donnell (@DanODonnellShow) November 3, 2022

That third tweet is disingenuous at best. Why send them to her home and not office? Why not a cover letter alerting that this is a huge problem?

Yeah, that dog won't hunt.

---

Hawg,
Here's a heads up. I just heard Ted Cruz interviewed on 820 and it was great. He was describing how his brand new book "Justice Corrupted" goes into all the details of the Spygate/Dossier lie, and also what was going on Jan 6 and exactly what he was attempting and about to present. That Pence undermined, etc. May get it for the inside take from expert on the Trump side of the legal options on Jan 6 that is always just dismissed.

Sounds like you would really want to know about it.
https://www.amazon.com/Justice-Corrupted-Weaponized-Legal-System/dp/1684513618/ref=sr_1_1?keywords=justice+corrupted&qid=1667514701&qu=eyJxc2MiOiIxLjU0IiwicXNhIjoiMS4zOSIsInFzcCI6IjEuMzYifQ%3D%3D&s=books&sr=1-1

HumpitPuryear said:

---

Over half the Republicans in various races in 48 states have concerns about the legitimacy of the 2020 election? That's a lot of far-right conspiracy nuts. How many people have to believe something for it not to be a conspiracy?

---

There are 2 types of people in this world: those who think hiding information is a legimate way to prove you aren't hiding something and non-idiots aka conspiracy theorists.

Thanks, titan.

Does "aggiehawg" appear in the credits and index? Just joking of course. Cruz has better things to do than to read TexAgs 16 and he is waaaaay smarter than I am.

My advantage was that I had a lot more time to do deep dives down a lot of rabbit holes, many dead-ended. Some gave links that were not dead yet. They are now, of course. Youtube scrubbed a lot of Dominion's training sessions, their manuals and their sales presentations as to the capability to alter votes from their platform.

HumpitPuryear said:

---

Over half the Republicans in various races in 48 states have concerns about the legitimacy of the 2020 election? That's a lot of far-right conspiracy nuts. How many people have to believe something for it not to be a conspiracy?

---

"Having concerns" is different than "lying incessantly" about fake fraud. These candidates knew they had to lie about "election fraud" to be in Trump's good graces and win their primaries. Few of them really believe it.

oh no said:

---

HumpitPuryear said:

---

Over half the Republicans in various races in 48 states have concerns about the legitimacy of the 2020 election? That's a lot of far-right conspiracy nuts. How many people have to believe something for it not to be a conspiracy?

---

when does the number of "election deniers" create enough interest in the media to actually cause one of them to take a look at the reasons why so many people have questions or doubts about that election instead of simply vilifying them?

The fraud deniers in the media might one day have to stop and think for a moment that all-out censoring proof of corruption before the election and colluding to call that proof russian disinformation might have been the biggest piece of election interference in history. They might have to examine one day that using the fear pr0n of the scamdemic to introduce unprecedented ez fraud mailing campaigns might have opened the possibility for ez fraud to keep finding/counting enough ballots long after election day until there was enough in certain precincts to change the outcome. ..at least acknowledge the appearance of such warrants valid questions. If it's the most secure election ever, don't just say it; allow it to be proven.

---

My point is that this segment from CBS actually gives a lot of credibility to the "big lie". ie more than half of Republicans aren't mega MAGA right-wing zealots and they wouldn't be talking about it if it wasn't polling well which means a lot of everyday Americans believe it too. I don't think throwing out these big numbers of election deniers is likely to have the effect that they think it will. I was actually surprised by the number (308 candidates). Dems are overplaying the hand, as usual.

Whistle Pig said:

---

HumpitPuryear said:

---

Over half the Republicans in various races in 48 states have concerns about the legitimacy of the 2020 election? That's a lot of far-right conspiracy nuts. How many people have to believe something for it not to be a conspiracy?

---

"Having concerns" is different than "lying incessantly" about fake fraud. These candidates knew they had to lie about "election fraud" to be in Trump's good graces and win their primaries. Few of them really believe it.

---

It doesn't matter if they believe it. It must be polling well or they wouldn't take that position which means a lot of people do believe it. And that's really bad for progressives.

Being delivered, thanks
Justice Corrupted: How the Left Weaponized Our Legal System

Quote:

---

It must be polling well or they wouldn't take that position which means a lot of people do believe it. And that's really bad for progressives.

---

So are facts of current life in the US.

Also bad for Dems/Progressives.

I've always said you should write a book. Or two.

Quote:

---

It doesn't matter if they believe it. It must be polling well or they wouldn't take that position which means a lot of people do believe it. And that's really bad for progressives.

---

A false belief held by a large minority of people is still false. I suspect many of these responses don't hold much conviction, but it's the answer that shows support for the tribe and "owns the libs".

40% of adults tell pollsters they believe in Santa Claus.

Tailgate88 said:

---

I've always said you should write a book. Or two.

---

Not on this subject. I write murder mystery fiction novels.

TRADUCTOR said:

---

Being delivered, thanks
Justice Corrupted: How the Left Weaponized Our Legal System

---

You are welcome, hawg too. Thought this thread would be into it.