It's not really an opinion. It's a fact.
Polls = Facts LMFAOKeegan99 said:
His negative numbers with the electorate are a matter of record.
It's not really an opinion. It's a fact.
If they are done correctly. As the person above me pointed out, PeoplesPundit was one of the best poller before the last election.sicandtiredTXN said:Polls = Facts LMFAOKeegan99 said:
His negative numbers with the electorate are a matter of record.
It's not really an opinion. It's a fact.
Holy crap, can anyone believe the election wasn't corrupted and insecure?will25u said:The federal cybersecurity agency assured us after the 2020 election that it was perfectly secure vote. Months later, federal prosecutors admitted two Iranian nationals hacked into a state’s database and stole the identities of 100,000 voters#JustTheNews https://t.co/jSENPzqpN4
— Just the News (@JustTheNews) March 10, 2022
That was well worth the readQuote:
Months later, federal prosecutors admitted two Iranian nationals hacked into a state's database and stole the identities of 100,000 voters in an effort to influence the election.
……
(In Wisc.)
Now, two separate courts have concluded that state election regulators illegally changed rules, allowing tens of thousands to cast ballots in an unlawful manner
…..
Georgia's elections chief similarly expresses confidence to this day in his state's declaration that Joe Biden won in 2020, but he now admits the state's largest county ran a vote counting operation so dysfunctional that the state may take over the county. He also has launched a probe into potential illegal harvesting of ballots that he says may result in prosecutions.
…..
Here are 20 of the most important revelations uncovered by Just the News over the last 15 months of reporting, complete with substantiating evidence and links"
- [ol]
- A Foreign Intrusion.
- Alleged Bribery.
- Illegal ballot harvesting in Wisconsin.
- Ballot harvesting probe in the Peach State.
- Bad voter signatures?
- 50,000 Arizona ballots called into question..
- Illegal ballot drop boxes.
- Foreign voters found on Texas rolls.
- Foreign voters found on Georgia rolls.
- Unconstitutional mail-in voting.
- More noncitizen voters.
- Ballot chain of custody issues.
- Fulton County irregularities.
- Errant vote counting.
- Dirty voter rolls.
- Illegal exemptions from voter ID.
- Uneven enforcement of election laws.
- More illegal harvesting.
- Voter fraud in Michigan.
- Still more nursing home fraud
[/ol]
Your condescension is duly noted, but I don't need it explained to me. Polling is an art not a science and is only as good as the poller wants it to be, and can be manipulated in any direction and that is an absolute FACT. To claim a poll is factual, is laughable.Keegan99 said:
There are plenty of good data analysts out there (eg PeoplesPundit) that can explain this to you if you would like to educate yourself a bit.
His negative poll numbers are largely due to the anti Trump/pro Democrat MSM propaganda spewed between 2015 and 2020. Imo, despite big tech's best efforts to censor speech of independent journalists, social media has actually given a voice to people outside of the MSM circles and specifically the lies spread in 2020 have significantly diminished the credibility of traditional news sources. They blew their wad keeping Trump out in 2020 and the consequences of their rank dishonesty has tarnished their reputation beyond repair. A much bigger part of the population is now getting their information from smaller independent sources that they consider (rightly or wrongly) more trustworthy. Let's see how this plays out in 2022 and 2024, but I think the Democrat's iron grip on MSM propaganda is going to be far less impactful going forward.Keegan99 said:
His negative numbers with the electorate are a matter of record.
It's not really an opinion. It's a fact.
aggiehawg said:
Here you go. Garland Favorito.
Link
74,000,000 votesKeegan99 said:
His negative numbers with the electorate are a matter of record.
It's not really an opinion. It's a fact.
Kemp and/or Rafassburger were bought off, I have zero doubts about that.captkirk said:aggiehawg said:
Here you go. Garland Favorito.
Link
- [url=https://voterga.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/How-Georgia-election-results-were-electronically-manipulated-legislators.pdf#page=7][/url]
- 17,724 Presidential votes have no ballot images. Net gain of 9,024 votes for Biden.
- 374,128 ballot images that were "Certified" are missing from everyone who voted in person.
- These votes can't be certified and shouldn't have been counted.
- Federal and State law require saving for 22 & 24 mo.
- 132,284 mail-in ballot images are missing their authentication files.
- Over 4,000 ballot images have duplicate time stamps. Often 3-8 ballots per/sec.
- VoterGA believes these ballots were inserted.
- 104,994 ballot image files have impossible duplicate time stamps.
- All tabulator closing tapes for 315,000 "in-person early voting" are unsigned.
- Only 2 slips were signed. It's impossible this number of workers would not sign off.
- VoterGA believes these unsigned tapes were fabricated and why no signatures.
- ALL ballot batches were sent to adjudication for human reinterpretation. WTH?
- 10 ballots adjudicated in one minute, by one user. It's impossible.
- 16,034 ballot images file modified dates are 3-8 days after image scan date
- Ballot image files were backdated prior to adjudication.
- 288 batches have backfilled images, also not in chronological order.
- Closing tapes for 148 early voting tabulators show only 12 different ID's (serial numbers).
- One tabulator machine was never closed. Could add votes days and weeks after the election.
- 12,024 ballots from Election Day have 85 closing tapes unsigned or missing.
- $11,000 Fulton County wanted for a copy of "zero tapes" for the 300 tabulators.
Don't forget that weasel scum Gabe Sterling. He's not even a state employee when all of this was going on. He resigned his position, started a consulting firm then was hired back for the exact same job for double the money. And as a consultant he could take other "jobs" and get paid, too.Quote:
Kemp and/or Rafassburger were bought off, I have zero doubts about that.
Quote:
A lawsuit questioning the integrity of Colorado's elections had its day in court on Friday.
Sort of.
The hearing was, actually, about Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold (D) trying to get the lawsuit tossed.
Two Republican County Clerks -- Elbert County Clerk Dallas Schroeder and Douglas County Clerk Merlin Klotz -- along with a few Republican County Commissioners from Park and Rio Blanco counties, want access to election servers.
Quote:
They want to see if the election equipment software update, known as a "Trusted Build" deleted election data.
"What we're asking the court to do is allow us to get an image of the system as it exists today," said John Case, the attorney representing Schroeder, Klotz and the county commissioners.
Schroeder admitted in an affidavit last month that he made his own copies of his voting machine services before the Trusted Build.
"I made a forensic image of everything on the election server, and I saved the image to a secure external hard drive," Schroeder wrote.
LinkQuote:
"He, personally, with (deputy clerk) Rhonda Braun took the hard drives out of the election voting system server, put it into a copying device that he had borrowed and that was a read-only device, to get the image off the hard drive, and then it writes that image onto an external hard drive, a portable hard drive that Mr. Schroeder had purchased. And he had imaged the two hard drives that were in the voting system server, and then he imaged the hard drives that were in the adjudication computer and in the two scanning computers," said Case.
Schroeder and Klotz now want a copy of the servers after the Trusted Build.
"Let's see if the update erased records, that's all we want to know," said Case. "The Secretary (of State) is preventing that audit from taking place. She won't allow the county clerks to hire their own experts to look at the system."
Last year, the Colorado Secretary of State's Office approved emergency rules limiting who can access voting machine servers. They have to pass a criminal background check and be an employee of the clerk's office, Secretary of State's Office, voting system provider or an election judge.
Because most likely it's going to show that the Dems scrubbed the files right after the election as has been shown elsewhere, violating both State and Federal law on record keeping. Georgia is missing hundreds of thousand of images, PA is missing backups, as well as Wisconsin and AZ. Michigan may well too,richardag said:
Not just you.
Why block such an easy audit?
Well unless all of the "experts" Lindell had amassed at that summit are FOS or we already know the "Trusted Build" conducted by Dominion removed a ton of files, hid others.sicandtiredTXN said:Because most likely it's going to show that the Dems scrubbed the files right after the election as has been shown elsewhere, violating both State and Federal law on record keeping. Georgia is missing hundreds of thousand of images, PA is missing backups, as well as Wisconsin and AZ. Michigan may well too,richardag said:
Not just you.
Why block such an easy audit?
The better question is why does it deserve a judges decision. Are the people being served by not doing what is necessary to find the truth? It should fall under a policy initiative.sicandtiredTXN said:Because most likely it's going to show that the Dems scrubbed the files right after the election as has been shown elsewhere, violating both State and Federal law on record keeping. Georgia is missing hundreds of thousand of images, PA is missing backups, as well as Wisconsin and AZ. Michigan may well too,richardag said:
Not just you.
Why block such an easy audit?
It's probably just a coincidence that the internet guy on Raffensperger's "Safe, Secure, and Accessible Elections Task Force" is buddies with Sussmann's and Joffe's tech guy. h/t @15poundstogo https://t.co/tvSJsDYJOg https://t.co/pImfAY9abR
— Hans Mahncke (@HansMahncke) March 13, 2022
— Florida Posting Its Ws (@FloridasWs) March 12, 2022
🚨BREAKING: Michigan House, on a 57-44 vote, passes #HB5253 banning Zuckerbucks from elections. Big win for election integrity!
— Tim Swain (@SwainForSenate) March 13, 2022
That's great and all, I'm sure they'll have to deal with that idiot Whitmire vetoing this, but I think there's a unique workaround in Michigan. But still writing laws to make actions illegal sounds great, but there were laws last time and still many illegal actions took place, nobody got punished! We need enforcement to do their damn jobs and then the prosecutors to dole out punishment to match the crime. 2020 was so blatant and everyone looked the other way because the plan was to take down Trump no matter what. Get that Romney girl off the leadership role in the RNC, because she was a day late and a dollar short to everything, leading from behind. They need a firebreather running the RNC that will be one their toes before the fact.will25u said:🚨BREAKING: Michigan House, on a 57-44 vote, passes #HB5253 banning Zuckerbucks from elections. Big win for election integrity!
— Tim Swain (@SwainForSenate) March 13, 2022
Democrats also failed to field a candidate in #IL16, the ridiculously gerrymandered Trump +21 seat of Rep. Darrin LaHood (R).
— RRH Elections (@RRHElections) March 15, 2022
Are the people covering this new to the area or what?will25u said:Democrats also failed to field a candidate in #IL16, the ridiculously gerrymandered Trump +21 seat of Rep. Darrin LaHood (R).
— RRH Elections (@RRHElections) March 15, 2022
This bill is vital & builds off last year’s election bill. Remember mobile voting & Zuckerbucks only given to Dem-majority counties? This bill aims to make laws surrounding elections uniform across the state. Now on to the Senate. Follow me to keep updated!
— Tim Swain (@SwainForSenate) March 16, 2022
Virginia Assembly advances legislation banning 'Zuckerbucks' in state electionshttps://t.co/8TkO8eEqbk
— RSBN 🇺🇸 (@RSBNetwork) March 16, 2022
Particularly through to the people counting the votes. They were on CTCL's payroll, effectively.American Hardwood said:
Sounds like it. I'm looking for a way that this would be bad. I don't see it. Private entities can still do private voter awareness campaigns and such, they just can't run it through the government entity. I think this is good.
I agree 100% that this is a good thing. I also know that if a law is passed to prevent one thing, a bunch of other "unforeseen" aspects from that law spawn. See The Patriot Act or No Child Left Behind.American Hardwood said:
Sounds like it. I'm looking for a way that this would be bad. I don't see it. Private entities can still do private voter awareness campaigns and such, they just can't run it through the government entity. I think this is good.
Layne Staley said:
Deniers are making the simple very complex. Biden ADMITTED it a couple weeks before the election. Stolen democracy.
thinking about this video of bernie sanders talking about mail-in votes pic.twitter.com/b6WpiIlwcs
— hannah (@hannahhycho) November 4, 2020