*****OFFICIAL ELECTION DAY THREAD*****

2,693,876 Views | 20889 Replies | Last: 2 yr ago by Whistle Pig
MarkTwain
How long do you want to ignore this user?
fasthorse05 said:

For a headline, it sounds like crap. However, there may be a little hope after reading the decision.
Yeah correct, it's not a final ruling it's basically extending the deadline for their ruling. SC od PA plans to hold oral argument regarding the legal challenge to the law later this month. Their decision to invalidate Leavitt's order gives them more time to rule without facing a 3 day deadline they were up against.

So they said "the law will remain in place, pending further action by the high court." So it's nothing finally they just bought more time.
People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because hard men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
***** Official 2022 Texas Primary Results Thread ****
EKUAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggieforester05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rubenstein needs to be thrown in jail and required to rat out Zuckerberg and/or Zuckerberg's organizations as part of his likely plea deal.
TRADUCTOR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LAST PARAGRAPH
" And second, the Legislature would need to invoke and then exercise its plenary power to designate the slate of electors it thought best accorded with the outcome of the election, had it been run legally in accord with the state election laws in effect on November 3, 2020. This would lead to decertifying the relevant electors, if the Legislature concluded that they were not the slate of electors that best accorded with the election if run consistent with all relevant Wisconsin laws in effect on election day.
However, this action would not, on its own, have any other legal consequence under state or federal law. It would not, for example, change who the current President is."

..."would not"...
Idiotic considering our justice system jails criminals. Biden is the fraudulent election kingpin, a criminal.

I'm ok with no-knock warrants to round up the all the conspirators: Being the President, Zuckerberg, and the 81MM* vile, corrupt liberal progressive stains on society illegally casting millions of ballots.

Hawg posting crimes of the President & Zuckerberg crimes for the past year+. Should have posted in all caps and maybe we wouldn't have to wait a year+ for a special counsel.
TRADUCTOR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TRUMP WON 2020.

Fact
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It doesn't matter at this point if it would change the election for 2020. It would be used to shed light on all the shady election bs that went on.
richardag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TexAg2001 said:

I'm currently in line at a polling place in Harris County. Separate lines for R and D. There is currently no one in the Democrat line and well over 100 in the Republican line. A bunch of "democrat only" voting machines are not being used because there isn't the demand. R voters leaving the line because it's so long.

There has to be a better way to run this.
Same thing where I voted. As I was voting the supervisor had 3 Democratic machines moved over and changed for Republican voting.

As I was leaving after voting, turned to all the Republicans voting, laughed and asked where all the Democrats were, got a good round of laughs except for the woman behind me that was a Democrat.

Probably over 60-70 people in line on the Republican side, no line at all on the Democratic side.
fasthorse05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I am proud of Wisconsin. Seems to me Arizona came the closest to this, and like Wisconsin, the players involved wouldn't give up the information, since it seems few Dems have to respond to sopoenas.
TRADUCTOR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u said:

It doesn't matter at this point if it would change the election for 2020. It would be used to shed light on all the shady election bs that went on.


Amen.

Light it up.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Quote:

Here's more of the story. Several months ago, the Mississippi Office of the State Auditor started investigating allegations of fraud at the Hinds County Elections Commission, an office that received $1.9 million in CTCL grants. Agents eventually discovered that election commissioners purchased two 85-inch Samsung televisions that never made it into the commission's building. The TVs were allegedly bought to allow election workers to socially distance and still watch the 2020 results, but instead the TVs went to the homes of private individuals, including one commissioner.

Thousands of dollars worth of personal protective equipment also walked away. That, too, was found at a private residence. Fake invoices one by a local movie production company and the other by a hairdresser's LLC were submitted for sanitizing buildings, Covid testing, and voting machine audits. The work described in the invoices was never done, but the people submitting the invoices were paid.

The total loss due to fraud in this case will tumble into the hundreds of thousands of dollars. Also, to no one's surprise, evidence shows that the culprits submitted false paperwork to CTCL describing how they were spending Zuckerberg's money.
More @ The Federalist
FJB
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Republican uniparty members just whistle and wonder aimlessly around with their hands in their pockets. They don't want to "look trite" by defending their voters and America. "Optics are too important".

Such BS
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Also, to no one's surprise, evidence shows that the culprits submitted false paperwork to CTCL describing how they were spending Zuckerberg's money.
Such reporting was required by the contractual language of CTCL "grants" as a measure to enforce the claw back clause. Spend our money as we say (in violation of election laws) or we will sue to get it back.
Decay
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

Quote:

Also, to no one's surprise, evidence shows that the culprits submitted false paperwork to CTCL describing how they were spending Zuckerberg's money.
Such reporting was required by the contractual language of CTCL "grants" as a measure to enforce the claw back clause. Spend our money as we say (in violation of election laws) or we will sue to get it back.

Yeah ironically they could claw back those funds now. Wouldn't that really drive the point home that these people don't give a **** about anything except winning at all costs.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Have seen any sauce on this yet.

aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Here you go. Garland Favorito.

Link
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Tina Peters of Mesa, CO has been indicted for BS charges.

Quote:

Tina Peters, a Republican elected in 2018 to oversee elections in Mesa County, was charged with seven felony and three misdemeanor counts, including attempting to influence a public servant, criminal impersonation and first-degree official misconduct. Also facing charges in the case is Deputy Clerk Belinda Knisley.
Over the past year, Peters has appeared onstage with supporters of former President Donald Trump who made false claims that the 2020 presidential election was stolen. Peters recently announced plans to launch a campaign for Colorado secretary of state, on the podcast of former Trump adviser Steve Bannon.
The indictment, filed in Mesa County District Court, alleges that Peters and Knisley were part of a "deceptive scheme which was designed to influence public servants, breach security protocols, exceed permissible access to voting equipment, and set in motion the eventual distribution of confidential information to unauthorized people."
ABC News
FTAG 2000
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
will25u said:


So the hippie sippie stepped down? Wonder what her severance package looked like from Dora.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Strike One
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oops, wrong thread!
M-K-TAG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


Love her or hate her it's good news to see something going against Dominion....
Funky Winkerbean
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
will25u said:


Good to see one state acting like an adult. We need Desantis as president.
richardag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg said:

Here you go. Garland Favorito.

Link
WTH, no DAs willing to investigate.
richardag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u said:


More rays of hope.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
That US Attorney, Damian Williams is in SDNY.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Keegan99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Generic ballot - R+5
Biden - 57% disapproval
Trump - 55% disapproval
Congressional R's run 25(!) points ahead of Trump among voters who dislike both presidents.


While only Latinos, this shows Trump's major problem as a candidate.

He's a known quantity and his negatives are high and have no ability to drop. The people that don't like him, and it's a majority of the electorate, aren't going to budge.
aggieforester05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Keegan99 said:

Quote:

Generic ballot - R+5
Biden - 57% disapproval
Trump - 55% disapproval
Congressional R's run 25(!) points ahead of Trump among voters who dislike both presidents.


While only Latinos, this shows Trump's major problem as a candidate.

He's a known quantity and his negatives are high and have no ability to drop. The people that don't like him, and it's a majority of the electorate, aren't going to budge.
It's actually pretty amazing that his disapproval is two points lower than Biden considering the overwhelming propaganda painting Trump as a racist bigot that hates immigrants vs. painting generic Democrats as saviors of immigrants. The Latino community is not stupid and they are starting to realize that the Democrat party does not align with their family and religious ideals.

Trump could do better with these people in 2024, but he's got to figure out a way to better articulate his messages, to make it much harder to take them out of context and weaponize them. Just someone to review his tweets (or whatever platform he uses) for proper wording, errors, and things that could be taken out of context would go a long way.
MarkTwain
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Keegan99 said:

Quote:

Generic ballot - R+5
Biden - 57% disapproval
Trump - 55% disapproval
Congressional R's run 25(!) points ahead of Trump among voters who dislike both presidents.


While only Latinos, this shows Trump's major problem as a candidate.

He's a known quantity and his negatives are high and have no ability to drop. The people that don't like him, and it's a majority of the electorate, aren't going to budge.
He's carrying the biggest minority numbers in Republican history and you think he's got a bunch of negatives. You must be a Bob Dole fan.....LMFAO
People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because hard men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.
First Page Last Page
Page 556 of 597
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.