*****OFFICIAL ELECTION DAY THREAD*****

2,694,193 Views | 20889 Replies | Last: 2 yr ago by Whistle Pig
aggiehawg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 10:59a, 2/4/22
AG
will25u said:
Two thoughts:

Part of the Kraken allegations?

Did the CIA actually get those computers in Germany?
Reply Quote
5
aggieforester05
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:40a, 2/4/22
AG
It's simply amazing, you conduct an unprecedented election with all kinds of anomalies, propaganda, and dark money and then act like anyone who cries foul is in fact the bad actor. There's no limit to the hypocrisy and shamelessness of liberals.
Reply Quote
17
peacedude
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to aggiehawg • 11:53a, 2/4/22
AG
I believe it was all related to these events that were transpiring right around that time:

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/12/breaking-fbi-texas-rangers-us-marshals-raid-solarwinds-hq-austin/

CISA and Trump's EO's were redundant, and were to be used in case of election tampering/interference. Pence had what he needed proof-wise, but didn't act upon it.
Reply Quote
6
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:19p, 2/4/22

Reply Quote
5
1 edit
ProgN
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 9:16p, 2/4/22
What about the NY map? **** these progs, crush their evil asses.
Reply Quote
7
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:45a, 2/5/22
Reply Quote
6
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:17a, 2/5/22
Reply Quote
8
fasthorse05
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 12:30p, 2/5/22
You know, McConnell got tons of leeway with me after the Obama SCOTUS issue. But, over time, his actions suggest corruption along with the Dems

I'd be surprised if his bride was breaking the law in her dealings with China and taiwan, but, his actions while Trump was president suggests he just didn't want an investigationperiod. He's definitely a swamp monster.
Reply Quote
2
2 edits
TRM
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:36p, 2/5/22
AG
What does McConnell have to do with redistricting? That's state legislature and governor issue along with the state judiciary which we haven't focused on taking - which we need to based on the NC ruling.
Reply Quote
1
TRADUCTOR
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 12:39p, 2/5/22
will25u said:

two...lol
Reply Quote
1
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to TRADUCTOR • 12:40p, 2/5/22
Did you read the rest? The election was decided by those 2 votes.
Reply Quote
5
TRADUCTOR
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 12:45p, 2/5/22
will25u said:
Did you read the rest? The election was decided by those 2 votes.


There is probably waaaaaay more. Two tilted the scales...lol
Reply Quote
5
fasthorse05
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 12:47p, 2/5/22
It's such a shame those two were arrested. I'd nearly bet my life there was several party members pushing those two to vote illegally.

When the "folks simply do as they're told", and they suffer the consequences, I get seriously pissed!
Reply Quote
4
ProgN
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to fasthorse05 • 1:03p, 2/5/22
They should be deported immediately.
Reply Quote
13
richardag
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to aggiehawg • 4:46p, 2/5/22
aggiehawg said:
Anybody remember Mesa County CO clerk, Tina Peters? The one who took a forensic image of her election equipment both before and after the state mandated an overhaul? And those images showed election records from the 2020 election were missing in the after image. Illegal under both state and federal law.

Here's another.

Quote:
On Monday, January 24, 2022, Jena Griswold was having a very bad day.
As everyone should know by now, Jena is facing a pretty explosive lawsuit from elected officials around the state of Colorado. If you need to catch up, you can read about that here: Griswold is in Hot Water

A big part of that case is the saga of Tina Peters and Mesa County, so you should read up on that as well, especially if you're new to Colorado's role in the stolen election on November 3, 2020.

The case, Hanks et al v. Griswold was filed in November of 2021 in the City and County of Denver District Court, and Griswold's lawyers recently filed a motion to dismiss, on standing, what they cannot defend, on substance.

In response to Griswold's motion to dismiss, the plaintiffs filed new evidence in the case, disclosing the existence of a second forensic image in Elbert County, Colorado, and requesting a court order to have it forensically examined to confirm what cyber experts found in Mesa: destruction of election records, an uncertifiable, non-compliant voting system, and a coffin-nail in the unwarranted "gold standard" refrain. :
Quote:
n an affidavit signed by Clerk Schroeder, he explains his actions:
Elbert County Clerk & Recorder Dallas Schroeder, January 7, 2022 said:
"I was told that there was evidence that the 'trusted build' process that was performed on Mesa County's Dominion voting system during May of 2021, had erased electronic files that were part of the 2020 election records. This information was concerning, because I have a legal duty to retain election records for 25 months after every election. The purpose of retaining the records is so that a proper audit of an election can be performed. I was concerned that the 'trusted build' process might erase electronic election records from the Elbert County elections systems, which would violate state law."
Quote:
The basis of the plaintiffs' claims is filed with the court and has been provided to Secretary Griswold's counsel, and directly to her before that. It's a stack of government documents, either publicly posted or obtained through open records requests. And it's damning.

In other words, not only ought Griswold to know better, she DOES know better. But this isn't her first time making false statements to the public. More on that in a minute.

For the Clerk to take a forensic image of the machines, particularly when there are concerns that the updates the vendor is conducting will destroy election records and evidence, is not a violation of any security protocol or, more importantly, legal statute. It is, in fact, the Clerk's statutory responsibility to preserve election records for 25 months according to Colorado law. Clerk Schroeder, like Clerk Peters, was doing his job.
Link
From the article:
  • Place your bets. My sources say the images are safely in the hands of the White Hats, folks.

    So, we are going to find out.

let's hope so. The sheer amount of irregularities across multiple states, all in favor of Democratic candidates is disgusting and this bull**** needs to stop.
Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
Reply Quote
10
richardag
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 4:54p, 2/5/22
will25u said:
Don't care who the voted for, deport them.
Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
Reply Quote
8
TRADUCTOR
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to richardag • 5:12p, 2/5/22
Old bull says deport'em all.
Reply Quote
3
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
5:47p, 2/5/22
Reply Quote
13
fasthorse05
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to richardag • 5:58p, 2/5/22
the Clerk to take a forensic image of the machines, particularly when there are concerns that the updates the vendor is conducting will destroy election records and evidence, is not a violation of any security protocol or, more importantly, legal statute. It is, in fact, the Clerk's statutory responsibility to preserve election records for 25 months according to Colorado law. Clerk Schroeder, like Clerk Peters, was doing his job.

Perhaps my reading comprehension sucks, but doesn't this paragraph above say those actions aren't illegal or against security protocol?
Reply Quote
2
richardag
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to fasthorse05 • 8:07p, 2/5/22
fasthorse05 said:
the Clerk to take a forensic image of the machines, particularly when there are concerns that the updates the vendor is conducting will destroy election records and evidence, is not a violation of any security protocol or, more importantly, legal statute. It is, in fact, the Clerk's statutory responsibility to preserve election records for 25 months according to Colorado law. Clerk Schroeder, like Clerk Peters, was doing his job.

Perhaps my reading comprehension sucks, but doesn't this paragraph above say those actions aren't illegal or against security protocol?
IANAL
I read that as making updates is not a violation of any security protocol but that does not absolve the clerk from responsibility to maintain records for 25 years (22 years by federal law).
Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
Reply Quote
richardag
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:11p, 2/5/22
Embedded in the article aggiehawg posted is a link:
GRISWOLD IS IN HOT WATER!
Quote:
When asked whether the deleted elections records were significant or simply inconsequential extra files on election servers, or electronic voting equipment, Col. (ret.) Shawn Smith USAF systems testing expert stated, "The Federal Election Commission's 2002 Voting System Standards, which are a mandatory standard for Colorado voting systems, require voting systems to maintain and produce 'all audit trail information,' including operating system and hardware. The Department of Justice has already confirmed that digital records ARE election records. The federal and state statutes that require preservation of election records were written for the EXACT purpose of ensuring the availability of records EXACTLY like the those destroyed by the Secretary of State."
A second claim in the case states that Griswold "failed to employ a federally accredited laboratory to test Colorado voting systems before the 2020 election." When investigating whether the claim is a mere clerical oversight, the exhibits included in the case show otherwise. Griswold's selected testing lab's, Pro V&V's, accredited status expired in 2017. The next time Pro V&V was officially accredited was 2021. However, in 2019, Griswold issued an official letter [exhibit 1] approving Pro V&V's test plans, and Griswold cited that testing in her certification of Colorado voting systems used in November 2020. Within the forty-seven months Pro V&V was unaccredited, meaning the lab was not qualified to conduct proper electronic voting equipment testing, Griswold repeatedly used the testing lab and cited its testing reports.
Colorado voters shouldered all the risk when Griswold approved an unaccredited lab to test voting systems. Every single Colorado county used voting equipment during the 2020 election that was not properly tested, and the lapsed lab accreditation likely affected the voting systems used in the 2021 election, as well.
. . . . . . .
Was she promoted beyond her capabilities or something more sinister?
Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
Reply Quote
4
1 edit
fasthorse05
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to richardag • 9:09p, 2/5/22
Thanx!

I read that twice, took the dog for a walk, and it didn't get much better. Thought my readers malfunctioned-not me, of course.
Reply Quote
1
Faustus
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 9:53p, 2/5/22
will25u said:


OAN and Newsmax wouldn't put up with that. Along with Forbes the WSJ is practically the NYT when it comes to credibility. I don't know anyone here who reads that stuff.


Reply Quote
2
1 edit
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:19a, 2/6/22
Reply Quote
20
TRADUCTOR
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:35a, 2/6/22
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:04p, 2/6/22
Reply Quote
17
Keegan99
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 9:15p, 2/6/22
AG
Could be better in AZ, but all-in-all, very, very positive.

Manchin has to have an eye on that WV number! That's massive in a state the size of WV. Even moreso for OK.

DeSantis is building a machine in FL.
Reply Quote
1
2 edits
DamnGood86
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 10:38p, 2/6/22
AG
Is it fair to assume that the Democrats made gains and all the other states?
You may not be a moron, but some people think you are.
Reply Quote
jt2hunt
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to DamnGood86 • 10:58p, 2/6/22
AG
No
Reply Quote
2
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:53a, 2/7/22
Reply Quote
9
peacedude
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:04p, 2/7/22
AG
Live press conference with Patrick Byrne (and Gen. Flynn's team) is on now:

https://rumble.com/vuan99-press-conference-1pm-est.html

Reply Quote
aggiehawg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to peacedude • 1:52p, 2/7/22
AG
Don't know what I think of Byrne in general but it is without doubt he was involved and there. We know he was in a long meeting with Trump on December 18th (or maybe 16th?) and Sidney and Flynn were along with others whether present or on the phone regarding the election.

Several options were put forth for Trump's consideration, stemming from an Obama Executive Order regarding foreign interference in an election. That EO, which apparently Trump had extended years before, allowed for the seizure of voting machines should there be a high level of confidence that such interference occurred.

Discussion of using DOD to possibly do that but Flynn shot that down. No military officers could be involved. Then perhaps the NG which also has cyber talents and capabilities or US Marshals. No decision was made and various people took it upon themselves to draft various proposals. According to Byrne, both CISA and the FBI had said they believed there was interference by one or more foreign governments.

Byrne saying none of that was ever Trump's idea and he was not inclined to go in that direction without further proof.

There's a lot more in there as to what was in the works for January 6th before it all got derailed.

One thing Byrne asserted several times was that if they weren't able to find what they expected to find within a few days, Trump would need to concede and Trump readily agreed he would do so. But Trump was torn about allowing a stolen election to have happened and he would just walk away. Would that be best for the country?
Reply Quote
2
nortex97
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
1:56p, 2/7/22
AG
Reply Quote
11
peacedude
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to aggiehawg • 2:03p, 2/7/22
AG
Not sure about what would be best for the country, but all those CEHs he mentioned...

...uhhh...hmmm...yeah.
Reply Quote
aggiehawg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to peacedude • 2:04p, 2/7/22
AG
peacedude said:
Not sure about what would be best for the country, but all those CEHs he mentioned...

...uhhh...hmmm...yeah.
What he terms "the dolphins"??
Reply Quote
First Page Last Page
Page 551 of 597 ▼
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.