This happened a few months ago but wonder if you had any thoughts about it.





The response:

Funky Winkerbean said:

---

Yes. You have everything solved, so please leave.

---

While waiting for some other pressing issue for me to solve, would you like a math problem to do?

Instead of my usual problem, how about this simple one that only takes something like three or four lines to solve? You might even be able to solve it on the back of one grocery store receipt.

Suppose that you have two jars. In one jar, there are 4 red balls and 6 blue balls. In the other jar, there are 16 red balls and some number of blue balls.

If you randomly choose one ball from each jar, the probability that both balls will be the same color is 44%.

How many blue balls are in the second jar?

You can thank me later.

Would you like a math problem, too?

Again, thank you. Simply insane the different standards for who actually has to follow laws.

eric76 said:

---

Funky Winkerbean said:

---

Yes. You have everything solved, so please leave.

---

While waiting for some other pressing issue for me to solve, would you like a math problem to do?

Instead of my usual problem, how about this simple one that only takes something like three or four lines to solve? You might even be able to solve it on the back of one grocery store receipt.

Suppose that you have two jars. In one jar, there are 4 red balls and 6 blue balls. In the other jar, there are 16 red balls and some number of blue balls.

If you randomly choose one ball from each jar, the probability that both balls will be the same color is 44%.

How many blue balls are in the second jar?

You can thank me later.

---

I used to respect you as a poster. Sadly, that is no longer the case.

e=mc2 said:

---

eric76 said:

---

Funky Winkerbean said:

---

Yes. You have everything solved, so please leave.

---

While waiting for some other pressing issue for me to solve, would you like a math problem to do?

Instead of my usual problem, how about this simple one that only takes something like three or four lines to solve? You might even be able to solve it on the back of one grocery store receipt.

Suppose that you have two jars. In one jar, there are 4 red balls and 6 blue balls. In the other jar, there are 16 red balls and some number of blue balls.

If you randomly choose one ball from each jar, the probability that both balls will be the same color is 44%.

How many blue balls are in the second jar?

You can thank me later.

---

I used to respect you as a poster. Sadly, that is no longer the case.

---

What's wrong? Too easy a problem?

You would think a problem from the actuary exams would be tougher than that.

Quote:

---

Arizona will operate under the 2019 Elections Procedures Manual in the upcoming elections after Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich refused to certify AZ Secretary of State Katie Hobbs' 2021 draft manual.
Arizona Secretary of State Katie Hobbs is running for Governor of Arizona, and she tried to make it even easier to cheat again.
In September, the Gateway Pundit reported that EZAZ, a citizen-led action group, found over 170 issues and statute violations, including provisions to allow internet connection, in Hobbs' 2021 Elections Procedures Manual Draft.

---

Quote:

---

On December 9, the Attorney General's legal team sent a letter to Secretary of State Katie Hobbs in disapproval of the new manual that her office submitted on October 1.

---

Quote:

---

The draft was submitted to Attorney General Brnovich a week after the Arizona audit results were presented and delivered to Brnovich on September 24th. It has been almost four months, and we have not seen or heard anything from his office.

The deadline for these changes to be made passed on December 31, and Hobbs did not correct the issues. Arizona will now run its 2022 elections under the 2019 Elections Procedures Manual.

---

Quote:

---

Attorney General Brnovich prevented the certification of Hobbs' 2022 election fraud scheme, but he has not said a word about his criminal investigation into the 2020 election in Arizona.

---

Link

You are one weird dude.

Edited for brevity

Quote:

---

...

I am betting, because you have only had this user name since July and started posting late on this thread, this is a sock. One created because your previous posting proved you to be a troll, or a shill only looking to gaslight the talking points....

---

You would lose that bet (big surprise). This is the first and only account I have ever had on TexAgs, Although I started reading these boards in the late 2000s, I didn't register. When I lived in College Station in the mid 1980s, I didn't know they existed. The computer I had back then was a 128k Macintosh and it did not have internet access.

Quote:

---

Regardless, some bullet points you can start with:

MCBoE likes to hang their hat on transparency based on laughable "audits" by Pro V&V and SLI

---

In the interest of brevity, I have to state here that you don't seem to understand the point of these audits. I don't believe they were designed to prove that nothing could possibly be amiss, but, rather, to indicate that a check was made on the system and all components were installed and were operating correctly. This is why these firms were chosen to perform the audits. The assumption is made that the procedures and methods were adequate to insure that everything was above board, the audit is merely an exercise to demonstrate that those procedures were followed. As the procedures and methods were approved under (Republican) oversight and were similar to ones that were used in previous elections without incident, this should be adequate. If there was any other evidence than "my guy didn't win", there might be something to investigate. But, since that seems to be that is all there is...

Quote:

---

As to a list of items in the CN audit where MCBoE did not comply or participate.

https://www.azsenaterepublicans.com/cyber-ninjas-report

---

Again, in case you missed it, the Arizona (Republican controlled) Senate (they guys who started this whole hot mess) agreed that the Senate confirmed that

Quote:

---

the County was in full compliance with all issued subpoenas

---

Yep, the entity that called for the subpoenas agreed they were complied with. This means that claims that MCBOE did not comply with the subpoenas are false claims. FALSE.

Furthermore, most, if not all, of the claims about server logs, internet access, and other IT issues, only involve the vote counting process. The multiple recounts, even the hand recount indicate that the vote counting process was accurate.

That is, all of these issues are moot. Even though the Cyber Ninjas' audit indicates that the counting was accurate, they are trying to say that the County was negligent because these issues "might have been" compromised? They weren't. Their own counts proved that.

Breaking: Bombshell rocks Georgia election investigationhttps://t.co/UqgdLM1BbV

— George Papadopoulos (@GeorgePapa19) January 8, 2022

Do not forget the Judge’s statement about an active cover up in WI. Stay focused. They want you to forget https://t.co/nGYcCWsRYU

— George Papadopoulos (@GeorgePapa19) January 9, 2022

FYI

Brad Raffensperger is set to be on Face the Nation in just a few minutes. Wonder what lies he's going to spew to cover up for his crimes.

*This is awful. He can't stop lying through his teeth:

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/transcript-georgia-secretary-of-state-brad-raffensperger-face-the-nation-01-09-2022/

Quote:

---

In the interest of brevity, I have to state here that you don't seem to understand the point of these audits. I don't believe they were designed to prove that nothing could possibly be amiss, but, rather, to indicate that a check was made on the system and all components were installed and were operating correctly. ....{text removed}. If there was any other evidence than "my guy didn't win", there might be something to investigate. But, since that seems to be that is all there is...

---

I absolutely understand the point of these audits. Pro V&V and SLI Compliance were only contracted to audit small samples of election equipment to make sure the same after the election as certified before the election. The companies state as much in their documentation.

Quote:

---

The Maricopa County Board of Elections contracted with Pro V&V to conduct a Post-Election Field Audit to ensure the software and hardware certified for use in Maricopa County are the same as the software and hardware used in the conduction of the November 2020 General Election

---

There are a few issues with this. (1) these were the same companies contracted to setup the voting environments (2) all these audits could confirm is essentially these machines were in the same order as they were before the election and would work if used properly. The bigger issue is the narrative which was being spun. From the SLI Compliance press release still on the site today.

Quote:

---

Wheat Ridge, CO (April 13, 2021) SLI Compliance was one of two Voting System Test Laboratories (VSTL) recently selected to perform a forensic audit of Maricopa County, AZ's 2020 election results.

---

How, pray tell, was what they did a "forensic audit" of the "election results"? This is a massive overstatement of what they did, as well as, what could be determined by the results of there testing. All they could confirm is the small sampling of machines they looked at were in the same condition after the election as they were before and there didn't appear to be any additional software or malicious code on them. Media, talking heads, the TDS cabal (including plenty of Republicans), the twittersphere. Facebook, etc helped pushed that narrative. Some using in an attempt to shut down any additional audit or review.

There are anomalies and questions which cannot be answered by a review of a few pieces of the voting hardware. Yes, much more than "my guy didn't win." If that is your belief, than none of this matters and it isn't worth rehashing.

With regards to the subpoena's, what would you call it?

December 15, 2020 - Subpoena issued for MCBOS to provide materials by December 18. That didn't happen. MCBOS sat on it because they new there would be a new legislative session sworn in in January. So through political gamesmanship they delayed so the original subpoena would void as the previous session had concluded LINK

January 12, 2021 - the new session, having been sworn in the day before, issued another subpoena. They did not comply by the deadline. The failure was turned over to a judge who ruled the subpoena was legal and within the senate authority. He ordered resolution within a week.....MCBOS never complied.

July 26, 2021 - Once again, a subpoena was issued to MCBOS and now Dominion. Both of which refused to comply. LINK

Quote:

---

(snip) county officials and a Dominion attorney sent Senate President Karen Fann a letter outlining why they will not comply.

---

August 26, 2021 - Arizona AG released the findings of their report and notified MCBOS would lose their funding if they didn't comply within 30 days LINK

Some snippets

Quote:

---

MCBOS does not dispute that it has not fully complied with the Senate's July 26, 2021 subpoena.

... the Attorney General has determined that the failure of MCBOS to fully comply with the Senate's legislative subpoena violates state law

... MCBOS does not appear to have produced any new information or documents in response to the subpoena and expressly refused to do so with respect to certain of the requests.

The legal issue the Office must resolve is whether MCBOS is violating Arizona law by admittedly failing to fully comply with a legislative subpoena.

---

MCBOS did everything BUT comply, so no, it is not false. Coming to a settlement 9 months later, under threat of losing funding, isn't compliance. The ENTIRE MCBOS should, at a minimum, be fired. More likely they should personally face legal action for contempt and ignoring judges orders.

Finally, in the TLDR post. I want to leave you with this...insight into the people entrusted with elections in the state of Arizona. The people we are supposed to believe when they say their election was without error or fraud.

Quote:

---

MCBOS' sole argument in response to the Request is that the Senate cannot currently hold MCBOS in contempt because the Senate is not in session

---

It's cool ya'll, we aren't breaking the law because those who enforce it aren't in session.

I have not done much digging so I don't know what to think on this one.

On one hand, I agree with the part stating being within 100 ft to a drop box multiple times doesn't rise to probable cause. They could live, work, or frequent a business which may be in that area. You would have to prove it was irregular or unnecessary for those people to be in that area (which would be a tough burden).

With that said, the amount of effort taken to pull that data and cull millions of devices into a specific subset is not something I see anyone doing without reason. I wonder if a whistleblower, tip, or some other information led to them pulling this together.

I am going to do some digging to see if I can find out some more details. I also wonder why either party would want to leak this to the media? Seems like there is much more to lose for both sides having this public.

After watching the FTN with Brad R, there might be a potentially deadly situation forming in GA this week. Joey and Kamala will be visiting the state to discuss election reform, thus the heightened risk for lines of khakis. Their hoodlum's khakis, of course...

Quote:

---

Did I understand correctly? The FBI leaked information and found no probable cause. Yet they found enough probable cause to send 40 agents to investigate garage door pull down lanyards. The FBI seems to be preemptively picking winners and losers.

---

It was either leaked by the Governor's office, the FBI, or the GBI based on the lawyers for True the Vote.

It is getting harder and harder to believe the FBI and all state affiliates are not completely corrupted and politically motivated.

aggiehawg said:

---

Quote:

---

Arizona will operate under the 2019 Elections Procedures Manual in the upcoming elections after Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich refused to certify AZ Secretary of State Katie Hobbs' 2021 draft manual.
Arizona Secretary of State Katie Hobbs is running for Governor of Arizona, and she tried to make it even easier to cheat again.
In September, the Gateway Pundit reported that EZAZ, a citizen-led action group, found over 170 issues and statute violations, including provisions to allow internet connection, in Hobbs' 2021 Elections Procedures Manual Draft.

---

Quote:

---

On December 9, the Attorney General's legal team sent a letter to Secretary of State Katie Hobbs in disapproval of the new manual that her office submitted on October 1.

---

Quote:

---

The draft was submitted to Attorney General Brnovich a week after the Arizona audit results were presented and delivered to Brnovich on September 24th. It has been almost four months, and we have not seen or heard anything from his office.

The deadline for these changes to be made passed on December 31, and Hobbs did not correct the issues. Arizona will now run its 2022 elections under the 2019 Elections Procedures Manual.

---

Quote:

---

Attorney General Brnovich prevented the certification of Hobbs' 2022 election fraud scheme, but he has not said a word about his criminal investigation into the 2020 election in Arizona.

---

Link

---

So the cheat is on, just not as much as Hobbs intended to increase the cheat.

Here We Go: True the Vote Delivers the Goods on Georgia Ballot Trafficking - American Liberty Report https://t.co/Mzi1aNyNed

— The Dirty Truth (Josh) (@AKA_RealDirty) January 9, 2022

The bolded part below doesn't make sense to me. There's no incentive to flip unless there was some sort of criminal investigation.

Quote:

---

The evidence from True the Vote is so compelling that it has forced Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger to launch an investigation. And because of the strict nature of Georgia's anti-ballot harvesting laws, it could invalidate hundreds of thousands of absentee ballots in a state that Joe Biden supposedly "won" by 11,779 votes.

The big news about this update is that True the Vote has flipped one of the ballot traffickers. True the Vote is not releasing the identity of this individual to Raffensperger, and I think that's a wise choice on the part of True the Vote's legal. Brad Raffensperger is not a friend to this movement, after all. He certified dirty, fraudulent election results in 2020 and claimed there was no evidence of election fraud. If he intentionally botches this investigation into ballot trafficking, True the Vote can then bring out the whistleblower who will nuke Raffensperger from orbit. Good play!

---

SCOOP:
A Virginia-based PAC that tried to suppress GOP turnout for Glenn Youngkin paid Dem voting rights hero Marc Elias for legal services.

Add this alongside the Steele dossier to Elias’s resume. https://t.co/Ie1ZoG2Huw

— Chuck Ross (@ChuckRossDC) January 11, 2022

The Lincoln Project has a new spin off, the "Beer Hall Project" which is comparing January 6th to the Beer Hall Putsch and of course, Trump to Hitler.

Huh. Who is Ludendorff in that analogy?

Republican proposed TN map is finally up on 538, and it is a thing of beauty. pic.twitter.com/63qrCXrooN

— DavitTheBuilderAficionado 🇺🇲🇬🇪☦️ (@Davit4thFan) January 14, 2022

politically neutral public election infrastructure in order to elect the favored candidates of the billionaires: https://t.co/gP4Srzp6XH

— Kingmaker - Big IF! (True) (@KingMakerFT) January 15, 2022

Any article on this subject that doesn't mention the $450million put up by Zuckerberg isn't worth reading.

BigJim49 AustinNowDallas said:

---

Any article on this subject that doesn't mention the $450million put up by Zuckerberg isn't worth reading.

---

It was written by Phil Klein, of Amistad Project, and it does talk about private billionaires skewing the election results, turnout, etc. in violation of equal protection.

Back to Wisconsin.

Quote:

---

But there is more to this story. Wisconsin State Representative Tim Ramthun put together an excellent inventory of events that occurred leading up to the 2020 Election in his state. Included are shocking revelations about Wisconsin's 'Republican' Speaker of the House, Robin Voss.

In his report, Ramthun says:

Quote:

---

"Upon a more extensive review of the case, it was discovered that the drop box effort was organized by the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA). CISA was present at Senator Brenier's press conference alongside the Center for Elections Innovation and Research (CEIR)."

"CISA worked in conjunction with other national organizations like the CTCL and CEIR, but the most concerning of note is the National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL), which promoted CISA's campaign of illegal drop boxes on October 2nd, 2020. NCSL's president at the time was the Speaker of the Wisconsin State Assembly Robin Vos, who later appointed a special counsel investigation into the 2020 election under a contract that states the findings may only be reported to himself."

---

Ramthun then goes on to discuss Mueller's case above where he notes that the organization led by Vos, the NCSL worked with the CISA (led by corrupt Chris Krebs who was later let go by President Trump. Ramthun points out that the "CISA and NCSL linked their websites in the campaign to "trust election officials" and "stop the spread of misinformation and disinformation". Then Krebs "worked with CISA and the NCSL to repeat the messages that "there is no evidence of voter fraud".

---

Rest of the report is at the Link

Huh, you don't say. Nothing, at all, nefarious about any of that.

We probably discussed this well over a year ago, so let's hope (at some point) it gets applied towards Zuck, Jack, Stacey A, Kemp, Hobbs, Biden, etc:

18 U.S. Code 610 - Coercion of political activity
U.S. Code

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/610

Quote:

---

In section 7322(1) of title 5, United States Code, to engage in, or not to engage in, any political activity, including, but not limited to, voting or refusing to vote for any candidate or measure in any election, making or refusing to make any political contribution, or working or refusing to work on behalf of any candidate. Any person who violates this section shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

---

All of the Zuckbuck "grants" had strings and claw back provisions if the money wasn't spent as specifically directed. And most of those directions were contrary to state law.