Good luck bruh. I did something almost exactly like that and was sent to banned camp for "hateful comments". Seems public figures are protected now.

You can't go onto a web site and insult the tech lord. If Zuck purchased the outcome of a national election with all of his funding for one party and censoring on his platform against the other, it's only because the tech god is a hero and he must not be questioned or insulted on any other platform.

/surprised you didn't know that .gif

https://twitter.com/RandPaul/status/1475542595673763848?t=NnQoDtxQRQqHRhUD5etGMw&s=19

How to steal an election: “Seeding an area heavy with potential Democratic votes with as many absentee ballots as possible, targeting and convincing potential voters to complete them in a legally valid way, and then harvesting and counting the results.”https://t.co/LwE3MdeWeG

— Senator Rand Paul (@RandPaul) December 27, 2021

I followed this thread for a long time, but I haven't kept up over the last few months as I've attempted to dial back my anxiety.

To me, the largest issue still outstanding is how the voting laws changed because of COVID and how they encourage zuckerbucks and other schemes to exploit mail in ballots and harvesting.

Can anyone point me to a source that can explain what is being done, state by state, to reduce voter fraud via these types of schemes? Is this going to continue in 2022 in all of these states or some of them?

Trek Strategy said:

---

I followed this thread for a long time, but I haven't kept up over the last few months as I've attempted to dial back my anxiety.

To me, the largest issue still outstanding is how the voting laws changed because of COVID and how they encourage zuckerbucks and other schemes to exploit mail in ballots and harvesting.

Can anyone point me to a source that can explain what is being done, state by state, to reduce voter fraud via these types of schemes? Is this going to continue in 2022 in all of these states or some of them?

---

That would be great. The only aggregator site regarding states taking steps to reduce fraud I know of is this thread.

I ran a Google search to see what I could track down.

If you put on your Bizarro hat and read these articles in the opposite voice, they likely have much of what you want.

The two footnotes (1 and 2) in the first link have the specific state and bills for expanding and tightening up voting procedures as of this past summer.

https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/voting-laws-roundup-july-2021

This year-end article from the same site (again read with your Bizarro hat on) is probably more on point with what you were after.

https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/voting-laws-roundup-december-2021

The footnotes again have cites to specific states/bills.

Faustus said:

---

I ran a Google search to see what I could track down.

If you put on your Bizarro hat and read these articles in the opposite voice, they likely have much of what you want.

The two footnotes (1 and 2) in the first link have the specific state and bills for expanding and tightening up voting procedures as of this past summer.

https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/voting-laws-roundup-july-2021

This year-end article from the same site (again read with your Bizarro hat on) is probably more on point with what you were after.

https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/voting-laws-roundup-december-2021

The footnotes again have cites to specific states/bills.

---

Thanks, and yes need to read with understanding the articles are biased toward less secure elections.

richardag said:

---

Faustus said:

---

I ran a Google search to see what I could track down.

If you put on your Bizarro hat and read these articles in the opposite voice, they likely have much of what you want.

The two footnotes (1 and 2) in the first link have the specific state and bills for expanding and tightening up voting procedures as of this past summer.

https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/voting-laws-roundup-july-2021

This year-end article from the same site (again read with your Bizarro hat on) is probably more on point with what you were after.

https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/voting-laws-roundup-december-2021

The footnotes again have cites to specific states/bills.

---

Thanks, and yes need to read with understanding the articles are biased toward less secure elections.

---

Wow, what an understatement! Complete and total liberal editorial masquerading as news as usual for the leftist propaganda wing of the demonic party...

It has news in there. It has all the states' various actions regarding election laws, which is what they wanted to know.

Just ignore the site's take on them, and be glad that someone did the leg work for what the posters were after. If you have one that provides the information in the voice you prefer feel free to link.

ravingfans said:

---

richardag said:

---

Faustus said:

---

I ran a Google search to see what I could track down.

If you put on your Bizarro hat and read these articles in the opposite voice, they likely have much of what you want.

The two footnotes (1 and 2) in the first link have the specific state and bills for expanding and tightening up voting procedures as of this past summer.

https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/voting-laws-roundup-july-2021

This year-end article from the same site (again read with your Bizarro hat on) is probably more on point with what you were after.

https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/voting-laws-roundup-december-2021

The footnotes again have cites to specific states/bills.

---

Thanks, and yes need to read with understanding the articles are biased toward less secure elections.

---

Wow, what an understatement! Complete and total liberal editorial masquerading as news as usual for the leftist propaganda wing of the demonic party...

---

OK, i apologize, I vastly understated the bias. Still was nice to see the laws being passed to prevent voter fraud.

Back to Detroit.

Link

Wayne Co. Recount Leader for Trump, Brian Szmytke, argues with Detroit election officials to allow Wayne Co. Canvasser Chair Monica Palmer back into absentee ballot counting room on Nov. 4th. after being locked out. pic.twitter.com/T9sDvRiugD

— @SassyConservativeGirl45 (@SassyConservat1) December 30, 2021

The level of corruption by Detroit election officials is over the top.

richardag said:

---

ravingfans said:

---

richardag said:

---

Faustus said:

---

I ran a Google search to see what I could track down.

If you put on your Bizarro hat and read these articles in the opposite voice, they likely have much of what you want.

The two footnotes (1 and 2) in the first link have the specific state and bills for expanding and tightening up voting procedures as of this past summer.

https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/voting-laws-roundup-july-2021

This year-end article from the same site (again read with your Bizarro hat on) is probably more on point with what you were after.

https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/voting-laws-roundup-december-2021

The footnotes again have cites to specific states/bills.

---

Thanks, and yes need to read with understanding the articles are biased toward less secure elections.

---

Wow, what an understatement! Complete and total liberal editorial masquerading as news as usual for the leftist propaganda wing of the demonic party...

---

OK, i apologize, I vastly understated the bias. Still was nice to see the laws being passed to prevent voter fraud.

---

Please know my Red Face is never aimed at you, Richard--more in agreement. As you and Faustus point out, I'm really glad that someone, even if they are the libs, are cataloging the activities. Overall I get a Red Face whenever I'm around the msm outlets or other leftist propaganda sources...

richardag said:

---

The level of corruption by Detroit election officials is over the top.

---

Remember Melissa Carone? She was at the Detroit counting center and witnessed a lot of shenanigans with counting machines not being properly cleared after a jam resulting in double counting, triple counting of batches. She even went to her Dominion supervisor to alert him the workers were doing it wrong.

His response? "We are not here to run the election for them." Same thing the CEO of Dominion said while touting their election day (and expensive) "tech assistance."

aggiehawg said:

---

richardag said:

---

The level of corruption by Detroit election officials is over the top.

---

Remember Melissa Carone? She was at the Detroit counting center and witnessed a lot of shenanigans with counting machines not being properly cleared after a jam resulting in double counting, triple counting of batches. She even went to her Dominion supervisor to alert him the workers were doing it wrong.

His response? "We are not here to run the election for them." Same thing the CEO of Dominion said while touting their election day (and expensive) "tech assistance."

---

I had forgotten, thanks for the memory.

ravingfans said:

---

richardag said:

---

ravingfans said:

---

richardag said:

---

Faustus said:

---

I ran a Google search to see what I could track down.

If you put on your Bizarro hat and read these articles in the opposite voice, they likely have much of what you want.

The two footnotes (1 and 2) in the first link have the specific state and bills for expanding and tightening up voting procedures as of this past summer.

https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/voting-laws-roundup-july-2021

This year-end article from the same site (again read with your Bizarro hat on) is probably more on point with what you were after.

https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/voting-laws-roundup-december-2021

The footnotes again have cites to specific states/bills.

---

Thanks, and yes need to read with understanding the articles are biased toward less secure elections.

---

Wow, what an understatement! Complete and total liberal editorial masquerading as news as usual for the leftist propaganda wing of the demonic party...

---

OK, i apologize, I vastly understated the bias. Still was nice to see the laws being passed to prevent voter fraud.

---

Please know my Red Face is never aimed at you, Richard--more in agreement. As you and Faustus point out, I'm really glad that someone, even if they are the libs, are cataloging the activities. Overall I get a Red Face whenever I'm around the msm outlets or other leftist propaganda sources...

---

No explanation needed, I was glad to clarify my understatement.

ravingfans said:

---

richardag said:

---

ravingfans said:

---

richardag said:

---

Faustus said:

---

I ran a Google search to see what I could track down.

If you put on your Bizarro hat and read these articles in the opposite voice, they likely have much of what you want.

The two footnotes (1 and 2) in the first link have the specific state and bills for expanding and tightening up voting procedures as of this past summer.

https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/voting-laws-roundup-july-2021

This year-end article from the same site (again read with your Bizarro hat on) is probably more on point with what you were after.

https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/voting-laws-roundup-december-2021

The footnotes again have cites to specific states/bills.

---

Thanks, and yes need to read with understanding the articles are biased toward less secure elections.

---

Wow, what an understatement! Complete and total liberal editorial masquerading as news as usual for the leftist propaganda wing of the demonic party...

---

OK, i apologize, I vastly understated the bias. Still was nice to see the laws being passed to prevent voter fraud.

---

Please know my Red Face is never aimed at you, Richard--more in agreement. As you and Faustus point out, I'm really glad that someone, even if they are the libs, are cataloging the activities. Overall I get a Red Face whenever I'm around the msm outlets or other leftist propaganda sources...

---

No worries. Since I dug it up, and went out of my way to preface how unpalatable the presentation would be (Bizarro hat), I took it personally when you labeled it "masquerading as news".

Twas my bad.

Cheers and have a happy New Year everyone.

richardag said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

richardag said:

---

The level of corruption by Detroit election officials is over the top.

---

Remember Melissa Carone? She was at the Detroit counting center and witnessed a lot of shenanigans with counting machines not being properly cleared after a jam resulting in double counting, triple counting of batches. She even went to her Dominion supervisor to alert him the workers were doing it wrong.

His response? "We are not here to run the election for them." Same thing the CEO of Dominion said while touting their election day (and expensive) "tech assistance."

---

I had forgotten, thanks for the memory.

---

Just watch Gateway Pundit the next several days. They have a three parter coming out on Detroit. The link above is part one.

They just dropped something up your alley, Hawg, but it's WI (issuing mass subpoenas).

Timing may be a good thing, but who knows:

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/12/breaking-exclusive-election-investigators-make-surprise-move-wi-blanket-state-subpoenas-related-2020-election/

Quote:

---

A source close to the investigation told The Western Journal that, in short, CTCL approached these five Wisconsin cities and offered $8.8 million grants to help keep voters safe from COVID. The group reportedly offered this money even though the source said the federal government, under the Trump administration, had already given $7 million to make sure clerks had enough PPE, sanitation and anything else needed to keep voters safe from COVID-19.

According to the source, each mayor of the five cities took "good faith" money. Racine allegedly received $60,000 and the other four cities received $10,000 each. Once they took this initial grant, CTCL sent questionnaires to see if the five cities then qualified for the full $8.8 million grant, the source said.

The questionnaire asked what the city was going to do to drive up the vote in what they deemed were historically disenfranchised neighborhoods, according to the source.

---

Bait and switch. Classic. And has been illegal since the 60s for any private for profit companies.

Harris County official trying to get the feds to allow her to violate state law.

🚨🚨🚨 Isabel Longoria has filed a lawsuit to try and gain the ability to send out UNSOLICITED MAIL IN BALLOTS for the 2022 November elections. See below 👇🏼 https://t.co/Y5MmI5jcQU pic.twitter.com/TSQcueKyxw

— Merissa Hansen 🇺🇸 (@MerissaHansen17) January 1, 2022

aggiehawg said:

---

Quote:

---

A source close to the investigation told The Western Journal that, in short, CTCL approached these five Wisconsin cities and offered $8.8 million grants to help keep voters safe from COVID. The group reportedly offered this money even though the source said the federal government, under the Trump administration, had already given $7 million to make sure clerks had enough PPE, sanitation and anything else needed to keep voters safe from COVID-19.

According to the source, each mayor of the five cities took "good faith" money. Racine allegedly received $60,000 and the other four cities received $10,000 each. Once they took this initial grant, CTCL sent questionnaires to see if the five cities then qualified for the full $8.8 million grant, the source said.

The questionnaire asked what the city was going to do to drive up the vote in what they deemed were historically disenfranchised neighborhoods, according to the source.

---

Bait and switch. Classic. And has been illegal since the 60s for any private for profit companies.

---

How the hell do you spend $7 million on PPE?

That alone should be investigated.

Yes, Harris County/Houston keep electing blatantly corrupt idiots to run the city because the elections are fair without any cheating.

Part 2 of the fraud in Detroit in 2020.

Link

peacedude said:

---

They just dropped something up your alley, Hawg, but it's WI (issuing mass subpoenas).

Timing may be a good thing, but who knows:

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/12/breaking-exclusive-election-investigators-make-surprise-move-wi-blanket-state-subpoenas-related-2020-election/

---

From the article:

Quote:

---

The source close to the investigation said the team is expecting pushback on every single subpoena issued, but as that happens, the investigation will continue. According to the source, the group will move on to the higher courts as necessary, in order to keep investigating all of what went on in the 2020 election.

---

"expecting pushback"
Typical tactic, delay as long as possible to again cheat in 2022.

Keegan99
These people have no shame, no honor.

There are a lot of special-sessions forthcoming this next week+ in various states, so maybe traction is gained elsewhere (Tina Peters' case in CO, Happy Faces, etc).

For the WI case, it (imo) really has legs because of the big-brain angle the former judge/litigator brings to the table. His points are easily made, valid/credible, and it just depends on whether or not he knows the legal channels (to skirt the obstacles) as to them being openly heard.

They all have extremely valid and provable cases...everywhere. Rampant fraud. Massive cheating. Everywhere.

peacedude said:

---

There are a lot of special-sessions forthcoming this next week+ in various states, so maybe traction is gained elsewhere (Tina Peters' case in CO, Happy Faces, etc).

For the WI case, it (imo) really has legs because of the big-brain angle the former judge/litigator brings to the table. His points are easily made, valid/credible, and it just depends on whether or not he knows the legal channels (to skirt the obstacles) as to them being openly heard.

They all have extremely valid and provable cases...everywhere. Rampant fraud. Massive cheating. Everywhere.

---

Thanks for the ray of hope.

aggiehawg said:

---

Update: Audit principal @JovanHPulitzer podcast confirms last night counterfeit ballot issue is substantial & under active AZ AG investigation. Canadian specialty ballot paper manufacturer assisting. Counterfeits apparently used in AZ to “fill in” for vote shortfalls. https://t.co/jiIqIuo7NV

— Rasmussen Reports (@Rasmussen_Poll) January 3, 2022

---

Interesting. Thanks.

If there were ballots on counterfeit paper, then why was that fact not in the audit report to the Arizona Senate?

Keegan99 said:

---

If there were ballots on counterfeit paper, then why was that fact not in the audit report to the Arizona Senate?

---

Because Jovan had not completed his kinematic artifact tests yet.

Keegan99 said:

---

If there were ballots on counterfeit paper, then why was that fact not in the audit report to the Arizona Senate?

---

Overview of The Arizona Audit Report:
From the article:

Quote:

---

Informational Findings Section:

In the Informational Findings portion of the report a multitude of issues were found, including large numbers of ballots also in question, procedural errors, and improper variations of ballots. The issues span from: early votes not accounted for in the EV33 (election data collection software), high bleed through rates on ballots, improper paper utilized, missing subpoena items, no record of voters in commercial database and real time provisional ballots. This portion of the report sheds light on more issues that further question the validity of the Maricopa County election results. Pages 48-61 of the report. Here's an overview of the Informational Findings:

---

edit to add

Quote:

---

Improper Paper Utilized:

Quote:

---

A large number of the ballots from in-person voting, utilized paper that is not recommended by the manufacturer of the tabulators for use in the systems. This can result in higher jam rates, more bleed through, and could theoretically impact the readability of the ballots by the scanners, but this last case is extremely unlikely. At this time 10 different papers have been found. Several of these paper stocks include paper with the weight from 20lb to 30lbs; when the generally accepted best practice for voting is to utilize ballot stock of 80lbs or higher.

---

---

Thanks.