Troutslime said:

---

And exposed to hacking or manipulation?

---

Possibly. No telling what is on that laptop, or if it has updated anti-virus / anti-malware / anti-ransomware software loaded.

It is so maddening to me. These voting systems are supposed to contain everything they need to perform the tasks without the need for external printers, computers, networks, software, etc. They scan, tabulate, and aggregate the voting data onto encrypted storage with the means to export the data to encrypted removable devices. Bringing in any laptop, router, WIFI device, etc. introduces a potential security threat and should not be acceptable or possible.

fasthorse05 said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

David Clements is one helluva of a trial attorney. His presentation of the parable is must see at Lindell's symposium.

---

I can't begin to tell you how comforting that is.

I know this isn't true, but for the last five years, ALL of the good trial attorneys have been Dems. It actually gives me a tad bit of hope.

Now, go forth and prosper.

---

Great closing argument. Nails. Were he in court, leave the religion stuff out at the end before a jury.

In a civil case? Preponderance of the evidence? Pretty good.

So this isn't from the 2020 election but from one this year?

Isn't Dominions parent company backed/owned by a group of Chinese?

Why do you guess 20%?

Why do you think all the bellwether areas were wrong?

Would you consider manipulation of mail in ballots as stolen or only cyber manipulation?

He's just making up stuff because it's easier to throw ad hominems at Mike Lindell (who might actually be a Muppet) than refute any of the evidence that has been presented.

Rather than derailing the thread with insults, let's discuss real issues:

Why are "air gapped" voting machine automatically connecting to the City of Detroit's WIFI network?

You called him a muppet not me.

I'll leave the sleuthing to y'all, I'm sure you'll crack the case any day now

BoerneAg11 said:

---

You called him a muppet not me.

I'll leave the sleuthing to y'all, I'm sure you'll crack the case any day now

---

Since you admit that you have nothing to add other than insults to derail the thread, why don't you change your name to TrollAg and post "yall all dummies! trollolololol!"?

It would make your purpose here less obvious.

Faustus said:

---

Here are Dr. Shiva's calculations for stolen votes across the states (pulled from another site with a 90+ page thread on the Cyber Symposium):



Those cheeky pickpockets purloined at the rate of 420.

---

how freaking stupid are you that you don't adjust the stolen rate?

Maybe not stupid, but arrogant.

Line Ate Member said:

---

Faustus said:

---

Here are Dr. Shiva's calculations for stolen votes across the states (pulled from another site with a 90+ page thread on the Cyber Symposium):



Those cheeky pickpockets purloined at the rate of 420.

---

how freaking stupid are you that you don't adjust the stolen rate?

Maybe not stupid, but arrogant.

---

I'd have to go watch the presentation but this distribution makes me suspicious of these findings. Note that I'm on record many times as saying there is a lot of fraud out there, in the 10,000s in most states. But this tightly clumped percentage and in states where it doesn't make as much sense makes me very suspicious of the finding.

Yeah, I watched his video last year and I was impressed, but I watched it again a couple days later and there was something off about his analysis, but I don't remember what. Maybe, if the video wasn't deleted off YouTube, I could tell you.

I just want the states to fix the glitches so this crap doesn't happen again.

Here is David Clements' presentation. Highly recommend.

Link

I would normally agree, except for the possibility that it would have been easier to set the percentage of stolen votes at a specific number to ensure election victory, instead of having to contact each state criminal group and adjust as the night went on. I will say California may not be as dead blue as we think it is.

The criminals in charge would have had to run repeated trial runs using math to arrive at that percentage. Prior to 2020, I would have agreed with you 100%. Now, I'm not so sure.

We have to remember that the Dems haven't suffered any blow back, or accountability of any kind since about 2009. If it really was set at roughly 4.2%, why would our election overlords be concerned about investigations. Hell, we can't even complete AZ without the Dems violating every subpoena issued!

I'm not saying your point isn't correct, just there might be another reason.

TRM said:

---

Yeah, I watched his video last year and I was impressed, but I watched it again a couple days later and there was something off about his analysis, but I don't remember what. Maybe, if the video wasn't deleted off YouTube, I could tell you.

I just want the states to fix the glitches so this crap doesn't happen again.

---

FWIW, there are no "glitches".

The more we find out, the more it appears to be a massive, planned, and organized operation that was probably four years, or more, in the planning. I'm sure Soros's money was involved, but it looks like others (the Schmidt's of the world) also helped. Once again, which investigative unit from the government would you trust to deliver a proper and honest report.

aggiehawg said:

---

For posterity's sake. A collection of the links to each presentation from Lindell's Cyber conference.

Link

---

Click Hawg's link then click the settings gear on Rumble and set speed to 1.5.

40 min video now with 60min of good

Line Ate Member said:

---

Faustus said:

---

Here are Dr. Shiva's calculations for stolen votes across the states (pulled from another site with a 90+ page thread on the Cyber Symposium):



Those cheeky pickpockets purloined at the rate of 420.

---

how freaking stupid are you that you don't adjust the stolen rate?

Maybe not stupid, but arrogant.

---

I cut and pasted it from another site as noted in the post. That arrogant.

TRADUCTOR said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

For posterity's sake. A collection of the links to each presentation from Lindell's Cyber conference.

Link

---

Click Hawg's link then click the settings gear on Rumble and set speed to 1.5.

40 min video now with 60min of good

---

He does talk really slowly, so the 1.5 still sounds perfectly normal.

So is anything going to come of this, will it be fixed or are all elections now going to be flawed/corrupt etc.?

Reload8098 said:

---

So is anything going to come of this, will it be fixed or are all elections now going to be flawed/corrupt etc.?

---

Nothing will be done about the 2020 election and when the dems do away with the filibuster and pass HR1, we're ****ed.

Reload8098 said:

---

So is anything going to come of this, will it be fixed or are all elections now going to be flawed/corrupt etc.?

---

Watch the Clements' presentation that hawg linked:

https://rumble.com/vl2fp5-election-cartel-presentation-by-professor-david-clements.html

He alludes that they are finishing evidence collection and he is working on a case.

Prognightmare said:

---

Reload8098 said:

---

So is anything going to come of this, will it be fixed or are all elections now going to be flawed/corrupt etc.?

---

Nothing will be done about the 2020 election and when the dems do away with the filibuster and pass HR1, we're ****ed.

---

It will take years, if ever, for SCOTUS to rule (correctly under the Constitution) that HR1 is in fact unconstitutional. (Which is a no brainer if you read the Constitution.)

The feds won't save us.

The states have to grow some hair on their balls and stop this. State legislatures have to reassert their Constitutional powers to stop that train.

We're in complete agreement, but if you think progressives will let this opportunity escape them, then I'll nominate you for SCOTUS when I'm POTUS.

Dems are looking to lose 7 seats via redistricting from the census, they have to codify the routes to cheating. They will eliminate the filibuster and pass HR1. If it's struck down by SCOTUS, then they'll pack SCOTUS and will be called Constitutional when it's resubmitted. IMO, dark days are ahead.

God I hope you're wrong...

agcrock2005 said:

---

God I hope you're wrong...

---

So do I my friend, so do I, but I'm very familiar with progs and the progressive movement. They're evil and insidious and that's the safest thing I can post without getting a trip to banned camp.

aggiehawg said:

---

Prognightmare said:

---

Reload8098 said:

---

So is anything going to come of this, will it be fixed or are all elections now going to be flawed/corrupt etc.?

---

Nothing will be done about the 2020 election and when the dems do away with the filibuster and pass HR1, we're ****ed.

---

It will take years, if ever, for SCOTUS to rule (correctly under the Constitution) that HR1 is in fact unconstitutional. (Which is a no brainer if you read the Constitution.)

The feds won't save us.

The states have to grow some hair on their balls and stop this. State legislatures have to reassert their Constitutional powers to stop that train.

---

Yeah. This makes the most and really only sense. If it came to it I'd be willing to fight for freedom. Not sure the dems have the stomach for it. Maybe we can split like Czechoslovak???

Prognightmare said:

---

We're in complete agreement, but if you think progressives will let this opportunity escape them, then I'll nominate you for SCOTUS when I'm POTUS.

Dems are looking to lose 7 seats via redistricting from the census, they have to codify the routes to cheating. They will eliminate the filibuster and pass HR1. If it's struck down by SCOTUS, then they'll pack SCOTUS and will be called Constitutional when it's resubmitted. IMO, dark days are ahead.

---

I starred your post...reluctantly. I have been screaming about this for it feels like years.

It is not like I am a huge Trump fan but I do see where he was a bulwark for a time, against what is coming.

Now??? They had to get him out. He was too American for them.

And they did that without the whole JFK thing happening.

aggiehawg said:

---

Prognightmare said:

---

We're in complete agreement, but if you think progressives will let this opportunity escape them, then I'll nominate you for SCOTUS when I'm POTUS.

Dems are looking to lose 7 seats via redistricting from the census, they have to codify the routes to cheating. They will eliminate the filibuster and pass HR1. If it's struck down by SCOTUS, then they'll pack SCOTUS and will be called Constitutional when it's resubmitted. IMO, dark days are ahead.

---

I starred your post...reluctantly. I have been screaming about this for it feels like years.

It is not like I am a huge Trump fan but I do see where he was a bulwark for a time, against what is coming.

Now??? They had to get him out. He was too American for them.

And they did that without the whole JFK thing happening.

---

Progs are evil, but not stupid. If Trump was assassinated, it would have a very good chance of putting a target on the foreheads of dem politicians.