*****OFFICIAL ELECTION DAY THREAD*****

2,704,732 Views | 20889 Replies | Last: 2 yr ago by Whistle Pig
Ag In Ok
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 4:29p, 7/21/21
AG
will25u said:


Watch for complaints of volunteers constantly dropping batches on the floor - all over the place and rebuilding them for the official "scan".
Reply Quote
3
aggiehawg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 4:58p, 7/21/21
AG
will25u said:
I have tried to watch that a couple of times now and it moves too fast for my tired old eyes to follow. I understand those are supposed to be duplicate ballots across other batch and ballot numbers but is that really convincing evidence to people here?

I'd need a higher resolution (and better glasses) to be conclusive to me.
Reply Quote
1
American Hardwood
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to aggiehawg • 5:01p, 7/21/21
AG
I would call it 100% conclusive that some batches were scanned multiple times. That is not to draw any conclusions from that, but I think it is a guaranteed statement of fact that there are duplicate batches.
Reply Quote
7
Funky Winkerbean
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to aggiehawg • 5:03p, 7/21/21
AG
Nothing is evidence to the liberals here.
Reply Quote
8
snowdog90
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to aggiehawg • 5:05p, 7/21/21
aggiehawg said:
will25u said:
I have tried to watch that a couple of times now and it moves too fast for my tired old eyes to follow. I understand those are supposed to be duplicate ballots across other batch and ballot numbers but is that really convincing evidence to people here?

I'd need a higher resolution (and better glasses) to be conclusive to me.


They are exactly the same. Same batch of ballots entered twice at least as different batches. Wow. That is crazy
Reply Quote
3
aggiehawg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
5:12p, 7/21/21
AG
Thanks, folks. I just wasn't sure it really presented what it purported to present but that is mostly because of my personal medical issues with my eyes. And I wasn't able to do this.

Reply Quote
3
chjoak
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to snowdog90 • 5:18p, 7/21/21
AG
snowdog90 said:
aggiehawg said:
will25u said:
I have tried to watch that a couple of times now and it moves too fast for my tired old eyes to follow. I understand those are supposed to be duplicate ballots across other batch and ballot numbers but is that really convincing evidence to people here?

I'd need a higher resolution (and better glasses) to be conclusive to me.


They are exactly the same. Same batch of ballots entered twice at least as different batches. Wow. That is crazy
If you watch what he is doing, they are the same with one batch being 1 thru X and the other batch matching X thru 1 (1=X, 2=X-1, etc.... Indicating that the batch was run and then put back though the scanner "backwards" which is how they would have been spit out from the first scan.
Reply Quote
2
aggieforester05
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Funky Winkerbean • 5:30p, 7/21/21
AG
Troutslime said:
Nothing is evidence to the liberals here.
The only way it qualifies as evidence is if they ever hear it repeated on CNN or by their Democrat masters, so it's never going to happen. CNN could tell them the sun didn't rise this morning and they'd defend it to their death.
Reply Quote
8
aggiehawg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to aggieforester05 • 5:36p, 7/21/21
AG
aggieforester05 said:
Troutslime said:
Nothing is evidence to the liberals here.
The only way it qualifies as evidence is if they ever hear it repeated on CNN or by their Democrat masters, so it's never going to happen. CNN could tell them the sun didn't rise this morning and they'd defend it to their death.
Or a judge agrees to look at it.
Reply Quote
6
OldArmyBrent
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to chjoak • 6:17p, 7/21/21
AG
chjoak said:
snowdog90 said:
aggiehawg said:
will25u said:
I have tried to watch that a couple of times now and it moves too fast for my tired old eyes to follow. I understand those are supposed to be duplicate ballots across other batch and ballot numbers but is that really convincing evidence to people here?

I'd need a higher resolution (and better glasses) to be conclusive to me.


They are exactly the same. Same batch of ballots entered twice at least as different batches. Wow. That is crazy
If you watch what he is doing, they are the same with one batch being 1 thru X and the other batch matching X thru 1 (1=X, 2=X-1, etc.... Indicating that the batch was run and then put back though the scanner "backwards" which is how they would have been spit out from the first scan.

Admittedly I didn't watch, but don't most scanners spit things out in the same order they went in? If that's the case someone had to intentionally change the order the second time through.
Reply Quote
1
aezmvp
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to OldArmyBrent • 6:21p, 7/21/21
OldArmyBrent said:
chjoak said:
snowdog90 said:
aggiehawg said:
will25u said:
I have tried to watch that a couple of times now and it moves too fast for my tired old eyes to follow. I understand those are supposed to be duplicate ballots across other batch and ballot numbers but is that really convincing evidence to people here?

I'd need a higher resolution (and better glasses) to be conclusive to me.


They are exactly the same. Same batch of ballots entered twice at least as different batches. Wow. That is crazy
If you watch what he is doing, they are the same with one batch being 1 thru X and the other batch matching X thru 1 (1=X, 2=X-1, etc.... Indicating that the batch was run and then put back though the scanner "backwards" which is how they would have been spit out from the first scan.

Admittedly I didn't watch, but don't most scanners spit things out in the same order they went in? If that's the case someone had to intentionally change the order the second time through.

Yes they basically cut the deck and ran it again.
Reply Quote
1
1 edit
txags92
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to OldArmyBrent • 10:44p, 7/21/21
AG
OldArmyBrent said:
chjoak said:
snowdog90 said:
aggiehawg said:
will25u said:
I have tried to watch that a couple of times now and it moves too fast for my tired old eyes to follow. I understand those are supposed to be duplicate ballots across other batch and ballot numbers but is that really convincing evidence to people here?

I'd need a higher resolution (and better glasses) to be conclusive to me.


They are exactly the same. Same batch of ballots entered twice at least as different batches. Wow. That is crazy
If you watch what he is doing, they are the same with one batch being 1 thru X and the other batch matching X thru 1 (1=X, 2=X-1, etc.... Indicating that the batch was run and then put back though the scanner "backwards" which is how they would have been spit out from the first scan.

Admittedly I didn't watch, but don't most scanners spit things out in the same order they went in? If that's the case someone had to intentionally change the order the second time through.
No. Most document feeders pull from the top page in a stack, which then becomes the bottom page on the exit stack. If you pick up the exit stack and run them through again, it will pull the top page to start, which was the bottom page the last time it was run through the scanner.
Reply Quote
3
Albatross Necklace
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:14p, 7/21/21
Interesting article.

Why was Dominion allowed to run the elections in Arizona and else where?

Because Dominion employees are technically government employees

https://patelpatriot.substack.com/p/devolution-part-5
Reply Quote
4
OldArmyBrent
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to txags92 • 11:57p, 7/21/21
AG
txags92 said:
OldArmyBrent said:
chjoak said:
snowdog90 said:
aggiehawg said:
will25u said:
I have tried to watch that a couple of times now and it moves too fast for my tired old eyes to follow. I understand those are supposed to be duplicate ballots across other batch and ballot numbers but is that really convincing evidence to people here?

I'd need a higher resolution (and better glasses) to be conclusive to me.


They are exactly the same. Same batch of ballots entered twice at least as different batches. Wow. That is crazy
If you watch what he is doing, they are the same with one batch being 1 thru X and the other batch matching X thru 1 (1=X, 2=X-1, etc.... Indicating that the batch was run and then put back though the scanner "backwards" which is how they would have been spit out from the first scan.

Admittedly I didn't watch, but don't most scanners spit things out in the same order they went in? If that's the case someone had to intentionally change the order the second time through.
No. Most document feeders pull from the top page in a stack, which then becomes the bottom page on the exit stack. If you pick up the exit stack and run them through again, it will pull the top page to start, which was the bottom page the last time it was run through the scanner.

I've never used a document feeder like that. You put it face down so it takes it from the bottom and keeps it in order. Or it pulls from the bottom and stacks it right back up on the other end in the same order. You have to do this because sometimes you need multiple runs to get all the pages. Can you imagine if it started reversing the order of everything? Worst document feeder ever.
Reply Quote
txags92
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to OldArmyBrent • 12:24a, 7/22/21
AG
OldArmyBrent said:
txags92 said:
OldArmyBrent said:
chjoak said:
snowdog90 said:
aggiehawg said:
will25u said:
I have tried to watch that a couple of times now and it moves too fast for my tired old eyes to follow. I understand those are supposed to be duplicate ballots across other batch and ballot numbers but is that really convincing evidence to people here?

I'd need a higher resolution (and better glasses) to be conclusive to me.


They are exactly the same. Same batch of ballots entered twice at least as different batches. Wow. That is crazy
If you watch what he is doing, they are the same with one batch being 1 thru X and the other batch matching X thru 1 (1=X, 2=X-1, etc.... Indicating that the batch was run and then put back though the scanner "backwards" which is how they would have been spit out from the first scan.

Admittedly I didn't watch, but don't most scanners spit things out in the same order they went in? If that's the case someone had to intentionally change the order the second time through.
No. Most document feeders pull from the top page in a stack, which then becomes the bottom page on the exit stack. If you pick up the exit stack and run them through again, it will pull the top page to start, which was the bottom page the last time it was run through the scanner.

I've never used a document feeder like that. You put it face down so it takes it from the bottom and keeps it in order. Or it pulls from the bottom and stacks it right back up on the other end in the same order. You have to do this because sometimes you need multiple runs to get all the pages. Can you imagine if it started reversing the order of everything? Worst document feeder ever.
If you put it in face down, it is going to scan the back of the page. We must be dealing with different machines, because every copier and scanner feeder I have dealt with for at least the 15 years you set the stack in face up, and it grabs from the top first.
Reply Quote
Burrus86
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:25a, 7/22/21
AG
?itemid=13008000
Injecting a bit of humor this morning.
Reply Quote
8
Booma94
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:59p, 7/22/21
AG
Slow couple of days on the audit news front. Has the conversation moved elsewhere, is news actually slow, or is something else going on?
Reply Quote
Albatross Necklace
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Booma94 • 7:05p, 7/22/21
Existential crisis:

https://texags.com/forums/16/topics/3210615/1
Reply Quote
2
aggiehawg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Booma94 • 7:07p, 7/22/21
AG
Booma94 said:
Slow couple of days on the audit news front. Has the conversation moved elsewhere, is news actually slow, or is something else going on?
Sorry been distracted by the SEC news.

There's this Link

Quote:
The number of ballots mailed out in the state of Georgia was over 7 million. This comes from the Georgia 2020 Cares report on item 12 page 5 where the state claims over 7 million absentee ballots were prepared and mailed out in the 2020 Primary Election. The assumption is that this number was the same only a few months later in the general election in November.


Explanation is HERE
Reply Quote
3
ravingfans
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to aggiehawg • 11:31p, 7/22/21
AG
aggiehawg said:
fasthorse05 said:
Hawg, is Uncoverdc.com a good follow?

I've seen it quoted here more than once, but don't want to add every single thing I see.
I don't follow them. I got to that piece from a link at Red State HERE

Red State has a regular feature "A.U.D.I.T." that I have found to be a good round up of what is happening in many states.

this thread, thanks to you, will25u, and several other great folks is all the news I can stand on the subject!
Reply Quote
4
1 edit
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:29a, 7/23/21
Haven't seen anything else on this.

Reply Quote
19
dubi
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 6:42a, 7/23/21
AG
will25u said:
Haven't seen anything else on this.




https://www.scribd.com/document/516851701/2021-07-13-complaint-4814-7096-7793-1
Reply Quote
2
We fixed the keg
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 11:14a, 7/23/21
AG
will25u said:
Haven't seen anything else on this.

Reply Quote
8
stetson
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to dubi • 11:23a, 7/23/21
AG
dubi said:
will25u said:
Haven't seen anything else on this.




https://www.scribd.com/document/516851701/2021-07-13-complaint-4814-7096-7793-1
Judge is no doubt a leftist.
FJB
Reply Quote
1
We fixed the keg
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:25a, 7/23/21
AG
Reading that complaint is infuriating. Meetings held in private, off the record, and out of the reach of FOIA. Knowingly making changes which lessen security and are against the stated requirements.

Oh, and they better damn well release the names of everyone in that meeting, including the "manufacturers" who were present and who colluded to do this. If I am not mistaken, those companies can be subject to permanent removal from future government contracts.
Reply Quote
13
richardag
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to We fixed the keg • 11:39a, 7/23/21
We fixed the keg said:
Reading that complaint is infuriating. Meetings held in private, off the record, and out of the reach of FOIA. Knowingly making changes which lessen security and are against the stated requirements.

Oh, and they better damn well release the names of everyone in that meeting, including the "manufacturers" who were present and who colluded to do this. If I am not mistaken, those companies can be subject to permanent removal from future government contracts.
Agree. Also from the complainant
"66.
Defendant failed these obligations because it voted on final adoption of a significantly modified version of the VVSG 2.0 that it had not submitted to Plaintiff Stark, other members of the Board of Advisors, or the Standards Board for comments and recommendations. The new version was so different from the version Defendant submitted that the modifications could not have been reasonably anticipated."
Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
Reply Quote
4
1 edit
We fixed the keg
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:03p, 7/23/21
AG
Taking a step back to see the forest through the trees.

Regardless of your beliefs about the outcome of the 2020 election and if there was the existence of fraud, who can actually believe the way we currently handle our elections is acceptable?

I have said this before, and it bears repeating. Our government, at all levels, acts like a 3-year-old playing a board game. Rules only exist until they don't like them, then it descends into a 'do whatever the hell you like' free-for-all until the 'game' becomes unplayable.
Reply Quote
27
oh no
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to We fixed the keg • 12:35p, 7/23/21
AG
It seems that the game is becoming unplayable very quickly in this country.
Reply Quote
4
txags92
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to oh no • 12:55p, 7/23/21
AG
oh no said:
It seems that the game is becoming unplayable very quickly in this country.


The time is coming very quickly when the only winning move will be to grab the game table and flip it over, scattering all the game pieces to wherever they want to land
Reply Quote
10
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:14p, 7/23/21
Reply Quote
20
richardag
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 8:18p, 7/23/21
Really like what Vernon Jones has been saying.
Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
Reply Quote
5
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to richardag • 8:23p, 7/23/21
Like I said before, I think he has my vote for 2022.
Reply Quote
5
txags92
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 8:49p, 7/23/21
AG
will25u said:
Like I said before, I think he has my vote for 2022.
Vote once for me too...
Reply Quote
6
Faustus
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:56p, 7/23/21
His instincts seem sharp.
Reply Quote
1
fasthorse05
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to richardag • 9:33a, 7/24/21
richardag said:
Really like what Vernon Jones has been saying.
When he made the switch from Dem to Republican, I remember one of his interviews stating (paraphrasing) that Republicans don't know how to fight, but I do.

I already liked him, but really did after that.
Reply Quote
7
First Page Last Page
Page 497 of 597 ▼
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.