*****OFFICIAL ELECTION DAY THREAD*****

2,693,969 Views | 20889 Replies | Last: 2 yr ago by Whistle Pig
M-K-TAG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/06/breaking-mi-rep-daire-rendon-r-receipt-evidence-reflecting-systemic-election-fraud-mi-occurred-november-2020-election/?utm_source=Twitter&utm_medium=PostTopSharingButtons&utm
TRADUCTOR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Houston we have a problem WOW
Line Ate Member
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
agcrock2005 said:

Sterling82 said:

But when is someone going to provide evidence? Where is the evidence of fraud? You people are an affront to our democracy for continuing to perpetuate these debunked conspiracy theories.

Trolling or moron?

edit: saw that it was sarcasm. My bad Sterling. I shouldn't do TexAgs so late
Burrus86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Sterling82 said:

But when is someone going to provide evidence? Where is the evidence of fraud? You people are an affront to our democracy for continuing to perpetuate these debunked conspiracy theories.

Affront to our democracy...that's rich!
We fixed the keg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Sterling82 said:

M-K-TAG said:

Sterling82 said:

But when is someone going to provide evidence? Where is the evidence of fraud? You people are an affront to our democracy for continuing to perpetuate these debunked conspiracy theories.
Sarcasm? Your posting history seems 360 degrees in opposition to that unless I did not go back far enough.

I was impersonating someone like agalaska but looks like I need to reel in the sarcasm around this crowd.


Decay
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
At this point sarcastic posts are indistinguishable between the standard gaslighting that most media outlets portray.

It's less about baiting and more about trying to respond to people who actually listen to the mainstream media. Literally, how do you talk to someone who thinks 2020 was completely legitimate? For one thing, you barely can. But really you just have to be consistent and point out the evidence and biases inherent to the tech and media.

Not that trolling isn't fun... It's just we're so beyond parody that it's impossible to differentiate.
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
approaching 500 pages on the election "DAY" thread.

No fraud. No evidence. Courts shot everything down. Thousands of sworn affidavits across many states are all lies of course. Most secure election in history obviously. Data makes perfect sense. DEBUNKED!

...just don't do a forensic audit to confirm. That would undermine democracy.

...and if you need to do an audit, it can only be a re-scan recount and you can only use this approved audit firm that is run by former Dominion employees.
Trek Strategy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
At this point, on a national scale, do we (you) think that if a fair audit were to be performed, which states would flip back to red based on all the we've seen and heard from various investigations and audits in process?

A) Arizona
B) Pennsylvania
C) Michigan
D) Wisconsin
E) Georgia
F) All of the above
G) None of the above

Would love to hear the honest opinion of the board...
An L of an Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
F)

at MINIMUM.
BaileyAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
All listed
agcrock2005
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I think every single one of them, and most likely some others. There was zero energy at all on the left for 6 months before the election.
Funky Winkerbean
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
If everything is followed to the letter of the law..F)
chjoak
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Based on what we saw and the affidavits that were thrown out, F. And I think there may be 1-2 others that would be flipped if everyone did a real audit.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Trek Strategy said:

At this point, on a national scale, do we (you) think that if a fair audit were to be performed, which states would flip back to red based on all the we've seen and heard from various investigations and audits in process?

A) Arizona
B) Pennsylvania
C) Michigan
D) Wisconsin
E) Georgia
F) All of the above
G) None of the above

Would love to hear the honest opinion of the board...
Arizona (10,457 vote difference)

Georgia (11, 799 vote difference)

Wisconsin (20,600 vote difference)

Pennsylvania (44,292 vote difference)

Michigan might be a stretch because the vote difference was over 150,00.

ETA: Nevada (33,596 vote difference)
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
All of the laws that were circumvented by the big cities, judges, and the zuck bucks....

F
agz win
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Will be unable to prove a "fair" audit, so G.
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Trek Strategy said:

At this point, on a national scale, do we (you) think that if a fair audit were to be performed, which states would flip back to red based on all the we've seen and heard from various investigations and audits in process?

A) Arizona
B) Pennsylvania
C) Michigan
D) Wisconsin
E) Georgia
F) All of the above
G) None of the above

Would love to hear the honest opinion of the board...
in addition to those FIVE you listed, you can possibly add Nevada, New Mexico, Virginia... and some deep blue states like California were closer to purple and some purple states like Texas were actually deep red. It's wide-spread on a national scale, and they are using their power to make it permanent.

This is what coup d'etat looks like:


This is not what a coup looks like:

posing for a picture with a podium then putting it back; he's still in jail.

You think having questions about the election "undermines" democracy? Well I think using compromised monopolies to suppress freedom of speech and freedom of the press because of opposing political views undermines democracy. I think using compromised MSM propaganda media that is filled with your agents to censure negative news and spread lies undermines democracy. I think federal overreach to stop states from passing voter integrity laws to lessen the exposure of easy-fraud loop holes undermines democracy. I think weaponizing the bureaucracies throughout the Fed, including the DOJ and DOD, against half of our population to demonize them and paint them all as "racist", "white supremacist", and "domestic terrorists" undermines democracy. I think wide open borders to change the population of the country undermines democracy. I think intentionally dividing the country based on how we look, intentionally defunding police forces to watch crime rates soar in order to create a federal police force, and trying to federalize state and local elections all undermine fundamental principles of our "democracy". I think compromised politicians caving to every whim of the CCP and European "friends" compromises our democracy. I think permanent power grabs by attempting to end the filibuster, add new states, end the electoral college, etc. undermines our democracy in the new one-party system we are about to have. I think intentionally devaluing the dollar, firing up the printing press for many trillions of dollars, and setting us up for hyperinflation puts us all at serious risk. I think just about everything I said in this paragraph was done in Venezuela. I just don't believe 81 million people over the age of 18, citizens, non-felons, registered voters wanted this.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Anecdotal but:

Quote:

According to Nielsen, 1.9 million cable viewers tuned into Newsmax to watch the network's coverage of the former president's rally Saturday in Wellington, Ohio.

Newsmax estimates another 1.3 million viewers watched through free streaming devices, bringing Newsmax's total viewership over 3 million.
Quote:

Newsmax's Nielsen ratings success is even more astounding considering Newsmax is carried in about 30 million less U.S. cable homes than Fox.

Still, in a key demo of 35-64, Newsmax had cable impressions per minute of 483,000 viewers, compared to Fox's 409,000.

Even with a significantly larger reach than Newsmax, Fox was able to eke out a small win in total impressions, 1.53 million to Newsmax's 1.4 million.

Newsmax had more than double CNN's impressions and triple MSNBC's, during the same time period.
Link

But Biden totally received 81 million legit votes.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
richardag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Well said
Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
From the link:

Quote:

Pullen: Absolutely as you know, we are moving out of the coliseum tomorrow. As you can see, all the equipment is being taken down and boxed up and moved out of the coliseum. 46 pallets of boxes will all be put over into another building here on the grounds, it's the same building we used before. They will be stored there for a couple of weeks, a few minor things still need to be done, with respect to some software additions they made. We got some additional information for the county. Apparently there was a difference on how many duplicate ballots there were, per batch. So they gave us a new list. And so we had to create software that took that data and compared it to our data to deal with the duplicate ballots and so they're finishing that up and down here they're wrapping that up, and then down here they're finishing up in the boxes, getting then ready for movement.
Just now turning over info on duplicate ballots? These MCBOS folks should be called on the carpet and read the riot act by the judge and then tossed into the pokey for contempt.
richardag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u said:


IANAL but in my option he is getting off light. Should be disbarred and in jail, he has been off the rails numerous times.
Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
FLATOUT
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

From the link:

Quote:

Pullen: Absolutely as you know, we are moving out of the coliseum tomorrow. As you can see, all the equipment is being taken down and boxed up and moved out of the coliseum. 46 pallets of boxes will all be put over into another building here on the grounds, it's the same building we used before. They will be stored there for a couple of weeks, a few minor things still need to be done, with respect to some software additions they made. We got some additional information for the county. Apparently there was a difference on how many duplicate ballots there were, per batch. So they gave us a new list. And so we had to create software that took that data and compared it to our data to deal with the duplicate ballots and so they're finishing that up and down here they're wrapping that up, and then down here they're finishing up in the boxes, getting then ready for movement.
Just now turning over info on duplicate ballots? These MCBOS folks should be called on the carpet and read the riot ac by the judge ad then tossed into the pokey for contempt.
Nothing would shock me at this point.
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Kamala got this same reaction when she visited the border, right?



81 million my ass
ChemEAg08
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
oh no said:

Kamala got this same reaction when she visited the border, right?



81 million my ass


To be fair she probably did.




Trump flags and all.
ravingfans
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
agcrock2005 said:

Sterling82 said:

But when is someone going to provide evidence? Where is the evidence of fraud? You people are an affront to our democracy for continuing to perpetuate these debunked conspiracy theories.

Trolling or moron?


Why not both?

Upon further information, looks like this was sarcasm and not Sterling's true beliefs/opinion
ravingfans
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Sterling82 said:

M-K-TAG said:

Sterling82 said:

But when is someone going to provide evidence? Where is the evidence of fraud? You people are an affront to our democracy for continuing to perpetuate these debunked conspiracy theories.
Sarcasm? Your posting history seems 360 degrees in opposition to that unless I did not go back far enough.

I was impersonating someone like agalaska but looks like I need to reel in the sarcasm around this crowd.


You sold it so well that several of us bought it hook line sinker (me included)

Helful hint--I've learned to include /sarcasm as the last line of a post to remove all doubt...
Sterling82
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ravingfans said:

Sterling82 said:

M-K-TAG said:

Sterling82 said:

But when is someone going to provide evidence? Where is the evidence of fraud? You people are an affront to our democracy for continuing to perpetuate these debunked conspiracy theories.
Sarcasm? Your posting history seems 360 degrees in opposition to that unless I did not go back far enough.

I was impersonating someone like agalaska but looks like I need to reel in the sarcasm around this crowd.


You sold it so well that several of us bought it hook line sinker (me included)

Helful hint--I've learned to include /sarcasm as the last line of a post to remove all doubt...

I assumed it would be obvious that such a post right below the damning evidence and audio could only be satire. Not so much.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Counterpoint
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ravingfans said:

Sterling82 said:

M-K-TAG said:

Sterling82 said:

But when is someone going to provide evidence? Where is the evidence of fraud? You people are an affront to our democracy for continuing to perpetuate these debunked conspiracy theories.
Sarcasm? Your posting history seems 360 degrees in opposition to that unless I did not go back far enough.

I was impersonating someone like agalaska but looks like I need to reel in the sarcasm around this crowd.


Helful hint--I've learned to include /sarcasm as the last line of a post to remove all doubt...

But that's not as much fun!
Faustus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sterling82 said:

ravingfans said:

Sterling82 said:

M-K-TAG said:

Sterling82 said:

But when is someone going to provide evidence? Where is the evidence of fraud? You people are an affront to our democracy for continuing to perpetuate these debunked conspiracy theories.
Sarcasm? Your posting history seems 360 degrees in opposition to that unless I did not go back far enough.

I was impersonating someone like agalaska but looks like I need to reel in the sarcasm around this crowd.


You sold it so well that several of us bought it hook line sinker (me included)

Helful hint--I've learned to include /sarcasm as the last line of a post to remove all doubt...

I assumed it would be obvious that such a post right below the damning evidence and audio could only be satire. Not so much.


Seemed pretty obvious to me. Hit all the hot button words and even had a "you people".
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
will25u said:


"Requested page not found."
American Hardwood
How long do you want to ignore this user?
First Page Last Page
Page 477 of 597
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.