*****OFFICIAL ELECTION DAY THREAD*****

2,694,684 Views | 20889 Replies | Last: 2 yr ago by Whistle Pig
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Would she not have to disclose her interest in a company that is a government contractor?
If she were in public office, she would. She's not.
Stinky T
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
captkirk said:

will25u said:


The illustrator needs to add about 200 lbs to that caricature


Yeah it has way too much of a neck. A four strand wrap of pearls around her neck would cause a worldwide oyster shortage.
richardag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
American Hardwood said:

In a related story from December:

Quote:

Many of the temps from the agency Tucker, Georgia-based Happy Faces were described as partisan, inexperienced and poorly trained by poll managers and monitors who worked alongside them.

Quote:


LINK
Add to that this from the article you linked:
Quote:

The lack of action undercuts Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger's promise last month "to prosecute those who try to undermine our elections to the fullest extent of the law."
So now Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger is a confirmed liar.
Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
American Hardwood
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

Quote:

Would she not have to disclose her interest in a company that is a government contractor?
If she were in public office, she would. She's not.
Yeah, forgot she was no longer in office.
ChemEAg08
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
will25u said:




Looking forward to this! Any steps after this but before Red 2?
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ChemEAg08 said:

will25u said:




Looking forward to this! Any steps after this but before Red 2?
The forensic analysis of the hardware has been ongoing since the early days of the audit when they scanned the machines and then returned them to MCBOS.

I haven't heard any noise about the admin passwords for a few weeks do I can only assume that Ben Cotton of Cyfir figured out the work around after he recovered the missing data files.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
captkirk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
captkirk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
M-K-TAG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The Devastating Reality of the Arizona Forensic Audit - Bernard Kerik

Quote:

Democrats and the mainstream media have been aggressively denouncing the Maricopa County, Arizona election audit from the beginning.

At, first I didn't understand why.

I thought that it was because they were afraid of what the results would be, but I now believe it's something far worse.
The Democrats aren't "just" afraid of the outcome but they're afraid that the audit results will be irrefutable and unimpeachable. They know that their efforts to discredit the audit process in Arizona will not stand up to scrutiny and here's why.

The Arizona audit is being run impeccably, utilizing security and surveillance procedures with a longstanding track record of effectiveness.

To say that I was impressed after viewing the audit process for myself would be a massive understatement. I've spent decades working in security and law enforcement at the highest levels, and this is exactly the level of conscientiousness and attention to detail that I would demand for a sensitive or high-profile investigation.

They're not trying to reinvent the wheel; they're using the same methods casinos have used for decades to catch cheaters.
It's common knowledge that casinos are exceptionally good at catching cheaters, and if anybody tries to pull a fast one during the Arizona audit, they face the same long odds of getting away with it.
https://www.newsmax.com/bernardkerik/arizona-forensic-audit-2020-ballots/2021/06/15/id/1025217/
Keegan99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
From the article...

Quote:

When I was there, one of the auditors showed me an example of a ballot that was flagged as suspicious because every single oval was filled out perfectly, without a single stray mark something that would be easy for a machine to accomplish, but is almost impossible to do by hand.
TRADUCTOR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oh boy the MSM is going to squirm.
X was born on October 28, 2022 and should be a national holiday.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
American Hardwood
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
There have been posters on f16 who believe that nothing would result from the Arizona audit. Maybe not in the way some people would like (public hangings, jail time, perp walks, etc.), but I believe that many of the actions going on in other states are the result of seeing Arizona take bold moves. This disproves the notion that nothing would result from the audit.

I believe there will be more to come too. It gives me a tiny bit of hope that the cheating will be suppressed and real elections can turn the tide.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I am sure someone has some ridiculous excuse why EVERY WHERE there are BIG discrepancies in EVERYTHING related to the 2020 election.

atmtws
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So they were scanning ballots multiple times?

You would think that the scanning machines could print a simple barcode on the ballot once it's tabulated (that way it anonymous), so if it's scanned again, it wont be counted twice (or multiple times).
aggieforester05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
atmtws said:

So they were scanning ballots multiple times?

You would think that the scanning machines could print a simple barcode on the ballot once it's tabulated (that way it anonymous), so if it's scanned again, it wont be counted twice (or multiple times).

The omission of such is a feature, not a bug.
fasthorse05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
American Hardwood said:

Quote:

Quote:

I would be curious if Zuckbucks were a part of the $7M contract.
Zuckbucks allowed those contracts to happen. I'm quite confident that that company was on one of their approved lists. The wording of those grants had restrictions on where and how the money was to be spent without prior approval from CTCL.
It appears Happy Faces is deeply embedded as a Georgia state contractor. Their name pops up in a bunch of other government contractor documents. You are probably right in that the Zuckbucks don't have to be directly spent, they can assuredly offset costs though to free up a nice fat contract for Happy Faces. Stacey Abrams is certainly in bed with them too. Would she not have to disclose her interest in a company that is a government contractor?
Talk to her sister. She would know, but wouldn't likely tell the truth.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Meanwhile, in California.

Quote:

Thirteen congressional candidates intend to take their fight for fair and honest elections in California to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, a nonpartisan elections watchdog group announced on Wednesday.

The plaintiffs, who include a former military advisor to President Bill Clinton, are challenging laws, regulations and election practices creating an environment ripe for irregularities, according to the Election Integrity Project California.

"This is a potentially groundbreaking case that challenges the blatantly unconstitutional election practices taking place in California and increasingly, in other parts of the country" said Linda Paine, president of EIPCa.

"Unlike other recent election cases, it is forward looking, seeking to create a transparent election process for all future elections."

700 sworn affidavits

In January, the candidates, all Republicans, sued numerous county and state election officials in federal court, including Gov. Gavin Newson, charging that they violated several clauses of the U.S Constitution, allowing fraud to occur in the Nov. 3 election.

The Los Angeles-based Primary Law Group filed the suit after EIPCa collected some 700 sworn affidavits from trained citizen observers that described various irregularities during the election.

The complaint also examines how California laws like ballot harvesting, and last-minute changes like privileging vote-by-mail voting over in-person voting, disadvantaged minority groups.

"The conduct of the 2020 election eviscerated citizen oversight, caused mass irregularities and opportunities for fraud, and violated the rights of lawful voters, citizen observers, and candidates," the complaint stated.

Violate the 14th Amendment

Practices that promote the casting of illegal or unreliable ballots fail to contain basic minimum guarantees and violate the Fourteenth Amendment, leading to the diminution in value of validly cast ballots, the plaintiffs argued.

"Observers were prevented from entering voting locations; kept 30, 40 or 50 feet back from vote counting operations, or even outside the counting rooms altogether; obstructed by having screens placed between observers and election workers so that observers could not see what election workers were doing; and many other instances of obstruction and concealment."

The detailed 44-page complaint argued that "California's use of voting machines supplied by Dominion and Smartmatic provided opportunities for registrars, election workers and others to tamper with results."

Dominion and a flash drive

In Ventura County, for example, the complaint states, "a Dominion employee was observed inserting a flash drive into a Dominion machine while it was tallying votes, after which the Dominion system was rebooted. The Dominion employee then removed the drive from the Dominion machine, placed it into his own laptop, and performed operations on the laptop. He then removed the drive from the laptop and provided it to the Ventura County election official who was operating the Dominion system."

On June 15, the federal trial court granted defendants' motions to dismiss the case without ruling on the facts, paving the way for plaintiffs' appeal to the Ninth Circuit.

The candidates ran for U.S. Congress in districts where substantial irregularities were documented. They are James P. Bradley, Aja Smith, Eric Early, Alison Hayden, Jeffrey Gorman, Mark Reed, Buzz Patterson, Mike Cargile, Kevin Cookingham, Greg Raths, Ronda Kennedy, Chris Bish, and Johnny Nalbandian.
Link
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

A final decision has not yet been made as to a proposal to pull in a California-based nonprofit to tabulate votes using ballot images.

"Still working on that," Bennett recently told The Epoch Times.

If the proposed work happens, the Arizona Senate would have three sets of numbers to comparethe original tabulation, the auditors' figures, and the nonprofit's tabulation.

Arizona senators have said they'll use the findings from the audit to inform future election integrity bills. The Arizona Senate ordered the audit in December 2020, citing public concerns about how the 2020 election was run.
Link
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Tom Kazansky 2012
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
What is CNN trying to say here?

https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2021/06/17/arizona-montana-election-audit-ac360-tuchman-pkg-vpx.cnn/video/playlists/this-week-in-politics/
American Hardwood
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Tom Kazansky 2012 said:

What is CNN trying to say here?

https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2021/06/17/arizona-montana-election-audit-ac360-tuchman-pkg-vpx.cnn/video/playlists/this-week-in-politics/
Why does that matter even if it's true? But I guarantee you it will have rock solid chain of custody documentation unlike the election officials in Georgia.
Stinky T
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

Meanwhile, in California.

Quote:

Thirteen congressional candidates intend to take their fight for fair and honest elections in California to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, a nonpartisan elections watchdog group announced on Wednesday.

The plaintiffs, who include a former military advisor to President Bill Clinton, are challenging laws, regulations and election practices creating an environment ripe for irregularities, according to the Election Integrity Project California.

"This is a potentially groundbreaking case that challenges the blatantly unconstitutional election practices taking place in California and increasingly, in other parts of the country" said Linda Paine, president of EIPCa.

"Unlike other recent election cases, it is forward looking, seeking to create a transparent election process for all future elections."

700 sworn affidavits

In January, the candidates, all Republicans, sued numerous county and state election officials in federal court, including Gov. Gavin Newson, charging that they violated several clauses of the U.S Constitution, allowing fraud to occur in the Nov. 3 election.

The Los Angeles-based Primary Law Group filed the suit after EIPCa collected some 700 sworn affidavits from trained citizen observers that described various irregularities during the election.

The complaint also examines how California laws like ballot harvesting, and last-minute changes like privileging vote-by-mail voting over in-person voting, disadvantaged minority groups.

"The conduct of the 2020 election eviscerated citizen oversight, caused mass irregularities and opportunities for fraud, and violated the rights of lawful voters, citizen observers, and candidates," the complaint stated.

Violate the 14th Amendment

Practices that promote the casting of illegal or unreliable ballots fail to contain basic minimum guarantees and violate the Fourteenth Amendment, leading to the diminution in value of validly cast ballots, the plaintiffs argued.

"Observers were prevented from entering voting locations; kept 30, 40 or 50 feet back from vote counting operations, or even outside the counting rooms altogether; obstructed by having screens placed between observers and election workers so that observers could not see what election workers were doing; and many other instances of obstruction and concealment."

The detailed 44-page complaint argued that "California's use of voting machines supplied by Dominion and Smartmatic provided opportunities for registrars, election workers and others to tamper with results."

Dominion and a flash drive

In Ventura County, for example, the complaint states, "a Dominion employee was observed inserting a flash drive into a Dominion machine while it was tallying votes, after which the Dominion system was rebooted. The Dominion employee then removed the drive from the Dominion machine, placed it into his own laptop, and performed operations on the laptop. He then removed the drive from the laptop and provided it to the Ventura County election official who was operating the Dominion system."

On June 15, the federal trial court granted defendants' motions to dismiss the case without ruling on the facts, paving the way for plaintiffs' appeal to the Ninth Circuit.

The candidates ran for U.S. Congress in districts where substantial irregularities were documented. They are James P. Bradley, Aja Smith, Eric Early, Alison Hayden, Jeffrey Gorman, Mark Reed, Buzz Patterson, Mike Cargile, Kevin Cookingham, Greg Raths, Ronda Kennedy, Chris Bish, and Johnny Nalbandian.
Link


Having a thumb drive in a room where ballots are being counted should be a hangable offense.

You want to see what other security-focused businesses think about thumb drive security. The next time you apply for a loan, hand the loan processor at the bank a thumb drive when they ask for all of your financial documents. Then come back here and post the look on that person's face.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Decay
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ID required for affidavits but not voting... You can't make this sht up...
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bowers is a republican. But didn't even know this was happening.

will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Slow news day I guess.

FrioAg 00
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
There are lots of places that were bad, but Atlanta stinks the most. They didn't just cheat a few hundred votes here or there - I would guess we're taking 100k cheated votes or more
Faustus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If the state Rs would have paid for top law firms or accounting firms attach their name to the audits it would drawn heads and carried weight.

You can't tell me that one of the Big 5 accounting firms or a reputable law firm wouldn't have been willing to undertake this - albeit it would have been without a predetermined outcome - which nixed their involvement in the first place.

Given that's not happening it's pretty clear that these endeavors amount to little more than hired gun expert reports which don't seek to sway concerned mods or libs (e.g the Court or the jury), but rather that the legislators' constituents were right all along. That's a worthwhile endeavor for those legislators answerable to their electorate. Their voters wanted to hear they were robbed, so to the extent they have control of the state legislature they can retain firms that will produce reports that say they were, it's possible they were, or that conditions were present where they were.

I could be swayed by proof that come from an audit, but it's hard to imagine a less suspect process. Then again the process was never geared towards me/concerned moderates/libs, it's geared towards hard core Rs not having to admit defeat. It's helpful to have something more than tweets, DJTs indefatigability, disdain for the opposition, and quasi celebrities' support. This adds another plank to those buckets of "evidence".

So carry on.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Faustus said:

If the state Rs would have paid for top law firms or accounting firms attach their name to the audits it would drawn heads and carried weight.

You can't tell me that one of the Big 5 accounting firms or a reputable law firm wouldn't have been willing to undertake this - albeit it would have been without a predetermined outcome - which nixed their involvement in the first place.

Given that's not happening it's pretty clear that these endeavors amount to little more than hired gun expert reports which don't seek to sway concerned mods or libs (e.g the Court or the jury), but rather that the legislators' constituents were right all along. That's a worthwhile endeavor for those legislators answerable to their electorate.

I could be swayed by proof that comes from the audit, but it's hard to imagine a less suspect process. Then again the process was never geared towards me or moderates, it's geared towards Rs not having to admit consession.




What a dumb take. And you wouldn't believe any accounting firm either. But you would believe the electronic voting systems employees checking their own systems?

Pro V&V are garbage firms that even a federal judge found not credible (Pro V&V specifically but Pro V&V ceo testified that they relied on SLI provided information witout checking it themselves.)

The inventor of the RLA testified in the same lawsuit that Dominion's systems are not configured in such a manner that his RLA will provide a verifiable result. They would be garbage and a waste of time.

But since you are here, and since the Dems have already admitted they "saved" the election by illegal means, pray tell me when you will admit there is a reason to investigate further??? 2025?
agcrock2005
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

I could be swayed by proof that comes from the audit, but it's hard to imagine a less suspect process.
You won't be swayed by anything because you won't look at it. For example, this is the most transparent audit in the history of audits yet you call it "suspect" because that's what you heard on CNN. Open your eyes.
snowdog90
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Faustus said:

If the state Rs would have paid for top law firms or accounting firms attach their name to the audits it would drawn heads and carried weight.

You can't tell me that one of the Big 5 accounting firms or a reputable law firm wouldn't have been willing to undertake this - albeit it would have been without a predetermined outcome - which nixed their involvement in the first place.

Given that's not happening it's pretty clear that these endeavors amount to little more than hired gun expert reports which don't seek to sway concerned mods or libs (e.g the Court or the jury), but rather that the legislators' constituents were right all along. That's a worthwhile endeavor for those legislators answerable to their electorate.

I could be swayed by proof that comes from the audit, but it's hard to imagine a less suspect process. Then again the process was never geared towards me or moderates, it's geared towards Rs not having to admit defeat. It's helpful to have something more than tweets, DJTs indefatigability, and disdain for the opposition. This does that.






This post is laughable. You talk about the process as if you have any clue. You don't.

Take a look at Will's post above yours. The cheating is caught on camera and you don't even care. Pathetic. And the cheating amounted to millions of votes nationwide. You're blind, deluded or a liar if you don't see that.
Faustus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg said:

Faustus said:

If the state Rs would have paid for top law firms or accounting firms attach their name to the audits it would drawn heads and carried weight.

You can't tell me that one of the Big 5 accounting firms or a reputable law firm wouldn't have been willing to undertake this - albeit it would have been without a predetermined outcome - which nixed their involvement in the first place.

Given that's not happening it's pretty clear that these endeavors amount to little more than hired gun expert reports which don't seek to sway concerned mods or libs (e.g the Court or the jury), but rather that the legislators' constituents were right all along. That's a worthwhile endeavor for those legislators answerable to their electorate.

I could be swayed by proof that comes from the audit, but it's hard to imagine a less suspect process. Then again the process was never geared towards me or moderates, it's geared towards Rs not having to admit consession.




What a dumb take. And you wouldn't believe any accounting firm either. But you would believe the electronic voting systems employees checking their own systems?

Pro V&V are garbage firms that even a federal judge found not credible (Pro V&V specifically but Pro V&V ceo testified that they relied on SLI provided information witout checking it themselves.)

The inventor of the RLA testified in the same lawsuit that Dominion's systems are not configured in such a manner that his RLA will provide a verifiable result. They would be garbage and a waste of time.

But since you are here, and since the Dems have already admitted they "saved" the election by illegal means, pray tell me when you will admit there is a reason to investigate further??? 2025?
I said I'd believe one of the Big 5 accounting firms in the very post you quoted (not that they're infallible when it comes to serving the one paying the fees - but Republicans would be paying the fees in this instance ).

They went with Cyber Ninjas instead because you were the intended audience, madam.

Edit: looking back it's at least implied I would have accepted a reputable source audit from a world class accounting or law firm in the post. If not let me be clear here. I would.

However state Rs weren't about to pay for something that could have gone either way and weren't looking to convince me in the first place.
Faustus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

This post is laughable. You talk about the process as if you have any clue. You don't.

Take a look at Will's post above yours. The cheating is caught on camera and you don't even care. Pathetic. And the cheating amounted to millions of votes nationwide. You're blind, deluded or a liar if you don't see that.

This is a surprise! I hardly expected personal attacks based on suggesting that more reputable auditors might be more broadly accepted, and that the current ones undertaking the endeavor were only retained by local Rs to pander to their electorate.

It's true I haven't been taking into account the leaks from the state Rs and their hired guns before the actual report showing that you were right all along is released.

I'll excuse myself having soiled the vibe of the thread, which is my want from time to time.
Carry on.
First Page Last Page
Page 468 of 597
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.