Quote:

---

They purposely created an error so the ballot (vote) could be manipulated.

---

But then they were instructed to turn off the over vote feature so those ballots were not kicked out. Not in New Hampshire.

Back to the Georgia hearing. Plaintiffs requested scanning of the mail in ballot envelopes. Judge ruled that scanning the front of the envelopes but not the back since that is where the voters sign them. Only problem is the plaintiffs also wanted to see a date and time stamps on when they were received and that was also on the back. Judge asked them to come up with a possible work around.

Plaintiffs advised the court that the 600 dpi scanner needs to not compress any images, need to be in an uncompressed format. The court said they have one that can be used but not sure it is the right one. So, judge doesn't want a third party vendor to do the scanning so whatever scanner is sued will have to be bought by plaintiffs or Fulton County or maybe even the court, depending on how much they cost.

I work in industrial computer controls and they are slow to upgrade things because of the certification process. They will keep using ancient parts until they are basically forced to upgrade. This is even more exaggerated when dealing with government entities like the nuclear industry because that is just unbearably bureaucratic. I wonder if this is part of the reasoning. They have all of the certification on all the parts and they don't want to spend the time and money and risk of not getting certified.


Or they are just lazy or incompetent...

FHKChE07 said:

---

I work in industrial computer controls and they are slow to upgrade things because of the certification process. They will keep using ancient parts until they are basically forced to upgrade. This is even more exaggerated when dealing with government entities like the nuclear industry because that is just unbearably bureaucratic. I wonder if this is part of the reasoning. They have all of the certification on all the parts and they don't want to spend the time and money and risk of not getting certified.


Or they are just lazy or incompetent...

---

In the case of New Hampshire and Vermont, LHS has a monopoly.

aggiehawg said:

---

Quote:

---

They purposely created an error so the ballot (vote) could be manipulated.

---

But then they were instructed to turn off the over vote feature so those ballots were not kicked out. Not in New Hampshire.

---

Not sure what "turn off" would mean. You clearly can't vote for two candidates in the same race. I think in that case the machine doesn't tabulate the unreadable ballot in which case the Republican vote isn't counted. A Democrat is going to blacken that bubble anyway so there's no error in a straight Democrat ballot and that ballot will be counted. So even more effective than manually adjudicating unreadable ballots.

Quote:

---

Not sure what "turn off" would mean. You clearly can't vote for two candidates in the same race. I think in that case the machine doesn't tabulate the unreadable ballot in which case the Republican vote isn't counted.

---

And that's what happened in Windham. The Republicans were each shorted by 300 votes.

HumpitPuryear said:

---

The design of the ballot in the video below is very suspect. Note how the Democrat St. Laurent is shifted down within the block for that office relative to the Republican candidates in the next column. That voting bubble aligns perfectly with the fold in the ballot. Had it been aligned with the Republican candidates the fold would have been between bubbles and had no influence on the machine read. This was purposely done. The machine misreading folds is cover for this blatant cheat. The tell is in the design of the ballot.

WINDHAM:🚨 Close up look of Nov 3rd ballot!@WAuditors are currently forensically analyzing absentee ballots under a microscope.

An election official describes machines rejecting thousands of ballots during the election. @RealAmVoice pic.twitter.com/9NeT7wOoxq

— Heather Mullins - Real America’s Voice (RAV-TV) (@TalkMullins) May 24, 2021

---

I'm sure thats just a coincidence

aggiehawg said:

---

Link

---

Since CodeMonkey was quoted again, figured I'd share his Telegram channel.

https://t.me/CodeMonkeyZ

HumpitPuryear said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

Quote:

---

They purposely created an error so the ballot (vote) could be manipulated.

---

But then they were instructed to turn off the over vote feature so those ballots were not kicked out. Not in New Hampshire.

---

Not sure what "turn off" would mean. You clearly can't vote for two candidates in the same race. I think in that case the machine doesn't tabulate the unreadable ballot in which case the Republican vote isn't counted. A Democrat is going to blacken that bubble anyway so there's no error in a straight Democrat ballot and that ballot will be counted. So even more effective than manually adjudicating unreadable ballots.

---

I think this is the game. Silvestro was the guy to push this through. He made the case that sending large envelopes would be too costly thereby guaranteeing that the ballots would be folded benefitting democrats. As far as "turning off" the settings, it's hard to say what that affects. It would seem that perhaps it just doesn't count the ballot and not flag it in any way as an overvote for manual adjudication. It would be a nice quiet way to toss out straight republican ballots.

Shameless bump.

aggiehawg said:

---

Link

Sooo, who or how many of them are lying??

---

It would be nice if we had a media that was somewhat curious about that question.

aggiehawg said:

---

..
Sooo, who or how many of them are lying??

---

Just a guess, but at different points in time all of them have lied.

Wish all the judges involved in the plaintiffs suits to stop the audits were following this thread.

aggiehawg, you have accumulated an incredible amount of information and made very discerning conclusions about tha evidence/information. Thank you and all the contributors.

SCOOP: Private Investigator Says AG Barr Told Him to Stop Investigating Election Fraud Claims https://t.co/Ww5ny9XiQJ

— The Election Wizard (@Wizard_Predicts) May 29, 2021

https://t.co/m18tUhTsc7

— Jess (@jessiprincey) May 28, 2021

Wait, isn't Hursti the guy that said it Diebold machines could be hacked? Could these resets/starts be related to testing how the machines are reading the ballots in different ways like the upfold and downfold someone posted earlier?

will25u said:

---

https://t.co/m18tUhTsc7

— Jess (@jessiprincey) May 28, 2021

---

Oh, he actually replied to her tweet.

So, it was explained before anything was done, what will be done and why. And the election officials who actually operated machine, said it aloud with every machine. It was said aloud many times that the cards need to be resetted BACK TO THE PRE-ELECTION MODE.

— Harri "scofield" Hursti (@HarriHursti) May 29, 2021

will25u said:

---

SCOOP: Private Investigator Says AG Barr Told Him to Stop Investigating Election Fraud Claims https://t.co/Ww5ny9XiQJ

— The Election Wizard (@Wizard_Predicts) May 29, 2021

---

He wanted Trump out

captkirk said:

---

will25u said:

---

SCOOP: Private Investigator Says AG Barr Told Him to Stop Investigating Election Fraud Claims https://t.co/Ww5ny9XiQJ

— The Election Wizard (@Wizard_Predicts) May 29, 2021

---

He wanted Trump out

---

So did everybody else who conspired to commit treason to accomplish that. He should get at least one round of what they should be getting in honor of the assistance he provided to the coup plotters.

will25u said:

---

SCOOP: Private Investigator Says AG Barr Told Him to Stop Investigating Election Fraud Claims https://t.co/Ww5ny9XiQJ

— The Election Wizard (@Wizard_Predicts) May 29, 2021

---

Thanks for the post. That, if true (which at this point I do), is scary.

TRM said:

---

will25u said:

---

https://t.co/m18tUhTsc7

— Jess (@jessiprincey) May 28, 2021

---

Oh, he actually replied to her tweet.

So, it was explained before anything was done, what will be done and why. And the election officials who actually operated machine, said it aloud with every machine. It was said aloud many times that the cards need to be resetted BACK TO THE PRE-ELECTION MODE.

— Harri "scofield" Hursti (@HarriHursti) May 29, 2021

---

I believe this was posted earlier:
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/05/breaking-exclusive-windham-new-hampshire-2020-election-audit-started-two-three-auditors-conflicts-pelosi-schumer/

" Some history is critical. NH's Diebold AccuVote OS voting machines are nationally infamous for being hackable and it was Harri Hursti, Ph.D., himself, as the invited computer scientist "hacker" who, back in December 2005, proved to the country that these Diebold memory cards could be easily hacked and manipulated to secretly change vote counts. He also demonstrated that his hacks were absolutely undetectable.
All Hursti did was take a Diebold, credit card-sized memory card, quickly pre-program it using an inexpensive, readily available agricultural scanning device, and stick it in the Diebold optical scanner. No keys or passwords were needed. His hack happened fast. This staged election in which the outcome was known by all, ended up with Hursti's hacked memory card secretly deciding the "election," and whose count reflected Hursti's choice"
So he proved he machines were EASILY HACKED

In addition from the article:
" Also, why, did Verified Voting appear to disappear evidence of Hursti's seat upon its advisory board?

VV's current webpage shows he is not a member. However, the Internet Archive tells a very different story. As of April 29, Hursti is shown as being a member. On May 3, the NH AG and SoS hired him to be a member of their audit team. Two days later, on May 5, any evidence of Hursti's participation as an advisor with Verified Voting had been deleted."

What the hell. The guy proves the machines are garbage and easily hackable then works for Verified Voting but his role is hidden.

Again I believe this was posted before but now with the tapes showing memory card deletions something just doesn't seem right. Why not duplicate the memory cards to retain information then proceed with the audit?

Quote:

---

The Arizona Senate may sign a deal for another 2020 election review in Maricopa County following reports that some overseers of the audit are dissatisfied with the process.

The present audit, which includes a review of 2.1 million ballots cast in the state's November election in the county, has been underway since April 23 at the Veterans Memorial Coliseum in Phoenix, led by the hired firm Cyber Ninjas. Audit liaison, former Secretary of State Ken Bennett, told a reporter with CBS5 News on Thursday that hand counters had gone through more than 800,000 ballots so far. Organizers have said they hope to finish by the end of June.

But the GOP-led state Senate is already eyeing another recount that would be entirely electronic, running digital images of ballots through a program to count all votes cast for every race on the county's ballot, according to the Arizona Republic. Bennett told the outlet they are considering a California-based election transparency nonprofit group called Citizens Oversight for the job, and the results from both audits could be compared to one another.

---

Quote:

---

Voting machines create digital images of ballots each time one is fed into it. The Maricopa County Board of Supervisors already provided the state Senate with those images as part of subpoenas a judge ruled in late February as "legal and enforceable."
Lutz told the Washington Examiner he would prefer to receive the election data directly from the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors in order to separate the copies of election information used in the Cyber Ninjas audit from the information Citizens Oversight would be processing for its own recount. He noted he recently visited the site of the present Maricopa audit.
When Lutz was asked whether he is entirely confident his system could accurately audit the county's election, Lutz told the Arizona Republic his team sometimes sees "mistakes that are made on our side."
He talked more about this issue with the Washington Examiner on Friday. "Of course it's computer evaluation which is really really good," Lutz said, adding: "Our computer evaluation, when we disagree with a [election] vendor, We're 97% right." Lutz also said he has "observed many many audits, probably in the hundreds."

---

Link

Interesting thread on GA.

New: Updated Georgia Precincts for Presidential Election See full video https://t.co/IFnjXrT1OR

(and/or download direct link .mp4 at https://t.co/iLyi5LntaZ ) pic.twitter.com/gZxtPziyWC

— ⏳ Prof. Zhuang Zhou’s Crooked Yet SteadFast Tree (@politicalwilli) May 28, 2021

So gonna do a short (hopefully) explanatory thread on the GA election chart video I posted the other day (here: ) https://t.co/uhm7QmtLZg pic.twitter.com/eGVF3hwvNs

— ⏳ Prof. Zhuang Zhou’s Crooked Yet SteadFast Tree (@politicalwilli) May 29, 2021

captkirk said:

---

---

China engineered a virus, now comes the stolen election truth

Hopefully it won't be long until a person is implicated in all this and starts talking. Get to the table and work out their own immunity for testimony deal and roll up all the guilty parties.

Long video explaining what happened in Windham, FWW.

aggiehawg said:

---

Link

---

It's good to see CodeMonkeyZ didn't just bail after the Q charade stopped.

There is a pretty good documentary with Ron featured prominently available on HBO Max:
Q: Into the Storm.