#BREAKING: U.S. Postal Service Worker Admits To Dumping Election Ballots In Oct. 2020 - https://t.co/sebAZY6pgn pic.twitter.com/0xpDVKn6Hb

— Breaking911 (@Breaking911) May 27, 2021

Damnit!

Quote:

---

A judge in Georgia told parties in an election integrity case on May 27 that a previously scheduled meeting at a ballot storage warehouse was canceled after officials filed a flurry of motions in the case.
Henry County Superior Court Judge Brian Amero said a May 28 meeting was no longer taking place because of motions filed by Fulton County, the county's Board of Registration and Elections, and the county's clerk of Superior and Magistrate Courts, a spokesperson for the court confirmed to The Epoch Times.

Amero said the motions must be heard before the plaintiffs can gain access to the absentee ballots. He proposed a June 21 hearing, but the order scheduling the hearing hasn't yet been filed.

"It seems like a desperation move. The silver lining is that we now have more time to perfect the changes we had to make in our inspection plan," Garland Favorito, the lead petitioner, told The Epoch Times via email.

County officials argued that the complaint filed by voters should be dismissed because the petitioners failed to serve, or even attempt to serve, the county. They also said Fulton County doesn't have final control over elections, that petitioners aren't entitled to declaratory judgment, and that petitioners haven't complied with election contest requirements.

---

Link

aggiehawg said:

---

Damnit!

Quote:

---

A judge in Georgia told parties in an election integrity case on May 27 that a previously scheduled meeting at a ballot storage warehouse was canceled after officials filed a flurry of motions in the case.
Henry County Superior Court Judge Brian Amero said a May 28 meeting was no longer taking place because of motions filed by Fulton County, the county's Board of Registration and Elections, and the county's clerk of Superior and Magistrate Courts, a spokesperson for the court confirmed to The Epoch Times.

Amero said the motions must be heard before the plaintiffs can gain access to the absentee ballots. He proposed a June 21 hearing, but the order scheduling the hearing hasn't yet been filed.

"It seems like a desperation move. The silver lining is that we now have more time to perfect the changes we had to make in our inspection plan," Garland Favorito, the lead petitioner, told The Epoch Times via email.

County officials argued that the complaint filed by voters should be dismissed because the petitioners failed to serve, or even attempt to serve, the county. They also said Fulton County doesn't have final control over elections, that petitioners aren't entitled to declaratory judgment, and that petitioners haven't complied with election contest requirements.

---

Link

---

Whenever I read crap like that, I am reminded why I hate our overburdensome legal system that seems to be constructed specifically for lawyers to find procedural ways to stand in the way of a simple pursuit of justice.

Why do you think I got disgusted and stopped practicing? Because of crap like that.

American Hardwood said:

---

will25u said:

---

#BREAKING: U.S. Postal Service Worker Admits To Dumping Election Ballots In Oct. 2020 - https://t.co/sebAZY6pgn pic.twitter.com/0xpDVKn6Hb

— Breaking911 (@Breaking911) May 27, 2021

---

Let's hear from the "no evidence" crowd please. I'll hang up and listen.

---

I'm all for investigating/auditing the election because, at a minimum, gross misconduct and incompetence was part of that picture. As for this guy, it seems like he just dumped mail and headed for the bar. The fact the haul included ballots appears to be coincidental.

American Hardwood said:

---

will25u said:

---

#BREAKING: U.S. Postal Service Worker Admits To Dumping Election Ballots In Oct. 2020 - https://t.co/sebAZY6pgn pic.twitter.com/0xpDVKn6Hb

— Breaking911 (@Breaking911) May 27, 2021

---

Let's hear from the "no evidence" crowd please. I'll hang up and listen.

---

Most secure election eva! /tds

Coincidence or not, I remember the angry protesting from democrats that there is NO EVIDENCE that ballots were dumped and that it was all Trump team lies.

Quote:

---

It is good that they have the contact info for a good criminal defense attorney. I suspect they will need them in the near future.

---

Problem is that two highly crim defense attorneys are being paid from taxpayer funds. That won't continue too long, leading to a substitution of counsel and another massive delay. It's all a game of legal procedural one-up-man-ship to them.

I sense the hand Perkins, Cooie here. Anything to delay, deflect and hope they'll get tired or tapped out financially and go away.

I know you guys are tired of hearing me say this but in my day, the judge would be livid about this and deny the motion to dismiss sua sponte. Can't object to the court's jurisdiction after appearing not in a special appearance to contest jurisdiction first. Hiring new counsel doesn't change that. Hiring criminal defense attorneys on the taxpayers' dime in a civil suit, an election related civil suit no less, raises huge red flags for the judge.

He should demand an explanation and well before the end of June. Zoom them all in at 7:30 in the morning, if need be. Some may think that the plaintiffs' attorneys should have a chance to respond and not have to do that on the fly but truth is under these circumstances, judge likely doesn't need to even hear that much from them.

Unless Georgia's laws of civil procedure are way outside of the norm, that is.

REPORT: Wisconsin Assembly Speaker Robin Vos will hire three retired police officers to investigate parts of the 2020 general election. The investigation will be overseen by an attorney and given a broad mandate. -- Milwaukee Journal Sentinel.

— The Election Wizard (@Wizard_Predicts) May 27, 2021

will25u said:

---

REPORT: Wisconsin Assembly Speaker Robin Vos will hire three retired police officers to investigate parts of the 2020 general election. The investigation will be overseen by an attorney and given a broad mandate. -- Milwaukee Journal Sentinel.

— The Election Wizard (@Wizard_Predicts) May 27, 2021

---

Overseen by "an attorney"?????? That's a bit too vague for me.

Assuming only Dominion has the administrator passwords, in a just world those responsible that have the passwords should be charged with obstructing and given space in a jail cell until they offer up the passwords.
Aren't they defying a court order or something?

American Hardwood said:

---

will25u said:

---

#BREAKING: U.S. Postal Service Worker Admits To Dumping Election Ballots In Oct. 2020 - https://t.co/sebAZY6pgn pic.twitter.com/0xpDVKn6Hb

— Breaking911 (@Breaking911) May 27, 2021

---

Let's hear from the "no evidence" crowd please. I'll hang up and listen.

---

You don't have to sell me with a tweet. 280k plus fraudulent ballots were shipped into PA and concerned moderates went blithely about their business as if the tweet didn't happen.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/12/driving-completed-ballots-ny-pennsylvania-decided-speak-update-usps-contract-truck-driver-transferred-288000-fraudulent-ballots-ny-pa-speaks-presser/

The tweeter admitted it happened. It's like a glitch in the matrix.

No glitch, gaslighting part of the plan and working on ,evidently here, many.

TRADUCTOR said:

---

No glitch, gaslighting part of the plan and working on ,evidently here, many.

---

I think you have to take the tweets at face value, notwithstanding how sexy the consonance is between glitch and gaslighting.

Arizona Secretary of State STRIPPED of Duties After Trying to Interfere in Election Audit by GOP State House, Power Given to AG Until End of 2023 https://t.co/s9YBs7n9Bg

— Matt Couch (@RealMattCouch) May 28, 2021

Back to Georgia. Fulton County's memo in support of their MTD is HERE.

Favorito, et. al originally filed suit in December against certain individuals including Richard Barron, the director of election. They then moved to substitute parties by naming Fulton County and their election sub-agencies. Court granted that motion in April. Once defendants are substituted, they still need to be served. That is true. And apparently Fulton County has not been served, to date.

However,

Quote:

---

County officials argued that the complaint filed by voters should be dismissed because the petitioners failed to serve, or even attempt to serve, the county. They also said Fulton County doesn't have final control over elections, that petitioners aren't entitled to declaratory judgment, and that petitioners haven't complied with election contest requirements.

Amero heard in a hearing last week that petitioners weren't able to properly examine ballot images they've received because of their low resolution200 dots per inch (DPI). Amero granted the petitioners' request to unseal the mailed ballots and said they could go to where they were stored in order to observe county workers create higher resolution images of the ballots.

Amero mentioned during the hearing that no parties had filed a motion to dismiss, allowing petitioners to obtain some discovery.

During the hearing, lawyers for the county urged the judge not to grant access to the ballots.

---

Link

So they were at that hearing and represented by counsel and the judge had to remind them that they had not filed a motion to dismiss and thus discovery could proceed. Such an appearance and argument before the court is usually deemed a waiver of both service and jurisdictional claims, unless those are specifically reserved. I can only assume they were not since the judge went ahead and issued the order granting the inspection and further ordered he would issue specific instructions on how that was to be done. If those issues were still up in the air at that time, he would have ordered defendants to file their motions and do so very quickly and not ruled on the plaintiffs' request for a closer inspection. I haven't seen if the Board of Registration and Elections had separate counsel at that hearing or just left it to the Fulton County attorneys to handle?

It now appears the defendants have retained separate counsel. From The Epoch Times:

Quote:

---

Henry County Superior Court Judge Brian Amero said a May 28 meeting was no longer taking place because of motions filed by Fulton County, the county's Board of Registration and Elections, and the county's clerk of Superior and Magistrate Courts, a spokesperson for the court confirmed to The Epoch Times.

---

Those are separate motions, suggesting different counsel. Having different counsel for the subagency of the county, the Board of Registration and Elections, suggests their legal interests are not aligned but the Board is still a part of the County's operations. So how can Fulton County not be a proper party??

Maybe I'm missing some quirk in Georgia law and Fulton County Board of Registration and Elections actually work for and are paid by the state and not the county? Odd.

will25u said:

---

WINDHAM!🚨@WAuditors @HarriHursti took this video with my phone showing the inside of a voting machine & gave a detailed explanation of what you’re seeing. Check it out! Transparency from the audit team has been very good. I give credit where it’s due. @RealAmVoice pic.twitter.com/cO90bA5etX

— Heather Mullins - Real America’s Voice (RAV-TV) (@TalkMullins) May 26, 2021

---

Wow, that is some Ancient technology! Almost all through-hole devices (chip leads that goe through the circuit board) instead of surface mount. This stuff was designed in the 80's. Manufactured possibly into the 90's.

In many cases, designs like this continue on exactly as they were because devices have been certified by a federal agency and it is costly and takes a long time to re-certify. The parts become difficult/impossible to get over time.

American Hardwood said:

---

will25u said:

---

Raffensperger Makes Shocking Pivot, Now Supports Fulton County, Georgia Forensic Audit

Quote:

---

Anti-Trump Secretary of State of Georgia Brad Raffensperger, who once petitioned the court to NOT have a forensic audit in Georgia, now shockingly supports the forensic audit in his state.

...

But after a Georgia judge ruled late last week that a group of voters must be allowed to view copies of all 147,000 absentee ballots cast in the state's largest county, in yet another disinformation-driven campaign, Mr. Raffensperger voiced his support for the effort, saying that inspecting the ballots would provide "another layer of transparency and citizen engagement."

---

More in the article.

---

Maybe he is smart enough to see how super bad it appears to be trying to prevent an audit as seen in Arizona. But, my gut tells me he is trying to CYA for his own ineptitude lying/cheating/stealing.

---

FIFY...

aggieforester05 said:

---

I really despise agenda driven journalists. The statement I bolded is so unnecessary to the story. Why can they not just report the facts without inserting their deranged opinion?

---

Because they are doing their part to make or influence the news rather than report the news.

"Absolute power corrupts absolutely."
-- applies to "journalists" just as much as politicians...

aggiehawg said:

---

MR Gadsden said:

---

aggiehawg - i just wanted to express my gratitude to you for staying on top of all of this. I have been away from this thread for a while and it took me most of the morning to catch up. Outside of this thread you don't hear about any of this. It must take a good amount of your time to stay on top of all of this and wanted you to know it's appreciated.

---

You're welcome. Some days it's easier than others. Flurry of activity for a day or two and then not much else coming out. Have to go down some rat holes to find information at times.

Don't know how much it will matter in the end though.

---

It matters to us and our circles of influence. What you are doing is of extreme importance!

Whether we reach a point where we have elections with integrity in the future or not is uncertain, but exposing the truth always matters!

Back to NH.

Quote:

---

This revelation is news to the public, but our trusted politicians and Jeff Silvestro of LHS Associates knew this would happen months before the election occurred.

Irrespective of their knowledge, they collectively committed gross negligence when they failed to implement corrections that would have protected the voters of New Hampshire.

Moreover, Philip J. Abirached, Chairman of the Windham Republican Town Committee reported yesterday that "the function of rejecting overvotes was turned off per the state's request."

---

Wait, what? Who turned that function off? If they knew in advance that folds in the mail in ballots could be misinterpreted as "votes" wouldn't they want that function on?? So the ballots would get kicked back to the election workers and addressed by hand?

Quote:

---

Found on the Secretary of State's website under sos.nh.gov.minutes-may-19-2 were the transcribed minutes for the "Meeting of the Select Committee on 2020 Emergency Election Support" held on May 19th, 2020 at 2:00 p.m.

This meeting was convened to determine how to implement Covid-19 mandates such as PPE requirements and sanitizing protocol for the November 3rd election proceedings.

The meeting style was a "question and answer" format that also included discussion surrounding the anticipated influx of mail-in ballots.

All of the participants were clearly listed at the top of the minutes to include House Election Law Committee Chair, Rep. Barbara J. Griffin; David Scanlan, Deputy Secretary of State; Orville "Bud" Fitch, Legal Counsel to the Secretary of State; Nicholas Chong Yen, Assistant Attorney General; among others.

Except one. There is one person not listed as either "Member" or "Participating", but who piped into the meeting unexpectedly pages deep into the transcribed scroll.

That person was Jeff Silvestro, President of LHS Associates. (AKA Dominion.) The transcription refers to him as Jeff Silvestro of AHI Associates. (AHI is not a keystroke combination indicative of a typo. Not even close.) His participation in the meeting though seemingly covert was instrumental toward the production and decision-making concerns of the ballots used in the 2020 General Election.

When a question was posed about the absentee ballots and whether or not they ought to consider using manila envelopes for people to remit the ballots to avoid having to fold them, Silvestro drew from his pre-existing knowledge.

"Folded ballots always have a higher possibility of being misread or rejected. The creases can cause shadowing and result in misreading/rejection," Silvestro said.

"I'd like to see less folded ballots, but I don't think it's possible with what we're trying to accomplish", he said.

What were they trying to accomplish? Why did they not eliminate the problem entirely and go with manila envelopes?

Silvestro, as it turns out, had advised the committee that the November ballots would likely be 17" or 18" at which point "postage would probably get cost-prohibitive".

---

Again, wouldn't they want the overvote feature on? They knew they would have problems.

Quote:

---

The design and printing of these ballots as it would square with the manner in which the machines were programmed to receive them, would prove integral to the Windham audit results.

So, who printed the ballots?

It has also been reported that Evans Printing Company in Bow, New Hampshire is the non-certified company that prints our federal election ballots. But who provides them with the design and copy?
Buried deeper within the scroll of the transcribed Minutes of May 19th, 2020, Silvestro provides the seminal information.

"There are technical limitations within the programming software that designs the ballots and the code which goes around the perimeter and back of the ballot," he said.

---

Quote:

---

Strangely, and out of nowhere, Barbara Griffin (whose involvement we'll discuss later) changed the subject completely when she asked Silvestro about putting a sheet of paper onto each voting station's surface for the in-person booths.

Not so fast, Barbara. What about his answer? Programming software? Codes around the perimeter and backs of the ballots?

That's a pretty sophisticated answer coming from the very Dominion supplier who Bud Fitch, Deputy to the Secretary of State, initially denied was involved in the printing of our ballots. (Phone interview of April 2, 2021.)

When pressed on the matter, Fitch admitted that LHS would have to be involved in order to make certain the ballots were compatible with the machines.

Does it matter, really, what company actually prints the ballots or would it be more relevant to our concerns who provides the "programming software that designs the ballots and the code which goes around the perimeter and backs of the ballots"?

---

I found that in the Runbeck Election Services materials as well. The graphic design of the particular ballots and how they are to be printed is done by the voting machine vendor. In NH, that would be LHS using machines owned by Dominion.

Quote:

---

Back to Windham and the preliminary results of the audit. Some machines, not all, misread the ballotsthe very same ballots that Silvestro (at the very least) helped to configure.

The Windham Forensic Audit Team led by Harri Hursti, in a genius and unexpected move, proceeded to feed leftover absentee ballots (which they had filled out) to replicate resultant voting machine readings that can't possibly be accidental.

It is difficult to describe in writing how the configuration of the candidates and the staggering of parties contributed to the lop-sided misreadings but suffice it to saythat crease zeroed over a democrat's target bubble causing over-votes for straight-ticket republican votes for that particular race.

Quizzically, not all the machines read the ballots with identical results.

Perhaps a discovery in Bedford could help to explain the discrepancy.

It has been conclusively determined that Bedford consigned three machines, in particular, to tally the mail-in votes exclusively. Other towns report the same or similar protocol.

All of the mail-in ballots were dedicated exclusively to certain machines and certain machines only. It cannot be determined if every single town in New Hampshire followed this method, but it definitely was the case in several towns.

---

Quote:

---

Why were the mail-in ballots (replete with creases) fed into specific machines? One would hope that those machines were custom programmed by LHS to correctly handle and eliminate the anticipated problem since they also decided to disable the feature that would have alerted election workers.

---

LINK

The design of the ballot in the video below is very suspect. Note how the Democrat St. Laurent is shifted down within the block for that office relative to the Republican candidates in the next column. That voting bubble aligns perfectly with the fold in the ballot. Had it been aligned with the Republican candidates the fold would have been between bubbles and had no influence on the machine read. This was purposely done. The machine misreading folds is cover for this blatant cheat. The tell is in the design of the ballot.

WINDHAM:🚨 Close up look of Nov 3rd ballot!@WAuditors are currently forensically analyzing absentee ballots under a microscope.

An election official describes machines rejecting thousands of ballots during the election. @RealAmVoice pic.twitter.com/9NeT7wOoxq

— Heather Mullins - Real America’s Voice (RAV-TV) (@TalkMullins) May 24, 2021

Quote:

---

This was purposely done. The machine misreading folds is cover for this blatant cheat. The tell is in the design of the ballot.

---

Agree. And that is a part of what Pulitzer has been saying since the beginning. The machine does what the coding tells it to do and by coding, I mean on the ballot itself. Those codes (bars, squares, diamonds whatever) direct the machine where to look on the paper.

aggiehawg said:

---

Back to NH.
.
LINK

---

Quote from the link:
As previously reported, Silvestro benefitted from a clause stricken from SB 43 (now law) that barred him from any involvement with the Windham audit due to his clear conflict of interest.

The "conflict of interest" clause stricken from the bill was initiated by Republican Barbara Griffin, Chair of the House Election Law Committee, and took place about an hour before SB 43 passed. (Zoom, House Election Law Committee meeting, March 10th, 2021.)

What the hell

This is an older article that does not reflect that the hearing originally scheduled for this morning is no longer taking place because of intervening motions filed by the defendants But it is noteworthy for a few reasons and it has the video of the nearly two hour court hearing regarding access to the absentee ballots.

Link

Quote:

---

An attorney representing Georgia citizens who secured the right to review over 145,000 absentee ballots cast in Fulton County in November told the judge overseeing the case that a top county election official could not say how many absentee ballots were printed.

Plaintiff's attorney Bob Cheeley told Judge Brian Amero on Friday that Fulton County Registration Chief Ralph Jones, during a pretrial deposition, estimated the county printed 20,000 absentee ballots through a vendor in the 10 days leading up to the election.

Jones could not give the attorney a precise number.

---

Remember when I posted the press release from Fulton County lauding the efforts of Runbeck Election Systems and Dominion to assist the county in their absentee (mail-in) ballot efforts?

Quote:

---

"So I asked for the invoice, during the deposition, for those ballots. ... As of now, I don't have the invoice yet, so we still don't know if it's 20,000 or some other number," Cheeley told Amero.

"I asked Mr. Jones questions about chain of custody of those papers [ballots] and who was limited access to those papers because that's very, very important that you keep that under close scrutiny," the attorney continued.

"And I asked him also how many of those papers were actually printed and sent out to voters, and he didn't know."

Cheeley further recounted that he queried Jones about whether any of the ballots were left over, but the official could not say.

---

Quote:

---

Cheeley told The Western Journal via email Wednesday that he had yet to receive those figures from the county concerning the ballots printed and used, or a copy of the printing invoice, despite the deposition of Jones taking place back on May 17.

"I have served a Request for Production of Documents for these in order to force the county to do so," the lawyer wrote.

---

Hmm. Maybe that's why the defendants filed to stop discovery pending the resolution of those (questionable) motions to dismiss?

Quote:

---

An independent report contracted by the Georgia State Election Board and released on Jan. 12 determined that there were many abnormalities in Fulton County's November election, including some matters that involved Jones himself.

"There were persistent chain of custody issues throughout the entire absentee ballot processing system," the report said.

It added that "the fact that ballots were delivered to State Farm Arena in unsecured mail carts is very concerning."

"Protocol for securing ballots exists not only in securing the ballots themselves but also ensuring no ballot stuffing occurred," it said.

"The problem was exacerbated by poor managerial processes by Ralph Jones, who failed to do intake counts for provisional ballots."

The report also noted that some staff seemed to not understand that absentee ballots needed to be verified before they were counted.

---

Quote:

---

While standing with election observers, "Jones had to intervene to stop a temporary staffer from moving a pile of recently-accepted but unverified absentee ballots into the stack going straight to State Farm Arena for scanning and counting."

"Had Jones not been there with me (the election observer) to catch the mistake, it is safe to assume that those ballots would've been counted as if they had been verified."

---

Report

I have been listening/watching that hearing from May 21. It was an evidentiary hearing partially in person and by zoom. The Fulton County Senior Attorney, Cheryl Ringer appeared by zoom and the Sec of State's counsel was (actually represented by an attorney in the AG's office) was there in person.

Plaintiffs' attorney Cheeley presented a forensic accountant who was qualified as an expert and testified as such. Ringer cross-examined that expert. I'm about an hour into it and there is no mention of a motion to dismiss, complaint about lack of service of process, lack of jurisdiction nor proper party arguments being made.

In my book, that would deem those issues were waived.

Plaintiffs' second expert was a materials and chemicals scientist, worked for DARPA at DOD and Georgia Tech's research institute. She detects counterfeits. Qualified as an expert and no objections. She needs the ballots to use UV light on them.

aggiehawg said:

---

Plaintiffs' second expert was a materials and chemicals scientist, worked for DARPA at DOD and Georgia Tech's research institute. She detects counterfeits. Qualified as an expert and no objections. She needs the ballots to use UV light on them.

---

Seems I have heard this method of examination before, why yesyes I have. And we have idiot leftists progressives mocking this audit process used in Maricopa county.

HumpitPuryear said:

---

The design of the ballot in the video below is very suspect. Note how the Democrat St. Laurent is shifted down within the block for that office relative to the Republican candidates in the next column. That voting bubble aligns perfectly with the fold in the ballot. Had it been aligned with the Republican candidates the fold would have been between bubbles and had no influence on the machine read. This was purposely done. The machine misreading folds is cover for this blatant cheat. The tell is in the design of the ballot.

WINDHAM:🚨 Close up look of Nov 3rd ballot!@WAuditors are currently forensically analyzing absentee ballots under a microscope.

An election official describes machines rejecting thousands of ballots during the election. @RealAmVoice pic.twitter.com/9NeT7wOoxq

— Heather Mullins - Real America’s Voice (RAV-TV) (@TalkMullins) May 24, 2021

---

The way that ballot is arranged has to be purposeful with the democrats for that race being the only misaligned entry. On the other side of the coin, what makes a state house race in NH worth the trouble? What the hell is going on?

richardag said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

Plaintiffs' second expert was a materials and chemicals scientist, worked for DARPA at DOD and Georgia Tech's research institute. She detects counterfeits. Qualified as an expert and no objections. She needs the ballots to use UV light on them.

---

Seems I have heard this method of examination before, why yesyes I have. And we have idiot leftists progressives mocking this audit process used in Maricopa county.

---

She also wants to study the ovals and ink and impressions on the ballots whether machine made or human made. Just like Pulitzer.

LOL. Pultizer was available online to testify as a witness for the plaintiffs by zoom. Judge thought he would be cumulative and redundant to what the materials and chemical scientist had just said. So they didn't need him.

Sterling82 said:

---

HumpitPuryear said:

---

The design of the ballot in the video below is very suspect. Note how the Democrat St. Laurent is shifted down within the block for that office relative to the Republican candidates in the next column. That voting bubble aligns perfectly with the fold in the ballot. Had it been aligned with the Republican candidates the fold would have been between bubbles and had no influence on the machine read. This was purposely done. The machine misreading folds is cover for this blatant cheat. The tell is in the design of the ballot.

WINDHAM:🚨 Close up look of Nov 3rd ballot!@WAuditors are currently forensically analyzing absentee ballots under a microscope.

An election official describes machines rejecting thousands of ballots during the election. @RealAmVoice pic.twitter.com/9NeT7wOoxq

— Heather Mullins - Real America’s Voice (RAV-TV) (@TalkMullins) May 24, 2021

---

The way that ballot is arranged has to be purposeful with the democrats for that race being the only misaligned entry. On the other side of the coin, what makes a state house race in NH worth the trouble? What the hell is going on?

---

The way I understand it, the crease creates and over-vote or a condition that the machine can't reconcile. It doesn't have anything to do with that particular office. That ballot gets managed manually because the machine can't determine what to do with it and, well you know what happens then to a ballot that was clearly marked all Republican....

All they needed to do was to move the Democrat candidate list up where it was horizontally aligned with the Republican candidates and the fold would not fall on a bubble the machine is trying to read. They did this with the full knowledge that folds on a bubble cause over-votes that need to me manually handled. They purposely created an error so the ballot (vote) could be manipulated.