Interesting point - how can a vote count be negative? According to this group up now they found multiple occurrences decrements in the vote tallies in GA - where the vote counts went down instead of up throughout the time stamped totals submitted.

Just now said; when a vote is adjudicated; it replaces the original ballot image - so the original intent of the voter (the original ballot image or intermediate images) are not kept. Only the final changes vote is kept and auditable... what?

SpreadsheetAg said:

---

Interesting point - how can a vote count be negative? According to this group up now they found multiple occurrences decrements in the vote tallies in GA - where the vote counts went down instead of up throughout the time stamped totals submitted.

Just now said; when a vote is adjudicated; it replaces the original ballot image - so the original intent of the voter (the original ballot image or intermediate images) are not kept. Only the final changes vote is kept and auditable... what?

---

I was previously a little fuzzy on what happened to the original ballot after it was "adjudicated." That got answered today and not in a good way.

Soooo, to recap. After watching all five hours of the testimony, there is little doubt there was much frickery a foot and easily provable as well. But the Sec of State is actively resisting and stonewalling every effort to get to the truth.

aggiehawg said:

---

SpreadsheetAg said:

---

Interesting point - how can a vote count be negative? According to this group up now they found multiple occurrences decrements in the vote tallies in GA - where the vote counts went down instead of up throughout the time stamped totals submitted.

Just now said; when a vote is adjudicated; it replaces the original ballot image - so the original intent of the voter (the original ballot image or intermediate images) are not kept. Only the final changes vote is kept and auditable... what?

---

I was previously a little fuzzy on what happened to the original ballot after it was "adjudicated." That got answered today and not in a good way.

Soooo, to recap. After watching all five hours of the testimony, there is little doubt there was much frickery a foot and easily provable as well. But the Sec of State is actively resisting and stonewalling every effort to get to the truth.

---

It's clear that many of these SOSs, Governors, and county election officials are more interested in covering their ass and looking good, than finding out the truth about election fraud. Their professional image is more important than any party affiliation.

This election steal scheme by the Democrats was handled just like the previous schemes of Spygate, Mueller Special Counsel and the Impeachment, lazy, sloppy and stupid. To pull this off, with all the expert geniuses and technology available would have required a group of people light years smarter than the Dopey Democrats !

aggiehawg said:

---

SpreadsheetAg said:

---

Interesting point - how can a vote count be negative? According to this group up now they found multiple occurrences decrements in the vote tallies in GA - where the vote counts went down instead of up throughout the time stamped totals submitted.

Just now said; when a vote is adjudicated; it replaces the original ballot image - so the original intent of the voter (the original ballot image or intermediate images) are not kept. Only the final changes vote is kept and auditable... what?

---

I was previously a little fuzzy on what happened to the original ballot after it was "adjudicated." That got answered today and not in a good way.

Soooo, to recap. After watching all five hours of the testimony, there is little doubt there was much frickery a foot and easily provable as well. But the Sec of State is actively resisting and stonewalling every effort to get to the truth.

---

Seems to me a slew of other states should be filing a SCOTUS case against Georgia. I realize SCOTUS weaseled out of the other one but this is ridiculous. Can they file under article 3 instead of 2? IANAL so I don't even quite understand the full implications of that but this is an outrage.

Without a court order, there's no way to compel Raffensperger to produce anything. Or produce anything in time to stop the process on January 6th.

But as Rudy told those state lawmakers today, it is their constitutional duty to protect their constituents voting rights while they can. Halfmeasures and lip service won't work.

aggieforester05 said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

SpreadsheetAg said:

---

Interesting point - how can a vote count be negative? According to this group up now they found multiple occurrences decrements in the vote tallies in GA - where the vote counts went down instead of up throughout the time stamped totals submitted.

Just now said; when a vote is adjudicated; it replaces the original ballot image - so the original intent of the voter (the original ballot image or intermediate images) are not kept. Only the final changes vote is kept and auditable... what?

---

I was previously a little fuzzy on what happened to the original ballot after it was "adjudicated." That got answered today and not in a good way.

Soooo, to recap. After watching all five hours of the testimony, there is little doubt there was much frickery a foot and easily provable as well. But the Sec of State is actively resisting and stonewalling every effort to get to the truth.

---

It's clear that many of these SOSs, Governors, and county election officials are more interested in covering their ass and looking good, than finding out the truth about election fraud. Their professional image is more important than any party affiliation.

---

Or they are compromised by kickbacks. . .

SpreadsheetAg said:

---

Interesting point - how can a vote count be negative? According to this group up now they found multiple occurrences decrements in the vote tallies in GA - where the vote counts went down instead of up throughout the time stamped totals submitted.

Just now said; when a vote is adjudicated; it replaces the original ballot image - so the original intent of the voter (the original ballot image or intermediate images) are not kept. Only the final changes vote is kept and auditable... what?

---

Also, recall that Fulton County Election Supervisor stated that of 113,000+ ballots, 106,000+ were "adjudicated" during the recount. At first I thought he misspoke but now know he did not. They were trying to hide the fraud.

Full video of today's hearing is HERE

will25u said:

---

---

What a wonderful 'swampy' 'DC-ish' solution......

will25u said:

---

This is promising.

I have been lurking recently and not really engaged, but I haven't seen any Senator publicly state they would object to the electoral college vote count.

It takes a member of the house and a member of the senate to contest the votes of a state.

Is Hawley the first senator to publicly say they object to the vote?

---

From a Texan, thanks Josh. It's too bad the rest of your Republican colleagues are too soft to stand up to lib corruption.

I believe Tuberville from Arkansas said he would sign on

oh no said:

---

We fixed the keg said:

---

I believe Tuberville from Arkansas said he would sign on

---

---

ROFLMAO, Yes, born in Ark not representing.....Jeez. This is what happens when you texags and work. So I will stop the work thing.

will25u said:

---

---

Typical. If you don't like what's happening, change the rules.

GA hearing closing statement by Giuliani.

Thread.

And the video.

It's okay. I never let work get in the way of searching for just the right .gif

oh no said:

---

It's okay. I never let work get in the way of searching for just the right .gif

---

Selection and Speed deserves blue parachute

How can Pelosi and McConnell work on a "deal" to change the rules which are in the Constitution?

smjack1 said:

---

How can Pelosi and McConnell work on a "deal" to change the rules which are in the Constitution?

---

The constitution only means something when it suits these corrupt politicians' agenda. Otherwise, they couldn't care two ****s what it says.

smjack1 said:

---

How can Pelosi and McConnell work on a "deal" to change the rules which are in the Constitution?

---

They are not really in the Constitution itself, they are in the federal statute 3 U.S.C. Sections 5 and 15. And that statute is a mess giving some wiggle room under House and Senate "rules." And SCOTUS has held in the past that the courts cannot get involved into such internal "rules" of Congress.

aggiehawg said:

---

There was a lawyer, named Halliburton who testified earlier that he had filed a FOIA request for non-destructive testing of Fulton County Ballots to be conducted under Jovan's direction. There was an agreement that he would be allowed to to do so, this morning. His teams and equipment were assembled and pulled up to the designated place at the time specified and no ballots were at that location. They were then directed to go to another location. When they got there they were told to FO and don't come back without a court order.

---

Sounds like searching Iranian nuclear sites.....

So if Pelosi and McConnell change the procedures, there is no hope for us?

smjack1 said:

---

How can Pelosi and McConnell work on a "deal" to change the rules which are in the Constitution?

---

There are no such rules in the Constitution. All it says is that the certificates with the electors votes shall be opened and the votes counted.

smjack1 said:

---

So if Pelosi and McConnell change the procedures, there is no hope for us?

---

Ever again

In fact, the Constitution does not even provide for objections to the votes of the electors. That is created by statute, which also sets up the process for resolution.

Thread.

Thanks for the reference will.

See also:

Also a good thread by Larry Schweikart.

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1344402026973646849.html

aggiehawg said:

---

Bar codes for heavily R precincts. None for heavily D precincts.

---

Where is Mapplethorpe to explain this to us?

Nothing to see here sir. Just an innocent, minor clerical error.

I see the evidence and believe Trump won 99.9%, too many things going on that if it was cheese I would not eat it. But my concern is the left has been packing courts and there is too much money behind the scenes to let me believe the Dems and CCP will let Trump win. I mean Pelosi and Feinstein are worth almost a quarter billion being members of congress. Feinstein has had 2 known CCP spies working for her in the past 10 years.