txags92 said:

---

Troutslime said:

---

txags92 said:

---

agcrock2005 said:

---

txags92 said:

---

polarice said:

---

Barr Won't Appoint Special Counsel to Probe Hunter Biden, Vote FraudBn per WSJ

---

That ok. He is gone in 2 days and the guy coming in behind him can clean up after him and do the right thing. For all his talk and eye rolling before Congress, Barr has been pretty worthless as AG.

---

After the last 4 years with an anti-establishment President, what in the hell makes you think the next guy will "do the right thing"?? Dozens of Dems should be in prison and nothing has happened except good conservative anti-establishment people being harassed and arrested (Flynn, D'Souza, etc.).

---

You misunderstand what I said. Barr is resigned as of the 23rd. The next guy Trump puts in that role will have a month to try to do what Barr didn't.

---

Or Barr is dropping the bomb on his way out.

---

I have seen nothing from Barr to make me think he was anything other than a palace guard for the deep state. Name one actual action he has taken since he became AG that makes you think he is anything else?

---

Do you know everything he's done and/or is doing?

No? Then you're just speculating like everyone else.

MooreTrucker said:

---

txags92 said:

---

Troutslime said:

---

txags92 said:

---

agcrock2005 said:

---

txags92 said:

---

polarice said:

---

Barr Won't Appoint Special Counsel to Probe Hunter Biden, Vote FraudBn per WSJ

---

That ok. He is gone in 2 days and the guy coming in behind him can clean up after him and do the right thing. For all his talk and eye rolling before Congress, Barr has been pretty worthless as AG.

---

After the last 4 years with an anti-establishment President, what in the hell makes you think the next guy will "do the right thing"?? Dozens of Dems should be in prison and nothing has happened except good conservative anti-establishment people being harassed and arrested (Flynn, D'Souza, etc.).

---

You misunderstand what I said. Barr is resigned as of the 23rd. The next guy Trump puts in that role will have a month to try to do what Barr didn't.

---

Or Barr is dropping the bomb on his way out.

---

I have seen nothing from Barr to make me think he was anything other than a palace guard for the deep state. Name one actual action he has taken since he became AG that makes you think he is anything else?

---

Do you know everything he's done and/or is doing?

No? Then you're just speculating like everyone else.

---

I am not speculating on anything. I will gladly eat crow if he has secretly put a bunch of deep state types in Guantanamo. I just haven't seen anything from him that would lead me to believe that is the case. Feel free to disabuse me of that notion by showing me something he has actually done to have earned that level of trust to believe he has a big rabbit up his sleeve. Nothing I have seen in his time so far leads me to believe he will do anything different in his last 2 days on the job.

Meanwhile in the never ending saga that is NY-22:

Quote:

---

The battle in NY-22 is still ongoing but after three counties updated their vote totals last week Republican Claudia Tenney has expanded her lead slightly from 12 votes to nineteen. Most of the change happened in Chenago County where elections officials had previously announced finding 55 uncounted ballots, 44 of which were deemed valid.

Quote:

---

After election officials counted the ballots today, Tenney picked up 25 votes and Brindisi 17 votes, said Carol Franklin, a Chenango County elections commissioner. An additional four ballots left the line for Congress blank.

State Supreme Court Justice Scott J. DelConte had ordered Chenango County to count the 44 valid affidavit ballots after they were found by election officials in their office on Dec. 1, almost a month after the election. The ballots were cast during the state's early voting period

Separately, two other counties filed paperwork with DelConte detailing changes in their vote counts: Tenney picked up one vote in Oswego County and Brindisi picked up three votes to one for Tenney in Broome County.

---

However, the biggest mess was in Oneida County which had failed to write challenges on ballots in ink and wound up losing sticky notes affixed to some ballots. The County was unable to say for certain why certain ballots had been challenged or whether they had been counted. All of the counties were supposed to complete their recanvas of the vote Friday. Then the judge planned to walk through all of the various objections today just after noon. But it appears Oneida County is once again holding up the works:

Quote:

---

The 12:30PM time has come and gone without a court hearing in the NY 22nd Congressional District lawsuit. The hold up appears to be with the Oneida County Board of Election having not yet completed their recanvass of disputed votes in the congressional race.
The Oneida County Board of Elections are the only county board not to have submitted their recanvass results in the disputed New York 22nd Congressional race to State Supreme Court Judge Scott DelConte in time for the judge to hold his scheduled hearing Monday morning.

---

Eventually, Oneida County told Judte DelConte that they won't be done with their recanvas until next week. So around 2 pm the judge started working on the ballots he has from the other counties:

---

VIA Hot Air

txags92 said:

---

I am not speculating on anything. I will gladly eat crow if he has secretly put a bunch of deep state types in Guantanamo. I just haven't seen anything from him that would lead me to believe that is the case. Feel free to disabuse me of that notion by showing me something he has actually done to have earned that level of trust to believe he has a big rabbit up his sleeve. Nothing I have seen in his time so far leads me to believe he will do anything different in his last 2 days on the job.

---

I'm not saying that you're wrong or that I know he has done anything, I'm saying that the bolded words are important. He could very well be doing things that we (and the deep state types) aren't privy to that we'll find out about in time but not right now.

So yeah, speculating...educated guessing, maybe?....but a firm "not doing anything" can't be accurately assessed.

MooreTrucker said:

---

txags92 said:

---

I am not speculating on anything. I will gladly eat crow if he has secretly put a bunch of deep state types in Guantanamo. I just haven't seen anything from him that would lead me to believe that is the case. Feel free to disabuse me of that notion by showing me something he has actually done to have earned that level of trust to believe he has a big rabbit up his sleeve. Nothing I have seen in his time so far leads me to believe he will do anything different in his last 2 days on the job.

---

I'm not saying that you're wrong or that I know he has done anything, I'm saying that the bolded words are important. He could very well be doing things that we (and the deep state types) aren't privy to that we'll find out about in time but not right now.

So yeah, speculating...educated guessing, maybe?....but a firm "not doing anything" can't be accurately assessed.

---

Feel free to bookmark my post so that when we all learn about all the amazing stuff Barr has been doing, you can remind me how wrong I was.

txags92 said:

---

Feel free to bookmark my post so that when we all learn about all the amazing stuff Barr has been doing, you can remind me how wrong I was.

---

LOL....I bookmark all your posts for just that scenario.

I feel so appreciated...

Watch the video.

will25u said:

---

---

Im no English major, but does this tweet read like they are fighting back against the mounting evidence and not the election.

Didn't the electoral college already vote? Seems like they'd be too late, right?

LostInLA07 said:

---

Didn't the electoral college already vote? Seems like they'd be too late, right?

---

I think there were seven states that had two different groups of electors cast their votes on the 14th. Once they decide which candidate won their state, they will send the electoral votes from the panel for the winning candidate to Washington for certification on the 6th of January.

LostInLA07 said:

---

Didn't the electoral college already vote? Seems like they'd be too late, right?

---

Not too late under 3 U.S.C. 15. Governor has to be on board with it though.

ETA: Not enough to get Biden less than 270 though.

texagbeliever said:

---

will25u said:

---

---

Im no English major, but does this tweet read like they are fighting back against the mounting evidence and not the election.

---

I thought the same thing. To me it reads like they are fighting the evidence of voter fraud, meaning they are defending Biden as legitimate. I know that's not what it means, obviously. But as non English major, I thought the same thing you did

will25u said:

---

---

I want to believe this, but struggle to take tweets that just say "Report" as legitimate. Any other links or sources corroborating this? I was unable to find anything else on my end.

Quote:

---

When Justices are more concerned about political fallout and their personal stake, it might be time to open Pandora's box:

Bring a Bivens claim against all Justices in District Court under theory of implied constitutional cause of action

---

Here ya go, Hawg. It was a tweet from a named Ron two hours ago. As long as we're making suggestions to fix SCOTUS under the "will never happen" clause, I thought you might find this interesting.

Clear proof of dead people voting in Pennsylvania!!!

https://www.inquirer.com/news/bruce-bartman-election-fraud-delaware-county-20201221.html

Whoop4Life said:

---

Clear proof of dead people voting in Pennsylvania!!!

https://www.inquirer.com/news/bruce-bartman-election-fraud-delaware-county-20201221.html

---

GOOD! Lock them up!

Whoop4Life said:

---

Clear proof of dead people voting in Pennsylvania!!!

https://www.inquirer.com/news/bruce-bartman-election-fraud-delaware-county-20201221.html

---

Of course the guy getting in trouble was a Trump supporter...what a joke our media has become.

WTF?!!

https://www.usatoday.com/documents/7339563-Affidavit/

That tweet seems misleading to me. It's asking for the legislatures to certify the results themselves and if they do not then those electors don't count.

Guiliani on Bannons show said it's likely wednesday arizona legislature is going to decertify.