Now do that and compare it to their savior Obama and his numbers!

PJYoung said:

---

agsalaska said:

---

While Biden may very well beat Trump, there is zero wave for Biden. None of the radical **** the left wing Democrats want can be passed, and the Republicans will almost certainly own both the house and Senate in 2022. Not to mention the Supreme Court majority and the Democrats will need a new candidate in 2024.

This is the best loss ever.

---

100% agreed.

---

Also from what I've read and has been mentioned only some here is that the GOP will have much bigger sway in redistricting for the coming decade. Not being talked about much but thats huge.

Forum Troll said:

---

PJYoung said:

---

agsalaska said:

---

While Biden may very well beat Trump, there is zero wave for Biden. None of the radical **** the left wing Democrats want can be passed, and the Republicans will almost certainly own both the house and Senate in 2022. Not to mention the Supreme Court majority and the Democrats will need a new candidate in 2024.

This is the best loss ever.

---

100% agreed.

---

Also from what I've read and has been mentioned only some here is that the GOP will have much bigger sway in redistricting for the coming decade. Not being talked about much but thats huge.

---

Don't forget that with all of the net migration to the red states, we will see those states getting more electoral votes after the 2020 census is finalized.

txags92 said:

---

Forum Troll said:

---

PJYoung said:

---

agsalaska said:

---

While Biden may very well beat Trump, there is zero wave for Biden. None of the radical **** the left wing Democrats want can be passed, and the Republicans will almost certainly own both the house and Senate in 2022. Not to mention the Supreme Court majority and the Democrats will need a new candidate in 2024.

This is the best loss ever.

---

100% agreed.

---

Also from what I've read and has been mentioned only some here is that the GOP will have much bigger sway in redistricting for the coming decade. Not being talked about much but thats huge.

---

Don't forget that with all of the net migration to the red states, we will see those states getting more electoral votes after the 2020 census is finalized.

---

Yep. More EC votes and additional House members.

Must be outdated, there's at least 2 Whataburgers in NorthWest Arkansas

J.D. c/o 05 said:

---

Onto more important things.

---

I believe Arizona, Georgia, and New Mexico need their Whataburgers removed due to 2020 election concerns.

Jim jordan was just on Hannity and said that ballots that were received after 11/3 8p in some counties were counted and not sequestered. Wonder what counties did that?

J.D. c/o 05 said:

---

Onto more important things.

---

There is no Whataburger in Montgomery County?

SJEAg said:

---

J.D. c/o 05 said:

---

Onto more important things.

---

There is no Whataburger in Montgomery County?

---

There's one in Willis, outdated map. And conroe

will25u said:

---

Jim jordan was just on Hannity and said that ballots that were received after 11/3 8p in some counties were counted and not sequestered. Wonder what counties did that?

---

Pittsburgh and Philly most likely. Philly is notorious for cheating in elections.

I foresee Az and Pa going to recounts as well!

mazag08 said:

---

Good Poster said:

---

---

They claim this is refuted because that's a % of registered voters and the way Wisconsin actually counts it is a % of 18+ eligible voters.

They fail to grasp that there's never been an election where even 70% of eligible voters have voted.

---

Except for 2004 and 2012

BoerneAg11 said:

---

mazag08 said:

---

Good Poster said:

---

---

They claim this is refuted because that's a % of registered voters and the way Wisconsin actually counts it is a % of 18+ eligible voters.

They fail to grasp that there's never been an election where even 70% of eligible voters have voted.

---

Except for 2004 and 2012

---

Democrats have been cheating a long time

Good Poster said:

---

Is this true?

---

Yes, Jesus is coming back.

mazag08 said:

---

Good Poster said:

---

---

They claim this is refuted because that's a % of registered voters and the way Wisconsin actually counts it is a % of 18+ eligible voters.

They fail to grasp that there's never been an election where even 70% of eligible voters have voted.

---

I voted for Trump. The numbers in this case don't lie, and they don't tell the story this guy is trying to tell. He's got his numbers wrong.

There was not significantly increased turnout in Milwaukee County. The numbers are easily verifiable by simply looking at the 2016 totals compared to the 2020 totals.

Approximately 441,000 people voted in Milwaukee county in 2016. In this election, Joe Biden got 317,000 votes and Donald Trump got 134,000 votes. Not much of an increase. At all.

J.D. c/o 05 said:

---

Onto more important things.

---

There is strong and building evidence out there that In-N-Out has been interfering with the development of new Whataburgers in the grayed out areas.

Rough guess Trump will be down 5K in GA and 20K in PA.

Thats going to be hard to flip.

barnyard1996 said:

---

Rough guess Trump will be down 5K in GA and 20K in PA.

Thats going to be hard to flip.

---

Didnt the HRC recount find like 400 votes for Trump in 2 days before she gave up?

Gladiator 96 said:

---

J.D. c/o 05 said:

---

Onto more important things.

---

There is strong and building evidence out there that In-N-Out has been interfering with the development of new Whataburgers in the grayed out areas.

---

Now that makes me angry.

Wrong icon.

Good Poster said:

---

Is this true?

---

https://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/own-disp?action=getissuer&CIK=0000896841

Good Poster said:

---

Is this true?

---

Someone called this in a post on another. Kudos to them.

PA--If you refuse to allow observers the whole thing should be nullified.

FbgTxAg said:

---

Good Poster said:

---

---

Dominoes are falling...

---

Good. And if Democrats are so sure everything's above board and they won't mind a recount now will they.

Oh, wait

Don't forget to count the envelopes, look at the postmarks, and look for matching signatures. That's where the fraud is. Once the ballots are in the piles they look valid.

Good Poster said:

---

---

Figured it out. The theory is if someone is fudging numbers in a set they will put random numbers down. In reality, the number 1 is most common in datasets and should be seen more frequently in a reliable set.

However, some researchers don't think this is always valid in terms of elections:
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/political-analysis/article/benfords-law-and-the-detection-of-election-fraud/3B1D64E822371C461AF3C61CE91AAF6D#

It would be cool if tweets shared were from someone with a blue check.

Or if the poster provided info about who the tweeter is and why they know what they're talking about.

Please?