They are claiming most the votes are comming out of Fulton County (Atlanta) which is BS.

Are R poll participating or locked out like Philly?

Still locked out even after a judges ruling.

Interesting...

SLAM said:

---

https://streamable.com/1w9h17

You see voter fraud doesn't exist, videos like this are a fabrication!

---

SquareOne07 said:

---

SLAM said:

---

https://streamable.com/1w9h17

You see voter fraud doesn't exist, videos like this are a fabrication!

---

But is there proof on when this was? Where this was? I have no idea how the ballot counting process works. Is there some sort of possible explanation why that would be taking place?

Just trying to get answers to the questions I know I'd be asked if I posted this.

---

The guy across is reading off the ballot that is being reproduced. She isn't creating brand new votes unless she changes it from what he is saying to her.

scoop12 said:

---

SquareOne07 said:

---

SLAM said:

---

https://streamable.com/1w9h17

You see voter fraud doesn't exist, videos like this are a fabrication!

---

But is there proof on when this was? Where this was? I have no idea how the ballot counting process works. Is there some sort of possible explanation why that would be taking place?

Just trying to get answers to the questions I know I'd be asked if I posted this.

---

The guy across is reading off the ballot that is being reproduced. She isn't creating brand new votes unless she changes it from what he is saying to her.

---

Then why aren't Republicans allowed in to watch? If she's just transcribing it then what's the problem?

scoop12 said:

---

SquareOne07 said:

---

SLAM said:

---

https://streamable.com/1w9h17

You see voter fraud doesn't exist, videos like this are a fabrication!

---

But is there proof on when this was? Where this was? I have no idea how the ballot counting process works. Is there some sort of possible explanation why that would be taking place?

Just trying to get answers to the questions I know I'd be asked if I posted this.

---

The guy across is reading off the ballot that is being reproduced. She isn't creating brand new votes unless she changes it from what he is saying to her.

---

Why would a ballot need to be reproduced?

PJYoung said:

---

Heismenberg said:

---

PJYoung said:

---

cctexagMD said:

---

What's the truth ******?

As much the truth as the bull**** "fact checking" that apologies all over my Facebook and Twitter feed?

---

Nobody can stop you from believing what you want but the information is there and the explanation is quite believable to me.

---

Because it suits your party. Joe Biden could claim Donald Trump killed JFK and people like you would say the same thing: "It's true the truth is out there."

---

I voted for Trump, life long conservative.

---

PJ has been all over this thread rooting for POTUS, posting results, and calmly considering and doing some research into each fraud allegation. It's frankly disconcerting and messing with my confirmation bias.

He's clearly a witch and you guys should keep flaming him.

ANSC Ag said:

---

Are R poll participating or locked out like Philly?

---

I've seen accusations but nothing nearly to the extent of Philly.

Ummm

SLAM said:

---

scoop12 said:

---

SquareOne07 said:

---

SLAM said:

---

https://streamable.com/1w9h17

You see voter fraud doesn't exist, videos like this are a fabrication!

---

But is there proof on when this was? Where this was? I have no idea how the ballot counting process works. Is there some sort of possible explanation why that would be taking place?

Just trying to get answers to the questions I know I'd be asked if I posted this.

---

The guy across is reading off the ballot that is being reproduced. She isn't creating brand new votes unless she changes it from what he is saying to her.

---

Then why aren't Republicans allowed in to watch? If she's just transcribing it then what's the problem?

---

I agree. I'm a republican who voted for Trump and want any fraud overturned so Trump can win. This isn't a smoking gun though.

annie88 said:

---

Interesting...

---

If we aren't going to try to exercise discernment before posting some of the tinfoil stuff like that, then it just hurts the credibility for the legitimate complaints. That kind of stuff is just a counterproductive distraction.

AgShaun00 said:

---

FbgTxAg said:

---

FireAg said:

---

SLAM said:

---

---

Based on what development, I wonder? Is this opinion or fact?

---

Do you trust me or the clown on FoxNews?

---

Will you be able to provide how you are in the know one day?

---

I haven't really been "cryptic" about it. There are three options.

1. I'm just making shlt up about one very specific thing and just riding the wave as it seems to be coming true.

2. I have a crystal ball or I'm psychic.

3. I know someone involved in the campaign and have nearly parroted the exact same information they have, albeit sometimes earlier than that info is actually made public.


I'll let you pick. I believe Arizona will eventually be RED. Whether I'm a rojo, or a wizard, or just a guy who knows a guy, I really don't care. I just want Trump to win. And right now I don't like his chances overall, but I know he/they are fighting. It's 2020. It wouldn't surprise me if it ended up 269 -269 but Hilliary Clinton decided to be a faithless elector and voted for Trump, just to keep Joe from the Presidency out of jealousy. Who knows?

This whole reproducing ballots is shady as F. So easy to scam... oh look, these Trump ballots won't scan, can you go "reproduce them"...

DTP02 said:

---

annie88 said:

---

Interesting...

---

If we aren't going to try to exercise discernment in some of the tinfoil stuff like that gets posted like that, then it just hurts the credibility for the legitimate complaints. That kind of stuff is just a counterproductive distraction.

---

Just said it was interesting, no need to get your panties in a wad.

annie88 said:

---

Ummm

---

Recreating a ballot that may have been unable to be scanned for some reason. Watch the girl across from him. They both complete at the same time. She reads the current ballot. He recreates. They flip to the next one. Fraud if he changes it.

EagleAg19 said:

---

PJYoung said:

---

EagleAg19 said:

---

PJYoung said:

---

Evil stuff. He knows the whole story and is sharing the lie anyway to help stir up the base and destabilize things. Masters of chaos.

---

There were still 0 Trump ballots in that drop out of 13k. A statistical impossibility. Don't distract from the real issue here.

---

Guys, the truth is out there like a 5 second search away. No 13k votes didn't drop for biden all at once.

https://www.freep.com/story/news/politics/elections/2020/11/04/michigan-election-ballots-mail-absentee-hour-count-update/6161367002/

---

Fair enough. I did some more reading on it and agree it's not what it seems. It's just frustrating to have errors and ambiguity right now.

---

That's two now. That kind of considered retraction is vanishing to nonexistent on the left.

FWIW if I hope they catch any fraud, those that have perpetrated it are punished, and if it makes a difference that any results are changed.

Also the VBM is a chaotic **** show that shouldn't be repeated by states that weren't already practicing it.

annie88 said:

---

Ummm

---

Someone please tell me how we know one guy is reading the right name and/or that the other is marking it the same as read.

scoop12 said:

---

annie88 said:

---

Ummm

---

Recreating a ballot that may have been unable to be scanned for some reason. Watch the girl across from him. They both complete at the same time. She reads the current ballot. He recreates. They flip to the next one. Fraud if he changes it.

---

"If" he changes it.

It's 2020 and this is the best we can do?

scoop12 said:

---

annie88 said:

---

Ummm

---

Recreating a ballot that may have been unable to be scanned for some reason. Watch the girl across from him. They both complete at the same time. She reads the current ballot. He recreates. They flip to the next one. Fraud if he changes it.

---

I'm not discounting this, but what a ****ed up system we have when we are "recreating" ballots to be scanned properly. Any sane person can't think this is how things should operate. Jesus.

annie88 said:

---

scoop12 said:

---

annie88 said:

---

Ummm

---

Recreating a ballot that may have been unable to be scanned for some reason. Watch the girl across from him. They both complete at the same time. She reads the current ballot. He recreates. They flip to the next one. Fraud if he changes it.

---

"If" he changes it.

It's 2020 and this is the best we can do?

---

I agree. We should have a wayyyy better process. At a minimum, we need a way to verify any recreated ballots were done accurately

DTP02 said:

---

annie88 said:

---

Interesting...

---

If we aren't going to try to exercise discernment before posting some of the tinfoil stuff like that, then it just hurts the credibility for the legitimate complaints. That kind of stuff is just a counterproductive distraction.

---

I don't think posting it on texags political board really matters.

For anyone who needs a quick laugh in these desperate times...

fooz said:

---

---

I actually have some family and friends that vote this way...they want gridlock. "A single party advantage is dangerous for the country" sort of philosophy.

Bretton Gekko said:

---

You guys are so lost. How have you had 4 years of Trump as an example and still don't get it?

You do not give an inch.

Quit rationalizing with people who support Biden.

---

Some of the best advice I've seen on this site today.

DannyDuberstein said:

---

annie88 said:

---

Ummm

---

Someone please tell me how we know one guy is reading the right name and/or that the other is marking it the same as read.

---

Someone said they are supposed to attach the original with the recreated, but super open to manipulation.

Do people think that these counters are stupid enough to perform this blatant supposed "fraud" when they know they are on camera?

Bretton Gekko said:

---

You guys are so lost. How have you had 4 years of Trump as an example and still don't get it?

You do not give an inch.

Quit rationalizing with people who support Biden.

---

I don't. That's why I call them all communists.

Brian Earl Spilner said:

---

Do people think that these counters are stupid enough to perform this blatant supposed "fraud" when they know they are on camera?

---

What's on camera? People across a room reading something we can't see, saying something we can't hear, and marking something too far away to see.

It's a ridiculous process. It's okay to admit it

Bretton Gekko said:

---

You guys are so lost. How have you had 4 years of Trump as an example and still don't get it?

You do not give an inch.

Quit rationalizing with people who support Biden.

---

Really no need to do so. They're putting a man in place who is compromised by the PRC.