SoS saying ballot watchers have been present everywhere.

"These people are not involved on voter fraud. These people are not involved in voter suppression." - GA SoS

GA:

Provisional/Military ballot process.

Working with counties to figure out how many there are. Election is NOT over after these counts. Still have until Friday to cure ballots that are technical throw outs.

No Bat Soup For You said:

---

Cactus Jack said:

---

"These people are not involved on voter fraud. These people are not involved in voter suppression." - GA SoS

---

Sounds like something someone involved in voter fraud would say.

---

ok. Can please point to the people that are involved? You know, the ones that supplied the ballots?

BuddysBud said:

---

MooreTrucker said:

---

Why? He's a TV guy who said some words that don't really matter.

---

Trying to influence the election by using you positions as a "TV guy" does matter.

---

Then everyone who projects or calls the states before the polls close in the west is doing that, too.

Cactus Jack said:

---

"These people are not involved on voter fraud. These people are not involved in voter suppression." - GA SoS

---

To be fair, has a Secretary of State, who is in charge of elections, EVER said "Yea, our election is pretty shady."

He also brought up the issue of overseas military absentee ballots, which can still be counted if they come in over the next few days and are not included in the other numbers he gave. Didn't say the number. Those normally don't matter, but they could come into play here.

"We know the number of requests" (of absentee ballots) but hedges that that's the high end to know whether something is way off. They did not apparently have a good count of returned ballots on election day.

THIS is the primary issue.

No matter what happens, at least this is the first time that all incidents of the cheating that always happens will be investigated because of how Trump always goes the limit on such things. He may not succeed in the end but at least it's a widespread "try to succeed with the right thing". I just want the correct outcome to always happen even if it's not my team or candidate, whether it's pass interference or voting. That's the only way it's true justice.

In the past there has always been pockets of cheating but I guess the elections haven't depended on where it actually was happening. So I'm hoping for the TRULY ACCURATE outcome, but even if it doesn't happen, maybe this will set a precedent to prevent it in future elections. I'm not that hopeful because it probably will go back to the old ways 1 week after this election is decided but here's to hoping for a fair and accurate decision.

Quote:

---

So I'm hoping for the TRULY ACCURATE outcome

---

Me too, and the truly accurate outcome is a Trump landslide that was in process while the Chinese Yuan was tanking and 2016 was happening all over again...and then they stopped counting and manufactured their own ballots over night. Still can't believe this happened.

"I am prayerful we can get to get to the resolution by the end of the day...this is very close race we want to get it right...provisional, curable ballots will come into play"

Adjudication system is new. Computerized system now using AI, if ballot has extra markings or marked twice in one race it will pop up on a screen for bipartisan panel to determine intent or if ballot can be counted.

Maybe 27,000 ballots from overseas?

How does the SOS get his ballots count off by 25 to 35,000... for the past 2 days?

"An accurate and fair count is much better than having a fast count."

He said over and over again that the margin is so tight that they want to get everything right.

Remember when the UN and other nations would come and observe our elections..........I have not heard any reporting of this at all this presidential election. Does this still happen?

bmks270 said:

---

---

If this is true, Trump has won GA

As far as recounts go, is there any reason to think that the recount process would be "fair"...i.e. couldn't the cheating dems just "find" more ballot boxes other places and the recount swings even further for Biden?

Any way to make this a fair recount? Very curious.

bmks270 said:

---

---

If he said that I completely missed it. I don't think he actually said that. I turned it on right when he was reading the county list of votes outstanding and he said the 60,000 number. Won't let me rewind.

SLAM said:

---

---

Does anyone know what the national % of voter turnout was relative to registered voters? How does this compare to historical voter turnout %?

If the voter fraud is this wide spread and in such large quantities how much of the Biden popular vote could potentially be reduced by?

For anyone interested.

Quote:

---

Trump Pence Make America Great Again |

Hello,

Please join us for an IMPORTANT Grassroots Call with Campaign Manager Bill Stepien, Deputy Campaign Manager Justin Clark and Senior Advisor Jason Miller today, November 5th at 12:00 PM EST. You can find your call-in information below:

Grassroots Call
START: 12:00 PM EST
Dial-in: 855-614-0272
Please dial in 10 minutes early

We look forward to you joining us today!

Thank you,

Team Trump-Pence

---

When will we know the results of the next batch of AZ ballots?

"The reality is there are 60,000 votes out right now..."

"This is the first time Georgia has used paper ballots in 20 years"

Big votes today if possible.

County by county:

Bryan: 3,027
Burk: 494
Chatham 17157
Clayton: 7408
Cobb: 700
FLoyd: 682
Forsyth: 4713
Fulton: 11200
Gwinnett 7300
Harris 3641
Lawrence: 1797
Putnam 1552
Taylor 456

Total just over 60,000

Wait why?

Cactus Jack said:

---

"The reality is there are 60,000 votes out right now..."

"This is the first time Georgia has used paper ballots in 20 years"

Big votes today if possible.

County by county:

Bryan: 3,027
Burk: 494
Chatham 17157
Clayton: 7408
Cobb: 700
FLoyd: 682
Forsyth: 4713
Fulton: 11200
Gwinnett 7300
Harris 3641
Lawrence: 1797
Putnam 1552
Taylor 456

Total just over 60,000

---

Trump may win. It will be extremely close.

cman1494 said:

---

As far as recounts go, is there any reason to think that the recount process would be "fair"...i.e. couldn't the cheating dems just "find" more ballot boxes other places and the recount swings even further for Biden?

Any way to make this a fair recount? Very curious.

---

In theory, yes. Because at that point there is a bit more scrutiny as well as more eyes on the counts helping to audit the valid ballots. Kind of depends how the recount is done. If the lawyers step in and ensure proper representation and audit in places like MI, NV, GA & PA where there have been allegations of Rep observers not being allowed to be present for counts.

Why has Nevada not updated its vote count in about 2 days.

Are they holding out hoping their votes put Lectric Joe over the top and they want to be part of some big announcement?

Cobra39

Cactus Jack said:

---

"The reality is there are 60,000 votes out right now..."

"This is the first time Georgia has used paper ballots in 20 years"

Big votes today if possible.

County by county:

Bryan: 3,027
Burk: 494
Chatham 17157
Clayton: 7408
Cobb: 700
FLoyd: 682
Forsyth: 4713
Fulton: 11200
Gwinnett 7300
Harris 3641
Lawrence: 1797
Putnam 1552
Taylor 456

Total just over 60,000

---

Current ratios:

Bryan: 71-28 Trump
Burke: 51 -48 Trump
Chatham (Savannah): 58-41 Biden
Clayton 85-14 Biden
Cobb: 56-42 Biden
Forsyth: 67-32 Trump
Floyd 71-28 Trump
Fulton 73-26 Biden
Gwinnet: 58-42 Biden
Harris 77-22 Trump
Laurens: 61-35 Trump
Putnam 71-29 Trump
Taylor 67-32 Trump

Biden will likely gain even in Trump areas. Biden is going to take the lead here.

Cobra39 said:

---

Why has Nevada not updated its vote count in about 2 days.

Are they holding out hoping their votes put Lectric Joe over the top and they want to be part of some big announcement?

Cobra39

---

Actually things might get interesting in Nevada today.

FbgTxAg said:

---

Cobra39 said:

---

Why has Nevada not updated its vote count in about 2 days.

Are they holding out hoping their votes put Lectric Joe over the top and they want to be part of some big announcement?

Cobra39

---

Actually things might get interesting in Nevada today.

---

Is Nevada going to be RED!?

Note that the data was as of this AM. I think he said some had already submitted their numbers so the outstanding is likely lower.

Has this been discussed yet?

https://www.newscentermaine.com/article/news/verify/verify-wisconsin-turnout-not-massively-larger-than-normal/507-ac05b2f4-fdfe-4bc5-91d5-7a22496c3314

Quote:

---

But the 2020 number in the claim is actually achieved using a different formula than the one Wisconsin uses.

To get 89%, the claim takes the current votes cast in Wisconsin this year and divides them by the registered voters in Wisconsin.

So that's 3,240,268 votes cast among 3,684,726 registered voters, which equals roughly 89%.

But that's the wrong equation to use, at least in Wisconsin.

It clearly states on its site that "Wisconsin does not calculate turnout based on the number of registered voters." Instead it uses the "total voting-age population." That's anyone in the state above the age of 18. For 2020, Wisconsin says that number is 4,536,293.

So let's run that math again with the Wisconsin formula for voter turnout. We keep the same total voter count, but instead of dividing by registered voters, we divide by "total voting-age population."

That's 3,240,268 votes cast among 4,536,293 voting-age adults.

That equals roughly 71%, a number that is much closer to the past turnout numbers in the state

---