*****OFFICIAL ELECTION DAY THREAD*****

2,693,907 Views | 20889 Replies | Last: 2 yr ago by Whistle Pig
Ag06Law
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Anti-taxxer said:

Two unrelated questions:

1. Are these western PA ballots legit? Or is this an urban legend?

2. In 2000, did Gore ever actually have 270? Most of what I remember from that night is Florida getting pulled back and forth.


I haven't seen any actual news reports saying that they're holding them deliberately, but I do know that when you look at the map, there are plenty of those counties that are still only at between 70-80% reporting.
Silvertaps
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TAMU1990
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AvidAggie said:

I do believe mail in ballots favor Dems...but I find it hard to believe it'd be 78%
No. this was the plan. To cheat through the mail in ballot.
Who?mikejones!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mail in voting should not be allowed. There is no way i will ever trust that vote. It is too easy to cheat in ways that cannot be found (see san antonio lady from veritas). When combined with legal vote harvesting, it really creates potential problems.

Absentee, over 65, disabled...sure.


But, you should show up to vote. 3 weeks of 7am to 7pm early voting plus election day is enough. No curbside voting. Get off your ass and vote.

Why is this so difficult?
Phat32
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This is exactly right. There is no reason for it unless you are handicapped or out of the country.

If you are too scared of COVID then stay the **** home.
SpreadsheetAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AAggie said:

Chase said:

russ05 said:

SLAM said:



Oh hey look, Biden at that ratio will get almost exactly the votes he needs to win. Pure coincidence of course.
That exact ratio over the last 880,950 would put Biden ahead by 14,780. How many in person ballots are left?
No, it puts him up by 7328 votes (if Trump's listed 369k is actually 369,000.

69.90% of 880,950 = 615,810
27.18% of 880,950 = 239,482
That's 376,328 for Biden

such a miracle.

But if there are still Western PA ballots that will lean conservative and Trump wins those with a >7.5K margin, then he still wins, right?


Yes. And they are there per NYT - I counted 6 Counties with <80% reporting and >75% Trump leaning all with 20-60k total votes. - so not peanuts
[url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_pill_and_blue_pill]I prefer the red pills[/url]
DTP02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
PJYoung said:

Arizona Secretary of State on Sharpiegate




I guess the followup question would be that if it was a widespread practice and the machine wouldn't count the votes because of the pen used, when are they going to be counted manually if they haven't been already?
ABATTBQ11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
SpreadsheetAg said:

AAggie said:

Chase said:

russ05 said:

SLAM said:



Oh hey look, Biden at that ratio will get almost exactly the votes he needs to win. Pure coincidence of course.
That exact ratio over the last 880,950 would put Biden ahead by 14,780. How many in person ballots are left?
No, it puts him up by 7328 votes (if Trump's listed 369k is actually 369,000.

69.90% of 880,950 = 615,810
27.18% of 880,950 = 239,482
That's 376,328 for Biden

such a miracle.

But if there are still Western PA ballots that will lean conservative and Trump wins those with a >7.5K margin, then he still wins, right?


Yes. And they are there per NYT - I counted 6 Counties with <80% reporting and >75% Trump leaning all with 20-60k total votes. - so not peanuts


Won't matter without AZ
Who?mikejones!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Or, why would such pens even be an option at a polling location?
azul_rain
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BIDEN AT 264
PJYoung
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Chase said:

bmks270 said:

RyanAg08 said:



I suspect the number of registered voters in that table is old and not current.
Arizona, Georgia and Pennsylvania do not allow same day registration and NC only allows it in early voting so if those numbers of registered voters are correct as of Monday, it highlights the reality of what is going on.

In the amount of time it takes you guys to post about this random tweet from a random account that seems to me to be obviously false you could've looked up one of those states online.




The (probable) Russian bot tweet said Nevada had 1.2 million registered voters, a quick search online shows the real # is 1.8 million.
4stringAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
No matter what happens we've destroyed all faith in our election system with this power grab by the Dems to go for mail in voting. And this was the plan all along to take advantage of Covid to regain power from Jim Clyburn's own mouth caught on an open mic back in Feb or Mar: paraphrasing "we can use this virus to enact our agenda"
HowdyTexasAggies
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Mass mail in voting allows for very easy voter harvesting, there is no restriction, none, round up as many 1000s as you want. Much different than seeking out the old (nursing homes) or sick etc, Of course, it allow allows for easily casting votes "for" people unknowingly.
EagleAg19
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ABATTBQ11 said:

SpreadsheetAg said:

AAggie said:

Chase said:

russ05 said:

SLAM said:



Oh hey look, Biden at that ratio will get almost exactly the votes he needs to win. Pure coincidence of course.
That exact ratio over the last 880,950 would put Biden ahead by 14,780. How many in person ballots are left?
No, it puts him up by 7328 votes (if Trump's listed 369k is actually 369,000.

69.90% of 880,950 = 615,810
27.18% of 880,950 = 239,482
That's 376,328 for Biden

such a miracle.

But if there are still Western PA ballots that will lean conservative and Trump wins those with a >7.5K margin, then he still wins, right?


Yes. And they are there per NYT - I counted 6 Counties with <80% reporting and >75% Trump leaning all with 20-60k total votes. - so not peanuts


Won't matter without AZ
No ****
hbtheduce
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
SpreadsheetAg said:

AAggie said:

Chase said:

russ05 said:

SLAM said:



Oh hey look, Biden at that ratio will get almost exactly the votes he needs to win. Pure coincidence of course.
That exact ratio over the last 880,950 would put Biden ahead by 14,780. How many in person ballots are left?
No, it puts him up by 7328 votes (if Trump's listed 369k is actually 369,000.

69.90% of 880,950 = 615,810
27.18% of 880,950 = 239,482
That's 376,328 for Biden

such a miracle.

But if there are still Western PA ballots that will lean conservative and Trump wins those with a >7.5K margin, then he still wins, right?


Yes. And they are there per NYT - I counted 6 Counties with <80% reporting and >75% Trump leaning all with 20-60k total votes. - so not peanuts

Even if they are VBM, they will break to Biden softer than VBM in philly.
AgDev01
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Except it doesn't. Here is the Nevada SoS site with the number of registered voters clearly punished.

https://www.nvsos.gov/sos/elections/voters/2020-statistics
SLAM
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rural areas should refuse to ever release any results until the cities do after this election and it should be nationwide. Basically sign a pact stating they will only release votes once the cities release their final numbers. This would solve all ballot harvesting.
Mr Gigem
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Shouldn't we allow everyone to vote however they can?
Paradise Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
PJYoung said:

Chase said:

bmks270 said:

RyanAg08 said:



I suspect the number of registered voters in that table is old and not current.
Arizona, Georgia and Pennsylvania do not allow same day registration and NC only allows it in early voting so if those numbers of registered voters are correct as of Monday, it highlights the reality of what is going on.

In the amount of time it takes you guys to post about this random tweet from a random account that seems to me to be obviously false you could've looked up one of those states online.




The (probable) Russian bot tweet said Nevada had 1.2 million registered voters, a quick search online shows the real # is 1.8 million.


So an 87.5% turnout in Nevada of all places.

Sounds legit.

That ol' Biden sure kept all the enthusiasm he inspired hidden from everyone.
beerad12man
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Nah. Not if you can be there in person. No reason not to. In a one off like Covid, there was obviously some loophole with some. Moving forward, I would sincerely hope not.
A is A
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Mr Gigem said:

Shouldn't we allow everyone to vote however they can?
absolutely not.
hbtheduce
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
SLAM said:

Rural areas should refuse to ever release any results until the cities do after this election and it should be nationwide. Basically sign a pact stating they will only release votes once the cities release their final numbers. This would solve all ballot harvesting.

Yep. If you want VBM and let ballots show up for days. You store all the votes, collect everything, and then count everything within 24 hours.
depriest1022
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Mr Gigem said:

Shouldn't we allow everyone to vote however they can?
No.
PJYoung
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Trump lead down to 276,981 with 87% reporting in Pennsylvania

It was close to 700,000 at 5am this morning.
hbtheduce
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Mr Gigem said:

Shouldn't we allow everyone to vote however they can?

Hell, why even make them turn in a ballot. They can just take a dump at a poling station and we can count each turd as a vote for Biden.
sellthefarm
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Mr Gigem said:

Shouldn't we allow everyone to vote however they can?
You can't possible be serious. However they can? However they can?

GTFO, there should be two ways to vote - by secret ballot at a polling place, or by very secure absentee. No way in hell should ballots go out to everyone. If you can't see that this is begging to be manipulated then you are willfully ignorant.
BrazosDog02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Mr Gigem said:

Shouldn't we allow everyone to vote however they can?
No. You should have to get off your fat ass to vote in person at a legitimate location, at a specified time, with a valid ID. This is a digital age. This should ALL be digital. No paper. If you are in such a situation that you cannot achieve either of the above, then you should not be voting.
azul_rain
How long do you want to ignore this user?
WHERE DO WE STAND ?
russ05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
DTP02 said:

PJYoung said:

Arizona Secretary of State on Sharpiegate




I guess the followup question would be that if it was a widespread practice and the machine wouldn't count the votes because of the pen used, when are they going to be counted manually if they haven't been already?
If you believe this, you're a moron. She admits that using a marker could potentially cause issues because of the ink bleeding through. Then why were there polling locations actively passing out sharpies and not allowing people to distribute pens? There is absolutely no reason to do that unless you plan on using it to not count certain votes.
HowdyTexasAggies
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Mr Gigem said:

Shouldn't we allow everyone to vote however they can?

So, you don't want any rules how votes are taken / counted? Just a free for all, no protections against voter fraud?

How do you know who "everyone" that voted is a person that actually cast a vote? With mail in, you don't have any controls on who did the voting, none at all.
Who?mikejones!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Thats a negative ghost rider.

The system needs to be a secure and infallible as possible.

Exceptions create opportunities to take advantage of the system.
samurai_science
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mr Gigem said:

Shouldn't we allow everyone to vote however they can?
Sure, I have a nice printer, I can vote 10,000 times the next election via mail. How about we use logic instead of emotion?
Mr Gigem
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
You should want more votes, right? More votes provides of more accurate representation of what the people want. This is a democracy, isn't it? "...Government of the people, by the people, for the people.."
96ags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Mr Gigem said:

Shouldn't we allow everyone to vote however they can?
No, absolutely not. I have never understood this logic.

Voting was stupidly easy even before this year. I'm 45 years old and I have never taken more than 20 minutes to cast a ballot in any election.

If someone is unwilling to spend 20 minutes voting in person, do you really trust them to be an informed voter? I don't, and I damn sure don't want uninformed people voting.

Voting is a civic duty. It should require some effort.
HowdyTexasAggies
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Mr Gigem said:

You should want more votes, right? More votes provides of more accurate representation of what the people want. This is a democracy, isn't it? "...Government of the people, by the people, for the people.."


Ok, you are FOS.
First Page Last Page
Page 194 of 597
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.