*****OFFICIAL ELECTION DAY THREAD*****

2,690,270 Views | 20889 Replies | Last: 2 yr ago by Whistle Pig
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
agcrock2005
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
They need people posted at every ****ING ballot box in these corrupt states.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
agcrock2005 said:

They need people posted at every ****ING ballot box in these corrupt states.
They do. That is how they got that picture.
agcrock2005
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

agcrock2005 said:

They need people posted at every ****ING ballot box in these corrupt states.
They do. That is how they got that picture.
Awesome. Then I expect to see his identity posted very shortly...
Whistle Pig
How long do you want to ignore this user?
People obscure rear plates in Arizona to beat red light cameras. Is there video of this guy going to a second drop box? Is there a picture of him "stuffing" more than 1 ballot?

Gateway Pundit gonna Gateway Pundit.
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
DEBUNKEDDD!!!!! talking point for everything. Maybe it's more uber drivers! Therefore, most secure election evvarrr!!!!!

Never an admission that insecure registration rolls, insecure mass mail outs, insecure drop boxes, inaccurate "signature verification", insecure tabulation machines, insecure connected devices, billionaires funding groups to take advantage of registration rolls to get votes from all apartment buildings, nursing homes, homeless shelters, etc. This is not the will of the people who actually care enough to make an effort to exercise their right to choose who represents them in government.
Whistle Pig
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Surely, with all those "problems" you read about in Gateway Pundit or Breitbart it would be easy to find thousands of prosecutable cases. Especially in red maga friendly jurisdictions. Instead of a paltry amount common in every election.


Quote:

We supported the Arizona Senate's ability to conduct an audit of Maricopa County's elections and understand the importance of reviewing the results. However, allegations of widespread deceased voters from the Senate audit and other complaints received by the Election Integrity Unit are insufficient and not corroborated.''


https://www.azag.gov/sites/default/files/2022-08/Letter%20to%20Fann%20-%20EIU%20Update%20080122.pdf
TRADUCTOR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Consider your views on speeding tickets and actual amount of speeding violations not ticketed.

Filter bubble is strong, FBI is the corrupt disconnect with your logic.
Whistle Pig
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I have no idea what you're trying to say. But you might check the link again, the letter is from the AZ AG not the FBI.

AZ AG Brnovich is a Trumpy "stop the steal type". He just never found anything significant, because it didn't exist.
agcrock2005
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So much more peaceful when you ignore WP...you don't have to see the dumb things that are said and the "evidence" he presents from the feds, CNN, et al. Strongly recommend. Thanks for the advice hawg!
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Whistle Pig
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Quote:

Judge CARTER: The emails show that President Trump knew that the specific numbers of voter fraud were wrong but continued to tout those numbers, both in court and to the public."
TRM
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Should Crime-Fraud exemption apply to a Congressional subpoena? What crime can Congress charge an individual with?
Whistle Pig
How long do you want to ignore this user?
That is a good question, I don't know if there's precedent or if this judge is wielding the exception broadly.

It has much more importance to the DOJ and Georgia investigations, if they didn't already have this email.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AG Brnovich. He's a coward or a grifter. Going after dime bag players and not the real dealers of election fraud.
Whistle Pig
How long do you want to ignore this user?
He would have loved nothing more than to "stop the steal" and cruise to an easy Senate primary win. Alas, there was no evidence, it requires more than feelings and fake clown auditors.


Quote:

We supported the Arizona Senate's ability to conduct an audit of Maricopa County's elections and understand the importance of reviewing the results. However, allegations of widespread deceased voters from the Senate audit and other complaints received by the Election Integrity Unit are insufficient and not corroborated.''


https://www.azag.gov/sites/default/files/2022-08/Letter%20to%20Fann%20-%20EIU%20Update%20080122.pdf
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Kraken
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Dominion CEO interviewed on 60 Minutes last night.

plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ravingfans
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/i-m-deadly-serious-michael-moore-doubles-down-on-his-prediction-of-a-blue-tsunami-in-the-midterms/ar-AA13k3Ql?cvid=6cca2a362d0e4c728fea06322156009f


I interpret this as starting the propaganda about the upcoming steal ahead of time in case the demlibs are successful at altering the outcome. Otherwise there is a "Thumpin" on the way for them...
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ravingfans said:

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/i-m-deadly-serious-michael-moore-doubles-down-on-his-prediction-of-a-blue-tsunami-in-the-midterms/ar-AA13k3Ql?cvid=6cca2a362d0e4c728fea06322156009f


I interpret this as starting the propaganda about the upcoming steal ahead of time in case the demlibs are successful at altering the outcome. Otherwise there is a "Thumpin" on the way for them...
Yep, because Moore is basing his prediction totally on abortion, and only the hardcore Democrat base has that as their top issue (generally in the top 3 depending on the poll).

So either he's full of crap (that's always true of course), he knows the fix is in, or he has access to polling data no one else does.

That said, the number of locations where they'd have to commit fraud in order to affect the outcome is astronomically higher than it was in 2020.

In 2020, they cheated in 5-6 counties, all of which were heavily Democrat to start with. All they needed was some good old ballot box stuffing with 50-60K votes in order to change the outcome. Not really a remarkable feat given Democrats have been pulling stuff like that forever in areas they fully control (see Chicago).

In 2022, they'd have to cheat in thousands of counties in almost every single state. That is a much harder thing to pull off then what they did in 2020.
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
ravingfans
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rapier108 said:

ravingfans said:

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/i-m-deadly-serious-michael-moore-doubles-down-on-his-prediction-of-a-blue-tsunami-in-the-midterms/ar-AA13k3Ql?cvid=6cca2a362d0e4c728fea06322156009f


I interpret this as starting the propaganda about the upcoming steal ahead of time in case the demlibs are successful at altering the outcome. Otherwise there is a "Thumpin" on the way for them...
Yep, because Moore is basing his prediction totally on abortion, and only the hardcore Democrat base has that as their top issue (generally in the top 3 depending on the poll).

So either he's full of crap (that's always true of course), he knows the fix is in, or he has access to polling data no one else does.

That said, the number of locations where they'd have to commit fraud in order to affect the outcome is astronomically higher than it was in 2020.

In 2020, they cheated in 5-6 counties, all of which were heavily Democrat to start with. All they needed was some good old ballot box stuffing with 50-60K votes in order to change the outcome. Not really a remarkable feat given Democrats have been pulling stuff like that forever in areas they fully control (see Chicago).

In 2022, they'd have to cheat in thousands of counties in almost every single state. That is a much harder thing to pull off then what they did in 2020.

Correct--my concern is of the "he knows the fix is in" variety. There are a few dem countys that could sway the overall results if there is not a lot of separation on the national scale, and this is my concern since several key states still have weak voter integrity laws and enforcement.
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ravingfans said:

Rapier108 said:

ravingfans said:

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/i-m-deadly-serious-michael-moore-doubles-down-on-his-prediction-of-a-blue-tsunami-in-the-midterms/ar-AA13k3Ql?cvid=6cca2a362d0e4c728fea06322156009f


I interpret this as starting the propaganda about the upcoming steal ahead of time in case the demlibs are successful at altering the outcome. Otherwise there is a "Thumpin" on the way for them...
Yep, because Moore is basing his prediction totally on abortion, and only the hardcore Democrat base has that as their top issue (generally in the top 3 depending on the poll).

So either he's full of crap (that's always true of course), he knows the fix is in, or he has access to polling data no one else does.

That said, the number of locations where they'd have to commit fraud in order to affect the outcome is astronomically higher than it was in 2020.

In 2020, they cheated in 5-6 counties, all of which were heavily Democrat to start with. All they needed was some good old ballot box stuffing with 50-60K votes in order to change the outcome. Not really a remarkable feat given Democrats have been pulling stuff like that forever in areas they fully control (see Chicago).

In 2022, they'd have to cheat in thousands of counties in almost every single state. That is a much harder thing to pull off then what they did in 2020.

Correct--my concern is of the "he knows the fix is in" variety. There are a few dem countys that could sway the overall results if there is not a lot of separation on the national scale, and this is my concern since several key states still have weak voter integrity laws and enforcement.
Except those counties cannot sway the House. They are already represented by Democrats so no amount of cheating in those counties will change the House, only the Senate. As I said, it would require cheating in thousands of counties across almost every state to have a Democrat wave in the House.
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ravingfans
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rapier108 said:

Except those counties cannot sway the House. They are already represented by Democrats so no amount of cheating in those counties will change the House, only the Senate. As I said, it would require cheating in thousands of counties across almost every state to have a Democrat wave in the House.

ahh, gotcha--

I am more concerned about a potential Senate steal than a house steal...
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Democrats always accuse the Republicans of what they are doing.

captkirk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
oh no said:


Do all these broads share the same nutritionist and same dentist?
captkirk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ravingfans said:

Rapier108 said:

Except those counties cannot sway the House. They are already represented by Democrats so no amount of cheating in those counties will change the House, only the Senate. As I said, it would require cheating in thousands of counties across almost every state to have a Democrat wave in the House.

ahh, gotcha--

I am more concerned about a potential Senate steal than a house steal...
Senate steal is certainly a concern
captkirk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
will25u said:

Democrats always accuse the Republicans of what they are doing.


Wait, I thought it was a threat to our Democracy to make such claims
agcrock2005
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
will25u said:

Democrats always accuse the Republicans of what they are doing.


Exactly what they do. So sad that the sheep totally believe everything they are presented by the media. It's just like Russia, but we actually have a "free" press which makes it even more sad. Awful that the journalists that truly want to report the truth are exiled out of their careers for the Acostas, et al, to come in and read their scripts.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
WTAF....

oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Nicolle Wallace and Steve Schmidt did everything they could to damage McCain and in particular Palin.
First Page Last Page
Page 592 of 597
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.