*****OFFICIAL ELECTION DAY THREAD*****

2,704,090 Views | 20889 Replies | Last: 2 yr ago by Whistle Pig
We fixed the keg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
For now, I am trying to believe this is ineptitude and not outright evil, but it is hard for me to shake knowing we were all waiting for a "false-flag" or "news story" to distract from what is going on with the election audits gaining traction and evidence.

I struggle to make sense of any of what transpired over the last 10 years. The rule of law is completely ignored, corruption is completely unchecked, and nobody seems to care to get REAL answers.
Decay
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
There's no reason to overthink it. They work really hard to orchestrate what they can but at the end of the day people are still people and if you're as delusional as our admin is, I believe they probably believed the BS they selectively heard regarding military preparedness and withdrawal tactics.

They are sloppy when they're on a roll, we know this. It just rarely spills out so publicly. Take advantage when it does because it's a peek behind the curtain.
ChemEAg08
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yeah I'm thinking to overshadow audit news. Dems want to keep the rona (and further control over the people) for as long as possible.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ttu_85 said:

Bigsteve said:

Y'all are delusional. President Trump will serve only one term. I wish it weren't so, (love his policies) but his behavior over the last 4 years just turned too many independents off. Jmho
Anyone voting based on personality is an idiot. This election is about the future direction of this country.
Should be memorialized again. The fraud enabled this sham presidency though.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
EAC...

textar4404
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u said:

EAC...


104.1%
RulesForTheeNotForMe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Hmmm.... 104.1%.... Remember the 4.2% of statistical irregularities from a few pages back?

Biden's margin of victory based on how Presidents are actually elected...... Probably not far off from roughly 0.1%.
We fixed the keg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

104.1%
155,485,078 votes
x 4.1%
==========
3,332,025

Margin of victory
AZ - 10,457 => 11 EV's
GA - 11,779 => 16 EV's
NV - 33,596 => 6 EV's
PA - 80,555 => 20 EV's
WI- 20,682 => 10 EV's
==================
157,069 => 63 EV's or 0.1010% of the total votes

Interesting, we see that number line closely with the "4.2%" estimated by the analysts a few pages back.
richardag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u said:

EAC...


The numbers for 2016 don't add up to 100% either. Means I have no confidence in the EAV.
Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm sure it's just a coincidence. We have already been assured by talking points and proven by court cases not heard that it was the most secure election ever and if we didn't have too many votes, it would obviously be racist voter suppression.
American Hardwood
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
richardag said:

will25u said:

EAC...


The numbers for 2016 don't add up to 100% either. Means I have no confidence in the EAV.


I am fairly sure there was cheating in 2016 too. Just not enough.
BigJim49 AustinNowDallas
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Will we ever hear results of the Arizona audit?
BigJim49AustinnowDallas
B2Ag05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BigJim49 AustinNowDallas said:

Will we ever hear results of the Arizona audit?


Karen Fann says likely early next week after the Senate reviews the report from the audit group.

HumpitPuryear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
American Hardwood said:

richardag said:

will25u said:

EAC...


The numbers for 2016 don't add up to 100% either. Means I have no confidence in the EAV.


I am fairly sure there was cheating in 2016 too. Just not enough.
Guaranteed. Hillary kept calling the election stolen but she never asked for any forensic audit to prove it. Very un-lib not go straight for litigation. If Dems were clean and she really thought it was stolen there would have been a judge in Hawaii making a ruling.
richardag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
American Hardwood said:

richardag said:

will25u said:

EAC...


The numbers for 2016 don't add up to 100% either. Means I have no confidence in the EAV.


I am fairly sure there was cheating in 2016 too. Just not enough.
Could be, probably did happen, cheating that is.

But who in the hell would publish these results not adding up to 100%. Did I miss the EAV's explanation? I admit I could have missed the explanation. 2020 ~ 104%; 2016 ~ 95% WTH

And people wonder why a large % of the population doesn't trust bureaucracies, politicians and legacy media.
Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
will25u said:

EAC...


What doesn't make sense to me is well outside of a rounding error. There is a solid 43%. But then break out the decimal points for the others? That's curious to me.
BigJim49 AustinNowDallas
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
B2Ag05 said:

BigJim49 AustinNowDallas said:

Will we ever hear results of the Arizona audit?


Karen Fann says likely early next week after the Senate reviews the report from the audit group.


Thanks, B2 ! Hopefully, the Senate team will act speedily unless they know the audit didn't

change the outcome. Strange that there has been not a single leak !
BigJim49AustinnowDallas
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
agdaddy04
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Does it seem odd they don't mention his political party at all in the article?
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
agdaddy04 said:

Does it seem odd they don't mention his political party at all in the article?
A lot of cities have "non-partisan" elections where they pretend they don't belong to a party, but everybody knows which side is which.
richardag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
agdaddy04 said:

Does it seem odd they don't mention his political party at all in the article?
Doesn't really matter, just lock him and his cronies up.

That said, I cannot vouch for this site:
Isaac Galvan is Charged with Fraud In Election
Quote:

Talking about his political party, Issac belongs to the Democratic Party.

Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
richardag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SIAP
Cyber Ninjas don't have to turn over election audit records immediately, court rules
Quote:

The Arizona Court of Appeals on Wednesday decided that Republican members of the Senate and Cyber Ninjas, the company they contracted to audit the 2020 election, do not immediately have to turn over documents related to the audit, reversing a lower court's ruling.
Small win
Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Hopefully just another two weeks away from the Maricopa audit report spurring new forensic audits all across the country. Obviously a certified election from a year ago can't be overturned, but states need to see this report and say 'enough is enough' and put some damn integrity and transparency into elections. There's going to be some scope limitations in the AZ report and that alone is part of the problem. Every part of an election should be audit-able. There should never be missing or secret logs that can't be audited. There shouldn't be administrative passwords on machines that no one running the election knows. There shouldn't be remote/online access to machines. It's not racist and it's not voter suppression to show an ID to prove you are registered. Signature verification should absolutely be used. All adjudicated ballots should have a clear, accountable audit trail. Same day registration should be scrutinized. Unsolicited mass mailing of mail-in ballots to outdated and in many cases insecure and in some known cases last year, compromised registration rolls should not be allowed. No county or precinct in any state should be allowed to outsource running their election processes and if they do, there should be controls in place to ensure political bias/pressure and ulterior motives can't be used in the processes. The list goes on and on. There are known gaps in the process that pose as fraud risk and "not finding enough fraud this time" is not a good enough reason to keep the gaps/exposure open or to fight tooth and nail to prevent anti-fraud controls from being implemented. The AZ Senate's audit of their state's largest county needs to shed more light and rip this thing open across the country.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
will25u said:


agcrock2005
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
will25u said:


Fann ought to send a counter claim for the cost of the audit and tell them she will pay for the new machines as soon as MBOS fully complies with the subpoenas. And tell them Cyber Ninjas will be in charge of certifying the new machines for use.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Faustus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Pulitzer is pursuing an encoding angle that's below the eye frequency level on the legal ballots.

ANSC Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Water marks you say?
BuddysBud
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Biden et al have a created a great diversion to keep attention away from any election audit results?
We fixed the keg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I have been meaning to watch the HBO documentary about the 2016 election and finally did last night.

https://www.hbo.com/documentaries/kill-chain-the-cyber-war-on-americas-elections

It was quite interesting, especially the parts where they went into how easy it was to impact and manipulate the systems. Even more so, some of the history and familiar names like Diebold to Dominion, ES&S, Pro V&V, SLI, etc. What I found truly amazing is the number of democrats and "experts" who were bemoaning how this shouldn't be a "partisan issue" and that everyone should care. Additionally, the people repeating over and over, "without paper ballots and chain of custody, you cannot confirm an election." Yet now, this is all Q conspiracy, not possible, everything is good, etc etc etc.

Hawg, if you haven't seen it, I recommend you do. It is very interesting to watch/listen while changing the date from November 2016 to November 2020 in your mind. They SAME things they are saying are EXACTLY what is being said now and on a larger scale.
richardag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Faustus said:

Pulitzer is pursuing an encoding angle that's below the eye frequency level on the legal ballots.


If true, wha was encoded on the ballots?
Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
First Page Last Page
Page 509 of 597
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.