aggiehawg said:

---

Just an odd corrupt decision in my view.

---

FIFY

Ken Bennett #azaudit director said to Tucson based talk show host Garrett Lewis that he went from thinking there would be a 90% chance they wouldn't find something to a 70 to 80% chance they would b/c of the push back they are getting.

— The AZ - abc15 - Data Guru (@Garrett_Archer) May 10, 2021

Hmm. Here's a case in Georgia of which I was unaware. Link

Reading through it got to the Exhibits starting on page 19. Letters and affidavits. Exhibit #6 starts on page 39, affidavit of Bridget Thorne, certified by Fulton County as a voting technician and was temporarily assigned to assist Dominion in prepping for the November 3 election doing the pre-testing for the machines.

She saw Dominion officials handling the "test ballots" in a very insecure manner, printing them on the same paper stock as the actual ballots and leaving them unsecured and in messy piles when other actual ballots were in the same room. Many test ballots were claimed to be "lost" by Dominion and she was ordered to reprint them.

She was alarmed enough to recruit her daughter, also a voting technician working for Dominion to start spoiling the test ballots by marking through the QR codes, even tearing the ballots. Together they did that to a couple of thousands but definitely nowhere close to all of them.

Then early voting ended and all of the machines were brought into the Georgia World Congress Building B to be prepped for election day voting. These included 50 tabulators from State Farm Arena (again during early voting) that still had ballots in them. They had not been retrieved and secured as mandated by law.

Dominion workers just put them into haphazard piles again. Dominion workers were left alone with these piles and piles of ballot.

Bridget also served on election day. What happened with the "ACLU clerks" on election day, with Fulton County officials full knowledge is atrocious! Rick Barron even told her that she should not have been told these people were from the ACLU.

Strongly urge you to read the rest. So much for Dominion's claims that they don't run the elections. They did in Georgia, just like in Arizona.

Coming back around on the ACLU "clerks" on election day. Bridget recounts that when she showed up as the poll manager at Johns Creek polling location on election day, there was a woman from the ACLU who served as an absentee clerk. The woman told her she was a lawyer and had been trained the preceding week.

Bridget had been given a laptop for this clerk to use but there was no password provided. This ACLU clerk said that was no problem since she had her personal laptop and could use that. Apparently, this woman had access to the voter database on her personal computer in order to clear absentee voters!

In August-September 2019, there was a school board election. Two of the cases each containing the entire state of Georgia databases were stolen from a polling location. The one system that Dominion doesn't change (ever) is the voter database system. That system was still in use. And some rando ACLU lawyer had it on her personal computer.

This seems odd. I'd think it'd be 90% they do find something?

agdaddy04 said:

---

This seems odd. I'd think it'd be 90% they do find something?

---

Bennett is not being told any results other than numbers processed a day. Part of the agreement. He gets raw numbers to asses how quickly they are processing, that is it.

Don't want to turn this into the Q thread, but here's a good follow if you use Telegram: https://t.me/CodeMonkeyZ

Back to Jan Bryant and her testimony last November.

Quote:

---

Jan Bryant: ten days before they quit tabulating they thought they were done. And then more truck loads of ballots would come in. And I'm like, how can you not know how many ballots are still out there.

State House Rep. David L. Cook: Mr. Chairman I'm sorry. WOULD YOU REPEAT THAT. They thought they were done, and then there was WHAT?

Jan Bryant: They thought they were done multiple times. Multiple times the people that were running the rooms thought they were done (counting ballots), or almost done. Or were gonna be done Wednesday morning (Nov. 4th), then Thursday morning (Nov. 5th), then Friday morning. Then it went on the whole next week. And I'm like, I asked the question, You don't know how many ballots are still left to come in? I don't know who does, againprocessproject management, but zero.

State House Rep. Mark Finchem: On that point Ma'am, I'm tracking with you but, what day did the truck show up?

Jan Bryant:Every day, yeah, every day.

Mark Finchem: OK. Just a minute. I want to make sure we capture this properly. So there were trucks that showed up on the 3rd, and then the 4th, and then the 5th, and how long did that go on. How many days?

Jan Bryant: I wasn't there the whole last week. My last day was the 10th and they were still coming in. They were coming from a company called Runbeck, that does the high speed scanning and printing of duplications, and I think the military ballots. And now I'm getting out of my comfort level here talking about this. I don't know what they are doing but those ballots are coming in from a high speed scanning company called Runbeck that. apparently you haven't heard of Runbeck.

Mark Finchem: No, I've heard of Runbeck Ma'am. What I'm trying to figure out is whether they printed them or if they scanned them. And if they scanned them offsite, to what purpose?

Jan Bryant: I can't tell you.

Mark Finchem: Wasn't that your job to scan them? I mean, not your job, but the (MCTEC).
Jan Bryant: No, all the high speed scanning happens at Runbeck. So, those ballots go to Runbeck. As far as I know there were no observers there. I don't know. I never got called to work at Runbeck. That's all I can tell you.

Mark Finchem: OK, with all do respect Mr. Cook, now we've now opened up a whole new can of worms.

Jan Bryant: And again I don't know enough about it to be the witness.

Mark Finchem: No that's fine. Your observation is useful here. What you telling me is the scanning wasn't actually done on site at a Maricopa County structure. It was done someplace else.
Jan Bryant: Where they have very high speed scanners.

Mark Finchem: Right now I really don't care what the speed is. I want to know were they Dominion scanners?

Jan Bryant: No, no, I don't think it has anything to do with Dominion.

Mark Finchem: I'm trying to understand what was the purpose of scanning them in advance of them being tabulated on the Dominion equipment.

Jan Bryant: They were duplicate, duplications. The ballots that wouldn't read through the tabulation machines. They were ballots that came in from Military and overseas. BUT THERE WERE MORE BALLOTS THAN THAT. So I don't know where the rest of them were coming from. Because they kept bringing trays of them in. So I don't know where they were coming from. That's a question for the county employees to explain to you, where those ballots came from that whole next week. I don't know where they came from.

Rudy Giuliani: So you were there from Nov. 3rd through the 10th. Seven days later (after election) ballots were still coming in.

Jan Bryant: Yes.

---

Quote:

---

State Senator Sylvia Allen (07:00:09): Ms Bryant, I'm curious, why did the county on the last days you were there, brought in county employees to take part in, being part of the observers?

Jan Bryant: They weren't observing they were actually adjudicating. So they were doing.. I think they just need all hands on deck. I mean, that was the intent, was to get the work done and finish counting because they kept thinking they were done and.

Senator Allen: I was thinking they were working to make up for the lack of not having Republicans. So were we (Republicans) short of having volunteers to go in and observers in Maricopa.

Jan Bryant: I don't believe so. There was always at least two of us in the tabulation center and at least one in one of the other rooms like signature verification. What the (county) employees were doing was the adjudication work which also requires two different parties to adjudicate each ballot. So you had to have at least 2 of the 3 parties to do that. So that's what the county employees were doing at the end. They brought them on just to help with the backlog.

---

Video at Link

So who is Runbeck? They print ballots and stuff the envelopes for mail in ballots.

Quote:

---

The company moved to a larger facility near Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport in 2018 and has expanded to another building nearby.

Around this point, the company is staffed by about 180 full-time employees and another 200 seasonal workers.

Stacks of envelopes around the company's two facilities are labeled with signs showing final destinations, from counties in California to Colorado and Georgia

But if those are the final destinations for each ballot, the journey for each begins on printers that roll out as many as 2 million a day.

---

Quote:

---

Workers feed the ballots along with envelopes into machines that scan each envelope, match it with a voter and stuff the envelope with the right paperwork for each voter.

It's much faster than stuffing envelopes by hand.

The machines also include some security measures meant to stop fraud and mix-ups.

The barcodes allow election officials to match the envelopes they sent out to the envelopes they receive back. If someone tries submitting a ballot inside an envelope that was not logged at the start of the process, it would raise a red flag for election officials.

Machines also weigh each envelope once sealed. An envelope that is too heavy or too light might have been stuffed with the wrong forms or more than one ballot.

---

Quote:

---

In 2014, a glitch with a scanner that lasted less than a minute meant about 1,000 ballots were stuffed into the wrong envelopes, Runbeck said.

Some of those ballots were meant for Maricopa County voters, and election officials sent replacements.

The company is expecting to handle 31 million ballots for the general election, but the problems with a thousand or so ballots in 2014 did not go unnoticed.

---

I'm confused. Who does the scanning of the bar codes on the envelopes? County election workers? Or Runbeck? Jan Bryant seems to be saying a private company, like Runbeck does that. So where is the chain of custody here?

ETA" Ooops forgot the Runbeck Link

Runbeck in Georgia. From Sec of State's office.

Quote:

---

Georgia election officials, working with Dominion Voting and Runbeck Election Services, have sent more than one million absentee ballots to Georgia voters for the June 9 primary election. The new development underscores the speed and efficiency with which county election officials are processing absentee ballot requests and the excellent work of the mail vendors and the U.S. Postal Service to get the ballots in the mail and delivered to voters.

---

What role would Dominion play in that? They don't have anything to do with the voter rolls in any of their voting systems. At least they are not supposed to.

Quote:

---

"For a state that previously had only around 40,000 mail ballots voted in past general primary elections, the surge to one million ballots sent out is a monumental accomplishment on its own," said Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger. "That it was done in such a short time and under the restrictions of a global pandemic is a testament to the hard work of Georgia's election officials on the state and local level."

Georgia election officials have mailed out more than one million absentee ballots to Georgians planning to vote absentee by mail in the June 9 statewide general primary and Presidential Preference Primary. During the 2016 general primary only around 37,000 absentee ballots were submitted by mail. 200,000 were submitted for the November 2016 general election, just one fifth of the total we are seeing with more than one month to go until the June 9 election date.

---

Quote:

---

Instead of leaving the sending of absentee ballot request forms to local elections offices or third party organizations, the Secretary of State's office took on that responsibility, coordinating with experienced state vendors for the printing and mailing of the request forms. The Secretary of State's office also contracted with outside mail vendors for the fulfillment of the absentee ballot requests, including the provision of processing equipment and printing and mailing ballots, to take that burden off of local elections officials.

At the same time, the Secretary of State's office is focusing resources and energy to support early and Election Day in-person voting. In addition to procuring sanitation equipment to distribute directly to counties, the Secretary of State is providing millions of dollars in grants to local elections offices for sanitation equipment, elections infrastructure, and other voting needs. One grant in particular is dedicated to equipment like drop boxes, which will make it easier for voters to return their absentee ballots and for local elections offices to accept them.

---

Link

This is a stolen election circus, in the 1st ring we have...

Criminal circus just entertaining the FBI or FBI actually participating as the clowns.

Notice in my previous post that last statements about "grant monies" including "election infrastructure" and "drop boxes." They try to make it appear it was intragency grants of tax payer funds when it really came from Zuckerberg through CTCL.

From the Desk of Donald J. Trump:

Quote:

---

Donald J. Trump
8:52pm May 10, 2021
The major Michigan Election Fraud case has just filed a bombshell pleading claiming votes were intentionally switched from President Trump to Joe Biden. The number of votes is MASSIVE and determinative. This will prove true in numerous other States. All Republicans must UNIFY and not let this happen. If a thief robs a jewelry store of all of its diamonds (the 2020 Presidential Election), the diamonds must be returned. The Fake News media refuses to cover the greatest Election Fraud in the history of our Country. They have lost all credibility, but ultimately, they will have no choice!

---

Chances of that actually happening?

Agvet12 said:

---

Tailgate88 said:

---

From the Desk of Donald J. Trump:

Quote:

---

Donald J. Trump
8:52pm May 10, 2021
The major Michigan Election Fraud case has just filed a bombshell pleading claiming votes were intentionally switched from President Trump to Joe Biden. The number of votes is MASSIVE and determinative. This will prove true in numerous other States. All Republicans must UNIFY and not let this happen. If a thief robs a jewelry store of all of its diamonds (the 2020 Presidential Election), the diamonds must be returned. The Fake News media refuses to cover the greatest Election Fraud in the history of our Country. They have lost all credibility, but ultimately, they will have no choice!

---

Chances of that actually happening?

---

0% courts will protect what is fundamentally an American right, which means they discredit future elections in order to protect the "integrity" of a stolen election

---

Unfortunately I agree. Disgusting.

agcrock2005 said:

---

Agvet12 said:

---

Tailgate88 said:

---

From the Desk of Donald J. Trump:

Quote:

---

Donald J. Trump
8:52pm May 10, 2021
The major Michigan Election Fraud case has just filed a bombshell pleading claiming votes were intentionally switched from President Trump to Joe Biden. The number of votes is MASSIVE and determinative. This will prove true in numerous other States. All Republicans must UNIFY and not let this happen. If a thief robs a jewelry store of all of its diamonds (the 2020 Presidential Election), the diamonds must be returned. The Fake News media refuses to cover the greatest Election Fraud in the history of our Country. They have lost all credibility, but ultimately, they will have no choice!

---

Chances of that actually happening?

---

0% courts will protect what is fundamentally an American right, which means they discredit future elections in order to protect the "integrity" of a stolen election

---

Unfortunately I agree. Disgusting.

---

I agree and THIS is the reason the fence with razor wire and troops surround the Capitol. They fear the public reaction WHEN all is uncovered.

Prognightmare said:

---

agcrock2005 said:

---

Agvet12 said:

---

Tailgate88 said:

---

From the Desk of Donald J. Trump:

Quote:

---

Donald J. Trump
8:52pm May 10, 2021
The major Michigan Election Fraud case has just filed a bombshell pleading claiming votes were intentionally switched from President Trump to Joe Biden. The number of votes is MASSIVE and determinative. This will prove true in numerous other States. All Republicans must UNIFY and not let this happen. If a thief robs a jewelry store of all of its diamonds (the 2020 Presidential Election), the diamonds must be returned. The Fake News media refuses to cover the greatest Election Fraud in the history of our Country. They have lost all credibility, but ultimately, they will have no choice!

---

Chances of that actually happening?

---

0% courts will protect what is fundamentally an American right, which means they discredit future elections in order to protect the "integrity" of a stolen election

---

Unfortunately I agree. Disgusting.

---

I agree and THIS is the reason the fence with razor wire and troops surround the Capitol. They fear the public reaction WHEN all is uncovered.

---

That reminds me, I need to start a thread about how the Capitol Hill Police are refusing to release surveillance video of January 6th, even to defense attorneys. They are hiding a lot.

aggiehawg said:

---

Prognightmare said:

---

agcrock2005 said:

---

Agvet12 said:

---

Tailgate88 said:

---

From the Desk of Donald J. Trump:

Quote:

---

Donald J. Trump
8:52pm May 10, 2021
The major Michigan Election Fraud case has just filed a bombshell pleading claiming votes were intentionally switched from President Trump to Joe Biden. The number of votes is MASSIVE and determinative. This will prove true in numerous other States. All Republicans must UNIFY and not let this happen. If a thief robs a jewelry store of all of its diamonds (the 2020 Presidential Election), the diamonds must be returned. The Fake News media refuses to cover the greatest Election Fraud in the history of our Country. They have lost all credibility, but ultimately, they will have no choice!

---

Chances of that actually happening?

---

0% courts will protect what is fundamentally an American right, which means they discredit future elections in order to protect the "integrity" of a stolen election

---

Unfortunately I agree. Disgusting.

---

I agree and THIS is the reason the fence with razor wire and troops surround the Capitol. They fear the public reaction WHEN all is uncovered.

---

That reminds me, I need to start a thread about how the Capitol Hill Police are refusing to release surveillance video of January 6th, even to defense attorneys. They are hiding a lot.

---

IMO, they knew the truth would be revealed and are scared and they staged the "siege" and the press pushed the same narrative. A real siege would result in the Capitol building in flames, that's what they fear. They needed a reason to fortify it.

https://t.co/9YqRRUWSUo

— 🚨Patriot news (@Grahmptr) May 11, 2021

From that link:

WINDHAM, NH! 🚨 I am here on the ground where the ballot counting devices have just been delivered. I’m told ballots will arrive next. @HarriHursti and Mark Lindeman of @VerifiedVoting are here with @philipbstark expected to arrive this evening. @RealAmVoice pic.twitter.com/A2MZfXoc6p

— Heather Mullins - Real America’s Voice (RAV-TV) (@TalkMullins) May 11, 2021

A couple of points:

Lindeman of Verified Voting demanded Maricopa County not be allowed to audit. He's a believer in the election being completely fraud free. Verified Voting has financial ties to Soros funded organization.

Harry Hursti is white hat hacker with loads of experience in the electronic election voting systems. He testified as an expert against Dominion and Raffensperger in the Georgia case.

Phillip Stark is the Stanford professor who came up with the Risk Limited Audit and he too has said in the past that Dominion's configuration was not conducive to verifiable nor accurate RLAs. IIRC, he was also an expert in the Georgia case.

aggiehawg said:

---

From that link:

WINDHAM, NH! 🚨 I am here on the ground where the ballot counting devices have just been delivered. I’m told ballots will arrive next. @HarriHursti and Mark Lindeman of @VerifiedVoting are here with @philipbstark expected to arrive this evening. @RealAmVoice pic.twitter.com/A2MZfXoc6p

— Heather Mullins - Real America’s Voice (RAV-TV) (@TalkMullins) May 11, 2021

A couple of points:

Lindeman of Verified Voting demanded Maricopa County not be allowed to audit. He's a believer in the election being completely fraud free. Verified Voting has financial ties to Soros funded organization.

Harry Hurst is white hat hacker with loads of experience in the electronic election voting systems. He testified as an expert against Dominion and Raffensperger in the Georgia case.

Phillip Stark is the Stanford professor who came up with the Risk Limited Audit and he too has said in the past that Dominion's configuration was not conducive to verifiable nor accurate RLAs. IIRC, he was also an expert in the Georgia case.

---

Didn't they relent after last week and allow Cyber Ninjas to do the audit? I apologize for not keeping up.

No. Cyber Ninjas may be involved in Antrim County, MI though. Depends on if the judge dismisses the case next week or not.

Keegan99 said:

---

A reminder that Tarrant County's election administrator cut his teeth running elections for Chavez in Venezuela.

https://texags.com/forums/16/topics/3158749

Anyone with that experience on their resume shouldn't be permitted anywhere near US elections.

---

that's exactly who today's Democrats want running our elections. Hugo Chavez is their model for America.

aggiehawg said:

---

From that link:

WINDHAM, NH! 🚨 I am here on the ground where the ballot counting devices have just been delivered. I’m told ballots will arrive next. @HarriHursti and Mark Lindeman of @VerifiedVoting are here with @philipbstark expected to arrive this evening. @RealAmVoice pic.twitter.com/A2MZfXoc6p

— Heather Mullins - Real America’s Voice (RAV-TV) (@TalkMullins) May 11, 2021

A couple of points:

Lindeman of Verified Voting demanded Maricopa County not be allowed to audit. He's a believer in the election being completely fraud free. Verified Voting has financial ties to Soros funded organization.

Harry Hurst is white hat hacker with loads of experience in the electronic election voting systems. He testified as an expert against Dominion and Raffensperger in the Georgia case.

Phillip Stark is the Stanford professor who came up with the Risk Limited Audit and he too has said in the past that Dominion's configuration was not conducive to verifiable nor accurate RLAs. IIRC, he was also an expert in the Georgia case.

---

Lindeman and Verified Voting should NOT be allowed anywhere near ballots, election equipment of any kind and should be escorted and video taped by monitors.

aggiehawg said:

---

Quote:

---

Team Trump and Republicans nationwide made unprecedented inroads with black and Hispanic voters. Nationally, preliminary numbers indicated that 26 percent of Trump's voting share came from nonwhite voters the highest percentage for a GOP presidential candidate since 1960.

In Florida's Miami-Dade County, the heartland of Cuban America, Trump turned a 30-plus-point Hillary Clinton romp in 2016 into a narrow single-digit Joe Biden win. Texas' Starr County, overwhelmingly Mexican American and positioned in the heart of the Rio Grande Valley, barely delivered for the Democrats. Biden's Hispanic support in other key swing states, like Ohio and Georgia, tailed off from Clinton's 2016 benchmarks.

Overall, exit polls indicated that 32 to 35 percent of Latinos voted for the president. And young black men are gravitating to the GOP at a remarkable pace (given the baseline).

It turns out that minorities aren't so infatuated with the brand of unrepentant progressive "woke-ism" now peddled by the Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez wing of the Democratic Party. The political, legal, media, corporate and academic establishments have gone all-in on the woke agenda, peddling a toxic brew of intersectionality, socialism lite and Black Lives Matter anarchism. Latinos and many blacks aren't buying it. As one Twitter wit quipped, Democrats may have won the "Latinx vote," but they didn't fare well with actual Latinos.

---

Link

Quote:

---

Newly released data show that the majority of former President Donald Trump's supporters in the 2020 election were women and people of color.

The share of Trump voters who were women or people of color in last year's election was 57.2%, up from 54.8% in 2016, according to newly released data from Catalist. The former president also increased his support among all racial demographics in 2020, with the exception of white men, making a 7-point gain among nonwhite women, a 4-point gain with nonwhite men, a 1-point gain with white women, and a 1-point loss among white men.

The data also showed that Trump enjoyed a large increase in support among Latino voters, though Democrats still captured a majority of the group.

"Along with massive increases in turnout, Latino vote share as a whole swung towards Trump by 8 points in two-way vote share compared to 2016, though Biden-Harris still enjoyed solid majority (61%) support among this group," Catalist wrote in its analysis of the data. "Some of the shift from 2016 appears to be a result of changing voting preferences among people who voted in both elections, and some may come from new voters who were more evenly split in their vote choice than previous Latino voters. This question presents particularly challenging data analysis problems, which we discuss more in a dedicated section below."

---

Link

There's no way Biden won legitimately.

---

This information regarding a 1 point gain in white women is indicative of my belief that white suburban women turned on Trump because of mean tweets was another MSM fiction. I never believed that. I stated in another thread on this subject that I think that narrative was put out there prior to election to prime everyone into believing Trump was going to lose as a way of preconditioning people to accept the stolen election as legitimate.

The MSM blanketed everyone with that narrative before and after the election ad nauseum.

The people melting down over mean tweets were never going to vote for Trump to begin with.

All of the ones here who whined about mean tweets were our resident leftists.

Keegan99 said:

---

A reminder that Tarrant County's election administrator cut his teeth running elections for Chavez in Venezuela.

https://texags.com/forums/16/topics/3158749

Anyone with that experience on their resume shouldn't be permitted anywhere near US elections.

---

how do we get him ousted?

Ags4DaWin said:

---

Keegan99 said:

---

A reminder that Tarrant County's election administrator cut his teeth running elections for Chavez in Venezuela.

https://texags.com/forums/16/topics/3158749

Anyone with that experience on their resume shouldn't be permitted anywhere near US elections.

---

how do we get him ousted?

---

Excellent question.