*****OFFICIAL ELECTION DAY THREAD*****

2,699,109 Views | 20889 Replies | Last: 2 yr ago by Whistle Pig
Rossticus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Brian Earl Spilner said:

Silvertaps said:

Brian Earl Spilner said:

President Elect Biden

Because CNN said so?




Take your pick.


Cabal
richardag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mr Gigem said:

LOL if you think they were rightly punished. And sure, I would invite an investigation if there was actually any proof of fraud or cheating. All the "proof" that is currently out there has already been debunked
Has any of the evidence below been debunked?
Quote:

Has this been posted in this thread?
Original post by JFABNRGR

https://texags.com/forums/16/topics/3154740/replies/57864175

Watch it all or start at 24 min to answer your question.





Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
PJYoung
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Good Poster said:




You do realize that's just because the order of counting those ballots was backwards, right? Those people voted for Biden before election day but they were counted after. That's it. Optics.
RadAg14
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
No you have to have a 5d chess play reasoning why that happened
Chase
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
PJYoung said:

Good Poster said:




You do realize that's just because the order of counting those ballots was backwards, right? Those people voted for Biden before election day but they were counted after. That's it. Optics.


It being nothing more than optics is exactly what the left is hoping will be seen but the numbers simply dont back that up.

- Number of people that didnt bother to vote down the ticket
- Numbers that do not fit in with decades of historical data.
- Zero chance Biden engendered more support than Obama.
- Too many voting irregularities, "glitches," and "mistakes"
Chef Elko
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Oh noes they called it!!!!1!11!!!

Everyone on this thread, dem or rep, knows it's going to the courts. Reasonable doubt is a thing.
84AGEC
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
You do realize that's what the leftist media wants you to think
munch96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
https://www.theepochtimes.com/why-the-epoch-times-wont-call-the-presidential-race-until-all-challenges-are-resolved_3568313.html
Reload8098
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Chase said:

PJYoung said:

Good Poster said:




You do realize that's just because the order of counting those ballots was backwards, right? Those people voted for Biden before election day but they were counted after. That's it. Optics.


It being nothing more than optics is exactly what the left is hoping will be seen but the numbers simply dont back that up.

- Number of people that didnt bother to vote down the ticket
- Numbers that do not fit in with decades of historical data.
- Zero chance Biden engendered more support than Obama.
- Too many voting irregularities, "glitches," and "mistakes"

10's of thousands of votes that went all towards one candidate?? Really, that's legitimate? Bull crap. I would be just as mad if Republicans stole an election. I realize many people in this country don't have a moral or ethics compass as long as they get their way. I believe ethics/morality matter.
"What country before ever existed a century and a half without a rebellion? And what country can preserve its liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms. The remedy is to set them right as to facts, pardon and pacify them. What signify a few lives lost in a century or two? The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. It is its natural manure." Thomas Jefferson
policywonk98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Remember how the media spent a year in Florida and millions of dollars investigating the ballots and outcome of 2000? They did it even after a SCOTUS decision.

I do. I was in Washington at the time.

They will try everything in their power to spend no resources investigating a single thing here.

Their partisan hypocrisy knows no bounds.
GEA89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
We live in a country of morons, public education really needs a good hard look apparently
LostInLA07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
GEA89 said:

We live in a country of morons, public education really needs a good hard look apparently


I think it's working just how they want it to.
Aggie118
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
You guys are ridiculous. How does the news announcing the winner as Biden change anything we knew going forward? It's 100% without a doubt going to the courts. Not over by a long shot.
tsuag10
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
policywonk98 said:

Remember how the media spent a year in Florida and millions of dollars investigating the ballots and outcome of 2000? They did it even after a SCOTUS decision.

I do. I was in Washington at the time.

They will try everything in their power to spend no resources investigating a single thing here.

Their partisan hypocrisy knows no bounds.
Will any DC Republicans fight this? Or will most of them breathe a sigh of relief when Trump is gone?
“Progressivism is the b@stard child of Marxism.” — Mark Levin

“Indeed the safest road to Hell is the gradual one—the gentle slope, soft underfoot, without sudden turnings, without milestones, without signposts…” — CS Lewis, The Screwtape Letters

RebelE Infantry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
You're right. Everyone needs to remember that we knew they were going to do this all along.
aggieforester05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Aggie118 said:

You guys are ridiculous. How does the news announcing the winner as Biden change anything we knew going forward? It's 100% without a doubt going to the courts. Not over by a long shot.
It's all about public perception and LIVs. They see the headlines and start believing Trump is in the wrong. Our media is very powerful and extremely dishonest.
aggieforester05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
tsuag10 said:

policywonk98 said:

Remember how the media spent a year in Florida and millions of dollars investigating the ballots and outcome of 2000? They did it even after a SCOTUS decision.

I do. I was in Washington at the time.

They will try everything in their power to spend no resources investigating a single thing here.

Their partisan hypocrisy knows no bounds.
Will any DC Republicans fight this? Or will most of them breathe a sigh of relief when Trump is gone?
If they're relieved Trump was replaced by a corrupt Democrat then they are not very smart and an enemy of the state.
We fixed the keg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Mr Gigem said:

mazag08 said:

Mr Gigem said:

This thread is full delusion


Cowboys and Rangers fan talking about delusions. Hahahaha


This is rich, coming from an Astros fan whose team was CAUGHT cheating
That's gonna leave a mark......

Well played sir.
Reload8098
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
https://nworeport.me/2020/10/24/evidence-shows-houston-judge-election-staff-cheating-in-election-right-now/
"What country before ever existed a century and a half without a rebellion? And what country can preserve its liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms. The remedy is to set them right as to facts, pardon and pacify them. What signify a few lives lost in a century or two? The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. It is its natural manure." Thomas Jefferson
tsuag10
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggieforester05 said:

tsuag10 said:

policywonk98 said:

Remember how the media spent a year in Florida and millions of dollars investigating the ballots and outcome of 2000? They did it even after a SCOTUS decision.

I do. I was in Washington at the time.

They will try everything in their power to spend no resources investigating a single thing here.

Their partisan hypocrisy knows no bounds.
Will any DC Republicans fight this? Or will most of them breathe a sigh of relief when Trump is gone?
If they're relieved Trump was replaced by a corrupt Democrat then they are not very smart and an enemy of the state.

I was listening to a more liberal podcast (I guess I'm a masochist) and one asked the other, "Doesn't it make more sense now that we've realized that establishment Dems aren't spineless or incompetent? It's that they don't want to implement the new progressive policy that we want because it would put their power at risk."

It really summed up exactly how I feel about establishment Repubs.
“Progressivism is the b@stard child of Marxism.” — Mark Levin

“Indeed the safest road to Hell is the gradual one—the gentle slope, soft underfoot, without sudden turnings, without milestones, without signposts…” — CS Lewis, The Screwtape Letters

Aggie118
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I understand that, but again how is this coming as a surprise? You thought the news wasn't going to call it? We knew it would be an uphill battle.
aggieforester05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
tsuag10 said:

aggieforester05 said:

tsuag10 said:

policywonk98 said:

Remember how the media spent a year in Florida and millions of dollars investigating the ballots and outcome of 2000? They did it even after a SCOTUS decision.

I do. I was in Washington at the time.

They will try everything in their power to spend no resources investigating a single thing here.

Their partisan hypocrisy knows no bounds.
Will any DC Republicans fight this? Or will most of them breathe a sigh of relief when Trump is gone?
If they're relieved Trump was replaced by a corrupt Democrat then they are not very smart and an enemy of the state.

I was listening to a more liberal podcast (I guess I'm a masochist) and one asked the other, "Doesn't it make more sense now that we've realized that establishment Dems aren't spineless or incompetent? It's that they don't want to implement the new progressive policy that we want because it would put their power at risk."

It really summed up exactly how I feel about establishment Repubs.
Same side of a different coin. Two different ideologies fighting against each other with crappy politicians representing them. Difference is one ideology is responsible for the most successful nation the world has ever known and the other ideology is responsible for the suffering and misery of hundreds of millions of souls throughout history.
SLAM
How long do you want to ignore this user?
tsuag10 said:

policywonk98 said:

Remember how the media spent a year in Florida and millions of dollars investigating the ballots and outcome of 2000? They did it even after a SCOTUS decision.

I do. I was in Washington at the time.

They will try everything in their power to spend no resources investigating a single thing here.

Their partisan hypocrisy knows no bounds.
Will any DC Republicans fight this? Or will most of them breathe a sigh of relief when Trump is gone?





These two are going to fight it at least.
aggieforester05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Aggie118 said:

I understand that, but again how is this coming as a surprise? You thought the news wasn't going to call it? We knew it would be an uphill battle.
No I'm not surprised at all. The depths of depravity the media will go to to help Democrats knows no bounds. They are our greatest threat to our freedom because they empower those who want to take it away.
tsuag10
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
And hopefully Tom Cotton to that list too.
“Progressivism is the b@stard child of Marxism.” — Mark Levin

“Indeed the safest road to Hell is the gradual one—the gentle slope, soft underfoot, without sudden turnings, without milestones, without signposts…” — CS Lewis, The Screwtape Letters

We fixed the keg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Mr Gigem said:

LOL if you think they were rightly punished. And sure, I would invite an investigation if there was actually any proof of fraud or cheating. All the "proof" that is currently out there has already been debunked
man, your Astros post had me have hope for you and then you just ruined it 3 posts later. "Some" irregularities have been explained/debunked, many have either not been looked into, addressed, or been answered, and I would bet some have not even been made public yet.

No presidency is as dangerous as a fraudulent election, nor is one worth it. Especially one that will only effectively last 2 years. If you leave +70 million people without answers 2022 is going to be a midterm blood bath with the potential of super majorities in both houses.
Good Poster
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG

Good Poster
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG

SLAM
How long do you want to ignore this user?
tsuag10 said:

And hopefully Tom Cotton to that list too.


He is.
JamesE4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Good Poster said:



Is there more information on this? Link?
SLAM
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Good Poster said:





I am far too much of a brainlet to understand these numbers apparently.
Anti-taxxer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
SLAM said:

Good Poster said:





I am far too much of a brainlet to understand these numbers apparently.

Nothing to see here other than thousands of people excited to vote for Joe Biden!!
Good Poster
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Trump: The Art of the Deal

Biden: The Art of the Steal

Harris: The Art of the Kneel
BoerneAg11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
People, this is not hard to fact check

https://www.electionreturns.pa.gov/General/CountyResults?countyName=Lancaster&ElectionID=undefined&ElectionType=G&IsActive=undefined
Rossticus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Good Poster said:





Why couldn't they get it done in 4 years? Epic administration failure IMO.
First Page Last Page
Page 265 of 597
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.