SpaceX and other space news updates

1,502,066 Views | 16504 Replies | Last: 2 min ago by AtticusMatlock
bmks270
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This source says 12/31…. Really stretching to hit that 2022 mark.

first launch between Christmas and new years… but that is life at these space startups.

https://www.rocketlaunchschedule.com/relativity-space-terran-1-maiden-flight/
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


More here.

Quote:

Explanation: A mere seven hundred light years from Earth, toward the constellation Aquarius, a sun-like star is dying. The dying star's last few thousand years have produced the Helix Nebula (NGC 7293), a well studied and nearby example of a Planetary Nebula, typical of this final phase of stellar evolution. Combining narrow band image data from emission lines of hydrogen atoms in red and oxygen atoms in blue-green hues, it shows tantalizing details of the Helix, including its bright inner region about 3 light-years across. The white dot at the Helix's center is this Planetary Nebula's hot, central star. A simple looking nebula at first glance, the Helix is now understood to have a surprisingly complex geometry.
Jock 07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
bmks270 said:

Jock 07 said:

bmks270 said:

Anybody know Relativity's launch window? For all of their hype and marketing they haven't published a date on their website which still says 2022. They raised their rocket on the launch pad today.

ABL Space Systems launch window for their 1st rocket opened today, but is on hold due to a weather system. They've had 3 scrubbed attempts so must be pretty anxious to get those engines firing.



Supposed to go either overnight tonight or early tomorrow iirc, but wouldn't hold your breath. It's been on the docket for at least a few months now and keeps getting pushed.

I don't get it, they are a hype machine but a window time isn't posted on their website even though it's in the next day or two? I thought they wanted people to watch?
Yea I'm not entirely sure, looks like I was wrong, it's slated for ~3.5 hrs from now. Although that might be just the first launch window opening.
YellowPot_97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Falcon 9 launching 10 minutes.
RS1 launching in an hour 20
YellowPot_97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
That was a cool launch. Awesome light with the sunsetting. And they had awesome video of the first stage from the ground the entire trip up and back down!
hph6203
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Wild.

TexAgs91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG

I just saw that... HOLY ****!!!!


Jock 07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rs1 pushed to tomorrow afternoon ~ 4 TX time
AgBQ-00
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Came here to post this!! So awesome!!
GCRanger
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Other than Tim, the rest of the dear moon crew seems insufferable.

They don't seem like the type that will work well together to fix any technical, engineering issues during a trip around the moon.
Mathguy64
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
GCRanger said:

Other than Tim, the rest of the dear moon crew seems insufferable.

They don't seem like the type that will work well together to fix any technical, engineering issues during a trip around the moon.


I'm pretty sure if there are technical or engineering issues they won't be fixing anything.
jkag89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
YellowPot_97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Oh my god that's so awesome for Tim!!!
lb3
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm happy for Tim. But 8 people in a single dragon vehicle is going to really tax the toilet's capacity.

O2 and LiOH have been their limiting consumables to date with 4 crew missions so this sounds pretty sporty at first glance.

However NASA has a requirement to be able to feed a .25" leak all the way to splashdown. That's a valid requirement when the ocean is right under you and no more than a few hours away. On a multi day trip to the moon and back, it's basically impossible to feed a leak that long so I'm going to assume they will be filling one or more of their Nitrox tanks with Oxygen and will forgo the ability to feed a leak.

Honestly, I wish SpaceX would slow down a bit on these private missions. The Polaris Dawn mission will include an EVA which is pretty risky given they are going to use an adaptation of their existing IVA suit to do something it wasn't initially designed for.
The Kraken
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It's on Starship, not Dragon
plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose
lb3
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I missed that. The initial announcement was for a dragon on a Falcon Heavy. I guess I didn't realize they switched vehicles.
Mathguy64
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This is a long way off. Starship has a long way to go to get man rated much less something for a tourist mission.
TexAgs91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This may be a slight stretch for this thread, but it is astrophysics/cosmology related and may one day apply to space flight, but here is the headline:

Wormholes = quantum entanglement



Physicists Create a Holographic Wormhole Using a Quantum Computer

Quote:

Physicists have purportedly created the first-ever wormhole, a kind of tunnel theorized in 1935 by Albert Einstein and Nathan Rosen that leads from one place to another by passing into an extra dimension of space.
The wormhole emerged like a hologram out of quantum bits of information, or "qubits," stored in tiny superconducting circuits. By manipulating the qubits, the physicists then sent information through the wormhole, they reported today in the journal Nature.

The team, led by Maria Spiropulu of the California Institute of Technology, implemented the novel "wormhole teleportation protocol" using Google's quantum computer, a device called Sycamore housed at Google Quantum AI in Santa Barbara, California. With this first-of-its-kind "quantum gravity experiment on a chip," as Spiropulu described it, she and her team beat a competing group of physicists who aim to do wormhole teleportation with IBM and Quantinuum's quantum computers.

When Spiropulu saw the key signature indicating that qubits were passing through the wormhole, she said, "I was shaken."

The experiment can be seen as evidence for the holographic principle, a sweeping hypothesis about how the two pillars of fundamental physics, quantum mechanics and general relativity, fit together. Physicists have strived since the 1930s to reconcile these disjointed theories one, a rulebook for atoms and subatomic particles, the other, Einstein's description of how matter and energy warp the space-time fabric, generating gravity. The holographic principle, ascendant since the 1990s, posits a mathematical equivalence or "duality" between the two frameworks. It says the bendy space-time continuum described by general relativity is really a quantum system of particles in disguise. Space-time and gravity emerge from quantum effects much as a 3D hologram projects out of a 2D pattern.
hph6203
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Would be surprised if it happens this decade. Will be cool if it does.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Pretty cool. Tim living that space nerd dream. He seems like a good guy.
Jock 07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
RS1 pushed again to Sun, but I wouldn't hold my breath.
SoTxAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
At first glance Dear Moon trip looks like its being set up as a bad reality tv show. Hope thats not the case.
Premium
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I have a hard time believing they're going to bellyflop land 8 people after a trip to the moon on the hard surface ground? Sounds like you'd want about 1000 perfect landings before you tried it
Ag_of_08
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Powered landing is something that will definitely take a lot of work to perfect, and I'm not 100% sure that they'll ever do so with the vehicle crewed. It's a nice idea, but starship has an abort issue, along with a complex and difficult landing mode.

I think we're far more likely to see starship launched, fueled, and met by 1 or 2 dragons in orbit to bring crew there and especially back for the first decade or two
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I don't disagree initially but I do think the statistics geeks will start to work out pretty quickly that the risk of an in orbit loss of life transferring from (an outdated by then) crew dragon to starship will be a silly risk.

Cargo starship launches will wind up becoming so routine in this scenario/idea of a future 5+ years out that the debate will become a bit pedantic, as to abort/human risks (and F9 launches would also become a bit riskier as there wouldn't be the cadence/frequency of cargo launches).
Ag_of_08
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'd be leary of that argument, it's trending dangerously close to the line of reasoning that got us shuttle
TexAgs91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Splashdown coming at 11:39 am central
TexAgs91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It is within the atmosphere now
wangus12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
About to go subsonic. Looking good
wangus12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Good main chutes
TexAgs91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
wangus12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Splashdown
TexAgs91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Splashdown!!

TexAgs91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
One minute late
Premium
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Splashdowns are a bit of a letdown compared to what SpaceX has accomplished. Only an appropriate way to land on one planet.
First Page Last Page
Page 210 of 472
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.