I almost get the feeling that Elon would love to partner with NASA, but he's just as likely to flip them the bird and be waiting on the Moon for NASA's arrival if NASA flinches.
I think Elon wants DoD money.Flying Crowbar said:
I almost get the feeling that Elon would love to partner with NASA, but he's just as likely to flip them the bird and be waiting on the Moon for NASA's arrival if NASA flinches.
Will? He just won the most significant NASA award of at least this decade.scottimus said:
He will partner with NASA.
Was in response to Flying...nortex97 said:Will? He just won the most significant NASA award of at least this decade.scottimus said:
He will partner with NASA.
You're thinking about the KC-46 (Boeing) vs. KC-45 (Northrop/Airbus). I don't think congress forces this back, but they could 'give' more money so it is a dual award, I agree. BTW, Boeing has lost their ass on the KC-46 since, and will continue to do so for at least another two years.Maximus_Meridius said:
Holy hell, I never would have thought that they'd actually pick SpaceX...
That being said...this is NOT over. Make no mistake, Congress is going to force Boeing/LM/BO back into this somehow. They need their welfare program. Remember the KC-135 contract (I think it was that one)?
But man, how about NASA making the sensible decision?
Yep, you're right. Not sure about the additional money, I think it's going to be a "we believe the selection was flawed, we're going to give you a marginal increase in budget, go back and try again" kind of thing. There's too much at stake for them: LM/Boeing will be kicked squarely in the balls (well, not so much LM, their defense stuff should keep them happy), and Bezos is staring at a complete BO failure without this contract, which then screws ULA over with Vulcan*. I honestly don't know that SpaceX is the "best" choice because I don't necessarily think Starship works as a lander with Gateway, but when you look at performance over the last 5 years, or even 10, SpaceX has embarrassed everyone else.nortex97 said:You're thinking about the KC-46 (Boeing) vs. KC-45 (Northrop/Airbus). I don't think congress forces this back, but they could 'give' more money so it is a dual award, I agree. BTW, Boeing has lost their ass on the KC-46 since, and will continue to do so for at least another two years.Maximus_Meridius said:
Holy hell, I never would have thought that they'd actually pick SpaceX...
That being said...this is NOT over. Make no mistake, Congress is going to force Boeing/LM/BO back into this somehow. They need their welfare program. Remember the KC-135 contract (I think it was that one)?
But man, how about NASA making the sensible decision?
Centerpole90 said:
Do what??
You lucky SOB!Kenneth_2003 said:
The old saying, "If it ain't Boeing I ain't going" doesn't really ring true anymore.
That said my next flight will be on a Boeing aircraft. Though it's a significantly older design. B-29 Doc...
The new space race is now Xi vs Elon.Maximus_Meridius said:
With regards to SpaceX, IF this decision holds (still a big if to me), then I can honestly say that I will go from pessimistic about man ever reaching the moon before 2050, to believing it happens before the end of this decade. That's how big I think this decision is. Overemphasizing? Maybe, but I have zero confidence in anyone being able to beat SpaceX to the moon (unless Elon says **** that I'm going to Mars) at this point.
bthotugigem05 said:
I thought the manned launch was the 22nd?