SpaceX and other space news updates

2,634,688 Views | 22943 Replies | Last: 3 hrs ago by Bird Poo
hph6203
How long do you want to ignore this user?
On the long tail the manual controls will introduce more errors than they resolve. By a lot.
.
TexAgs91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It's for redundancy. It's a must-have
Chemistry happens and eventually the rocks get opinions...
Ad Lunam
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TexAgs91 said:

It's for redundancy. It's a must-have

You can have redundant systems without one of them being manual control.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
50 launches in '27 would be fantastic!

Featured Video Previews
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Would be pretty neat if they can pull it off.

double aught
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Why did they stop trying?
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
double aught said:

Why did they stop trying?


It depends if the weight of the cargo is low enough to have enough fuel to do it I believe. Most of the time they need to boost the orbit with the center stage so it makes it unrecoverable.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It has to be a real niche mission to recover the center core down range. Surprised to see that.
TexAgs91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Chemistry happens and eventually the rocks get opinions...
Ad Lunam
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?



double aught
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Those are badass. Good to see Pluto get its due credit.
Kenneth_2003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
double aught said:

Those are badass. Good to see Pluto get its due credit.

Why? It's not a planet.
It's the inner-most member of the kuieper belt
Jock 07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm more partial to that baby blue. Oh yea that reminds me, **** bud Adams, bout time to go piss on his grave again.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Up a bunch today I saw (pushing $170). I guess the options releases/blocks have finished and some valuation estimates are positive based on the SI/AI stuff.

As I'd expected, I wish I'd bought more shares. I do think volatility will continue, however. The V3 birds are still raising their orbits and have yet to begin testing communications in earnest.

More to follow.
Hey Nav
How long do you want to ignore this user?
For my modest "hobby" account, I finally bought SPCX a week ago. It's up 13% with today's bump. Charles Schwab still gives it an "F" grade. I think I was told to wait 'til it went south of $70 to buy. Oh well, it's just fun money.

CS also grades Rocket Lab as an "F". I bought it about 14 months ago. It's only up 64%.

I'm ready for a fun ride...
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hey Nav said:

For my modest "hobby" account, I finally bought SPCX a week ago. It's up 13% with today's bump. Charles Schwab still gives it an "F" grade. I think I was told to wait 'til it went south of $70 to buy. Oh well, it's just fun money.

CS also grades Rocket Lab as an "F". I bought it about 14 months ago. It's only up 64%.

I'm ready for a fun ride...

Yeah, I am pretty happy that I filled up the rest of my IPO request that wasn't initially granted back at $118.
Kenneth_2003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
txags92 said:

Hey Nav said:

For my modest "hobby" account, I finally bought SPCX a week ago. It's up 13% with today's bump. Charles Schwab still gives it an "F" grade. I think I was told to wait 'til it went south of $70 to buy. Oh well, it's just fun money.

CS also grades Rocket Lab as an "F". I bought it about 14 months ago. It's only up 64%.

I'm ready for a fun ride...

Yeah, I am pretty happy that I filled up the rest of my IPO request that wasn't initially granted back at $118.


I bought about a month ago at $140. Being laid off i picked up what I could. If I had paychecks coming in I would have made a bigger move.

No Ragerts!
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It's crowded up there!



Also... some space pron...

Arachnologistguy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Anyone here heard about a secret space program?
There is only one narrative: The ETs Farsight is in contact with are the good guys. Not so regarding the faction of et OUR military is in bed with.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?

techno-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Arachnologistguy said:

Anyone here heard about a secret space program?


The left cannot kill the Spirit of Charlie Kirk.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It's 'anonymous' from the @FT. Keep in mind they are straight enemy propaganda, whether Kiev, EU or anti-business;

FCC approved the SPCX direct-to-cell constellation plans (15K satellites).

(Which, for the record, ATT and VZW have dismissed as impossible, so expect an @FT piece shortly claiming it won't work, if it's not out already).
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I mean, they have doubted SpaceX every step of the way... And Elon is still raking in the wins over the doubters.



Quote:

SPACEX: Today, SpaceX was granted patent US 12,757,141 B1.

A Starlink satellite talks to phones on the ground through many narrow beams at once. A phone near the middle of a beam is closer to the satellite than a phone at the edge, so its signal arrives a little sooner. Cellular networks expect those arrivals to line up. If they do not, calls and data can slip out of step.

This patent is how SpaceX fixes this. For each short slice of time, the satellite measures how long the signal takes on every beam, using the distance from the satellite to a reference point inside that beam's footprint. It then holds the faster beams in a buffer just long enough that every beam matches the slowest one. The phone sees one steady delay instead of a mix.

The patent covers the satellite computer and the phased-array antenna that do this, plus the link from the satellite through a gateway into a normal mobile carrier's network.

Kenneth_2003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u said:



15,000 satellites
Assuming a 5 year life span, similar to Starlink V2
Assuming 50 units per Starship launch
60 launches per year
Jock 07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Arachnologistguy said:

Anyone here heard about a secret space program?


Not today vlad/xi
normaleagle05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Maximus_Meridius
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Given Elon's previous comments about keeping old flight articles around...I'm kinda curious what the end result here will be...
Tailgate88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Maximus_Meridius said:

Given Elon's previous comments about keeping old flight articles around...I'm kinda curious what the end result here will be...

I figured it was bound for the Rocket Garden at Starbase....
Kenneth_2003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Inspect the ablative layer below the tiles and the thermal impact to the SS beneath
techno-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
normaleagle05 said:



Glad they missed the hurricane brewing out there.
The left cannot kill the Spirit of Charlie Kirk.
PJYoung
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bthotugigem05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Would imagine it'll be chopped up for inspection.
First Page Last Page
Page 642 of 656 ▼
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.