SpaceX and other space news updates

1,401,075 Views | 15608 Replies | Last: 2 hrs ago by TexAgs91
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It did land on JRTI:





Oh boy.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Nice short video.

ETA: That first FH landing was pretty damn epic with them boosters almost simultaneously landing.

Quote:

The Storyline of this video is a series of SpaceX remarkable accomplishments, milestones that reshaped the space industry.

Epic SpaceX Rocket Landings
Events in chronological order

will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Faustus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
https://arstechnica.com/science/2022/07/rocket-report-a-minotaur-explodes-after-launch-starship-rolls-to-the-pad/

Quote:

. . .
SpaceX rolls vehicles to launch pad for tests. This week the company rolled both its "Booster 7" and "Ship 24" to its orbital launch pad in South Texas for tests. "Ship 24 was transported to the pad at Starbase in preparation for the first orbital flight test of Starship," SpaceX tweeted Wednesday, along with some lovely drone shots. If tests in the coming days and weeks go well, these could be the vehicles that SpaceX uses for the orbital flight test. But that's a big if.

Setting expectations ... We can probably have more confidence in the "Ship" upper stage, as SpaceX has been through several evolutions and flown prototypes half a dozen times. The bigger question is the booster, its ground systems, and the launch tower, all of which are new and of monumental size and complexity. I've heard that if everything goes well SpaceX could target early- to mid-August for the flight test. But a lot would have to go right for that to happen, and you should set your expectations accordingly.
. . .
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Flight plan filed;

Quote:

New Starship flight test docs for FCC:
https://apps.fcc.gov/oetcf/els/reports/ViewExhibitReport.cfm?id_file_num=1169-EX-ST-2022&application_seq=116809

Quote from: SpaceX
Quote:

FLIGHT PROFILE
The Starship-Super Heavy test flight will originate from Starbase, TX. The booster stage will
separate and will then perform a partial return and land in the Gulf of Mexico or return to
Starbase and be caught by the launch tower. The orbital Starship spacecraft will continue on its
path to an altitude of approximately 250 km before performing a powered, targeted landing in the
Pacific Ocean.

STARLINK TERMINALS
Multiple Starlink terminals will be fitted to each vehicle to ensure a clear view of the SpaceX
satellite constellation through the Starship flight profile. The terminals will use the same
antenna and communications electronics as SpaceX's previously authorized consumer
terminals but with a revised enclosure and mounting that is suitable for the mission profile.

Booster to 100 km, possibility they try to catch it, or just dump in the gulf.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Apologies in advance, first AA video I've watched in months (as I got burnt out on his tone/attitudes), but if you skip to around 10 minutes it's an interesting Relativity update.

I didn't realize these guys got their funding originally from a cold-email to Mark Cuban. Sounds like things are going well toward 2024 launch for them.

nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Speaking of relativity, approaching static fire/launch for Terran 1. 3 vehicles on launch pads this am between Kennedy/Canaveral;







In the next 6 or so months we should see Starship, SLS, Terran 1, Vulcan Centaur, Astra 3, Firefly Alpha, and maybe even New Glenn (head shake) take off for firsts also. Relativity has a lot of $$ riding on advancing over the next couple years;



They have to get the Terrran 1 down (or rather up) before going to the Terran R, though. "Good luck, have fun" is their first mission (no payload). LOL.

Malachi Constant
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


Part three of the Tim Dodd interview of Elon. Really cool stuff about Raptor 2.
Maximus_Meridius
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Man, what a time to be a space fan. I do know that Firefly's next attempt is already stacked and on the their erector at Vandenberg (still horizontal, though), can't remember the launch date off hand.
bthotugigem05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Maximus_Meridius said:

Man, what a time to be a space fan. I do know that Firefly's next attempt is already stacked and on the their erector at Vandenberg (still horizontal, though), can't remember the launch date off hand.


Obligatory "phrasing"
bmks270
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ABL Space Systems is also making progress and might attempt to launch their first rocket this year as well. Although they don't have the PR machine that Relativity does. Similar sized rocket to the Terran 1.

I think both are 9 engines on the first stage.
ABL advertisers 1350 kg payload.
Relativity Terran 1 Advertises 1250 kg payload.
Jock 07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Maximus_Meridius said:

Man, what a time to be a space fan. I do know that Firefly's next attempt is already stacked and on the their erector at Vandenberg (still horizontal, though), can't remember the launch date off hand.

Interesting, I was out at the SLC 10 museum a couple weeks ago for a retirement and didn't notice much activity or see the rocket, must've just arrived recently. I thought it wasn't launching til late summer/early fall, I could be wrong though.
Maximus_Meridius
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It was in their facility there, I think. It was an indoor photo on their LinkedIn account if I'm remembering right.
Faustus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Maximus_Meridius said:

Man, what a time to be a space fan. I do know that Firefly's next attempt is already stacked and on the their erector at Vandenberg (still horizontal, though), can't remember the launch date off hand.


It's July 17 if they're able to pull it off.
TexAgs91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Whoa....




They're doing testing with the booster at Boca Chica. There was a big blast and they're saying there was some sort of anomaly.


This is a live feed, so rewind to about 4:20pm

Kunkle for Congress TX-34
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TexAgs91 said:

Whoa....


They're doing testing with the booster at Boca Chica. There was a big blast and they're saying there was some sort of anomaly.


This is a live feed, so go to whatever time is about 4:50pm for the recap
Space X Group is saying a LOX dump followed by ignition some how....no bueno...Read that people at Wanna Wannas could feel it over there.
PJYoung
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Mathguy64
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So Musk claims the great big explosion was expected? Yeah somehow I don't think so.
TexAgs91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
PJYoung said:


Look at the workers in the rover cam starting to scramble at about 16:21:40 CDT. They didn't look like they were expecting it.
PJYoung
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mathguy64 said:

So Musk claims the great big explosion was expected? Yeah somehow I don't think so.
Might just mean they expected some problems to crop up, not this specifically.
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
PJYoung
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yeah I took it to mean - 'that's what you get when you test something new - a chance for big booms.'
PJYoung
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Post removed:
by user
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PJYoung said:




Just think of how many "things" are looking back at us in the photo.
bthotugigem05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I dunno, I'm a Fermi paradox guy, I think the scale of space and time are such that two civilizations would be unlikely to exist at the same time and be close enough to contact one another.
HossAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I think it's possible to see a galaxy during a time when life existed in it, even if it didn't exist at the same time as us. Andromeda is 2.5 million light years away, so I could see there being life there somewhere 2.5 million years ago even if it doesn't exist anymore. I'll admit that's a long shot when we're talking billions of years, but just pick a galaxy 1 billion light years away and the same logic applies.

But as far as actually making contact with other forms of life near us, I think that's impossible. There's just no way there's some form of intelligent life close enough to us to make contact that also exists in the same time period. We've barely had that type of communication ability for 50 years, and we still have barely sent the voyager probes beyond our own solar system.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HossAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


Full res image available at this link.
Mathguy64
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The Hubble deep field shot took weeks. They said the Webb shot released today took 12.5 hours. That's impressive.
TexAgs91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
HossAg said:

I think it's possible to see a galaxy during a time when life existed in it, even if it didn't exist at the same time as us. Andromeda is 2.5 million light years away, so I could see there being life there somewhere 2.5 million years ago even if it doesn't exist anymore. I'll admit that's a long shot when we're talking billions of years, but just pick a galaxy 1 billion light years away and the same logic applies.

But as far as actually making contact with other forms of life near us, I think that's impossible. There's just no way there's some form of intelligent life close enough to us to make contact that also exists in the same time period. We've barely had that type of communication ability for 50 years, and we still have barely sent the voyager probes beyond our own solar system.
The problem with the Fermi Paradox is that it does not account for the fact that the further you look in space the further back in time you're looking at. And the further back in time you're looking at, the fewer heavier elements beyond hydrogen and helium you see which is required for life.

Population III stars are made up of only hydrogen and helium. Population II stars contain some heavier elements and Population I contain the most.

So there's several billion years at the beginning of the universe where life is impossible. Then when you get to a time when 2nd generation stars come along with a few rocky planets and the ingredients for life, you still have to wait another few billion years for it to evolve into intelligent life.

So there's only a radius of about 3-5 billion LY from earth where we'd expect to find intelligent life. Anything outside of that hasn't had time to develop. You may find galaxies in every direction you look, but after you filter out everything further than 5 billion LY, you're left with much less.
TexAgs91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
will25u said:


Ah, now we start seeing the poor images from Hubble
Wyoming Aggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The CGI is getting better!
First Page Last Page
Page 171 of 446
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.