MidnightMugdown said:
Most likely yes. You're not allowed to shoot people for chasing you. I don't know about Wisconsin's laws, but that's not a valid legal defense in most places, and there's a good chance he will go to jail for it.
Yeah, if you are outside your house and other guy doesn't have a gun so that you can claim you thought he was shooting you, you are getting charged.MidnightMugdown said:
Most likely yes. You're not allowed to shoot people for chasing you. I don't know about Wisconsin's laws, but that's not a valid legal defense in most places, and there's a good chance he will go to jail for it.
MidnightMugdown said:
Most likely yes. You're not allowed to shoot people for chasing you. I don't know about Wisconsin's laws, but that's not a valid legal defense in most places, and there's a good chance he will go to jail for it.
It appears that after throwing the bag at him, the moron protester continues to chase the armed 17 yo until trying to assault him by the vehicles. Something about playing stupid games...MidnightMugdown said:
So no comment on why he shot a guy in the head who threw a bag at him?
MidnightMugdown said:
Most likely yes. You're not allowed to shoot people for chasing you. I don't know about Wisconsin's laws, but that's not a valid legal defense in most places, and there's a good chance he will go to jail for it.
AgBQ-00 said:
You do realize you can use a firearm for self defense if someone is threatening you with beating correct?
Curious on the highlighted text. Was it illegal for the kid to be carrying this gun? Because he was under age?MidnightMugdown said:
Easy breakdown to show it was clearly not a Molotov, as many on here have reported. Kid showed up to a riot (dumb) with an illegally carried gun (even dumber) and got chased down. Not sure if you can prove some people chasing you in public with no evidence of weapons justifies deadly force, but I'm going to guess not. We also don't know why he is running in the video initially. I wouldn't be surprised if he's convicted on one of the charges.
Yes, not old enough to possess a pistol.Quote:
Curious on the highlighted text. Was it illegal for the kid to be carrying this gun? Because he was under age?
Agree. If the Gov did his job, wouldn't need 17 year olds defending your cities.BQ78 said:
That the locals asked the state for help and did not get what they asked for, the governor has blood on his hands. As I said he is "properly woke" now and asked the Feds to fix his mess but that doesn't relieve him of his initial FU. Now the party is going to eat him alive for doing what they absolutely did not want to happen, Trump coming to the rescue.
he identified as 18GeorgiAg said:
yeah, he was 17. Have to be 18 to open carry there.
Nice mask, *******. Can't believe he isn't concerned about saving lives.aggiehawg said:
No doubt the guy who was shot in the arm had a gun.
Especially knowing the history of what happens to those the enemy of this nation do not like (anyone who disagrees with them). Look what happend in Portland. Dude gets beat up and kicked in the back of the head, almost dying. Watch endless videos of people getting beat up by mobs of people. This whole Kenosha situation has by far surpassed all other Riots in terms of potential explosiveness. Weighing that into the equation, when mobs of people are chasing you with whatever, you have to think they are trying to end your life.Quote:
In the same situation, a guy chasing me with a bag of unknown substance would get shot.
Kid said he got pepper sprayed earlier, perhaps that's what it was.El Chupacabra said:Nice mask, *******. Can't believe he isn't concerned about saving lives.aggiehawg said:
No doubt the guy who was shot in the arm had a gun.
What's the spray can in his backpack?
Fantastic. Last time he takes a skateboard to a gun fight.aggiehawg said:
The only shoot I have some questions about is the first one. The video quality on the that one makes it a little difficult to see what (soon to be dead) red shirt guy had in his hands and what he threw at Rittenhouse.
As to the two others:
Go away, dip***** The only people that are going to stand up to this mess are private citizens as the gov. federal, local, state and even the cops are just pointing fingers at each other.Nonregdrummer09 said:
This kid is a ****ing idiot he shouldn't have even been there. He deserves what is coming to him, as is often said on here, "play stupid games, win stupid prizes."
He wanted to pretend to be a big bad cop now he's going to jail for a long time.
Username and V status tell me this poster is kinda biased.MidnightMugdown said:
So no comment on why he shot a guy in the head who threw a bag at him?
Are you saying that there are no cases where a firearm has been deemed justifiable self defense against an unarmed attacker?Mr. AGSPRT04 said:AgBQ-00 said:
You do realize you can use a firearm for self defense if someone is threatening you with beating correct?
This is not correct. Please be careful when dispensing advice.
GeorgiAg said:
https://www.findmugshots.com/arrests/gaige_p_grosskreutz_id_6236626.html
Interesting.
It's been asked more than once and not really answered. A jury is going to consider that when/if this goes to court. WTF was a 17yr old in an area of a riot (where he went, on purpose, armed) to "defend property" which he did not own, or have any interest in.Aggie95 said:
so it was a 17 y/o kid that shot rioters? Was he just there to protect the area? What was his purpose of walking around armed?
I'm all for being armed and careful....I just questions someones judgement that goes into a rioting area.
Don't think this would be enough for the wound he had....ABATTBQ11 said:
Arm and hammer something. Looks like maybe saline spray.
El Chupacabra said:Fantastic. Last time he takes a skateboard to a gun fight.aggiehawg said:
The only shoot I have some questions about is the first one. The video quality on the that one makes it a little difficult to see what (soon to be dead) red shirt guy had in his hands and what he threw at Rittenhouse.
As to the two others:
