Cookouts and parties aren't political or terroristic targets, probably gang violence or beef between party attendees or host.
And that happens in Chicago all the time so it is ok.CanyonAg77 said:Not a mass shooting.Quote:
Newsham said there were at least three gunmen involved based on evidence at the scene.
A gang fight.
OldArmyBrent said:
It will fit the narrative because they'll force it to fit the narrative. Those evil fully semi automatic AR-14s and assault handguns with large clips need to be outlawed, don't you know?
I'll have the Sunny D please.black_hat_ag said:
Was they serving any of that purple drank though????
When he says "fully automatic AR-14s" and "assault handguns", I'm guessing the use of "clip" instead of "magazine" was intentional.Smokedraw01 said:I think you meant "magazines" and not clips.OldArmyBrent said:
It will fit the narrative because they'll force it to fit the narrative. Those evil fully semi automatic AR-14s and assault handguns with large clips need to be outlawed, don't you know?
Because no one gives two sh^ts about gang on gang violence.richardag said:?CanyonAg77 said:Not a mass shooting.Quote:
Newsham said there were at least three gunmen involved based on evidence at the scene.
A gang fight.
Please help me understand why a mass shooting is not a mass shooting if it is a gang fight.
Yeah, he's a bad dude.Stat Monitor Repairman said:
Coulda been Corn Pop, you never know.
Rapier108 said:
Since this will definitely not fit any approved narrative, and cannot be used to push gun control, the story will be out of the news within a day. Amazing it was even reported on.
Because their intent was to never take away unlawfully owned guns. Criminals are good to go!eric76 said:Rapier108 said:
Since this will definitely not fit any approved narrative, and cannot be used to push gun control, the story will be out of the news within a day. Amazing it was even reported on.
I don't understand why would this stop the gun grabbers from pushing for gun control.
Gang fight today, mass shooting in 2 months when there have been xxx mass shootings since 201X.CanyonAg77 said:Not a mass shooting.Quote:
Newsham said there were at least three gunmen involved based on evidence at the scene.
A gang fight.
Wouldn't their "logic" be that if nobody could legally own guns, there wouldn't be any for the criminals to steal?RGLAG85 said:Because their intent was to never take away unlawfully owned guns. Criminals are good to go!eric76 said:Rapier108 said:
Since this will definitely not fit any approved narrative, and cannot be used to push gun control, the story will be out of the news within a day. Amazing it was even reported on.
I don't understand why would this stop the gun grabbers from pushing for gun control.
The same reason Chicago is not the mass shooting capital of the world.richardag said:?CanyonAg77 said:Not a mass shooting.Quote:
Newsham said there were at least three gunmen involved based on evidence at the scene.
A gang fight.
Please help me understand why a mass shooting is not a mass shooting if it is a gang fight.