Ags4DaWin said:PabloSerna said:Ags4DaWin said:PabloSerna said:88planoAg said:
I think the answer to 'who pays', according to those who support reparations, is the American government, because there is "plenty of money we already spend on wars". You can see it already in his answers.
It is absurd. The people of all colors paying into the government now need to turn around and gift - who, exactly? because of the sins of the past.
Taxes are everyone's $$. But taxes need to go to a specific portion of the American population to make things equitable because of ancestor sins.
Was it right for our government to make promises and then break them? Apparently not. A recent SCOTUS decision started of with this by Justice Gorsuch,
"On the far end of the Trail of Tears was a promise. Forced to leave their ancestral lands in Georgia and Alabama, the Creek Nation received assurances that their new lands in the West would be secure forever."
I contend that we made promises to former slaves and we canceled them the very next term. That was not right to do and we should right that wrong.
+pablo
show me the recently freed slaves and i will start a gofundme. the truth is for the past 50 years- that's 4-5 generations abundant opportunities have been given to blacks as a group that whites as a group did not see. some took advantage and have become prosperous. some did not.
A failure to do so does not lie at the door of white people.
yeah - I was always using the "we" to make my point.
+pablo
That was not the point of my post. i gave you further clarification here:
regardless, cutting a check by taxing white people who had nothing to do with slavery will do nothing long term for the black community and is illegal, immoral, and unjust. if you think it will then you know nothing about the spending habits of poor people.
feel free to respond to the actual point i made in which preferential treatment has been given to blacks in EVERY arena from government contracts, to hiring practices, to higher education, to scholarships and grants for 50 years.
what else other than stealing from people who committed no crime via taxation and giving to people who have more abundant opportunities than whites via the programs i outlined above should we do?
and as out lined above the programs i mentioned have been in service for 4-5 generations. how many more generations of unequal opportunity and favoritism must we engage in before we wipe the slate clean.
when people can go from poor to middle class in a single generation, it would stand to reason that we are nearing the end of our obligation if we have not come to that point already.
I have heard this line of reasoning before. That through affirmative action, reparations were paid in full. Here is a quote a remember:
"Blacks have a 375-year history on this continent: 245 involving slavery, 100 involving discrimination, and only 30 involving anything else.
Historian Roger Wilkins
There is quite a bit of myth surrounding the success since affirmative action took place. It is an on going effort and still a needed measure. We disagree on it being a like for like payment in regards to reparations to the "40 acres and a mule" promised by the Lincoln administration, only to be canceled.
Land is what the newly freed former slaves of the south wanted the most. I think that was a great idea and IF I did sit on that panel - would be where I would start.
+pablo