***** OFFICIAL TRUMP IMPEACHMENT THREAD *****

996,068 Views | 9220 Replies | Last: 1 yr ago by Pizza
aggieforester05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Turns out the Burisma salary buys a pretty nice car. He's so lucky his "expertise" in Eastern European Oil and Gas pays so well.
Zemira
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
And he has he shown up in court for his child in Arkansas?
John Maplethorpe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Pinche Abogado said:

John Maplethorpe said:

Seemz lajit

Insufferable


Posting anything from Jack Posobiec should merit a 2 week ban.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggieforester05 said:

Turns out the Burisma salary buys a pretty nice car. He's so lucky his "expertise" in Eastern European Oil and Gas pays so well.
And also Chinese affairs.
Wildcat
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
When do proceedings resume?
The Catalyst
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
When do the proceedings resume?
Zemira
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
John Maplethorpe said:

Pinche Abogado said:

John Maplethorpe said:

Seemz lajit

Insufferable


Posting anything from Jack Posobiec should merit a 2 week ban.
Can we get you a two week ban?
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Zemira
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Good.
hbtheduce
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Hope the military follows through. Dude broke the law.
FriscoKid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
That's a giant nugget!
pdc093
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oh, PLEASE let THIS be true.
Spotted Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It's 10:00 AM on January 28, 2020 and Donald J. Trump is STILL your POTUS!!!
aggieforester05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
That's a good way to keep service members from using the whistleblower act as cover for political assassination. The whistleblower should be similarly prosecuted if he broke civilian laws.
FriscoKid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
V8Aggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Can't wait to see a photo of his fat smug face being court-martialed.
FriscoKid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

After Republican Utah Sen. Mitt Romney reiterated his desire to hear testimony from former National Security Adviser John Bolton on Monday morning, his office would not say whether Romney also supports calls to bring in Hunter Biden, Joe Biden, Adam Schiff, or the so-called whistleblower to testify before the Senate.
https://thefederalist.com/2020/01/27/after-urging-bolton-testimony-romney-refuses-to-say-if-he-supports-calling-biden-schiff-whistleblower-as-witnesses/

Shocked I tell you.
aggieforester05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
FriscoKid said:

Quote:

After Republican Utah Sen. Mitt Romney reiterated his desire to hear testimony from former National Security Adviser John Bolton on Monday morning, his office would not say whether Romney also supports calls to bring in Hunter Biden, Joe Biden, Adam Schiff, or the so-called whistleblower to testify before the Senate.
https://thefederalist.com/2020/01/27/after-urging-bolton-testimony-romney-refuses-to-say-if-he-supports-calling-biden-schiff-whistleblower-as-witnesses/

Shocked I tell you.
Republican In Name Only
1872walker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Too complimentary for Romney. POS is a much more appropriate acronym.
aggieforester05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
1872walker said:

Too complimentary for Romney. POS is a much more appropriate acronym.
Agreed, I can almost understand a wishy washy Republican moderate wanting to hear Bolton's testimony to satiate the desires of his/her purple constituency; however, having no interest in hearing the testimony of Biden, Schiff and the Whistleblower is absolutely ridiculous. It just proves they are anti Trump hacks toting the Democrat narratives. Basically they're choosing to be on the wrong side of history.
rwpag71
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Within the next 24 hours I anticipate a major media poll showing overwhelming support to make Bolton a witness and no mention of anyone else
aginlakeway
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
rwpag71 said:

Within the next 24 hours I anticipate a major media poll showing overwhelming support to make Bolton a witness and no mention of anyone else
OK. But that will never happen ...

If Bolton is called, the defense will call someone.
"I'm sure that won't make a bit of difference for those of you who enjoy a baseless rage over the decisions of a few teenagers."
VegasAg86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
rwpag71 said:

Within the next 24 hours I anticipate a major media poll showing overwhelming support to make Bolton a witness and no mention of anyone else


The questions (which they won't show) will be:

Should critical witness John Bolton be allowed to testify?

And:

Should the Bidens be forced to testify even though they have no relevance to the impeachment?
aginlakeway
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
VegasAg86 said:

rwpag71 said:

Within the next 24 hours I anticipate a major media poll showing overwhelming support to make Bolton a witness and no mention of anyone else


The questions (which they won't show) will be:

Should critical witness John Bolton be allowed to testify?

And:

Should the Bidens be forced to testify even though they have no relevance to the impeachment?
If Bolton is called, the defense will call someone.
"I'm sure that won't make a bit of difference for those of you who enjoy a baseless rage over the decisions of a few teenagers."
VegasAg86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aginlakeway said:

VegasAg86 said:

rwpag71 said:

Within the next 24 hours I anticipate a major media poll showing overwhelming support to make Bolton a witness and no mention of anyone else


The questions (which they won't show) will be:

Should critical witness John Bolton be allowed to testify?

And:

Should the Bidens be forced to testify even though they have no relevance to the impeachment?
If Bolton is called, the defense will call someone.


Absolutely, but we're talking about a media poll about witnesses.
Shack165
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The amount of corruption being discussed during this entire impeachment process is amazing. The numbers of people involved and there lack of moral character is disheartening to say the least. Just imagine what things would be like had the Democrats won the 2016 election.
ThunderCougarFalconBird
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
VegasAg86 said:

rwpag71 said:

Within the next 24 hours I anticipate a major media poll showing overwhelming support to make Bolton a witness and no mention of anyone else


The questions (which they won't show) will be:

Should critical witness John Bolton be allowed to testify?

And:

Should the Bidens be forced to testify even though they have no relevance to the impeachment?
this is the risk the house democrats were taking unnecessarily all along.

Impeachment isn't a legal proceeding in the traditional sense of a trial so - strangely enough - the concept of "relevance" doesn't really have to have any relevance.

There is a real risk that McConnell ya the votes to call people and force them to plead the 5th (ahem, Hunter Biden) or put them on the stand and force them to admit being part of the whistleblower concoction from the get-go (ahem, schiff).
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aginlakeway said:

VegasAg86 said:

rwpag71 said:

Within the next 24 hours I anticipate a major media poll showing overwhelming support to make Bolton a witness and no mention of anyone else


The questions (which they won't show) will be:

Should critical witness John Bolton be allowed to testify?

And:

Should the Bidens be forced to testify even though they have no relevance to the impeachment?
If Bolton is called, the defense will call someone.
Only if the Senate allow it.

If Romney can get enough fools to follow him, they can block any witness they want.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Shack165
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"...Danger, Danger, Danger these articles must be rejected. The Constitution requires it. Justice demands it."
- Jay Sekulow
He has my vote for MVP so far on the defense team.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This is telling. If she is even mentioning this...



This kerfuffle is getting crazy.
hbtheduce
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
will25u said:

This is telling. If she is even mentioning this...



This kerfuffle is getting crazy.


They need to squash this or else the establishment choice (biden) get sunk faster than the titanic.
Maroon Dawn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
will25u said:




Just shows what a foregone conclusion this whole piece of theater is

GOP will acquit

Dems will scream collusion, cover up and conspiracy
(and all it cost them was any chance with the Independents in 2020)
First Page Last Page
Page 246 of 264
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.