***** OFFICIAL TRUMP IMPEACHMENT THREAD *****

989,966 Views | 9220 Replies | Last: 1 yr ago by Pizza
Ellis Wyatt
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BeardedBear • 5:56p, 1/15/20
BeardedBear said:
UncleNateFitch said:
I see that too much Colbert and Oliver have ruined your sense of humor. THIS is what you guys want to hang hat on now?
I guess I don't understand what you're getting at, Parnas handed over new evidence that is relevant to the impeachment and I thought there would be discussion on it on a thread dedicated to the subject.

These documents are the most damning to date in my opinion, along with the emails that came out a few weeks ago.
Guess they'll have to impeach the President again to enter "new evidence." This horse**** isn't pertinent to what the dems hurriedly impeached him on.

They've had their role in impeachment. Now for the senate to smack that **** down.
Reply Quote
4
Jimmy Valentine
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to aggiehawg • 6:19p, 1/15/20
aggiehawg said:
oysterbayAG said:
Smart and fair people think using proportionality. Any missteps that Schiff & Co dig up about Trump and Giuliani's adventure through the Ukrainian landscape of cesspools is minuscule compared to what the Deep State Libtard Savages did to torture Trump for 3 years in Spygate !


The same thing Hillary did to Trump is now an impeachable offense.

Go figure.
To make this the same thing Hillary did to Trump, wouldn't Rudy Giuliani need to be a contractor working for and being paid by the Trump Campaign?
Reply Quote
2
nortex97
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Jimmy Valentine • 6:39p, 1/15/20
AG
Jimmy Valentine said:
aggiehawg said:
oysterbayAG said:
Smart and fair people think using proportionality. Any missteps that Schiff & Co dig up about Trump and Giuliani's adventure through the Ukrainian landscape of cesspools is minuscule compared to what the Deep State Libtard Savages did to torture Trump for 3 years in Spygate !


The same thing Hillary did to Trump is now an impeachable offense.

Go figure.
To make this the same thing Hillary did to Trump, wouldn't Rudy Giuliani need to be a contractor working for and being paid by the Trump Campaign?
Yes, and he wouldn't need to be 'snooping' overseas, he'd have a law firm hire an FBI employee's spouse to make thousands of FISC-sanctioned queries of the NSA database to find dirt on whoever he was interested in (and all his associates), then convey whatever was found via Ham radio to media/foreign sources for a report, and also have sleaze bags like Bruce Ohr/John McCain get a formal counter-intelligence investigation started. Finally, they would use the power of the state to plant confidential human sources near Hunter and Joe.

Does anyone think it would be hard to catch Hunter admitting/discussing what he did as such (with some booze/hookers/coke)? Then, finally, they'd have the FBI ask him about it, and bust him on both FARA (not registering as an agent for Ukraine) and also making false statements to the FBI. The same thing would happen to Paul Pelosi, btw.
Reply Quote
4
Prosperdick
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to nortex97 • 6:54p, 1/15/20
AG
nortex97 said:
Jimmy Valentine said:
aggiehawg said:
oysterbayAG said:
Smart and fair people think using proportionality. Any missteps that Schiff & Co dig up about Trump and Giuliani's adventure through the Ukrainian landscape of cesspools is minuscule compared to what the Deep State Libtard Savages did to torture Trump for 3 years in Spygate !


The same thing Hillary did to Trump is now an impeachable offense.

Go figure.
To make this the same thing Hillary did to Trump, wouldn't Rudy Giuliani need to be a contractor working for and being paid by the Trump Campaign?
Yes, and he wouldn't need to be 'snooping' overseas, he'd have a law firm hire an FBI employee's spouse to make thousands of FISC-sanctioned queries of the NSA database to find dirt on whoever he was interested in (and all his associates), then convey whatever was found via Ham radio to media/foreign sources for a report, and also have sleaze bags like Bruce Ohr/John McCain get a formal counter-intelligence investigation started. Finally, they would use the power of the state to plant confidential human sources near Hunter and Joe.

Does anyone think it would be hard to catch Hunter admitting/discussing what he did as such (with some booze/hookers/coke)? Then, finally, they'd have the FBI ask him about it, and bust him on both FARA (not registering as an agent for Ukraine) and also making false statements to the FBI. The same thing would happen to Paul Pelosi, btw.

But that's just a conspiracy theory....with 10,000 times more sources evidence than this impeachment sham.

It's OK...Dems judgment cometh and that right soon.
Reply Quote
3
RyanAg08
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Rockdoc • 7:07p, 1/15/20
AG
Rockdoc said:
Jimmy Valentine said:
FriscoKid said:
Just stop with the "dear leader" crap. You look silly.
Does it bother you that I talk about deal leader like that?

Who's deal leader?


Not defending the child, but Trump does like to make deals.
Reply Quote
Gary Johnson
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to ThunderCougarFalconBird • 7:44p, 1/15/20
Quote:
if all of this, uh, evidence was so important, why not bring it up before voting on impeachment?
Because the information wasn't available a month ago. A judge had to sign off on releasing the documents to the house. New information comes out over time, that's how scandals work.
Reply Quote
2
ThunderCougarFalconBird
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Gary Johnson • 7:47p, 1/15/20
AG
Gary Johnson said:
Quote:
if all of this, uh, evidence was so important, why not bring it up before voting on impeachment?
Because the information wasn't available a month ago. A judge had to sign off on releasing the documents to the house. New information comes out over time, that's how scandals work.
the house didn't ask a judge for that.
Reply Quote
6
Ag with kids
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Gary Johnson • 7:50p, 1/15/20
AG
Gary Johnson said:
Quote:
if all of this, uh, evidence was so important, why not bring it up before voting on impeachment?
Because the information wasn't available a month ago. A judge had to sign off on releasing the documents to the house. New information comes out over time, that's how scandals work.
So, Susan Collins was correct....the House failed in their investigation...

But, it's cool...there was a LOT of evidence repressed from the House proceedings due to the Democrat's rules...

Unfortunately, they can't repress it in the Senate...
Reply Quote
8
Gary Johnson
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Ag with kids • 8:00p, 1/15/20
Quote:
So, Susan Collins was correct....the House failed in their investigation...
How did they fail? They got what they could get when it was available.

Giuliani defied his subpoena or we would have already known all this. He wasn't impeached for stalking an ambassador, this is just the cherry on top.
Reply Quote
2
1 edit
Rockdoc
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:10p, 1/15/20
AG
Sorry Gary, but you got nothing. You'll realize that in a few weeks.
Reply Quote
3
Gary Johnson
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Rockdoc • 8:17p, 1/15/20
Rockdoc said:
Sorry Gary, but you got nothing. You'll realize that in a few weeks.
Correct, I'm not an investigator, I have nothing. But the investigators have a metric buttload that keeps snowballing.

They found enough to impeach for just the 3rd time in 250 years. Turn off OAN for a couple minutes and look around at real news, they're feeding you dopamine like a lab rat.
Reply Quote
2
Rockdoc
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Gary Johnson • 8:18p, 1/15/20
AG
You're gonna be so disappointed. It'll be glorious.
Reply Quote
7
Gary Johnson
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Rockdoc • 8:20p, 1/15/20
Rockdoc said:
You're gonna be so disappointed. It'll be glorious.
If Trump's innocent I want him to be exonerated. Seriously. That's the difference between me and you.

But it's hard to believe he's blocking exculpatory evidence.
Reply Quote
2
Rockdoc
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Gary Johnson • 8:22p, 1/15/20
AG
We're all good. I'm not going anywhere.
Reply Quote
3
Silent For Too Long
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Gary Johnson • 8:22p, 1/15/20
The cherry on top of the nothing burger?

Congrats?
Reply Quote
4
Silent For Too Long
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Gary Johnson • 8:26p, 1/15/20
Exculpatory evidence of what?

No impeachable offense has been put forth. The republicans in the Senate have made that perfectly clear. So, at this point, and it doesn't what evidence they find to support their unimpeachable nonsense. It really, really doesn't matter.

It's sad you are so blinded with hate you can't see that.
Reply Quote
4
aggiehawg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Gary Johnson • 8:28p, 1/15/20
AG
Gary Johnson said:
Rockdoc said:
You're gonna be so disappointed. It'll be glorious.
If Trump's innocent I want him to be exonerated. Seriously. That's the difference between me and you.

But it's hard to believe he's blocking exculpatory evidence.


The Pentagon Papers. Nixon had no exposure there.

He respected the office and fought it for the office of the presidency.
Reply Quote
5
FriscoKid
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Rockdoc • 8:29p, 1/15/20
AG
Rockdoc said:
You're gonna be so disappointed. It'll be glorious.

They didn't even alleged a crime. Trump did nothing. This is STILL the biggest temper tantrum our country has ever known. What the House did was just plain stupid.
Reply Quote
9
Ag with kids
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Gary Johnson • 8:34p, 1/15/20
AG
Gary Johnson said:
Quote:
So, Susan Collins was correct....the House failed in their investigation...
How did they fail? They got what they could get when it was available.

Giuliani defied his subpoena or we would have already known all this. He wasn't impeached for stalking an ambassador, this is just the cherry on top.
The House deliberately quit before they had done a thorough investigation.

Kind of like how they refused to argue in court against the executive privilege assertions.

This ENTIRE PROCESS was nothing more than a political effort to use the biased media in an effort to effect the 2020 election.

This is one of the most pathetic acts of political bull**** I've ever seen

And you should be ****ing ashamed for supporting it...
Reply Quote
10
Rockdoc
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Ag with kids • 8:36p, 1/15/20
AG
Don't forget you're talking to a liberal.
Reply Quote
6
Gary Johnson
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Ag with kids • 8:39p, 1/15/20
Quote:
The House deliberately quit before they had done a thorough investigation

It was thorough enough to impeach. You have crocodile tears about "more evidence", it is Trump blocking evidence, because he's guilty and scared.
Reply Quote
2
Squadron7
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Gary Johnson • 8:46p, 1/15/20
AG
Gary Johnson said:
Quote:
The House deliberately quit before they had done a thorough investigation

It was thorough enough to impeach. You have crocodile tears about "more evidence", it is Trump blocking evidence, because he's guilty and scared.

MSNBC calling the election for Trump that night in 2016 was enough to impeach for you and everyone else whose girl lost.
Reply Quote
5
Prosperdick
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Gary Johnson • 8:47p, 1/15/20
AG
Gary Johnson said:
Quote:
The House deliberately quit before they had done a thorough investigation

It was thorough enough to impeach. You have crocodile tears about "more evidence", it is Trump blocking evidence, because he's guilty and scared.

Nope, he's signing trade deals with China while your pathetic liberal masters continue their three year temper tantrum.

Don't worry, November is right around the corner and the populace will let their displeasure of this impeachment farce ring loud and true.
Reply Quote
6
annie88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:48p, 1/15/20
AG
Reply Quote
4
backintexas2013
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Gary Johnson • 8:50p, 1/15/20
AG
You lost a lot of credit when under your sock you started calling people ******. Now you have dropped that username to come back with this one.
Reply Quote
5
annie88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:50p, 1/15/20
AG
Reply Quote
8
Gary Johnson
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:53p, 1/15/20
Lol. As if this wasn't obvious already. Here we go.

Reply Quote
2
Rockdoc
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Gary Johnson • 8:55p, 1/15/20
AG
Gary Johnson said:
Quote:
The House deliberately quit before they had done a thorough investigation

It was thorough enough to impeach. You have crocodile tears about "more evidence", it is Trump blocking evidence, because he's guilty and scared.

Gosh Gary he sure doesn't act scared. You sure about that?
Reply Quote
5
Fat Black Swan
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BeardedBear • 8:59p, 1/15/20
AG
BeardedBear said:
Ellis Wyatt said:
BeardedBear said:
Man this thread derailed.

Maybe I missed it, but is no one concerned about the tracking and language used around Yovanovitch? All of these new documents between Rudy and Lev look pretty damning IMO.
Why? The President is in charge of foreign policy and Yovanovitch serves at his pleasure. It doesn't matter **** all what she thinks about anything.
Are you saying you're fine with associates of the Presidents personal lawyer (who aren't US citizens) tracking and at the very least joking about having a US Ambassador assassinated?



Link to documents in full: https://intelligence.house.gov/uploadedfiles/20200114_-_hpsci_transmittal_letter_to_hjc_-_new_evidence_attachment.pdf




Well I guess as long as you'reholding yourself personally accountable long for the words and actions of the associates of your associates...
Reply Quote
4
1 edit
Gary Johnson
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Rockdoc • 8:59p, 1/15/20
Scared as hell. Look at his actions not words. Trying to block every shred of evidence when(if he was innocent) he could drop exculpatory evidence and embarrass the dems.

He can't because he doesn't have any.
Reply Quote
4
Gary Johnson
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:00p, 1/15/20
Pompeo. Come on down.

Reply Quote
4
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Gary Johnson • 9:02p, 1/15/20
Gary Johnson said:
Scared as hell. Look at his actions not words. Trying to block every shred of evidence when(if he was innocent) he could drop exculpatory evidence and embarrass the dems.

He can't because he doesn't have any.
I bet this happens in the Senate trial and will blow the Democrats out of the water.
Reply Quote
2
Rockdoc
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:02p, 1/15/20
AG
Gary's fall is going to be a tough one for him. Will be fun to watch.
Reply Quote
7
Maroon Dawn
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:03p, 1/15/20
AG
The best part of the Senate acquitting the president will be Gary's salty, salty tears
Reply Quote
7
1 edit
Squadron7
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Gary Johnson • 9:05p, 1/15/20
AG
Gary Johnson said:
Scared as hell. Look at his actions not words. Trying to block every shred of evidence when(if he was innocent) he could drop exculpatory evidence and embarrass the dems.

He can't because he doesn't have any.
^
^
^
Receives a giant Honey Baked Ham every Christmas from Reynolds Aluminum.
Reply Quote
4
First Page Last Page
Page 217 of 264 ▼
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.