So, im interested in how a guy like connor lamb will vote.

He ran on being a moderate Democrat in a moderate district. He was pushed as a candidate who would be an example of someone who could win trump districts- he is a vet, definitely not an aoc type and ran on a more center based platform.

That said, i will not vote for any Democrat because when push comes to shove, they fall in line (unlike Republicans who have trouble getting every member in line).

Will Lamb prove my point?

Yep, democrats were trying to prove that a vote for these guys wasn't just another vote for Pelosi. And this impeachment gives the RNC to show that's exactly what it is with the "moderates".

On a separate note, where did all the liberal non ag tag posters go????

Quote:

---

Under FISA, "verification" simply requires both the FBI and lawyers in the Department of Justice to verify that the facts as set forth in the affidavit are supported by evidence obtained as part of the investigation. That does not mean, however, that the FBI is required, for example, to travel to Russia to interview a sub-source to confirm that the sub-source actually did tell Steele what Steele reported to the FBI. That, of course, almost certainly would not be possible. It is therefore not surprising that McCarthy cites no authority for his assertion that such a step is required.

---

Goldman is a fcking idiot. He's basically saying that the FBI can get some unsubstantiated bullsht, and choose to believe it and use it as a pretext for a spy warrant.

In this case, the "verified" facts are that Steele talked to some Russian dudes and they told him some outlandish bullsht about Trump. The FBI was then off to the races.

So can Nancy have her "battleground Democrats" vote not to impeach and still get to 218 votes needed to send it to the Senate?

It's 3:54 PM on December 11, 2019 and Donald J. Trump is STILL your POTUS!

Line Ate Member said:

---

So can Nancy have her "battleground Democrats" vote not to impeach and still get to 218 votes needed to send it to the Senate?

---

Not all 31 of them.

Ha so she gets to chose which ones "may" come back to the House next year. Awesome.

She put herself into a really tough position. If she doesn't get every Dem to vote with her, she looks like a weak-kneed Speaker and her impeachment looks totally partisan. If she does get every Dem to vote with her, she will lose the House and her impeachment will be partisan.

Couldn't happen to a better Skeletor!

Still no liberals on this thread?

They are all barnes socks

Link?

Wrong poster and wrong thread friendo.

A trial with no facts or evidence doesn't necessitate witnesses.

Gary Johnson said:

---

Link?

Wrong poster and wrong thread friendo.

---

Unfortunately you're quite absent in the IG report threads or I would. Maybe you just missed that whole thing. I apologize. I'm sure you would voice your disgust with the fbi if you were aware of it.

who?mikejones said:

---

On a separate note, where did all the liberal non ag tag posters go????

---

We're still here. Sometimes it's wiser for us to just sit back quietly while y'all explore rabbit holes for a few days.

Besides, short vacations are nice!

MetoliusAg said:

---

who?mikejones said:

---

On a separate note, where did all the liberal non ag tag posters go????

---

We're still here. Sometimes it's wiser for us to just sit back quietly while y'all explore rabbit holes for a few days.

---

No, just like always, you and the rest of your liberal buddies disappear after your latest "we got him!" blows up in your face.

Same thing with Mueller and Kavanaugh. You disappeared for months until the Democrats created their latest farce.

MetoliusAg said:

---

who?mikejones said:

---

On a separate note, where did all the liberal non ag tag posters go????

---

We're still here. Sometimes it's wiser for us to just sit back quietly while y'all explore rabbit holes for a few days.

---

You wouldn't know a rabbit hole even if you were a rabbit.

Stick to pancakes.

Well, now. I wonder what this is.

Donald Trump, aka by his supporters as "the crusader against corruption".

Let. Donald. Testify!

That is weak sauce from that turtle.

houag80 said:

---

That is weak sauce from that turtle.

---

He knows how bad it'll get if Mulvaney testifies against him and Trump tries to subpoena a fictional server.

How does it feel being wrong in everything you post? Wrong about tariffs, wrong about Mueller, wrong about the IG, wrong about impeachment and wrong about me. What's it like to live in loser land beating your wrinkled **** to DU posts and CNN "breaking news "? You want to flag me loser?....IDGAS!

I was afraid these two guys were lost. Glad they're back for the comedy value!

Lol. Giuliani's fishing expedition and smear campaign was being financed by the Russian mob.

This is totally clean and above board right?

Gary Johnson said:

---

houag80 said:

---

That is weak sauce from that turtle.

---

He knows how bad it'll get if Mulvaney testifies against him and Trump tries to subpoena a fictional server.

---

Liberal fan fiction at its finest.

Gary Johnson said:

---

Lol. Giuliani's fishing expedition and smear campaign was being financed by the Russian mob.

This is totally clean and above board right?

---

A fishing expedition and smear campaign was financed by the DNC.


Totally clean and above board right?


Charge him with a crime if he broke the law, idgaf. Libs got nothing to this date on Trump of Giuliani.