***** OFFICIAL TRUMP IMPEACHMENT THREAD *****
897,455 Views |
9220 Replies |
Last: 11 mo ago by Pizza
From the article:will25u said:
Get that man a Visa to testify, pronto!Quote:
Based on the testimony from Sondland and other witnesses, the final report from the House Intelligence Committee concluded last week that Sondland made this offer of a quid pro quo clear to Yermak that day in Warsaw. "Following this meeting, Ambassador Sondland pulled aside President Zelensky's advisor, Mr. Yermak, to explain that the hold on security assistance was conditioned on the public announcement of the Burisma/Biden and the 2016 election interference investigations," the report states.
Yermak disputes this. "Gordon and I were never alone together," he said when TIME asked about the Warsaw meeting. "We bumped into each other in the hallway next to the escalator, as I was walking out." He recalls that several members of the American and Ukrainian delegations were also nearby, as well as bodyguards and hotel staff, though he was not sure whether any of them heard his brief conversation with Sondland. "And I remember everything is fine with my memory we talked about how well the meeting went. That's all we talked about," Yermak says.
Did Sondland perjure himself to get Trump?
This also out today. He's less underwater than everybody except Mayor Pete and Andrew Yang who don't stand a chance:will25u said:
Still drawing huge crowds for rallies. Don't know if this impeachment SHAM is having much of an impact.
Also Rasmussen Presidential Poll has Trump over 50% for the last 4 days. Which is tied for the longest streak of 50% and above since shortly after he was elected.
Wouldn't be a surprise if he did.Wildcat said:
Did Sondland perjure himself to get Trump?
If so, I bet he really really regrets that $1 million donation.Rapier108 said:Wouldn't be a surprise if he did.Wildcat said:
Did Sondland perjure himself to get Trump?
To answer Rep.Jordan's question -- because they think the MSM will help them put their false approach across as somehow legitimate. But they don't realize that its now likely less than half the national audience that gives the media credibility.
yup
Why would perjury be a threat to one serving the DNC-MSM cause? Does it ever really stick?Rapier108 said:Wouldn't be a surprise if he did.Wildcat said:
Did Sondland perjure himself to get Trump?
Sondland was serving the DNC-MSM cause?titan said:Why would perjury be a threat to one serving the DNC-MSM cause? Does it ever really stick?Rapier108 said:Wouldn't be a surprise if he did.Wildcat said:
Did Sondland perjure himself to get Trump?
If he perjured to advance the Schiff narrative, he is. The statement was proceeding from that assumption above in the same quote.Jimmy Valentine said:Sondland was serving the DNC-MSM cause?titan said:Why would perjury be a threat to one serving the DNC-MSM cause? Does it ever really stick?Rapier108 said:Wouldn't be a surprise if he did.Wildcat said:
Did Sondland perjure himself to get Trump?
Sondland donated $1,000,000 to Trump's inauguration so that he could be the EU Ambassador. He did all of that just so he could advance Schiff's narrative?titan said:If he perjured to advance the Schiff narrative, he is. The statement was proceeding from that assumption above in the same quote.Jimmy Valentine said:Sondland was serving the DNC-MSM cause?titan said:Why would perjury be a threat to one serving the DNC-MSM cause? Does it ever really stick?Rapier108 said:Wouldn't be a surprise if he did.Wildcat said:
Did Sondland perjure himself to get Trump?
Your still not reading it. My reply was specific. To repeat, it was in response to these (you again quoted them yourself)Jimmy Valentine said:Sondland donated $1,000,000 to Trump's inauguration so that he could be the EU Ambassador. He did all of that just so he could advance Schiff's narrative?titan said:If he perjured to advance the Schiff narrative, he is. The statement was proceeding from that assumption above in the same quote.Jimmy Valentine said:Sondland was serving the DNC-MSM cause?titan said:Why would perjury be a threat to one serving the DNC-MSM cause? Does it ever really stick?Rapier108 said:Wouldn't be a surprise if he did.Wildcat said:
Did Sondland perjure himself to get Trump?
Quote:
Wildcat said:
Did Sondland perjure himself to get Trump?
What came before is irrelevant if those posts obtain.Quote:
Rapier108 said:
Wouldn't be a surprise if he did.
Jimmy Valentine said:Sondland donated $1,000,000 to Trump's inauguration so that he could be the EU Ambassador. He did all of that just so he could advance Schiff's narrative?titan said:If he perjured to advance the Schiff narrative, he is. The statement was proceeding from that assumption above in the same quote.Jimmy Valentine said:Sondland was serving the DNC-MSM cause?titan said:Why would perjury be a threat to one serving the DNC-MSM cause? Does it ever really stick?Rapier108 said:Wouldn't be a surprise if he did.Wildcat said:
Did Sondland perjure himself to get Trump?
With all due respect, you are smart enough to know that if you can donate I mill to Trump you can donate two mill to a dem if that falls through. You are not very good at this. And I hope all that car racing stuff works out for you.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
Jimmy Valentine said:Sondland donated $1,000,000 to Trump's inauguration so that he could be the EU Ambassador. He did all of that just so he could advance Schiff's narrative?titan said:If he perjured to advance the Schiff narrative, he is. The statement was proceeding from that assumption above in the same quote.Jimmy Valentine said:Sondland was serving the DNC-MSM cause?titan said:Why would perjury be a threat to one serving the DNC-MSM cause? Does it ever really stick?Rapier108 said:Wouldn't be a surprise if he did.Wildcat said:
Did Sondland perjure himself to get Trump?
At this point do you really not know anything about Sondland background?
Schiff is dirty, a liar, and treasonous
https://thefederalist.com/2019/12/10/ig-report-confirms-schiff-fisa-memo-media-praised-was-riddled-with-lies/
https://thefederalist.com/2019/12/10/ig-report-confirms-schiff-fisa-memo-media-praised-was-riddled-with-lies/
who?mikejones said:
Schiff is dirty, a liar, and treasonous
https://thefederalist.com/2019/12/10/ig-report-confirms-schiff-fisa-memo-media-praised-was-riddled-with-lies/
It's a fantastic read.
Adam ****t and these Democrats are all low life scum.
I'll take my beliefs, not worth very much, a little further. If the Senate Republicans, specifically Graham and McConnell, have a deal struck, and right now I think they do, it will only show that they still haven't learn you are dealing with snakes on the dems side. If the Senate simple dismisses the impeachment on grounds of "lack of evidence" or "unconstitutional charges", as Dershowitz claimed, the Democrats and the pravda media will immediately claim it was dismissed for partisan reasons. That will be their 2020 mantra. They will screech "we impeached this dirty president but the partisan Senate refused to do their constitutional duty"! They need to, at the very least, call Schiff and the seditious non-whistle blower, then dismiss. Expose the sham for what it is.txaggie_08 said:RGLAG85 said:Unfortunately the Senate is just going to dismiss it on grounds of lack of evidence and not hold a trial. It's frustrating to think that they have no desire to shine a light on this sham. So many need to account for their, at best, misdeeds and at worst, their corruption and treasonous sedition. No one will be held accountable from the left and it will only embolden them to try again.DallasAg 94 said:The write-up is expected Wed or Thurs. The GOP needs to announce they will take up the hearings in the Senate, and provide the list of witnesses they will Subpoena.Rapier108 said:
This isn't just weak sauce, this is weaker than distilled water.Quote:
Democrats plan to announce two articles of impeachment abuse of power and obstruction of Congress against President Donald Trump on Tuesday, multiple sources told NBC News on Monday night.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/trump-impeachment-inquiry/democrats-introduce-articles-impeachment-against-trump-tuesday-n1098781
Schiff
Schiff staff worker that helped WB
Berka
Whistle blower
6 people the WB relied on
All the same cast that Schiff put on
Joe Biden
Hunter Biden
John Kerry's step son
Goldman - He needs to testify on who gave up the phone numbers
Let the Dems know the Trial will go forward if Articles of Impeachment are delivered to them.
Tin foil hat here. I'm afraid a deal has already been struck here, the house will impeach to placate their base then the Senate will just dismiss thinking it will make their base happy with minimal damage. Then they'll all go have cocktails together.
The Senate needs to have a trial to refute all of this. If there is no trial, it's going to be a year's worth of the Democrats and the Press telling America that Trump is going to steal "another" election from outside interference. This is the Dems strategy to keep their narrative going that Trump is somehow an illegitimate President. The Senate needs to put an end to this through a trial, or you know what we will be hearing from Pelosi, Schiff, Nadler and all other lunatic lefties for the next 11 months.
Listen to this closely Gary, Met and concerned moderates that believe this is an echo chamber. If Graham does what he is eluding to and simply dismisses, it will only prove he's afraid for himself, McCain and other swamp Republicans being shown up to their eyeballs in this corruption and maybe even complicity in the earlier attacks on then candidate Trump. I truly think they are afraid of the dirt. Now let's see you call out your leadership, I'll wait!
All Americans need to see this corruption in the light! They need to "gas" the snake pit and I'd be more than happy to throw the match!
Yep I'm afraid Graham and McConnell are gonna punt and the dems are gonna get away without even a hand slap. I want Schiff and his fellow snakes punished. Is everybody in DC corrupt?
RGLAG85 said:I'll take my beliefs, not worth very much, a little further. If the Senate Republicans, specifically Graham and McConnell, have a deal struck, and right now I think they do, it will only show that they still haven't learn you are dealing with snakes on the dems side. If the Senate simple dismisses the impeachment on grounds of "lack of evidence" or "unconstitutional charges", as Dershowitz claimed, the Democrats and the pravda media will immediately claim it was dismissed for partisan reasons. That will be their 2020 mantra. They will screech "we impeached this dirty president but the partisan Senate refused to do their constitutional duty"! They need to, at the very least, call Schiff and the seditious non-whistle blower, then dismiss. Expose the sham for what it is.txaggie_08 said:RGLAG85 said:Unfortunately the Senate is just going to dismiss it on grounds of lack of evidence and not hold a trial. It's frustrating to think that they have no desire to shine a light on this sham. So many need to account for their, at best, misdeeds and at worst, their corruption and treasonous sedition. No one will be held accountable from the left and it will only embolden them to try again.DallasAg 94 said:The write-up is expected Wed or Thurs. The GOP needs to announce they will take up the hearings in the Senate, and provide the list of witnesses they will Subpoena.Rapier108 said:
This isn't just weak sauce, this is weaker than distilled water.Quote:
Democrats plan to announce two articles of impeachment abuse of power and obstruction of Congress against President Donald Trump on Tuesday, multiple sources told NBC News on Monday night.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/trump-impeachment-inquiry/democrats-introduce-articles-impeachment-against-trump-tuesday-n1098781
Schiff
Schiff staff worker that helped WB
Berka
Whistle blower
6 people the WB relied on
All the same cast that Schiff put on
Joe Biden
Hunter Biden
John Kerry's step son
Goldman - He needs to testify on who gave up the phone numbers
Let the Dems know the Trial will go forward if Articles of Impeachment are delivered to them.
Tin foil hat here. I'm afraid a deal has already been struck here, the house will impeach to placate their base then the Senate will just dismiss thinking it will make their base happy with minimal damage. Then they'll all go have cocktails together.
The Senate needs to have a trial to refute all of this. If there is no trial, it's going to be a year's worth of the Democrats and the Press telling America that Trump is going to steal "another" election from outside interference. This is the Dems strategy to keep their narrative going that Trump is somehow an illegitimate President. The Senate needs to put an end to this through a trial, or you know what we will be hearing from Pelosi, Schiff, Nadler and all other lunatic lefties for the next 11 months.
Listen to this closely Gary, Met and concerned moderates that believe this is an echo chamber. If Graham does what he is eluding to and simply dismisses, it will only prove he's afraid for himself, McCain and other swamp Republicans being shown up to their eyeballs in this corruption and maybe even complicity in the earlier attacks on then candidate Trump. I truly think they are afraid of the dirt. Now let's see you call out your leadership, I'll wait!
All Americans need to see this corruption in the light! They need to "gas" the snake pit and I'd be more than happy to throw the match!
Agree with your take. Lindsay being way too passive, gotta wonder if he, McCain, and others didn't also have their hands in the Ukrainian till.
The Right is my team but I've got zero problem with anybody, regardless of affiliation, going down for nefarious acts. I realize as I post this that this is what separates and disadvantages me in my dealings with the immoral Left. So be it.
Gary Johnson said:
Some of you guys are living in a Fox news fantasy bubble. Trump is guilty as hell which is why he's blocking testimony and documents. If this was just a big misunderstanding they could have easily ended this all weeks ago and embarrassed the dems in the process.
Why do people confuse loose (not tight) with lose (didn't win)?
EKUAg said:
Why do people confuse loose (not tight) with lose (didn't win)?
It's mostly in the way we read and construct words and meaning in our minds. Most people know the difference but it's usually subconscious when they do it.
So how puckered are Schiff, Nadler and Pelosi right now while watching Horowitz?
Featured Stories
See All
16:21
5h ago
7.6k
2026 North Forney cornerback Ryan Gilbert commits to Texas A&M
by Jason Howell
5:12
3d ago
3.2k
In-Home Visit: A&M's 2026 momentum keeps rolling as Gilbert commits
by TexAgs Recruiting
Way-too-early expectations for Texas A&M basketball in 2024-25
by David Sandhop
Longhorns join Southeastern Conference with grandiose expectations
by Olin Buchanan