***** OFFICIAL TRUMP IMPEACHMENT THREAD *****

1,018,733 Views | 9220 Replies | Last: 1 yr ago by 197361936
Gary Johnson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
hbtheduce said:

Except it's not because we privately and public pressure other countries in matters of criminal investigations ALL THE TIME

Joe ****ing Biden secretly pressured Ukraine to fire a prosecutor. Was it illegal because the Obama administration did it in secret?




Be careful. Trump's official position is "he wants nothing", there is "no quid pro quo"!

Totally normal to talk this way unsolicited, after you got caught for doing nothing wrong.
Wildcat
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TexasAggie_02 said:

tsuag10 said:


he must be texting from flip phone on 2G with only 1 bar. Just spit it out man!

How do they deny him access to a personal Twitter account? All you need is an internet connection, a username, and the password.
hbtheduce
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gary Johnson said:

hbtheduce said:

Except it's not because we privately and public pressure other countries in matters of criminal investigations ALL THE TIME

Joe ****ing Biden secretly pressured Ukraine to fire a prosecutor. Was it illegal because the Obama administration did it in secret?




Be careful. Trump's official position is "he wants nothing", there is "no quid pro quo"!

Totally normal to talk this way unsolicited, after you got caught for doing nothing wrong.


It really is outstanding that you want to use "a con man and a criminal" to define your legal standards. Maybe we should use federal law and legal definitions?

Quid pro quo isn't a crime. You gotta prove there was bribery or extortion. And your allergy to those legal definitions is really telling.

It's like "collusion" allegations pt 2. A rerun of dem desperation.
annie88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
annie88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TexasAggie_02 said:

tsuag10 said:


he must be texting from flip phone on 2G with only 1 bar. Just spit it out man!



What a wanker.
Just an Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
tsuag10 said:


I'd love to see Bolton bait them into calling him, then all he does is back up everything POTUS has said. <schiffiswyliecoyote.gif>
Silent For Too Long
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oh brother. Get over yourself.

I was obviously being a little flippant. You DID say he should "watch himself." You did say his speech was "dangerous." You were obviously implying that he was doing something very wrong, even criminal.

Right, so you can't back up your ridiculous take. That's what I thought.
Silent For Too Long
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

gobbledygook in Barr's essay is easy enough to do.


Then do it. Not on this thread, but that one. Lay out your arguments.

Or just admit that you are completely full of Schiff.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Interesting transcript and podcast of a discussion of the evidence adduced at the hearings and statutory construction of what constitutes bribery and extortion. HERE.
fooz
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cassius
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Just an Ag said:

tsuag10 said:


I'd love to see Bolton bait them into calling him, then all he does is back up everything POTUS has said. <schiffiswyliecoyote.gif>


So lack of Twitter prevents Bolton from speaking out?
Drahknor03
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
There are two things Bolton wants:

1) Sell his book and make money.

2) Be Nicki Hailey's SecDef.

He will do nothing to jeopardize either of those two things .
MetoliusAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Parnas' lawyer is claiming again today that his client has important evidence related to the impeachment investigation: "Parnas attended Rudolph's meeting with Yermak, and witnessed Rudolph pressuring Yermak on behalf of Trump to compel Zelensky to announce his admin was launching a corruption investigation into the Bidens and alleged 2016 meddling". Presumably Parnas' lawyer is shopping for some kind of an immunity deal.

Another oddity in this Trump-Giuliani mess is Nunes allegedly utilized Parnas to help him and his staff chase conspiracy theories.
1872walker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Soooooo.....the walls are closing in?
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG




More than one way to skin a cat.
FriscoKid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gary Johnson said:

Presidents don't deliver policy objectives through subordinates? He knows to be careful on a recorded call, come on don't play dumb.

Sondland is a first hand account.
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
1872walker said:

Soooooo.....the walls are closing in?
Noose is tightening.

Oh wait, that's probably racist.

Wheels are coming off.
Chance Chase McMasters
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If it's true that the ambassadors, NSC officials, and envoys were running a shadow campaign without Trump's knowledge I expect the White House to call for perjury or treason chargers against all 12 witnesses.

They're all telling the same story to implicate Trump, they must have conspired.
FriscoKid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Chance Chase McMasters said:

If it's true that the ambassadors, NSC officials, and envoys were running a shadow campaign without Trump's knowledge I expect the White House to call for perjury or treason chargers against all 12 witnesses.

They're all telling the same story to implicate Trump, they must have conspired.
Or they're all libs and this is just group think and assumptions.
Chance Chase McMasters
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Exactly I mean. Trump needs to make sure they're prosecuted and provide all relevant documents, emails, staff testimony, messages, call transcripts, directives, and meeting minutes involving Ukraine and send these turds to Gitmo.
Prosperdick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This whole thing reminds me of the scene in A Few Good Men where Nicholson tells Cruise "these marines are on trial for their lives, please tell me their lawyer didn't pin their hopes to a phone bill."

Yes if you could get Trump on the witness stand with a good litigator you might be able to get him to exclaim "Order the quid pro quo...you're Godd*** right I did!!!"

But that's never going to happen and all you've done is fire up Trump's base, added millions to the RNC's coffers, and turned off a LOT of swing voters.

Good job Schiff!!! Also from the movie, you're going to lose...and you're going to lose huge (or yuge).
MetoliusAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
With the leak about Horowitz report findings + this report, today has been a rough day for the "Deep State Coup Thread" truthers. From the news wire today:
Quote:

American intelligence officials informed senators and their aides in recent weeks that Russia had engaged in a yearslong campaign to essentially frame Ukraine as responsible for Moscow's own hacking of the 2016 election, according to three American officials.
Quote:

The revelations demonstrate Russia's persistence in trying to sow discord among its adversaries and show that the Kremlin apparently succeeded, as unfounded claims about Ukrainian interference seeped into Republican talking points.

American intelligence agencies believe Moscow is likely to redouble its efforts as the 2020 presidential campaign intensifies. The classified briefing for senators also focused on Russia's evolving influence tactics, including its growing ability to better disguise operations.
Quote:

This time, Russian intelligence operatives deployed a network of agents to blame Ukraine for its 2016 interference.

Starting at least in 2017, the operatives peddled a mixture of now-debunked conspiracy theories along with established facts to leave an impression that the government in Kyiv, not Moscow, was responsible for the hackings of Democrats and its other interference efforts in 2016, senior intelligence officials said.
Quote:

The Russian intelligence officers conveyed the information to prominent Russians and Ukrainians who then used a range of intermediaries, like oligarchs, businessmen and their associates, to pass the material to American political figures and even some journalists..
Hello, John Soloman, Sean Hannity, and RWM.
Quote:

That muddy brew worked its way into American information ecosystems, sloshing around until parts of it reached Mr. Trump, who has also spoken with Mr. Putin about allegations of Ukrainian interference. Mr. Trump also brought up the assertions of Ukrainian meddling in his July 25 call with President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine, which is at the heart of the impeachment inquiry into whether he abused his power by asking for a public commitment to investigations he stood to gain from personally.
Quote:

Mr. Putin began publicly pushing false theories of Ukrainian interference in the early months of 2017 to deflect responsibility from Russia, said Senator Angus King, independent of Maine and a member of the Senate Intelligence Committee, who declined to answer questions about the briefing.


link
Rockdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Those are crickets you're hearing etcetera. It's Friday evening, your boys have cratered, and you can't see it.
captkirk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:





More than one way to skin a cat.
This could get interesting
MouthBQ98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Convenient but also unfounded narrative desperately trying to tie some known information together with conjecture to salvage the dual Russia and Impeachment train wrecks.
captkirk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Chance Chase McMasters said:

If it's true that the ambassadors, NSC officials, and envoys were running a shadow campaign without Trump's knowledge I expect the White House to call for perjury or treason chargers against all 12 witnesses.

They're all telling the same story to implicate Trump, they must have conspired.
There has been no proof of a campaign, shadow or otherwise
captkirk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MetoliusAg said:

With the leak about Horowitz report findings + this report, today has been a rough day for the "Deep State Coup Thread" truthers. From the news wire today:
Quote:

American intelligence officials informed senators and their aides in recent weeks that Russia had engaged in a yearslong campaign to essentially frame Ukraine as responsible for Moscow's own hacking of the 2016 election, according to three American officials.
Quote:

The revelations demonstrate Russia's persistence in trying to sow discord among its adversaries and show that the Kremlin apparently succeeded, as unfounded claims about Ukrainian interference seeped into Republican talking points.

American intelligence agencies believe Moscow is likely to redouble its efforts as the 2020 presidential campaign intensifies. The classified briefing for senators also focused on Russia's evolving influence tactics, including its growing ability to better disguise operations.

Quote:

This time, Russian intelligence operatives deployed a network of agents to blame Ukraine for its 2016 interference.

Starting at least in 2017, the operatives peddled a mixture of now-debunked conspiracy theories along with established facts to leave an impression that the government in Kyiv, not Moscow, was responsible for the hackings of Democrats and its other interference efforts in 2016, senior intelligence officials said.
Quote:

The Russian intelligence officers conveyed the information to prominent Russians and Ukrainians who then used a range of intermediaries, like oligarchs, businessmen and their associates, to pass the material to American political figures and even some journalists..
Hello, John Soloman, Sean Hannity, and RWM.
Quote:

That muddy brew worked its way into American information ecosystems, sloshing around until parts of it reached Mr. Trump, who has also spoken with Mr. Putin about allegations of Ukrainian interference. Mr. Trump also brought up the assertions of Ukrainian meddling in his July 25 call with President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine, which is at the heart of the impeachment inquiry into whether he abused his power by asking for a public commitment to investigations he stood to gain from personally.

Quote:

Mr. Putin began publicly pushing false theories of Ukrainian interference in the early months of 2017 to deflect responsibility from Russia, said Senator Angus King, independent of Maine and a member of the Senate Intelligence Committee, who declined to answer questions about the briefing.


link

They wrote anti-Trump op-eds
They gave Chalupa the phony black ledger
They were one of the sources for the phony Steele dossier

These are facts that are not in dispute
whatthehey78
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rockdoc said:

Those are crickets you're hearing etcetera. It's Friday evening, your boys have cratered, and you can't see it.
That's why he desperately tries to defend them. Deep down...he knows they can't deliver. In the end, he will just disappear into his mommy's basement.
Chance Chase McMasters
How long do you want to ignore this user?
captkirk said:

Chance Chase McMasters said:

If it's true that the ambassadors, NSC officials, and envoys were running a shadow campaign without Trump's knowledge I expect the White House to call for perjury or treason chargers against all 12 witnesses.

They're all telling the same story to implicate Trump, they must have conspired.
There has been no proof of a campaign, shadow or otherwise


Right. In which case these 12 witnesses are colluding and committed perjury. Trump should release all the documents and witnesses related to Ukraine to nail them. I bet this happens very soon.
MetoliusAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Never in a million years would most Americans have ever guessed that someday one of the biggest dupes fooled by RWM propaganda and Russian propaganda would be the President of the United States. But that's exactly where we are today.
Artorias
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MetoliusAg said:



Never in a million years would most Americans have ever guessed that someday one of the biggest dupes fooled by RWM propaganda and Russian propaganda would be the President of the United States. But that's exactly where we are today.

And he will be for 5 more years.
Chance Chase McMasters
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

They wrote anti-Trump op-eds
They gave Chalupa the phony black ledger
They were one of the sources for the phony Steele dossier

These are facts that are not in dispute


They are in dispute and the relative importance is very much in doubt. It certainly wasn't a systematic government campaign as was the case for Russia.

Regardless, Trump never asked about this. He asked about the Bidens, about a server that doesn't exist, and the Ukrainian owner of Crowdstrike that doesn't exist.
MetoliusAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?


The most interesting thing imo about the continuous repeating of this absurd, debunked lie by Trump, Devin Nunes, Jim Jordan, Mark Meadows, et al is:

-- either Trump, Nunes, & those other Trumper R's know it's a lie and they keep repeating it anyway because they're fully aware tens of millions of Trump supporters will keep swallowing it,

or

-- Trump, Nunes, et al are too dumb to know the information they're disseminating to Trump supporters is false.
Maroon Dawn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Dear Metolius,

I have a question you will refuse to answer!

Here goes:

Every single Dem Witness testified that Trump did nothing wrong and or there was no QPQ

So are you just refusing to believe their testimony or do you think the Deep State Swamp Creatures are lying for Trump?
Gigem314
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Did we get him yet?
First Page Last Page
Page 120 of 264
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.