***** OFFICIAL TRUMP IMPEACHMENT THREAD *****

983,584 Views | 9220 Replies | Last: 1 yr ago by Pizza
FriscoKid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gary Johnson said:

Sorry yo boy's dumb conspiracy theory lost and got him impeached.
Gary. He didn't do anything wrong. There really isn't any other way to say this. You fell for it again.
Joe Exotic
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gary Johnson said:

Sorry yo boy's dumb conspiracy theory lost and got him impeached.


Sorry he's going to be 100% exonerated and cleared by the senate.







Actually, I'm not.
FriscoKid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
oldarmy1 said:


Twitter is getting pretty hyped up over this. If you are by a TV you might want to turn it on to listen to the gaggle questions.
FriscoKid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Again, The left is speculating like hell over this being bad for trump.

MetoliusAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aginlakeway said:

Gary Johnson said:

agsalaska said:

Gary Johnson said:

Quote:

He wasn't on the call. He just claims he could hear it because he was close Sondland and could make it out. Good luck with that
All these guys independently just making stuff that perfectly corroborates each other is some really bad luck for Trump.
That's your evidence? And if it is, you believe this is enough to impeach a duly elected President?
I'm forming a conclusion based on what we know, not prosecuting a criminal trial with high standards of evidence.

You have 3 Trump apointees including one who donated a million dollars. It's hard to make the case for a fabricated conspiracy against Trump with the known facts and testimony.
OK .. and based on that, and without hard evidence ... you want to impeach a POTUS?

There was hard evidence vs. Nixon and Clinton.
I want the facts to be uncovered, not obstructed. If the facts don't warrant impeachment, then I won't support impeachment. Nor will 80-90+% of the American people.

If you're a patriot whose loyalty is to country over party, you should be strongly in favor of:

-- continuing the impeachment investigation

-- the subpoenaed evidence (texts, emails, notes, and documents) being given to the impeachment investigation committee

-- Eisenberg, Pompeo, Kupperman, Bolton, Mulvaney, Perry, Parnas, Fruman, and Giuliani being deposed under oath.

But if you're a Trump supporter whose loyalty is to Trump and the GOP party first and your country second, then you'll oppose those things.

As for the Bidens, the DOJ should investigate (and imo, probably already are investigating them).
FriscoKid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This is year three of his impeachment inquiry and it's getting old. He should tell them to pound sand.
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FriscoKid said:

Again, The left is speculating like hell over this being bad for trump.


The left thinks everything is bad for Trump.

Still not sure if they're just stupid, or willfully ignorant.
MetoliusAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rockdoc said:

Hate to break it to you. They started planning his impeachment the day he was sworn in, before he did ANYTHING.
IOW, exactly like the R's did with Obama and Bill Clinton and planned to do with Hillary. Y'all got Bill, and as I've stated repeatedly, HRC would have been impeached too.

Obama otoh was too honest and clean. Y'all tried but never found anything.
BMX Bandit
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MetoliusAg said:

Rockdoc said:

Hate to break it to you. They started planning his impeachment the day he was sworn in, before he did ANYTHING.
IOW, exactly like the R's did with Obama and Bill Clinton and planned to do with Hillary. Y'all got Bill, and as I've stated repeatedly, HRC would have been impeached too.

Obama otoh was too honest and clean. Y'all tried but never found anything.
You completely made this up.

pathetic.
titan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S

Yes, that's pretty fraudulent.
Funky Winkerbean
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MetoliusAg said:

Rockdoc said:

Hate to break it to you. They started planning his impeachment the day he was sworn in, before he did ANYTHING.
IOW, exactly like the R's did with Obama and Bill Clinton and planned to do with Hillary. Y'all got Bill, and as I've stated repeatedly, HRC would have been impeached too.

Obama otoh was too honest and clean. Y'all tried but never found anything.


The cash on an airplane notwithstanding..

The R's feared the backlash of impeaching the first black President
hbtheduce
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MetoliusAg said:

Rockdoc said:

Hate to break it to you. They started planning his impeachment the day he was sworn in, before he did ANYTHING.
IOW, exactly like the R's did with Obama and Bill Clinton and planned to do with Hillary. Y'all got Bill, and as I've stated repeatedly, HRC would have been impeached too.

Obama otoh was too honest and clean. Y'all tried but never found anything.

Obama administration took bribes from Russians in the form of the Steele Dossier. According to you.
Rockdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MetoliusAg said:

Rockdoc said:

Hate to break it to you. They started planning his impeachment the day he was sworn in, before he did ANYTHING.
IOW, exactly like the R's did with Obama and Bill Clinton and planned to do with Hillary. Y'all got Bill, and as I've stated repeatedly, HRC would have been impeached too.

Obama otoh was too honest and clean. Y'all tried but never found anything.

Didn't figure you would be able to keep your tongue on that one. So you just lied. No need trying to post old fake news.
EKUAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The Dems have introduced Articles of Impeachment against every elected Republican starting with Reagan until now.

FriscoKid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
EKUAg said:

The Dems have introduced Articles of Impeachment against every elected Republican starting with Reagan until now.


Snopes says this is "Mostly False"

Quote:

What's True
Articles of impeachment were introduced against five of the six Republican presidents who have served since President Dwight D. Eisenhower.

What's False
Articles of impeachment were not introduced against President Gerald Ford; a handful of Democratic politicians filed articles of impeachment against President George H. W. Bush Sr. and President Ronald Reagan but their efforts did not receive the backing of the entire Democratic party; and the impeachment efforts against President Richard Nixon received bipartisan support.
MetoliusAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Very true:



Nixon supporters in the House and Senate continued to impede the investigations and support Nixon and fight against impeachment right down to the end. It wasn't until the tapes were gotten away from Nixon via court order that most of the Nixon loyalists finally gave up supporting the criminal, corrupt felon occupying the WH.
GCP12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Metolius is just as sure this will take down Trump as he was that Mueller would take down Trump. He will be just as sure the next "scandal" will take down Trump.

He's basically Rachel Maddow with a TexAgs account instead of a national TV show.

He's insane.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

With a grand total of 13,098,000 Americans tuning in to watch the televised opening of the House Select Committee on Intelligence questioning on Wednesday, Ambassador William Taylor and Deputy Secretary of State George Kent topped the 12.9 million who saw the former FBI Director's circumspect stint in the hot seat on July 25.

Having said that with Nielsen numbers from Fox News Channel. MSNBC, ABC, CNN, CBS and NBC now in, the 10 AM 3:30 PM ET hearing stumbled against another big ticket testimony. The Wednesday event, that the former Celebrity Apprentice host insists he didn't watch, was down a hard 32% from the audience that eyed pink slipped FBI Director James Comey's appearance before our elected representatives in June 2017.
LINK
End Of Message
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
America does not care. America understands TDS now.
Resistance to tyranny is obedience to God.
Joe Exotic
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Our loyalty is to liberty over socialism.





You still fail to get that.
Joe Exotic
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MetoliusAg said:

Very true:



Nixon supporters in the House and Senate continued to impede the investigations and support Nixon and fight against impeachment right down to the end. It wasn't until the tapes were gotten away from Nixon via court order that most of the Nixon loyalists finally gave up supporting the criminal, corrupt felon occupying the WH.


That was before the democrat party completely embraced socialism, gun confiscation, reparations, and open borders.


There is simply too much on the line to not support trump now. Your side has quite literally given us no alternative.
c-jags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MetoliusAg said:


It wasn't until the tapes were gotten away from Nixon via court order that most of the Nixon loyalists finally gave up supporting the criminal, corrupt felon occupying the WH.
so you're saying that when there was actual evidence as opposed to hearsay, they changed their mind on "innocent till proven guilty?"

novel concept.
backintexas2013
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Just FYI he just posted a tweet from a guy who describes himself as TV Writer & "The Gordon Ramsay of Fast Food" -

I am sure he is a political expert given those crowning achievements. Can't wait to see who he posts next. He is scraping the bottom of the barrel.
MetoliusAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
EKUAg said:

The Dems have introduced Articles of Impeachment against every elected Republican starting with Reagan until now.
Reagan should have been impeached.

https://fas.org/irp/offdocs/walsh/

Our country has paid an enormous price for that. And Bill Barr played a key part in that mess, because the IranContra conspirators and convicted felons never should have been pardoned. Now he heads the DOJ. That should concern anyone who wants the rule of law to apply to Presidents.
BanderaAg956
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MetoliusAg said:

aginlakeway said:

Gary Johnson said:

agsalaska said:

Gary Johnson said:

Quote:

He wasn't on the call. He just claims he could hear it because he was close Sondland and could make it out. Good luck with that
All these guys independently just making stuff that perfectly corroborates each other is some really bad luck for Trump.
That's your evidence? And if it is, you believe this is enough to impeach a duly elected President?
I'm forming a conclusion based on what we know, not prosecuting a criminal trial with high standards of evidence.

You have 3 Trump apointees including one who donated a million dollars. It's hard to make the case for a fabricated conspiracy against Trump with the known facts and testimony.
OK .. and based on that, and without hard evidence ... you want to impeach a POTUS?

There was hard evidence vs. Nixon and Clinton.
I want the facts to be uncovered, not obstructed. If the facts don't warrant impeachment, then I won't support impeachment. Nor will 80-90+% of the American people.

If you're a patriot whose loyalty is to country over party, you should be strongly in favor of:

-- continuing the impeachment investigation

-- the subpoenaed evidence (texts, emails, notes, and documents) being given to the impeachment investigation committee

-- Eisenberg, Pompeo, Kupperman, Bolton, Mulvaney, Perry, Parnas, Fruman, and Giuliani being deposed under oath.

But if you're a Trump supporter whose loyalty is to Trump and the GOP party first and your country second, then you'll oppose those things.

As for the Bidens, the DOJ should investigate (and imo, probably already are investigating them).

Time to investigate Obama, Hillary, Kerry, Emmanuel, Lynch, Comey, Holder, and every crooked lying cheating liberal associated with any of them! Time for Barr and Durham to open the flood gates on liberal crooks!
Liberals are Damn Liars! Terminate Section 230! It has been ONLY 72!hours since my last banning for defending my conservative values against liberal snowflake cupcakes and the LIBERAL Mod’s that protect them! Fairness is a myth! Stop trying to silence us! Decent LAW ABIDING HUMAN BEINGS MATTER and so do our voices. When you protect the wicked, the Anarchist, the deviant, you become One of them!

ALL LIVES MATTER - I support police and motorcycle riders. Patriot Gun Owners Unite!
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG



Impeachment related because this guy is a Schiff bestie.



ETA:
Quote:

Rep. Adam Schiff and Dr. Hensel have been closely linked for years, with the LA Times describing the doctor as a "special guest" at Schiff's 50th birthday party in 2010. Schiff also handpicked Dr. Hensel to work with him on health care townhalls in California and has been the recipient of big dollar donations from the 71-year-old throughout his political career.

LINK
oldarmy1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MetoliusAg said:

Very true:



Nixon supporters in the House and Senate continued to impede the investigations and support Nixon and fight against impeachment right down to the end. It wasn't until the tapes were gotten away from Nixon via court order that most of the Nixon loyalists finally gave up supporting the criminal, corrupt felon occupying the WH.
Only issue I have with Nixon was being too stupid to burn the tapes. Or is it bleach bitting them? I forget.
aginlakeway
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
GCP12 said:

Metolius is just as sure this will take down Trump as he was that Mueller would take down Trump. He will be just as sure the next "scandal" will take down Trump.

He's basically Rachel Maddow with a TexAgs account instead of a national TV show.

He's insane.
He also keeps replying to posters who have him ignored.
"I'm sure that won't make a bit of difference for those of you who enjoy a baseless rage over the decisions of a few teenagers."
aggielostinETX
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
No doubt Schiff is pedo.
backintexas2013
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Wonder if someone will ask Schiff about this
FriscoKid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Deats said:

No doubt Schiff is pedo.
He should release proof that he's not.
oldarmy1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So the reason Trump is late leaving for the rally is they are submitting a request for the Supreme Court to block the latest Tax Return release decision.
Prosperdick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:




Impeachment related because this guy is a Schiff bestie.



ETA:
Quote:

Rep. Adam Schiff and Dr. Hensel have been closely linked for years, with the LA Times describing the doctor as a "special guest" at Schiff's 50th birthday party in 2010. Schiff also handpicked Dr. Hensel to work with him on health care townhalls in California and has been the recipient of big dollar donations from the 71-year-old throughout his political career.

LINK
Gary Johnson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FriscoKid said:

Gary Johnson said:

Sorry yo boy's dumb conspiracy theory lost and got him impeached.
Gary. He didn't do anything wrong.
Sure buddy. We'll revisit this when Bolton or Mulvaney flip.
aginlakeway
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gary Johnson said:

FriscoKid said:

Gary Johnson said:

Sorry yo boy's dumb conspiracy theory lost and got him impeached.
Gary. He didn't do anything wrong.
Sure buddy. We'll revisit this when Bolton or Mulvaney flip.
Did you accept my wager yet on the 2020 election? Why not? You seem to know all of the facts.
"I'm sure that won't make a bit of difference for those of you who enjoy a baseless rage over the decisions of a few teenagers."
First Page Last Page
Page 94 of 264
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.