***** OFFICIAL TRUMP IMPEACHMENT THREAD *****

944,943 Views | 9220 Replies | Last: 1 yr ago by Pizza
chimmy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
mrad85 said:

Rapier108 said:

mrad85 said:

MetoliusAg said:

No surprise: Giuliani, Parnas, and Fruman replicated one of the recurring themes seen over & over from other Trump subordinates/toadies: while they're performing illegal actions for Trump, they engage in multiple illegal side deals to enrich themselves.

BOOM!
It wasn't intended as a "Boom" or anything.

What he said in his quote was 100% correct IMO.

I just wish he would follow through. I wish everyone would follow through with that.
Parnas and Fruman are sleazy guys with enough proof to get them indicted. Giuliani may have stepped in it too. Like Manafort, distance is needed.
hbtheduce
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MetoliusAg said:

No surprise: Giuliani, Parnas, and Fruman replicated one of the recurring themes seen over & over from other Trump subordinates/toadies: while they're performing illegal actions for Trump, they engage in multiple illegal side deals to enrich themselves.

Like the Bidens?

Is getting paid by Ukrainians worth investigation or not worth investigation?

Which is it Metolius?




will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MetoliusAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SecState Pompeo caught lying like a dog.



FTAG 2000
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MetoliusAg said:

SecState Pompeo caught lying like a dog.




Ah yes, we all know it's not possible that McKinley is lying like a dog.

Dems have been after Pompeo since his first NK trip, not a shocker, they're trying to throw more dog crap at the wall to see what they can try and make stick.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MetoliusAg said:

SecState Pompeo caught lying like a dog.




Read nearly all of McKinley's testimony today. Ditto Yovanovitch's testimony. You might want to read those for yourself.
Maroon Dawn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

MetoliusAg said:

SecState Pompeo caught lying like a dog.




Read nearly all of McKinley's testimony today. Ditto Yovanovitch's testimony. You might want to read those for yourself.


Whoa whoa

Rule #1 of liberal

Never let facts get in the way of The Narrative
aggie2812-2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Hey MetoliusAg....just a reminder you have more than 5 years left of hating everything, blaming others for your own problems and crying about everything.
BuddysBud
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MetoliusAg said:

SecState Pompeo caught lying like a dog.






CNN. You might consider posting something from a credible news source.
MetoliusAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?


hbtheduce
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yes, one random dinner at over a year ago. Gonna take more than that for me to consider that a strong relationship.

aginlakeway
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggie2812-2 said:

Hey MetoliusAg....just a reminder you have more than 5 years left of hating everything, blaming others for your own problems and crying about everything.


He'll have 3 more usernames in those 5 years.
TexasAggie_02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Photo op at dinner with dozens of people vs golf with 4.
hbtheduce
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


Very Interesting. Looks like Ukrainians viewed their payments to Biden as a bribe for access. I've been told by Metolius that this is a "high crime".

Thank GOD Trump was investigating such serious matters. A lesser president would have let Biden win the nomination and spring it next year. Hopefully the communist democrat party makes a better selection.
Claverack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u said:


And some on this thread will have you believe the Vice President was perfectly innocent.

The more Solomon digs up, the more damning the evidence against Biden and his equally-worthless son.


Gary Johnson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
hbtheduce said:



Very Interesting. Looks like Ukrainians viewed their payments to Biden as a bribe for access. I've been told by Metolius that this is a "high crime".

Thank GOD Trump was investigating such serious matters. A lesser president would have let Biden win the nomination and spring it next year. Hopefully the communist democrat party makes a better selection.



Requesting a meeting with the US state department =/ pressuring the PGO to stop investigating a case it wasn't investigating anyway.



Bwahaaaaa the case cracker. Biden followed someone on Twitter. John Solomon is a propagandist, a bad one, not a reporter.
CanyonAg77
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggie2812-2 said:

Hey MetoliusAg....just a reminder you have more than 5 years left of hating everything, blaming others for your own problems and crying about everything.
1,904 more days until January 20, 2025.

I'd say five more usernames
hbtheduce
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gary Johnson said:

hbtheduce said:



Very Interesting. Looks like Ukrainians viewed their payments to Biden as a bribe for access. I've been told by Metolius that this is a "high crime".

Thank GOD Trump was investigating such serious matters. A lesser president would have let Biden win the nomination and spring it next year. Hopefully the communist democrat party makes a better selection.



Requesting a meeting with the US state department =/ pressuring the PGO to stop investigating a case it wasn't investigating anyway.



Bwahaaaaa the case cracker. Biden followed someone on Twitter. John Solomon is a propagandist, a bad one, not a reporter.

Biden took cold hard cash for access. Quid pro quo. Impeachable. Trump was right to investigate.

Is a criminal investigation even "worth" money? Biden is even better than trump at being corrupt.
Gary Johnson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Nice try but that isn't the allegation. Shokin was still dirty and was never investigating Burisma. That's what you need to get Joe.
hbtheduce
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gary Johnson said:

Nice try but that isn't the allegation. Shokin was still dirty and was never investigating Burisma. That's what you need to get Joe.

False. The allegation is that Hunter Biden was raking in MILLIONS OF ****ING DOLLARS while his dad was in charge of Ukrainian policy. Were there any policy changes that were made because of these payments? Were the Biden's accepting foreign money for influence? Was Hunter Biden acting as a foreign agent? Did they take any other actions that benefited H. Biden and his cronies?

Biden operated foreign policy with clear conflicts of interest, and we need to make sure he didn't break the law. **** you want me to support impeaching Trump for an investigation that could come up empty, yet you are fine with the BIDENS TAKING COLD HARD CASH.

Open your ****ing eyes.


Gary Johnson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

Were there any policy changes that were made because of these payments?
Were the Biden's accepting foreign money for influence? Was Hunter Biden acting as a foreign agent? Did they take any other actions that benefited H. Biden and his cronies?


These are speculative questions not allegations with any evidence. Hunter being on the board was definitely a bad look, not disputing that. But Joe Biden's actions appear above board and in-line with the anti-corruption stance from the EU and internal Ukrainian groups. Shokin had to go, partially because he protected Zlochevsky. Shokin is the ideal PGO you'd want to leave in place if you're interested in orchestrating corruption in Ukraine.

hbtheduce
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It's your speculation that the DOJ has no other evidence worth pursuing. A FARA case already seems strong...

And then if these charges are so easily debunked, what value would an investigation really bring Trump. Your entire narrative falls apart both ways.
Gary Johnson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

And then if these charges are so easily debunked, what value would an investigation really bring Trump.


That's one of the funniest things about it. Trump being taken down by his own gullibility and conspiracy theory. A con man thinks everything's a con.
hbtheduce
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gary Johnson said:

Quote:

And then if these charges are so easily debunked, what value would an investigation really bring Trump.


That's one of the funniest things about it. Trump being taken down by his own gullibility and conspiracy theory. A con man thinks everything's a con.



It won't. Because seeking an justice for citizens is his duty as President. Much like his intervention in Otto Wombier or A$AP Rocky.
aginlakeway
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gary Johnson said:

Quote:

And then if these charges are so easily debunked, what value would an investigation really bring Trump.


That's one of the funniest things about it. Trump being taken down by his own gullibility and conspiracy theory. A con man thinks everything's a con.


So when will Trump be removed from office?
hbtheduce
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aginlakeway said:

Gary Johnson said:

Quote:

And then if these charges are so easily debunked, what value would an investigation really bring Trump.


That's one of the funniest things about it. Trump being taken down by his own gullibility and conspiracy theory. A con man thinks everything's a con.


So when will Trump be removed from office?


2024 once his second term ends.
Gary Johnson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
hbtheduce said:

Gary Johnson said:

Quote:

And then if these charges are so easily debunked, what value would an investigation really bring Trump.


That's one of the funniest things about it. Trump being taken down by his own gullibility and conspiracy theory. A con man thinks everything's a con.



It won't. Because seeking an justice for citizens is his duty as President. Much like his intervention in Otto Wombier or A$AP Rocky.


*Seeking "justice" =/ pursuing a conspiracy theory in a way that helps him personally and hinders congressionally approved aid to an ally.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

These are speculative questions not allegations with any evidence. Hunter being on the board was definitely a bad look, not disputing that. But Joe Biden's actions appear above board and in-line with the anti-corruption stance from the EU and internal Ukrainian groups. Shokin had to go, partially because he protected Zlochevsky. Shokin is the ideal PGO you'd want to leave in place if you're interested in orchestrating corruption in Ukraine.
Too bad Marie Yovanovitch said Lutshenko was way worse than Shokin.

Releasing her deposition was quite a mistake on Schiff's part.

A) She's not too bright.
B) She's way too much of a bureaucrat that only cared about Foggy Bottom.
C) She pretended that there was no CIA presence in her embassy in Ukraine. And thus she was operating in the darkness of the blind, except for some social media watchers at the embassy and then she complained the time difference was such a problem that she requested that DC do the social media watching for them and give them a readout the next morning.

When DC laughed and said, "Uhmm, no," she was upset.

She also talked to Fiona Hill at NSC often. Not clear why she didn't ask Fiona for the same heads up.

All in all, Yovanovitch's testimony was a damning example of how idiots who stay in the State Department long enough, get promoted beyond their abilities.
Gary Johnson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Franchione was way worse than RC, he still had to go. Keep swinging.
BuddysBud
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gary Johnson said:

hbtheduce said:

Gary Johnson said:

Quote:

And then if these charges are so easily debunked, what value would an investigation really bring Trump.


That's one of the funniest things about it. Trump being taken down by his own gullibility and conspiracy theory. A con man thinks everything's a con.



It won't. Because seeking an justice for citizens is his duty as President. Much like his intervention in Otto Wombier or A$AP Rocky.


*Seeking "justice" =/ pursuing a conspiracy theory in a way that helps him personally and hinders congressionally approved aid to an ally.


So then you agree that the Democrats use of the House "impeachment" inquiry as taxpayer paid political research should end and Congress should spend their time doing the business that they were elected to do?
MidTnAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

Quote:

These are speculative questions not allegations with any evidence. Hunter being on the board was definitely a bad look, not disputing that. But Joe Biden's actions appear above board and in-line with the anti-corruption stance from the EU and internal Ukrainian groups. Shokin had to go, partially because he protected Zlochevsky. Shokin is the ideal PGO you'd want to leave in place if you're interested in orchestrating corruption in Ukraine.
Too bad Marie Yovanovitch said Lutshenko was way worse than Shokin.

Releasing her deposition was quite a mistake on Schiff's part.

A) She's not too bright.
B) She's way too much of a bureaucrat that only cared about Foggy Bottom.
C) She pretended that there was no CIA presence in her embassy in Ukraine. And thus she was operating in the darkness of the blind, except for some social media watchers at the embassy and then she complained the time difference was such a problem that she requested that DC do the social media watching for them and give them a readout the next morning.

When DC laughed and said, "Uhmm, no," she was upset.

She also talked to Fiona Hill at NSC often. Not clear why she didn't ask Fiona for the same heads up.

All in all, Yovanovitch's testimony was a damning example of how idiots who stay in the State Department long enough, get promoted beyond their abilities.
I bet that you would not be saying all this crap if Trump was a Democrat would you?

It's sad to watch you Republicans and Democrats pretend you are the righteous ones. It is sad but there is no true right or wrong anymore. No matter what was done or said, if it was done by somebody on your team it was okay, it was good, maybe it was even great!.
On the other hand if the SAME ACT was done by somebody on the other team. it was horrible, terrible, awful. maybe even illegal or Criminal..

This is especially true presently of the Republicans. Republicans are spineless cowards. They bow down and kiss Trump's feet and probably his ass if he asked them to.

Too many Republicans appear to be trying out for a position on Fox News. They twist the facts as far as they can so that they are inaccurate or they just make up crap.

Will you people please please please try to get back to the philosophy that if something is done that is bad or wrong or illegal, it is that way no matter if it's done by somebody on your team or somebody on the other team. It is still wrong and should be criticize.

Please guys please please please. This tribal Warfare somehow has just got to stop damnit. It has just got to stop!!!
Claverack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gary Johnson said:

hbtheduce said:



Very Interesting. Looks like Ukrainians viewed their payments to Biden as a bribe for access. I've been told by Metolius that this is a "high crime".

Thank GOD Trump was investigating such serious matters. A lesser president would have let Biden win the nomination and spring it next year. Hopefully the communist democrat party makes a better selection.



Requesting a meeting with the US state department =/ pressuring the PGO to stop investigating a case it wasn't investigating anyway.



Bwahaaaaa the case cracker. Biden followed someone on Twitter. John Solomon is a propagandist, a bad one, not a reporter.
A poster continually carrying water for Joe Biden, without evidence to back up his point, referring to the man who has primary evidence to back up his point as a propagandist.

In typical leftist fashion, you project your own actions upon those who shine the light upon the rats you defend.

You have a TELCON that only demonstrates the President exercising his right to enforce the laws of this nation against those who have behaved in a corrupt manner while in office.

You have the word of a "whistleblower" who has already been exposed as a collaborator with House Democrats during the Russia probe and was working with Mr. Schiff and his team when the whole thing started.

You also have the word of LTC Vindman, an individual who has a history of using his uniform to push leftist political messages during operations with foreign military components.

https://amgreatness.com/2019/11/04/retired-army-officer-remembers-lt-col-vindman-as-partisan-democrat-who-ridiculed-america/

So essentially you wish to impeach Trump on the basis of hearsay from extremists whose first loyalty is to the Democratic Party.

But when we have direct evidence of Democrat Party corruption, as was the case with the likes of Lois Lerner, Hillary Clinton, Eric Holder, and others, you are known by either by your absence from commentary or your willingness to serve as an apologist for it.

In your world, there is truly one rule for Democrats and quite another set of standards for everyone else.

Claverack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MidTnAg said:

aggiehawg said:

Quote:

These are speculative questions not allegations with any evidence. Hunter being on the board was definitely a bad look, not disputing that. But Joe Biden's actions appear above board and in-line with the anti-corruption stance from the EU and internal Ukrainian groups. Shokin had to go, partially because he protected Zlochevsky. Shokin is the ideal PGO you'd want to leave in place if you're interested in orchestrating corruption in Ukraine.
Too bad Marie Yovanovitch said Lutshenko was way worse than Shokin.

Releasing her deposition was quite a mistake on Schiff's part.

A) She's not too bright.
B) She's way too much of a bureaucrat that only cared about Foggy Bottom.
C) She pretended that there was no CIA presence in her embassy in Ukraine. And thus she was operating in the darkness of the blind, except for some social media watchers at the embassy and then she complained the time difference was such a problem that she requested that DC do the social media watching for them and give them a readout the next morning.

When DC laughed and said, "Uhmm, no," she was upset.

She also talked to Fiona Hill at NSC often. Not clear why she didn't ask Fiona for the same heads up.

All in all, Yovanovitch's testimony was a damning example of how idiots who stay in the State Department long enough, get promoted beyond their abilities.
I bet that you would not be saying all this crap if Trump was a Democrat would you?

It's sad to watch you Republicans and Democrats pretend you are the righteous ones. It is sad but there is no true right or wrong anymore. No matter what was done or said, if it was done by somebody on your team it was okay, it was good, maybe it was even great!.
On the other hand if the SAME ACT was done by somebody on the other team. it was horrible, terrible, awful. maybe even illegal or Criminal..

This is especially true presently of the Republicans. Republicans are spineless cowards. They bow down and kiss Trump's feet and probably his ass if he asked them to.

Too many Republicans appear to be trying out for a position on Fox News. They twist the facts as far as they can so that they are inaccurate or they just make up crap.

Will you people please please please try to get back to the philosophy that if something is done that is bad or wrong or illegal, it is that way no matter if it's done by somebody on your team or somebody on the other team. It is still wrong and should be criticize.

Please guys please please please. This tribal Warfare somehow has just got to stop damnit. It has just got to stop!!!
Where was this when James Comey decided to exonerate Hillary Clinton before an investigation was ever launched?

Where was this when Brett Kavanaugh was being raked over the coals by someone who concocted a story none of her contemporaries would corroborate?

Where was this when this President held himself up to the rule of law in an investigation into Russian election-meddling brought about by a fraudulent dossier created by Russian intelligence and paid for by Hillary Clinton?

In your world, I guess those who are Republican or Conservative in their outlook should merely sit back and accept the corrupt machinations of the left in absolute silence.

(Removed:11023A)
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Go take your meds
First Page Last Page
Page 53 of 264
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.