Rockdoc said:
Oh I remember his past. I've witnessed his hate. But I haven't seen him profess his love for the policies of his party's candidates.
That's his MO. He never debates policy. Just pure trolling.
Rockdoc said:
Oh I remember his past. I've witnessed his hate. But I haven't seen him profess his love for the policies of his party's candidates.
blindey said:
Oh Christ, metolios is Stephenville77.
Perma-ignore.
blindey said:
Oh Christ, metolios is Stephenville77.
Perma-ignore.
You are confusing testimony with evidence.MetoliusAg said:Thus far all the evidence indicates it was an illegal scheme + a violation of this oath of office + a serious abuse of Presidential power + an impeachable offense. If new evidence is uncovered which contradicts that, then I'll re-evaluate. But thus far the evidence has all been very incriminating of Trump, Giuliani, and Mulvaney.hbtheduce said:
If you and ecetera want to adjust your claims that this was a legal, but impeachable offense, I think that would be more accurate. Now obviously I disagree, but we can at least have a conversation from the same understanding of the facts.
Gary Johnson said:
Would that be a "high crime or misdemeanor"? I was pretty young don't remember much.
Basically, the ONLY way that a Ukrainian investigation could even POSSIBLY be an election law violation (as some kind of "donation") is if the results of that investigation show that Biden committed a crime.MetoliusAg said:
The Ukraine quid pro quo could result in Trump prosecuted multiple ways: election law violations, bribery / extortion, or Hatch Act criminal violations.
And the Ukraine stuff doesn't even include the other ongoing investigations and potential indictments Trump is facing for tax fraud, insurance fraud, bank fraud, paying off Stormy Daniels, and multiple counts of obstruction of justice from the SCO investigation.
(But nothing was illegal!)
This is very reminiscent of 1974-75. With so many different crimes and coverups going on: at some point the dam inevitably breaks, just like it did with Nixon.
MetoliusAg said:I've debated domestic and foreign policy in this forum since 1998.Bo Darville said:Rockdoc said:
Oh I remember his past. I've witnessed his hate. But I haven't seen him profess his love for the policies of his party's candidates.
That's his MO. He never debates policy. Just pure trolling.
And btw, Bo, what was your previous handle?
yes it can. I'll distill it down to two words for the low IQ posters and trolls:MetoliusAg said:
It can't be explained any more starkly or succinctly than this:
MetoliusAg said:
It can't be explained any more starkly or succinctly than this:
^
|
This is the choice Senators will be facing.
Why do you have to keep making new accounts?MetoliusAg said:I've debated domestic and foreign policy in this forum since 1998.Bo Darville said:Rockdoc said:
Oh I remember his past. I've witnessed his hate. But I haven't seen him profess his love for the policies of his party's candidates.
That's his MO. He never debates policy. Just pure trolling.
And btw, Bo, what was your previous handle?
BenFiasco14 said:Why do you have to keep making new accounts?MetoliusAg said:I've debated domestic and foreign policy in this forum since 1998.Bo Darville said:Rockdoc said:
Oh I remember his past. I've witnessed his hate. But I haven't seen him profess his love for the policies of his party's candidates.
That's his MO. He never debates policy. Just pure trolling.
And btw, Bo, what was your previous handle?
Quote:
I've debated domestic and foreign policy in this forum since 1998.
Quote:
MetoliusAg
Joined: May 9, 2017
Posts: 6,763
will25u said:
Interesting article on what the Democrats might be trying to do. By Sundance
hbtheduce said:
What I find painfully ironic is how libs on here can accuse Trump of bribery without any money being exchanged.
But Joe Biden's son is getting paid millions of dollars while his father is VP and that is all clean and not worth another glance?
Its pathetic partisan hackery, and if they play by those rules, this country will devolve into civil war.
The HoR is engaged in a 100% legal Constitutional process.Quote:
Tom Fitton on The Lou Dobbs Show: "We have to do something in response to the coup. Go to court, have the Senate say there's going to be no trial. Have the Republicans try to shut it down as best they can."
aginlakeway said:BenFiasco14 said:Why do you have to keep making new accounts?MetoliusAg said:I've debated domestic and foreign policy in this forum since 1998.Bo Darville said:Rockdoc said:
Oh I remember his past. I've witnessed his hate. But I haven't seen him profess his love for the policies of his party's candidates.
That's his MO. He never debates policy. Just pure trolling.
And btw, Bo, what was your previous handle?
I'd like to know why as well.
MetoliusAg said:The HoR is engaged in a 100% legal Constitutional process.Quote:
Tom Fitton on The Lou Dobbs Show: "We have to do something in response to the coup. Go to court, have the Senate say there's going to be no trial. Have the Republicans try to shut it down as best they can."
If Trump is innocent, and if the ongoing impeachment process in the HoR is such an election boon for Congressional Republicans, Senators, and Trump in the upcoming 2020 campaign -- as dozens of Trump supporters in this thread have repeatedly claimed -- then why do so many Trump supporters and paid far-right operatives like Fitton want to shut it down?