The ONLY thing the Democrats might get out of this(if they actually get the GJ material) is something to smear Trump with. Otherwise the Mueller Investigation would have been more damning.
just sadwill25u said:
The ONLY thing the Democrats might get out of this(if they actually get the GJ material) is something to smear Trump with. Otherwise the Mueller Investigation would have been more damning.
I believe it is the same one that is over all the Mueller stuff. Hasn't changed.Rapier108 said:
Obama appointed judge of course.
It is, one of them. The other is Amy Jackson.will25u said:I believe it is the same one that is over all the Mueller stuff. Hasn't changed.Rapier108 said:
Obama appointed judge of course.
So? Rudy can say anything he wants. He could say Biden should be arrested tomorrow and it would mean nothing. His opinion of something is just that, an opinion. Not a crime no matter how much you want it to be.MetoliusAg said:
In Giuliani's two butt-dialed phone calls, he is recorded saying they have "to force" Ukraine to investigate the Bidens.
That's all it's ever been about. The dems know they don't have anything on him. It's all a show.will25u said:
The ONLY thing the Democrats might get out of this(if they actually get the GJ material) is something to smear Trump with. Otherwise the Mueller Investigation would have been more damning.
Quote:
Anyway, according to Taylor's opening statement, this man who has never met or spoken with Trump, claims he heard third- and fourth-hand information proving there was a dastardly quid pro quo between Trump and Ukraine: i.e., Ukraine gets no military assistance unless Ukraine publicizes the opening of an investigation into Joe and Hunter Biden.
This is important because while the White House admits aid was delayed, the White House also claims there can be no quid pro quo when Ukraine did not know about the delay. What's more, because we have the transcript, we know for a fact the delay was not mentioned during Trump's July 25 phone call, and there is no evidence showing Ukraine knew about the delay prior to August.
But what you have here is Taylor saying he discovered through Morrison, who says he heard it from Sondland, that Trump outright told Sondland there was a direct quid pro quo, not just about Ukraine cleaning up its overall corruption problems, but directly attached to investigating the Bidens and Burisma, the shady energy company that paid Hunter Biden $50,000 a month a month! to sit on its board, even though Hunter has no experience with Ukraine or energy.
"I heard from a friend, who....heard it from a friend, who....heard it from another Trump was messing arou-ound....."YouBet said:
I have fallen behind with the ongoing impeachment efforts against Trump. I've now caught up only to discover the latest claims are Kavanaugh all over again. Purely he said/she said and based on 3rd and 4th hand at that. And actually more fake news than Kavanaugh because the evidence is already public and yet we are still hearing about this.
You have to be kidding me with this sh^t at this point. Democrats are f'ing evil.Quote:
Anyway, according to Taylor's opening statement, this man who has never met or spoken with Trump, claims he heard third- and fourth-hand information proving there was a dastardly quid pro quo between Trump and Ukraine: i.e., Ukraine gets no military assistance unless Ukraine publicizes the opening of an investigation into Joe and Hunter Biden.
This is important because while the White House admits aid was delayed, the White House also claims there can be no quid pro quo when Ukraine did not know about the delay. What's more, because we have the transcript, we know for a fact the delay was not mentioned during Trump's July 25 phone call, and there is no evidence showing Ukraine knew about the delay prior to August.
But what you have here is Taylor saying he discovered through Morrison, who says he heard it from Sondland, that Trump outright told Sondland there was a direct quid pro quo, not just about Ukraine cleaning up its overall corruption problems, but directly attached to investigating the Bidens and Burisma, the shady energy company that paid Hunter Biden $50,000 a month a month! to sit on its board, even though Hunter has no experience with Ukraine or energy.
MetoliusAg said:
It's a serious abuse of Presidential power for a President to ask a foreign leader to criminally investigate his chief political opponent.
Then Trump and Barr should stop trying to prevent the HoR from seeing the GJ material and the other witness depositions from the SCO investigation.hbtheduce said:
Mueller, the guy who conducted the GJ, couldn't even bring himself to call it obstruction.
MetoliusAg said:Then Trump and Barr should stop trying to prevent the HoR from seeing the GJ material and the other witness depositions from the SCO investigation.hbtheduce said:
Mueller, the guy who conducted the GJ, couldn't even bring himself to call it obstruction.
MetoliusAg said:Then Trump and Barr should stop trying to prevent the HoR from seeing the GJ material and the other witness depositions from the SCO investigation.hbtheduce said:
Mueller, the guy who conducted the GJ, couldn't even bring himself to call it obstruction.
DC Circuit Court of Appeals made that call in the McKeever case. But I guess you would prefer that Barr just ignore the legally binding precedent and clear statutory law within the Federal Rules, eh?MetoliusAg said:Then Trump and Barr should stop trying to prevent the HoR from seeing the GJ material and the other witness depositions from the SCO investigation.hbtheduce said:
Mueller, the guy who conducted the GJ, couldn't even bring himself to call it obstruction.
Yeah...aggiehawg said:DC Circuit Court of Appeals made that call in the McKeever case. But I guess you would prefer that Barr just ignore the legally binding precedent and clear statutory law within the Federal Rules, eh?MetoliusAg said:Then Trump and Barr should stop trying to prevent the HoR from seeing the GJ material and the other witness depositions from the SCO investigation.hbtheduce said:
Mueller, the guy who conducted the GJ, couldn't even bring himself to call it obstruction.
So you want them to break the law? There's already appeals court case law that says GJ material can't be exposed like this.MetoliusAg said:Then Trump and Barr should stop trying to prevent the HoR from seeing the GJ material and the other witness depositions from the SCO investigation.hbtheduce said:
Mueller, the guy who conducted the GJ, couldn't even bring himself to call it obstruction.
Why do they need it? Schiff says they have reams of impeachable offenses. Lets see them, big boyMetoliusAg said:Then Trump and Barr should stop trying to prevent the HoR from seeing the GJ material and the other witness depositions from the SCO investigation.hbtheduce said:
Mueller, the guy who conducted the GJ, couldn't even bring himself to call it obstruction.
He'll produce them at the same time he produces his Russian collusion proof.captkirk said:Why do they need it? Schiff says they have reams of impeachable offenses. Lets see them, big boyMetoliusAg said:Then Trump and Barr should stop trying to prevent the HoR from seeing the GJ material and the other witness depositions from the SCO investigation.hbtheduce said:
Mueller, the guy who conducted the GJ, couldn't even bring himself to call it obstruction.
Houston needs to show up and represent. A MAGA, MAGA, MAGA, MAGA would be glorious in game 6.Rapier108 said:Exactly what one would expect from the rot that lives in and around D.C.Mr.Infectious said:
Can we file for divorce now or do we need to wait until after the impeachment?