Naw, not a sticker fan. Only one I have is this...Gary Johnson said:
Spotted Ag spotted in the wild
Covidians, Communists, CNN, FOX, and all other MSM are enemies of the state and should be treated as such.
Naw, not a sticker fan. Only one I have is this...Gary Johnson said:
Spotted Ag spotted in the wild
Partially correct. But you're still not seeing some things clearly. The Swamp has multiple factions, and there is a perpetual struggle among the elites.Quote:
At some point, I pray that all Americans will wake up to the fact that for over a century now, we have all been nothing but pawns of the elite on both sides of the aisle...
Almost everything has been scripted for us, and our ignorance has been extreme...
Turns out, many things you have always believed were true may not have been, and it has all been by design to benefit the elites who want to rule the world...
Where does wanting to repeal the NFA and requiring a balanced budget fall on that spectrum? AFAF.MetoliusAg said:Partially correct. But you're still not seeing some things clearly. The Swamp has multiple factions, and there is a perpetual struggle among the elites.Quote:
At some point, I pray that all Americans will wake up to the fact that for over a century now, we have all been nothing but pawns of the elite on both sides of the aisle...
Almost everything has been scripted for us, and our ignorance has been extreme...
Turns out, many things you have always believed were true may not have been, and it has all been by design to benefit the elites who want to rule the world...
The Conservative Elites want to turn the clock back to the 1890's. Roll back FDR's New Deal and TR's numerous reforms. Return us to a plutocracy.
The Moderate Elites (the Bush family, Clintons, Goldman Sachs, etc) want to maintain the New Deal and the post-WW2 US/UK-led hegemony: regulated capitalism, a partial safety net for poors and elderly, and international stability via the many constructs adopted post-WW2.
The Liberal Elites want a European-style "Socialist Democrat" utopia, a la Denmark. High taxes, lower military spending, universal health coverage, etc.
Not like he cares about facts. He has to get those talking points posted.Bo Darville said:
There's a wee bit of difference between closed doors and SCIF rooms don't you think?
Quote:
After Republican members of the House literally stormed the gates of the impeachment hearings on Wednesday, Judge Andrew Napolitano stopped by Fox & Friends Thursday morning to deliver a harsh wake-up call: Democrats are just "following the rules"rules written by Republicans.
"I read the House rules," Napolitano said. "And as frustrating as it may be to have these hearings going on behind closed doorsthe hearings over which Congressman Schiff is presidingthey are consistent with the rules."
Quote:
He went to explain that those rules were last written in January 2015 when Republicans held the majority and the Speaker of the House was John Boehner.
Quote:
"The rules say that this level of inquiry, this initial level of inquiry, can be done in secret," Napolitano said, effectively dismantling the primary talking point of both Fox News and the Trump White House.
Quote:
As the Fox & Friends hosts continued to protest, he added, "I know this is going to sound weird, these are not the impeachment hearings. The impeachment hearings have to be held in public by the House Judiciary Committee. This is the initial interview of witnesses to see what they have to say, to determine whether or not they are even worthy of presenting evidence of impeachment."
As was posted on another thread, Nap is wrong again, but no surprise you are now pushing it.MetoliusAg said:Quote:
After Republican members of the House literally stormed the gates of the impeachment hearings on Wednesday, Judge Andrew Napolitano stopped by Fox & Friends Thursday morning to deliver a harsh wake-up call: Democrats are just "following the rules"rules written by Republicans.
"I read the House rules," Napolitano said. "And as frustrating as it may be to have these hearings going on behind closed doorsthe hearings over which Congressman Schiff is presidingthey are consistent with the rules."Quote:
He went to explain that those rules were last written in January 2015 when Republicans held the majority and the Speaker of the House was John Boehner.Quote:
"The rules say that this level of inquiry, this initial level of inquiry, can be done in secret," Napolitano said, effectively dismantling the primary talking point of both Fox News and the Trump White House.
linkQuote:
As the Fox & Friends hosts continued to protest, he added, "I know this is going to sound weird, these are not the impeachment hearings. The impeachment hearings have to be held in public by the House Judiciary Committee. This is the initial interview of witnesses to see what they have to say, to determine whether or not they are even worthy of presenting evidence of impeachment."
Seems like approx. 90% of your posts in this forum consist of trolling and/or posting lies about the texags posters who don't support Trump. Both of those posting behaviors are clear violations of texags posting rules. I don't receive any talking points and I'm not paid by anyone. You are making baseless lies.Rapier108 said:As was posted on another thread, Nap is wrong again, but no surprise you are now pushing it.MetoliusAg said:Quote:
After Republican members of the House literally stormed the gates of the impeachment hearings on Wednesday, Judge Andrew Napolitano stopped by Fox & Friends Thursday morning to deliver a harsh wake-up call: Democrats are just "following the rules"rules written by Republicans.
"I read the House rules," Napolitano said. "And as frustrating as it may be to have these hearings going on behind closed doorsthe hearings over which Congressman Schiff is presidingthey are consistent with the rules."Quote:
He went to explain that those rules were last written in January 2015 when Republicans held the majority and the Speaker of the House was John Boehner.Quote:
"The rules say that this level of inquiry, this initial level of inquiry, can be done in secret," Napolitano said, effectively dismantling the primary talking point of both Fox News and the Trump White House.
linkQuote:
As the Fox & Friends hosts continued to protest, he added, "I know this is going to sound weird, these are not the impeachment hearings. The impeachment hearings have to be held in public by the House Judiciary Committee. This is the initial interview of witnesses to see what they have to say, to determine whether or not they are even worthy of presenting evidence of impeachment."
Pelosi changed the rules as soon as she took over; this is documented.
But keep earning that Share Blue check.
The evidence uncovered so far is very strong that there was a quid pro quo. But to be candid, it would simply be icing on the cake. Why? Because a Potus asking a foreign leader to interfere in the upcoming US election is sufficient for impeachment. And in addition to the phone call readout and Giuliani's incriminating admissions on tv, Trump himself has already confessed in public to doing that.fasthorses05 said:
I haven't read every single post on this thread, so I may have missed this part of the topic.
Has anyone said that even if Trump DID have a Quid Pro Quo, I'm certain he didn't mean to do it. Isn't that what every gd leftist said since Hillary destroyed 30,000 e-mails and hammered the hell out of 12 cell phones?
So every Leftist, black hearted, cognitive bypass, Dem who's been here educating us on THEIR version of Constitutional guilt, can get the hell over it, as Trump didn't have intent, never had intent, and certainly didn't look like he had intent.
EOT
MetoliusAg said:
As Napolitano noted, these aren't impeachment hearings. This is the precursor to impeachment hearings.
MetoliusAg said:
As Napolitano noted, these aren't impeachment hearings. This is a desperate attempt by the libs to hurts Trumps re-election chances as it is the only pathetic hope they have of winning.