This whole **** show is unraveling! Hilarious as expected!
dermdoc said:
IMHO, the Dems really do not want to bring Articles of Impeachment against Trump. They want to re create a Nixon scenario where the lib media basically takes down Trump by eroding his support. I honestly can not believe that college educated folks back this action.
So essentially Soviet Russians? Or ChiComs?dermdoc said:
Once you realize that liberalism beats religion, family, whatever then you will start to understand who these folks are.
And you know, I am fixing to walk to City Grocery in Oxford, MS before watching the Ags BTHO Ole Miss tomorrow. Name one socialist country one could do this activity in. Why do college educated people want that stuff? And even "poor" people do better here. I am flummoxed.aggiehawg said:So essentially Soviet Russians? Or ChiComs?dermdoc said:
Once you realize that liberalism beats religion, family, whatever then you will start to understand who these folks are.
That is a level of stupid I'm not sure I've come in contact with beforeQuote:
Claims Carter and Obama were the two best presidents we had.
You never have lived in Austin, then. The level of stupid is off the charts.captkirk said:That is a level of stupid I'm not sure I've come in contact with beforeQuote:
Claims Carter and Obama were the two best presidents we had.
And more power to you! Doc, you are the quintessential example of why capitalism works. Retire and still have the funds available to follow and attend Aggie Sports! Football, BB, baseball.dermdoc said:And you know, I am fixing to walk to City Grocery in Oxford, MS before watching the Ags BTHO Ole Miss tomorrow. Name one socialist country one could do this activity in. Why do college educated people want that stuff? And even "poor" people do better here. I am flummoxed.aggiehawg said:So essentially Soviet Russians? Or ChiComs?dermdoc said:
Once you realize that liberalism beats religion, family, whatever then you will start to understand who these folks are.
You should still be getting paid to practice law instead of doing it for free on here.aggiehawg said:And more power to you! Doc, you are the quintessential example of why capitalism works. Retire and still have the funds available to follow and attend Aggie Sports! Football, BB, baseball.dermdoc said:And you know, I am fixing to walk to City Grocery in Oxford, MS before watching the Ags BTHO Ole Miss tomorrow. Name one socialist country one could do this activity in. Why do college educated people want that stuff? And even "poor" people do better here. I am flummoxed.aggiehawg said:So essentially Soviet Russians? Or ChiComs?dermdoc said:
Once you realize that liberalism beats religion, family, whatever then you will start to understand who these folks are.
Unfortunately, I married a Razorback, not an Ag. First Hubs was grad of Berkeley. Berkeley! Tall guy with sizable endowments. Same with the current Hubs.
Damn! I'm a victim of preferring...uhhmmm...well shoot...how do I phrase this?
Arrgh. I'm a happy camper, okay?
aggiehawg said:
Tall guy with sizable endowments. Same with the current Hubs
I will never retire.aggiehawg said:And more power to you! Doc, you are the quintessential example of why capitalism works. Retire and still have the funds available to follow and attend Aggie Sports! Football, BB, baseball.dermdoc said:And you know, I am fixing to walk to City Grocery in Oxford, MS before watching the Ags BTHO Ole Miss tomorrow. Name one socialist country one could do this activity in. Why do college educated people want that stuff? And even "poor" people do better here. I am flummoxed.aggiehawg said:So essentially Soviet Russians? Or ChiComs?dermdoc said:
Once you realize that liberalism beats religion, family, whatever then you will start to understand who these folks are.
Unfortunately, I married a Razorback, not an Ag. First Hubs was grad of Berkeley. Berkeley! Tall guy with sizable endowments. Same with the current Hubs.
Damn! I'm a victim of preferring...uhhmmm...well shoot...how do I phrase this?
Arrgh. I'm a happy camper, okay?
Maybe the dems do read the polls, or election results from around the country?FireAg said:
Impeachment noise has really died out lately...
He's the one that texted that he thought it was quid pro quo and whomever he texted said explicitly, the POTUS said make sure there isn't any quid pro quo.txaggie_08 said:
Maybe gotten a little quieter in publicity, but still ongoing. Bill Taylor testified today, and one Dem said it's the most disturbing thing he's heard in the 10 months he's been in office.
Isn't Bill Taylor the one that we believe Schiff's team met with around the time the whistleblower came forward?
Spotted Ag said:He's the one that texted that he thought it was quid pro quo and whomever he texted said explicitly, the POTUS said make sure there isn't any quid pro quo.txaggie_08 said:
Maybe gotten a little quieter in publicity, but still ongoing. Bill Taylor testified today, and one Dem said it's the most disturbing thing he's heard in the 10 months he's been in office.
Isn't Bill Taylor the one that we believe Schiff's team met with around the time the whistleblower came forward?
This guys testimony is already known based on his text messages. Democrats say anything negative about Trump is the "most disturbing thing" ever.
During that two week recess that Pelosi organized, Dem members were supposed to get a feel for how impeachment was playing out in their districts. For Dems in Trump districts, the answer was not so hot.4stringAg said:
I didn't catch the full segment but Rush today was alluding to some internal polling amongst Dems and Reps that impeachment wasn't polling so well.
If someone thought about doing something then they are guilty. I don't know how you can prove it, but they are guilty damnit.Quote:
If a person intends to commit a crime, but fails to accomplish their goal, then it is okay? That's not how the law works.
-nmag
Did you READ the tweet?nmag34 said:
The 'no quid pro quo' narrative is being contradicted by one state department official after another. The goal posts will be moved soon.
Why not? They were wanting to do it on "obstruction" after the Mueller report was released on things like Trump just spitballing the idea of firing Mueller. Meanwhile, he turned a ton of docs over to Mueller, no one was ever fired, and Mueller wasn't obstructed in any way. But the horror of thinking about firing him or asking Sessions to do it demonstrates an impeachable offense.Bonfire1996 said:Did you READ the tweet?nmag34 said:
The 'no quid pro quo' narrative is being contradicted by one state department official after another. The goal posts will be moved soon.
The aid "could" have been held up? Was it? NOPE. But it could have. You plan on impeaching the President on a mother effing HYPOTHETICAL? Get after it Sweet tits.