***** OFFICIAL TRUMP IMPEACHMENT THREAD *****

896,204 Views | 9220 Replies | Last: 11 mo ago by Pizza
Chance Chase McMasters
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It does shed some light, the redactions obscure. But I'll agree we don't have the whole story yet.
captkirk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Chance Chase McMasters said:

It does shed some light, the redactions obscure. But I'll agree we don't have the whole story yet.
Nothing in the body of the email is redacted. WTF are you talking about?

You are setting yourself up for disappointment...again
Wildcat
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Why are we still arguing? Isn't Impeachment over?
captkirk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Wildcat said:

Why are we still arguing? Isn't Impeachment over?
Yes its over and it completely fizzled out. They just knew they had 'eeem this time
fasthorse05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wildcat said:

Why are we still arguing? Isn't Impeachment over?
No, hell no!

Chase can impeach him again by the end of the year, a couple of weeks into 2020, and maybe once before Valentines for good measure.

Just get on with your daily hate, and remember to hate as much as possible!
Chance Chase McMasters
How long do you want to ignore this user?
captkirk said:

Chance Chase McMasters said:

It does shed some light, the redactions obscure. But I'll agree we don't have the whole story yet.
Nothing in the body of the email is redacted. WTF are you talking about?

You are setting yourself up for disappointment...again


There's more than one email. The email dump you didn't read is heavily redacted.

https://publicintegrity.org/national-security/trump-administration-officials-worried-ukraine-aid-halt-violated-spending-law/
aggieforester05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It's hilarious how the Liberals on here act like this impeachment was some sort of accomplishment. It was completely partisan with no crimes. Literally any opposition party that's ever had the house could impeach the president in this manner. Just up until now the house major has had more than three sane members in its ranks. This impeachment means nothing and will be relegated to the annals of history rightly by the senate. If there's any justice in this world the Democrats will bigly in 2020, which is the best thing for this country considering that their policies are absolute garbage. It will also prevent them from being rewarded for this charade. Congratulations liberals, you're still the same morons we've always known you are. You've once again been duped by the scum bags in the Democrat party and their MSM puppets who've done nothing but spread propaganda designed to fool really stupid people.
annie88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
policywonk98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Chance Chase McMasters said:

captkirk said:

Chance Chase McMasters said:

It does shed some light, the redactions obscure. But I'll agree we don't have the whole story yet.
Nothing in the body of the email is redacted. WTF are you talking about?

You are setting yourself up for disappointment...again


There's more than one email. The email dump you didn't read is heavily redacted.

https://publicintegrity.org/national-security/trump-administration-officials-worried-ukraine-aid-halt-violated-spending-law/


Again, let me remind you as I've posted several times around here over the last few months.

Trump has written about his foreign policy mindset in no less than three published works since 2000. All of them with different titles and all of them essentially talking about how America can be "great again". But he's been very consistent. All of the books over 20 years and even interviews dating back into the 90s during both Bush 41 and Clinton, have a similar position.

His stated policy position, long before Hunter Biden unethically(at a minimum) sat on the board of Burisma while his father was the VP in charge of Ukrainian relationship for Obama, was to withhold aid from corrupt countries AND force allies closer to countries receiving US Aid to pay more to help these countries out.

Trump has spoken about doing this for literally decades.

This all lines up exactly with Mulvaney explanations in the aftermath of the hurt feelings that turned into whistleblowing.

Now, it is very possible that Trump ordered something that is not usually done and might even break some obscure rules or protocols. People around Trump that have done things or seen things done one way, may have freaked out. Chatter may have developed surrounding the orders. Just like it has for hundreds if not thousands of things over three years. And off we go on the charges of corruption, etc, etc.

Here's the problem.

Just because Trump desires to do something different doesn't make it illegal or corrupt in intent. Conversely, just because Trump wants to do something different doesnt mean he can without repercussions or considerations of proper protocol.

But painting everything he does with some evil intent, especially when he's doing things that he clearly laid out he would do, is crazy. The media and the democrats are capitalizing on the ignorance of people in this area. Its pathetic. And its actually not the first time they've done it. They did this during the Bush administration several times. People just forget and the Dems did not take it to the extremes they have taken it with Trump.



Brutal Puffin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Was Clinesmith anywhere near those emails?
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Is she serious? That is what just happened in the house.

What a crock of Schiff.
BanderaAg956
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u said:



Is she serious? That is what just happened in the house.

What a crock of Schiff.

Hey Wack Job Harris, no court would allow the unconstitutional and illegal processes used in the House of Representatives!

So go put some more black people in prison!
Liberals are Damn Liars! Terminate Section 230! It has been ONLY 72!hours since my last banning for defending my conservative values against liberal snowflake cupcakes and the LIBERAL Mod’s that protect them! Fairness is a myth! Stop trying to silence us! Decent LAW ABIDING HUMAN BEINGS MATTER and so do our voices. When you protect the wicked, the Anarchist, the deviant, you become One of them!

ALL LIVES MATTER - I support police and motorcycle riders. Patriot Gun Owners Unite!
aggieforester05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm perpetually amazed at the lack of self awareness and hypocrisy from the Democrats. There's no way to explain their blatant hypocrisy other than some sort of mental illness, possibly sociopathy. They have to have some sort of idea how crazy they sound.
captkirk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Chance Chase McMasters said:

captkirk said:

Chance Chase McMasters said:

It does shed some light, the redactions obscure. But I'll agree we don't have the whole story yet.
Nothing in the body of the email is redacted. WTF are you talking about?

You are setting yourself up for disappointment...again


There's more than one email. The email dump you didn't read is heavily redacted.

https://publicintegrity.org/national-security/trump-administration-officials-worried-ukraine-aid-halt-violated-spending-law/
Sorry bud - Winners win, and losers lose
Chance Chase McMasters
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sorry you didn't know anything about the redacted thing you said wasn't redacted because you didn't click the link you commented about.
Rockdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gary, that you?
e=mc2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rockdoc said:

Gary, that you?
One in the same. They're all liars.
Agvet12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
will25u said:



Is she serious? That is what just happened in the house.

What a crock of Schiff.


Isnt this charade by definition quid pro quo? And obstruction of Congress? The house trying to hold the senate hostage unless the senate agrees to the rules of the lowest house

What a time to be alive - I thought the dems cared about the constitution and was above the law?
Chance Chase McMasters
How long do you want to ignore this user?
e=mc2 said:

Rockdoc said:

Gary, that you?
One in the same. They're all liars.


Sorry you didn't know anything about the redacted thing you said wasn't redacted because you didn't click the redacted link you prematurely commented about.
e=mc2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Chance Chase McMasters said:

e=mc2 said:

Rockdoc said:

Gary, that you?
One in the same. They're all liars.


Sorry you didn't know anything about the redacted thing you said wasn't redacted because you didn't click the link you commented about.
I didn't say anything about it. Can you post without lying? Jesus.
e=mc2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Chance Chase McMasters said:

You seem awfully butt hurt.
Nope. Just here to point out liars. It's pretty easy.
Claverack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Chance Chase McMasters said:

Court ordered documents from OMB were dumped just before midnight last night. The aid freeze was ordered one hour after the July 25 call.



Sep 11: The DOD comptroller was relieved the aid was finally released and asked "what happened?" The White House response was redacted.
The term "plan" is the key word in the set of emails.

It is consistent with Senator Johnson's letter detailing President Trump's concerns about Ukrainian corruption and the role they played in the 2016 election:

https://www.ronjohnson.senate.gov/public/_cache/files/e0b73c19-9370-42e6-88b1-b2458eaeeecd/johnson-to-jordan-nunes.pdf

During these discussions with the President, Johnson makes it entirely clear Trump doesn't trust anyone in a political position of authority in the Ukraine.

The value of Johnson's letter is that it gives the reader insight into the President's mindset when it comes to foreign policy in a general sense and the Ukraine in particular before he ever talked to Zelensky.

This is why Senator Johnson, a man with direct knowledge of Trump's actions in this case, was never called by the Stalinist show trials of Schiff and Nadler.
Claverack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Chance Chase McMasters said:

You seem awfully butt hurt.
Just gets tiresome to see repeated flights of fancy regarding Trump from those who peddled the Steele Dossier as the irrefutable Word of God for the last 3 years.

Now we move heaven and earth to project Biden's guilt onto the President.

Why?

Because Simple Joe has to be protected at all costs.





Maroon Dawn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
will25u said:



Is she serious? That is what just happened in the house.


What a crock of Schiff.


Behold the beauty of a propaganda MSM press that would never entertain the idea of saying "You mean like the one sided hearing in the house that literally broke its own rules to prevent the defense from having any say?"

They know they can be as outlandishly false and hypocritical as they want since they know the MSM will never call them out on it and so Joe Six Pack will never know about it
Hogties
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I think Joe Six Pack knows because Joe Six Pack turned off CNN MSNBC and all the other media outlets of the Democrat Party years ago.

It's the soy boy urban elites and Costal Liberals who won't know any different because the DNC media outlets are now only preaching to the choir of the Globalists that remain their audience.

Joe Six Pack has figured out the MSM game. Joe Six Pack is likely more informed than an urban elite soy boy with a masters in Social Justice about the true corruptive nature of the children of politicians getting paid monthly more than Joe Six Pack makes annually simply to add their names to foreign boards of companies while their parents set US policies that impact those companies and countries.

It's really amazing to me how the Democrat House has shined a light on the swamp's hidden gravy train in a misguided effort to get Orange Man. They have laid bare for all their own corruption, not Trump's. Joe Six Pack sees this.

And just wait till 2020 when this pervasive corruption is highlighted by Trump and the Republican Party in ways that can't be ignored.
backintexas2013
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Chance Chase McMasters said:

You seem awfully butt hurt.


So this means Nancy is going to send the impeachment forward?
backintexas2013
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Fell back to page 2. USA Today was back talking about ICE facilities. I get the feeling this is what Nancy wants.

Is impeachment dead?
backintexas2013
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
New talking point. Senate has to agree to terms before it will be passed on. You can't make this stuff up.
Predmid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
backintexas2013 said:

New talking point. Senate has to agree to terms before it will be passed on. You can't make this stuff up.

AKA: QPQ.
MouthBQ98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I thought this was rushed through the house bypassing many house rules because the nation was in dire straits and the impeachment could not be slowed.
DallasAg 94
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Agvet12 said:

will25u said:



Is she serious? That is what just happened in the house.

What a crock of Schiff.


Isnt this charade by definition quid pro quo? And obstruction of Congress? The house trying to hold the senate hostage unless the senate agrees to the rules of the lowest house

What a time to be alive - I thought the dems cared about the constitution and was above the law?
Yes, but this is different. Trump's QPQ was an attempt to damage his "rival" (Biden) that is running against him in 2020.

Trump is not running in 2020 and is not running against Kamala, Booker, Sanders, Klou or Warren as a rival (like Biden).
ProgN
How long do you want to ignore this user?
What's even better is that "the call" occurred before Biden announced he was going to run.
Patentmike
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Prognightmare said:

What's even better is that "the call" occurred before Biden announced he was going to run.


Biden announced on April 25.
PatentMike, J.D.
BS Biochem
MS Molecular Virology


backintexas2013
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MouthBQ98 said:

I thought this was rushed through the house bypassing many house rules because the nation was in dire straits and the impeachment could not be slowed.


She is really hoping all this blows over. She doesn't want any of this and wanted the house to finish fast so it will die down before the break.
MouthBQ98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The call date isn't the issue. What is interesting is Biden announced his candidacy just a day or two after the big election Shake-up in Ukraine when the past president was replaced and we recalled our not-Trump friendly Ambassador.
First Page Last Page
Page 198 of 264
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.