Sine poena nulla lex.
No it is not.Just an Ag said:
Smollett fatigue has to setting in on most of us by now, but I came across the mini-tweet thread linked below. Interesting...
LisaMarie said:
I have a "friend" that posted on Facebook that it didn't hurt anyone to believe Smollett. That "survivors" should always be believed. That it is safer to err on the side of "survivors" than in the other direction. Like wtf??? He's not a survivor of anything except his own idiocy! How do people twist things up like this???
LisaMarie said:
I have a "friend" that posted on Facebook that it didn't hurt anyone to believe Smollett. That "survivors" should always be believed. That it is safer to err on the side of "survivors" than in the other direction. Like wtf??? He's not a survivor of anything except his own idiocy! How do people twist things up like this???
Good question.BallerStaf2003 said:
What is Q?
LisaMarie said:
I have a "friend" that posted on Facebook that it didn't hurt anyone to believe Smollett. That "survivors" should always be believed. That it is safer to err on the side of "survivors" than in the other direction. Like wtf??? He's not a survivor of anything except his own idiocy! How do people twist things up like this???
LisaMarie said:
I have a "friend" that posted on Facebook that it didn't hurt anyone to believe Smollett. That "survivors" should always be believed. That it is safer to err on the side of "survivors" than in the other direction. Like wtf??? He's not a survivor of anything except his own idiocy! How do people twist things up like this???
LisaMarie said:
I have a "friend" that posted on Facebook that it didn't hurt anyone to believe Smollett. That "survivors" should always be believed. That it is safer to err on the side of "survivors" than in the other direction. Like wtf??? He's not a survivor of anything except his own idiocy! How do people twist things up like this???
ATX_AG_08 said:LisaMarie said:
I have a "friend" that posted on Facebook that it didn't hurt anyone to believe Smollett. That "survivors" should always be believed. That it is safer to err on the side of "survivors" than in the other direction. Like wtf??? He's not a survivor of anything except his own idiocy! How do people twist things up like this???
I saw one that said conservatives still believed Kavanaugh even though there was much more "evidence" against him. Completely deluded.
LisaMarie said:
I have a "friend" that posted on Facebook that it didn't hurt anyone to believe Smollett. That "survivors" should always be believed. That it is safer to err on the side of "survivors" than in the other direction. Like wtf??? He's not a survivor of anything except his own idiocy! How do people twist things up like this???
Aggiebrewer said:West Point Aggie said:
It's hard to decide what's more satisfying...unhinged msnbc'ers or unhinged cnn'ers!?
Tough one!
what about unhinged Texags posters?
As I mentioned probably 10-12 pages ago, the only way for Jussie to be innocent now is if they can prove the two brothers hypnotized Jussie into believing they were two white homophobic racists and that's why the police have phone records of Jussie calling the brothers before and after the "attack" because they were somehow accessing his subconscious mind and tricking him. It doesn't really explain the $100 he gave them to purchases the supplies but perhaps that was part of the charade.aggiehawg said:How could anyone listening to the Chicago PD laying out the depth of their investigation remotely believe that Smollett was framed? The brothers confessed to their role. Smollett identified them from the surveillance tape as his "attackers".Prognightmare said:
Quote:
Another problem Howard has is his temper. He's been escorted off a plane for unruly behavior. He's punched out strangers in a restaurant. He's said to have knocked at least two of his women around, most recently ex-wife Michelle Ghent, who after a 2013 trip to Costa Rica with Howard was photographed with a black eye. She said Howard did it. He either denies the allegations or shades the circumstances or has outright justifications.
That time in 2001 when he was arrested for slugging his first wife (who he married in 1989, divorced in 2003 remarried in 2005, and divorced again in 2007), which led to a guilty plea for disorderly conduct? According to the police report, he had "punched her twice with a closed fist."
About that one, he is contrite. "She was talking to me real strong, and I lost my mind and slapped her in front of the kids," he says. "Her lawyer said it was a closed fist, but even slapping her was wrong."
And what happened in Costa Rica with Ghent? "She was trying to Mace me," he says, "and you can't see anything so all you can do is try to bat somebody away, and I think that something caught her. But I wasn't trying to hit her."
And the 2005 incident in the restaurant? When Howard and a couple were waiting in line to be seated, they got into an argument that didn't end until Howard knocked the man to the ground and hit the woman.
Howard says he wasn't even in any line. He'd just gone to check out the wait time for a table. The woman accused him of cutting in front of her and one thing led to another, with him acting in self-defense. He pleaded guilty, once again, to disorderly conduct.
Lets not over do itBiz Ag said:
That may be the funniest **** I've ever seen on the internet.
BallerStaf2003 said:
What is Q?
ATX_AG_08 said:LisaMarie said:
I have a "friend" that posted on Facebook that it didn't hurt anyone to believe Smollett. That "survivors" should always be believed. That it is safer to err on the side of "survivors" than in the other direction. Like wtf??? He's not a survivor of anything except his own idiocy! How do people twist things up like this???
I saw one that said conservatives still believed Kavanaugh even though there was much more "evidence" against him. Completely deluded.
Dead Presidents, tholil99chris said:
Terrence Howard.......not exactly a role model.
https://www.rollingstone.com/tv/tv-features/terrence-howards-dangerous-mind-37057/Quote:
Another problem Howard has is his temper. He's been escorted off a plane for unruly behavior. He's punched out strangers in a restaurant. He's said to have knocked at least two of his women around, most recently ex-wife Michelle Ghent, who after a 2013 trip to Costa Rica with Howard was photographed with a black eye. She said Howard did it. He either denies the allegations or shades the circumstances or has outright justifications.
That time in 2001 when he was arrested for slugging his first wife (who he married in 1989, divorced in 2003 remarried in 2005, and divorced again in 2007), which led to a guilty plea for disorderly conduct? According to the police report, he had "punched her twice with a closed fist."
About that one, he is contrite. "She was talking to me real strong, and I lost my mind and slapped her in front of the kids," he says. "Her lawyer said it was a closed fist, but even slapping her was wrong."
And what happened in Costa Rica with Ghent? "She was trying to Mace me," he says, "and you can't see anything so all you can do is try to bat somebody away, and I think that something caught her. But I wasn't trying to hit her."
And the 2005 incident in the restaurant? When Howard and a couple were waiting in line to be seated, they got into an argument that didn't end until Howard knocked the man to the ground and hit the woman.
Howard says he wasn't even in any line. He'd just gone to check out the wait time for a table. The woman accused him of cutting in front of her and one thing led to another, with him acting in self-defense. He pleaded guilty, once again, to disorderly conduct.