FIFYbmks270 said:
That link was worth it just for the photo of the letter...
AHHAHAHHAHA!
It looks like somethingCartman of South ParkVints would make.
FIFYbmks270 said:
That link was worth it just for the photo of the letter...
AHHAHAHHAHA!
It looks like somethingCartman of South ParkVints would make.
They didn't wait for the facts to come out regarding Brett Kavanaugh. Why should they start now?Muy said:
Now Booker and Harris are saying "we need to wait for the facts to come out". Weird considering they were so quick to believe this the moment the lie was told.
This is your party, liberals. Irresponsible, racist Democrats.
Quote:
They didn't wait for the facts to come out regarding Brett Kavanaugh. Why should they start now?
Tony Franklins Other Shoe said:
I've got a new favorite phrase: fear mongrels.
You know how I know these celebrities have a raging case of the dumb?
FWAppraiser said:
Just realized Jussie is one of the original Mighty Ducks. He played the little brother of the kid that thought "cake eater" was an insult.
He should hire the great Gordon Bombay to represent him.
Is that a power drill being pointed at Jussie?bmks270 said:
That link was worth it just for the photo of the letter...
AHHAHAHHAHA!
It looks like something Cartman of South Park would make.
johnnyblaze36 said:
This is a fantastic monologue from earlier tonight. He also calls Brian Stelter an "oily media reporter kid".
agree with Ben, wasn't one of the original hoax reasons that he was being written off the show and was trying to force fox to keep him on?BallerStaf2003 said:
Here's a repercussion. Smollett axed from Empire! Maybe this is the beginning of the tide turning!
http://m.tmz.com/#!2019/02/19/jussie-smollett-empire-role-slashed-alleged-attack/
That was the initial excuse, but the producers followed that with a denial that he was getting written out of the show.BenFiasco14 said:
Hmm, wasn't he getting written out of the show to begin with, which kinda started this whole attempt by him to get into the spotlight?
Otherwise I'd say this is pretty indicative that he's going to get the hammer dropped down on him if the network station is willing to expose themselves to the Twitter mob.
Ah, okay. Well, maybe now his initial fake excuse is going to become reality.MooreTrucker said:That was the initial excuse, but the producers followed that with a denial that he was getting written out of the show.BenFiasco14 said:
Hmm, wasn't he getting written out of the show to begin with, which kinda started this whole attempt by him to get into the spotlight?
Otherwise I'd say this is pretty indicative that he's going to get the hammer dropped down on him if the network station is willing to expose themselves to the Twitter mob.
They are just stirring *****johnnyblaze36 said:
The SJW twitterverse is in such a frenzy to make this story go away and get back on narrative now that today's outrage is about a John Wayne interview in 1971 in which he made "racist" and "anti-gay" comments.
It's seriously a trending topic right now.
C@LAg said:
the worst thing about it....
Jussie was all ready to testify against the 2 assailants police identified until he found out they were his accomplices, and his story started collapsing and he started to be even less cooperative.
He was LITERALLY going to condemn two innocent men, if the opportunity presented itself.
Yep, should say " role cut ANNOUNCEMENT in wake of fake attack"Icecream_Ag said:agree with Ben, wasn't one of the original hoax reasons that he was being written off the show and was trying to force fox to keep him on?BallerStaf2003 said:
Here's a repercussion. Smollett axed from Empire! Maybe this is the beginning of the tide turning!
http://m.tmz.com/#!2019/02/19/jussie-smollett-empire-role-slashed-alleged-attack/
'03ag said:
Uh can someone summarize what's going on for someone that hasn't been here since page 2 of the thread?
He lied'03ag said:
Uh can someone summarize what's going on for someone that hasn't been here since page 2 of the thread?
'03ag said:
Uh can someone summarize what's going on for someone that hasn't been here since page 2 of the thread?
'03ag said:
Uh can someone summarize what's going on for someone that hasn't been here since page 2 of the thread?
This is just awesome, dredging up interviews that are almost half a century old. The Duke should be ashamed of himself.Deats said:They are just stirring *****johnnyblaze36 said:
The SJW twitterverse is in such a frenzy to make this story go away and get back on narrative now that today's outrage is about a John Wayne interview in 1971 in which he made "racist" and "anti-gay" comments.
It's seriously a trending topic right now.
Deats said:They are just stirring *****johnnyblaze36 said:
The SJW twitterverse is in such a frenzy to make this story go away and get back on narrative now that today's outrage is about a John Wayne interview in 1971 in which he made "racist" and "anti-gay" comments.
It's seriously a trending topic right now.
lil99chris said:Deats said:They are just stirring *****johnnyblaze36 said:
The SJW twitterverse is in such a frenzy to make this story go away and get back on narrative now that today's outrage is about a John Wayne interview in 1971 in which he made "racist" and "anti-gay" comments.
It's seriously a trending topic right now.
....people pulling an article that is almost 50 years old. Goodness. Let's go ahead and pull comments from Joe Biden and Bernie Sanders regarding gay and racial issues. It isn't pretty.
Quote:
Williams demanded an apology from the Democratic presidential nominee for her use of the term "superpredators" during a 1996 speech in New Hampshire.
As anyone who has even been half paying attention to the 2016 election is aware, Clinton used the term while whipping up support for then-President Bill Clinton's 1994 crime bill. Yes, the same one that Sen. Bernie Sanders voted for and then-Sen. Joe Biden authored.
johnnyblaze36 said:
The SJW twitterverse is in such a frenzy to make this story go away and get back on narrative now that today's outrage is about a John Wayne interview in 1971 in which he made "racist" and "anti-gay" comments.
It's seriously a trending topic right now.
This one event, in my opinion, could cause long lasting issues for the Dems in 2020. With this being proven as a hoax, and so many liberals behind it, I think this will back fire on them in a huge way. How could anyone with a brain support someone who supported this sh*t? I could be wrong, but really think it will affect the party...MooreTrucker said:
He can no longer avoid accountability, but Harris and Booker will, and Ellen Page and all the other "believe him" whiners will as well, and just move on to the next fake/manufactured outrage.
That may just be wishful thinking, but I wish you're right.nu awlins ag said:This one event, in my opinion, could cause long lasting issues for the Dems in 2020. With this being proven as a hoax, and so many liberals behind it, I think this will back fire on them in a huge way. How could anyone with a brain support someone who supported this sh*t? I could be wrong, but really think it will affect the party...MooreTrucker said:
He can no longer avoid accountability, but Harris and Booker will, and Ellen Page and all the other "believe him" whiners will as well, and just move on to the next fake/manufactured outrage.