third coast.. said:

---

I'm pretty sick of being called a white supremacist and racist just for existing.

---

And this is going to churn out more shooters.

To her and her ilk, anyone that's not a POC is ultimately a white supremacist.

Prognightmare said:

---

Good grief

---

In her defense she probably meant to say that all mass shootings not caused by climate change are the result of White supremacy.

MooreTrucker said:

---

Tom Hagen said:

---

Quote:

---

But setting climate goals for 2030 isn't due to some arbitrary political rationale - it's there due to scientific consensus.

---

Again, she provides a gratuitous assertion without any evidence backing the claim.

---

Or any idea wtf "consensus" even means.

---

Margaret Thatcher said that consensus is the absense of leadership. She was right.

Two of the more recent mass shootings (Virginia Beach & Aurora, IL) were carried out by African-Americans (DeWayne Craddock & Gary Martin, respectively).

The left needs to pull their collective heads out and get their facts straight.

Sickos come in all races, colors, religions, ethnicities and sexual preferences. No one group has a monopoly on crime.

The left doesn't want their facts straight. They want CONTROL. White man bad!

third coast.. said:

---

I'm pretty sick of being called a white supremacist and racist just for existing.

---

And it's going to push more whites to vote for Trump

third coast.. said:

---

Said it many times on this board, wife and I didnt vote for him last election but we certainly will be this election.

---

Same here. Neither of us voted last election. We will both pull the lever for trump this go around.

third coast.. said:

---

Said it many times on this board, wife and I didnt vote for him last election but we certainly will be this election.

---

I voted for Trump as an anti-HRC vote. This time I'm energized and ready to help Trump crush it!

Going to vote trump in 2020 in cali and have the girlfriend doing the same. Her family did last cycle.


She didnt vote bc she felt it was useless 2016. Shes all in now. All of her friends but 2 or 3 are pro trump. #RedCaliWave

She's so dangerous. She's doing her absolute best to get a lot of minorities and marginalized people harmed.

She represents an aggressive version of racism against a white people who have otherwise been peaceful for the last 75 years and perhaps even complacent due to prosperity. She's articulate in a way that allows her blatant, actionable racism to go main stream.

She threatens to awaken some very latent biological functions that exist to perpetuate one's genetic groups, and defends themselves against threats.

Her and I actually agree that resources and intellectual property are not allocated proportionately. I just don't think she knows that conflicts are not won by ideas, they are won by resources and intellectual property.

Off her meds even more than usual

Can someone please explain to me what this tard is talking about here?

johnnyblaze36 said:

---

Can someone please explain to me what this tard is talking about here?

---

A) Typical condescending lib "or does someone do that for you"

B) Again typical lib acting like she speaks for everyone "we'd take public internet"

Pretty rich to hear her attacking folks for "does someone do that for you?" when she still doesn't know how to use basic things like a garbage disposal or rent and apartment

As I have said before, AOC is always good for a laugh to start your day with.

I wonder if she actually knows that she's f'ing crazy?

johnnyblaze36 said:

---

Can someone please explain to me what this tard is talking about here?

---

This is funny,,,,until it's not.

I'm still amazed that this kind of rally cry gets people behind her, and then i glance at the comments and it makes me sad.

Is she not aware that those people (if not personally, through their business interests) pay more in taxes already than the rest of us combined?

"Like 10 people" out of 350 million!



Doofus

Slicer97 said:

---

Is she not aware?

---

you could have stopped the question right here and i would hazard a guess that the answer would always be no

Valid point.

I realize most congress critters are not, um, overly gifted with intelligence, but AOC just makes me sad.

BlackGoldAg2011 said:

---

I'm still amazed that this kind of rally cry gets people behind her, and then i glance at the comments and it makes me sad.

---

So, she wants to tax *ONLY* the money made by these 10 people which is above what #11 makes.

I would like to see the numbers, but that doesn't seem like there would be all that much money there. At least after the first year.

Quote:

---

it's only like 10 people

---

What if it's "only 10 people" in a mass shooting? Same rules apply?

As soon as she's done appropriating (stealing) the wealth from this Top 10, guess what?... there becomes a new "top 10" by definition

It's the communist mantra since it's beginning, demonize a small group then use that sentiment to create a policy that allows you to oppress large groups.

BlackGoldAg2011 said:

---

I'm still amazed that this kind of rally cry gets people behind her, and then i glance at the comments and it makes me sad.

---

I don't think there's anyone in that comments section over the age of 30, and if there is, then their IQ is below that number as well.