You're probably right.
Presley OBannons Sword said:Wildcat said:
I advise ceasing with the comments/memes on her appearance. Those just allow she and her defenders to dismiss criticisms of her ridiculous positions by pointing to personal attacks and playing the part of the victim.
She's weapons grade stupid. Don't give her cover. That foolishness needs to be exposed as much as possible.
Plus she's a good looking woman, and this entire board would be "WOOD"ing all over the place if she was a conservative.
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.Quote:
Plus she's a good looking woman, and this entire board would be "WOOD"ing all over the place if she was a conservative.
Broba Fett said:Presley OBannons Sword said:Wildcat said:
I advise ceasing with the comments/memes on her appearance. Those just allow she and her defenders to dismiss criticisms of her ridiculous positions by pointing to personal attacks and playing the part of the victim.
She's weapons grade stupid. Don't give her cover. That foolishness needs to be exposed as much as possible.
Plus she's a good looking woman, and this entire board would be "WOOD"ing all over the place if she was a conservative.
Sorry, not into beastiality.
BVAg85 said:
Her Twitter responses sound like a child saying "I know you are but what am I." She just seems very immature.
Yes, that does seem to be gaining traction. I think Hillary was even floating it. The electoral college is something the non-urban blue bulk of the country needs to fight for. Its probably a camel's nose under the tent approach to getting rid of the EC.Farmer @ Johnsongrass, TX said:Ivy League Law Schools have been researching the elimination of the Electoral College for a few years now. Allegedly, the brightest legal minds, in liberal form, is where you go to test out these types of controversial movements/arguments . It's all sorted out in a legal sense well before it's pushed into the public arena. Makes me wonder if the legal boys are ready to roll with this and if Ocascio-Cortez is the mule for this one.JAS61 said:Not me.StorminAg said:Prognightmare said:
I have trouble believing she's college educated.
Wikipedia says Boston UniversityWendy 1990 said:
She went to Brown - which is sad upon itself.
Boston University identified as Brown just for AOC.Tex100 said:Wikipedia says Boston UniversityWendy 1990 said:
She went to Brown - which is sad upon itself.
Irish_Man said:
Whoever said she's good looking.............politics aside, no she's not. She could be the offspring of one of the Koch brothers and I'd say she's still ugly
Melodramatic. Today's olds were yesterday's young, who had their share of morons in the spotlight...the sun still comes up in the East every day.mathguy86 said:
Jake: "Its $38 T. That's quite a bit of money."
Former bartender: "Everyone gets free stuff."
Jake: "I guess I'm not going to get an answer."
No Jake, you aren't going to get an answer. Her education and experience ends with how to make a Cosmopolitan. That's it buddy. She's got pug eyes, can pour a beer and make sure the bar mix bowls are full all night. And sadly, she will likely be in a position of power for 30 years.
When everyone says "I fear for our country because the young will some day be in charge", well my friends, that day is now.
BVAg85 said:
Her Twitter responses sound like a child saying "I know you are but what am I." She just seems very immature.
sts7049 said:BVAg85 said:
Her Twitter responses sound like a child saying "I know you are but what am I." She just seems very immature.
you mean like half the posts on this board who immediately point to obama when any negative trump comments are made?
What is she, like 27 or so? What did you expect with so little "life experience". I didn't know as much back then as I do today. She's a COMPLETE and UTTER dumbass. Make that an ABSOLUTE dumbass just to round out the definition.BVAg85 said:
Her Twitter responses sound like a child saying "I know you are but what am I." She just seems very immature.
who gives a ****? Libs bash conservatives for their looks all the time. See crenshaw, cruz, trump. oh wait, those are evil white men, so it's okay.Wildcat said:
I advise ceasing with the comments/memes on her appearance. Those just allow she and her defenders to dismiss criticisms of her ridiculous positions by pointing to personal attacks and playing the part of the victim.
She's weapons grade stupid. Don't give her cover. That foolishness needs to be exposed as much as possible.
But she made this really cool science presentation in college...nu awlins ag said:What is she, like 27 or so? What did you expect with so little "life experience". I didn't know as much back then as I do today. She's a COMPLETE and UTTER dumbass. Make that an ABSOLUTE dumbass just to round out the definition.BVAg85 said:
Her Twitter responses sound like a child saying "I know you are but what am I." She just seems very immature.
Quote:
Their professors may have an understanding, and can articulate better reasoning, but these students are almost literal parrots that are unable to form novel ideas.
Quote:
After this fact check was published, Pentagon spokesman Christopher Sherwood said "DoD hasn't received $21 trillion in (nominal) appropriated funding across the entirety of American history."
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2018/12/04/alexandria-ocasio-cortezs-trillion-mistake/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.02a31558f46fQuote:
Let's put $21 trillion in context. The entire national debt is $21.8 trillion. According to the Congressional Budget Office, total defense spending from 1998 to 2015 was nearly $9 trillion. The CBO estimates $7 trillion in defense spending from 2019 to 2028.
In other words, completely defunding the military for the next decade would yield only one-fifth of $32 trillion. That's a much better way of illustrating the cost of Medicare-for-All.
The Pinocchio Test
Swing and a miss!
Ocasio-Cortez is not the first Twitter user to mangle information from a news report. But it's unconvincing to try to pass this off as a rhetorical point being misread. She cited the $21 trillion figure and said "66% of Medicare for All could have been funded already by the Pentagon."
That's a direct comparison. It's badly flawed. The same article she referenced on Twitter would have set her straight. The tweet is still up, probably causing confusion. So we will award Four Pinocchios to Ocasio-Cortez.
Four Pinocchios
One is a group of people on an internet board, the other is an elected member of Congress with actual power and responsibility.sts7049 said:BVAg85 said:
Her Twitter responses sound like a child saying "I know you are but what am I." She just seems very immature.
you mean like half the posts on this board who immediately point to obama when any negative trump comments are made?
thirdcoast said:
Can't wait until this drama student audition becomes a real debate with a challenger.