*****Official Funny Political Tweet Thread*****
10,862,784 Views |
86035 Replies |
Last: 57 min ago by Biz Ag
— 🇺🇸Evan🇺🇸 (@LifeLibertyEvan) October 4, 2022
— Declaration of Memes 💛🖤 (@libertycappy) October 3, 2022
You mean - Worst Puerto Rican President in US history.
— Catturd ™ (@catturd2) October 4, 2022
LOL @ 'worst Puerto Rican president in history.'
Looters Spotted Trying To Enter Mar-A-Lago After Hurricane Ian
We are living in a movie pic.twitter.com/Py80dBgEqc
— ELIJAH SCHAFFER (@ElijahSchaffer) October 4, 2022
He was in the Sharks, the roughest toughest Puerto Rican street gang in Scranton, and single handedly won the big dance-off vs the Jets https://t.co/j0J3lrOtCn
— David Burge (@iowahawkblog) October 3, 2022
LOTs of great follow ups on this one:
I win, I found it first.
— Rondalee Iowa (@Maga4Justice) October 3, 2022
😂😂😂😂😂 pic.twitter.com/uLas6bH5Ms
lol ok
— Gritty is the Way (@Gritty20202) October 3, 2022
'sort of' doing some heavy lifting there, but Biden's never been especially honest about his support of popular movements pic.twitter.com/Vds3zuhmUp
— Sam (@pancakerespectr) October 3, 2022
oh no said:
I'm not a climate change wacko, but this is just simply not true. They used to make the same claim about mount st helens.
You don't HAVE to believe every photo posted on Facebook.
but I do have to post funny political memes I see on twitter on this funny political tweets and memes thread.Esteban du Plantier said:
You don't HAVE to believe every photo posted on Facebook.
and every time I see that photo anywhere on the internet, I like it, because it always triggers climate change wackos to respond to it.
Well then let's put it out there once a week, every week.
It will be better than the football board at 11:00 PM on Saturday night.
It will be better than the football board at 11:00 PM on Saturday night.
I call B.S. Those aren't breakfast tacosAggie12B said:
Any taco is a breakfast taco if you eat it for breakfast
I watched my 10 chickens take turns pecking at a metal wall because one chicken did it first. Then they all individually went to stare at the food before flapping around a bit and finally settling in a pile.
— Juniper Wilberry Thurston (@junebotprolly) October 4, 2022
It’s like watching the progressives tend to their pet causes.
I like truth.Esteban du Plantier said:oh no said:
I'm not a climate change wacko, but this is just simply not true. They used to make the same claim about mount st helens.
You don't HAVE to believe every photo posted on Facebook.
Do you have some technical analysis I can reference? Honestly interested.
"Laws that forbid the carrying of arms … disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes… . Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man.”
--Thomas Jefferson
--Thomas Jefferson
BusterAg said:I like truth.Esteban du Plantier said:oh no said:
I'm not a climate change wacko, but this is just simply not true. They used to make the same claim about mount st helens.
You don't HAVE to believe every photo posted on Facebook.
Do you have some technical analysis I can reference? Honestly interested.
First, it's easy to spout bull****, but takes a lot of time to refute it. This is called Brandolini's law
I haven't researched this specific false claim in about a decade. Back then I did read quite a bit and it was obvious that volcanoes produce a small fraction of global co2, nowhere near 'the entirety of human history'.
5 seconds of googling brings me to a Reuters article:
"According to the U.S. Geological Survey ( here ), published scientific estimates of the global CO2 emissions for all on land and submarine volcanos "lie in a range from 0.13 gigaton to 0.44 gigaton per year."
This is a fraction of the CO2 produced by human activity. In 2021, the global CO2 emissions from energy combustion and industrial processes alone reached a record high of 36.3 billion tonnes (or gigatons, GT), data from the International Energy Agency (IEA) showed ( here ). A graph by the IEA tracking the increase of emissions since 1899 is viewable ( here )"
So unless you think they are lying about volcano emissions by several thousand-fold, it's obvious that volcanoes annually (much less a single eruption) could not produce 10000 times as much co2 as humanity over its history.
Consider that co2 has risen by like 100 ppm in the last century. If this one eruption produced 10000 times that much co2, we'd all be dead.
I'm on my phone at work, so can't do a much more thorough analysis.
interesting--but how do we know the accuracy of climate measurements in 1899 or 1922 (100 years ago)? are we using the same instruments, or at least the same measuring standards? what was the measurement process then, or did someone just eyeball it and do a WAG?Esteban du Plantier said:BusterAg said:I like truth.Esteban du Plantier said:oh no said:
I'm not a climate change wacko, but this is just simply not true. They used to make the same claim about mount st helens.
You don't HAVE to believe every photo posted on Facebook.
Do you have some technical analysis I can reference? Honestly interested.
First, it's easy to spout bull****, but takes a lot of time to refute it. This is called Brandolini's law
I haven't researched this specific false claim in about a decade. Back then I did read quite a bit and it was obvious that volcanoes produce a small fraction of global co2, nowhere near 'the entirety of human history'.
5 seconds of googling brings me to a Reuters article:
"According to the U.S. Geological Survey ( here ), published scientific estimates of the global CO2 emissions for all on land and submarine volcanos "lie in a range from 0.13 gigaton to 0.44 gigaton per year."
This is a fraction of the CO2 produced by human activity. In 2021, the global CO2 emissions from energy combustion and industrial processes alone reached a record high of 36.3 billion tonnes (or gigatons, GT), data from the International Energy Agency (IEA) showed ( here ). A graph by the IEA tracking the increase of emissions since 1899 is viewable ( here )"
So unless you think they are lying about volcano emissions by several thousand-fold, it's obvious that volcanoes annually (much less a single eruption) could not produce 10000 times as much co2 as humanity over its history.
Consider that co2 has risen by like 100 ppm in the last century. If this one eruption produced 10000 times that much co2, we'd all be dead.
I'm on my phone at work, so can't do a much more thorough analysis.
One of the measurements is simply how dirty places like London or New York were during the coal age with industrial smoke stacks galore. compare that to today and the air would seem to be much cleaner. I say would seem to be, since I was not around until much later in the process. with the efforts to clean up emissions from ICE's some areas are actually less smoggy than 50-60 years ago.
I don't have time to do a lot of detailed research, but it makes me think twice when people are quoting statistics from 100+ years ago...
What does 100 years ago matter?
If volcanoes produce 1% of the co2 that humans will THIS YEAR, then obviously this year volcanoes couldn't have produced 10,000 times as much as all of humanity.
If volcanoes produce 1% of the co2 that humans will THIS YEAR, then obviously this year volcanoes couldn't have produced 10,000 times as much as all of humanity.
Just post it on FaceBook....the fact checkers will be on that like chickens on a June bug!
don't worry, every time you see that or similar meme on twitter, there are dozens of "scientists" on there, eager to tell you to forget about volcanos or China. What's important is that your government spends trillions on this existential threat ASAP and you need to go buy yourself a Prius.
And any leftover meat from last night's dinner is suitable to be mixed with eggs and cheese and made into a taco.Geralt of Rivia said:
Any taco is a breakfast taco if you eat it for breakfast
First of all, yeah, sure, whatever on your math, bro.Esteban du Plantier said:BusterAg said:I like truth.Esteban du Plantier said:oh no said:
I'm not a climate change wacko, but this is just simply not true. They used to make the same claim about mount st helens.
You don't HAVE to believe every photo posted on Facebook.
Do you have some technical analysis I can reference? Honestly interested.
First, it's easy to spout bull****, but takes a lot of time to refute it. This is called Brandolini's law
I haven't researched this specific false claim in about a decade. Back then I did read quite a bit and it was obvious that volcanoes produce a small fraction of global co2, nowhere near 'the entirety of human history'.
5 seconds of googling brings me to a Reuters article:
"According to the U.S. Geological Survey ( here ), published scientific estimates of the global CO2 emissions for all on land and submarine volcanos "lie in a range from 0.13 gigaton to 0.44 gigaton per year."
This is a fraction of the CO2 produced by human activity. In 2021, the global CO2 emissions from energy combustion and industrial processes alone reached a record high of 36.3 billion tonnes (or gigatons, GT), data from the International Energy Agency (IEA) showed ( here ). A graph by the IEA tracking the increase of emissions since 1899 is viewable ( here )"
So unless you think they are lying about volcano emissions by several thousand-fold, it's obvious that volcanoes annually (much less a single eruption) could not produce 10000 times as much co2 as humanity over its history.
Consider that co2 has risen by like 100 ppm in the last century. If this one eruption produced 10000 times that much co2, we'd all be dead.
I'm on my phone at work, so can't do a much more thorough analysis.
Second, back to funny stuff;
Breaking …
— Catturd ™ (@catturd2) October 4, 2022
Dog shit flavored popsicles now have a higher approval rating than Joe Biden.
Featured Stories
See All
20:34
42m ago
916
9:36
22h ago
3.9k
14:50
30m ago
227
The Fan Show sponsored by PrizePicks
by David Nuño