VaultingChemist said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

Told you they were up to their eyeballs in that.Maybe Ambassador Stephens found out about that and needed to be "removed"??

---

Seems that way. It could have been the Libyans that told Stephens about the "theft".

How is it possible to move that much gold, silver, and cash without someone involved in the operation leaking the details?

---

Because they killed the guys there? Paid off the rest?

Seeing his picture comes under the category of "one can never be sued for enough money".

I'm thrilled by this decision and hope Passantino makes Weissman's life as uncomfortable as possible. Or, as uncomfortable as that POS made the people in his decisions.

https://thefederalist.com/2024/11/20/judge-rules-msnbc-pundit-potentially-defamed-trump-attorney/

When I first heard Passantino's interview on Tucker, I couldn't believe a witness would switch testimony AFTER the deposition.

BTW, Hawg, Megyn Kelly's episode 947 (Monday, 11/18/24) had Glenn Greenwald and David Harsanyi.

Around the 1hour and 25 minute mark, Harsanyi has a chat with Kelly about Gaetz. It's the best review of Gaetz' actions as a congressman I've heard. No matter your feelings on Gaetz, they make a decent summation of Gaetz possibly being the man necessary for the AG job.

My feelings on Gaetz grew to be luke warm. Over the last five years, I just decided he was more of a blowhard. I didn't even know he was an attorney.

Speaking of conversations, I happen to contact my rep, Jake Ellzey, in DC two days ago on the way home from work about the missing 143 tons of gold in Libya.

The girl who answered the phone had to be educated about the situation, but I told her to tell my rep to make sure the new DNI/CIA pick is very aware of the information, that it hasn't been released and barely reported on.

The Americans need to know where that gold went and who has it.

The great part was at the end of the 7-8 minute phone call; she said she was looking forward to getting home for Thanksgiving and going to the A&M-tu game November 30th.

Turns out, she's class of '18.

Hope y'all found value.

We have rules around here.

I have the Dagon and Antonakakis DNC hack attribution report from August 7, 2016.

Antonakakis and Dagon are referenced as Researchers 1 and 2 respectively in the Sussmann indictment owing to their roles in the Alfa Bank stuff.

Stand by 😊

— Undead FOIA 3.0 (@UndeadFoia) November 21, 2024

Man, I'm sorry.

I just talked to her.

Guess I'll have to look up Ellzey's staff in DC.

Just an update, although I read it quickly and didn't take time to completely understand it.

What I did understand is Chutkin approving it without prejudice. There's a bunch of other words I'd prefer to use in front of her name, but not at the expense of never posting again. Surely there's got to be a SOL around. Am I the only person who seems to recognize SOL's only appear to be recognized by our communist brethren on the left?

Quote:

---

Here are my observations on Jack Smith raising the white flag and moving to dismiss his “J6” case against Trump:

1) The motion seeks dismissal without prejudice. This is absurd and raises the prospect that Judge Chutkan will grant that relief and leave a Sword of Damocles… https://t.co/Tn2yK6AKlR

— Jeff Clark (@JeffClarkUS) November 25, 2024

---

Without Prejudice...

It is official.

Judge Tanya Chutkan grants motion to dismiss J6 case pic.twitter.com/ORi7h0pLvs

— Julie Kelly 🇺🇸 (@julie_kelly2) November 25, 2024

I wouldn't sweat the without prejudice part too much. Fact is they would still need a new indictment, not a superceding indictment. DOJ porlice and procedure would prohibit convening a grand jury with Trump as the target while he's a sitting POTUS.

Most federal crime SOLs are five years. That takes it up to Jan 2026.

aggiehawg said:

---

I wouldn't sweat the without prejudice part too much. Fact is they would still need a new indictment, not a superceding indictment. DOJ porlice and procedure would prohibit convening a grand jury with Trump as the target while he's a sitting POTUS.

Most federal crime SOLs are five years. That takes it up to Jan 2026.

---

Wouldn't the next DOJ and some D.C. judge just say it's tolled while Trump is in office?

It's over. Dems won't want to focus their 2028-2029 message around prosecuting Trump for 2020 crap. Everything else is just propaganda, imho.