Mueller dismisses top FBI agent in Russia probe for anti-Trump texts

7,153,954 Views | 49187 Replies | Last: 8 days ago by captkirk
VegasAg86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

Those were not "mistakes" Andy. They were deliberate as there was no Woods file done before the application. That warrant application went through, or to be more precise "around" the usual procedures even bypassing certain people normally in that chain that were not within the cabal, to get the application completed and filed ASAP.

The only thing McCabe regrets is that they did not cover their tracks better and for longer.


LOL, yep, I'm pretty sure he's most upset about getting caught. No regrets about what he did.
fasthorse05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You know, Smith isn't a thing of beauty.

He'd definitely make a stick horse buck!

I guess his political zeal is his passion in lieu of other options.
Hate is how progressives sustain themselves. Without hate, introspection begins to slip into the progressive's consciousness, threatening the progressive with the truth: that their ideas and opinions are illogical, hypocritical, dangerous, and asinine.
This is backed by data.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
VegasAg86 said:

aggiehawg said:

Those were not "mistakes" Andy. They were deliberate as there was no Woods file done before the application. That warrant application went through, or to be more precise "around" the usual procedures even bypassing certain people normally in that chain that were not within the cabal, to get the application completed and filed ASAP.

The only thing McCabe regrets is that they did not cover their tracks better and for longer.


LOL, yep, I'm pretty sure he's most upset about getting caught. No regrets about what he did.
It was unraveling when Trump fired Comey leaving McCabe in the spotlight. Which he could not withstand, not with his top aide Lisa Page and her lover Strzok chatting about it like a day at the beach.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It's still unraveling, with more disclosures/ramifications/legal actions taken through to this present day.



Quote:

Again, the reason Biden (illegally) raided Trump is because Trump declassified (via memo on 1/19/2021) and kept his personal copy of his Crossfire Hurricane presidential records.

Biden, through his Deputy Counsel White House Jonathan Su, waived Trump's claim of executive privilege.

Biden AG Merrick Garland personally approved the raid.

These Crossfire Hurricane records are devastating to Obama, Biden, Hillary, Clapper, Comey, and so many others.

They made up the Russian collusion hoax in 2016.

Because Russia almost certainly hacked Hillary's home server.

Evidencing her Clinton Foundation foreign corruption as Obama's Secretary of State.

If Russia leaked the hacked material before the election, Hillary wanted to blame a Trump dirty campaign trickfalsely accusing him of colluding with Russia.

Conspiracy theory?

51 former intel agents, working with the CIA, ran the same play with Hunter's laptop of Biden's foreign corruption in 2020.

This is a criminal conspiracy.

Trump could have publicly disclosed these declassified Crossfire Hurricane records in his civil lawsuit versus Hillary over the Russian-collusion hoax

Magistrate Judge Bruce Reinhart, a Democrat operative who bashed Trump on Facebook, was forced to recuse from that case.

Six weeks later, Reinhart's clear bias against Trump (somehow) didn't matter anymore. Reinhart approved Biden's (through Garland and Jay Bratt, now Jack Smith's counselor) unprecedented, unnecessary, and unlawful raid on Trump.

For presidential records Trump was allowed to have in the Office of the Former President, per the Presidential Records Act.

In other words, Obama and Biden have politicized and weaponized law enforcement and intel agencies to interfere in the 2016, 2020, and 2024 presidential elections against Trump.

Because Obama and Biden know Trump has the goods on their ongoing Russian-collusion criminal conspiracy.

The Trump 47 DOJ must deliver severe consequences.


Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
There is not a single democrat on this board, in DC, or on the planet that wants to know the truth.

What a corrupt anti-American organization.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I am confused though. If he has them…why hasn't he released a bunch?

The whole theory that he is sitting on these makes sense in terms of driving them mad, but it doesn't in terms of 'wtf is he sitting on them 4 years later?'
Fuzzy Dunlop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
nortex97 said:

I am confused though. If he has them…why hasn't he released a bunch?

The whole theory that he is sitting on these makes sense in terms of driving them mad, but it doesn't in terms of 'wtf is he sitting on them 4 years later?'
What if he is holding them for an October surprise? That is the only reason I could see he's keeping them close to his vest assuming he has it.
Double Talkin' Jive...
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Fuzzy Dunlop said:

nortex97 said:

I am confused though. If he has them…why hasn't he released a bunch?

The whole theory that he is sitting on these makes sense in terms of driving them mad, but it doesn't in terms of 'wtf is he sitting on them 4 years later?'
What if he is holding them for an October surprise? That is the only reason I could see he's keeping them close to his vest assuming he has it.
The DOJ and swamp would say he's lying and the MSM would refuse to cover it.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Fuzzy Dunlop said:

nortex97 said:

I am confused though. If he has them…why hasn't he released a bunch?

The whole theory that he is sitting on these makes sense in terms of driving them mad, but it doesn't in terms of 'wtf is he sitting on them 4 years later?'
What if he is holding them for an October surprise? That is the only reason I could see he's keeping them close to his vest assuming he has it.
My two cents would be that nothing he has done over the course of his adult life makes that…plausible. He's sitting on some bombshell info to release it in late 2024? I like the guy and respect that he is a fairly smart person but I don't think that makes sense, or fits etc.
Fuzzy Dunlop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ellis Wyatt said:

Fuzzy Dunlop said:

nortex97 said:

I am confused though. If he has them…why hasn't he released a bunch?

The whole theory that he is sitting on these makes sense in terms of driving them mad, but it doesn't in terms of 'wtf is he sitting on them 4 years later?'
What if he is holding them for an October surprise? That is the only reason I could see he's keeping them close to his vest assuming he has it.
The DOJ and swamp would say he's lying and the MSM would refuse to cover it.
I don't disagree with you there. It's possible he sat on it his first term and was planning to use it during his second term. He wasn't re-elected so he's planning to use it during the campaign.

I don't really believe he has this but, if he does have it, it's the only sense I can make of it.
Double Talkin' Jive...
TRADUCTOR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
President Trump does not need to reveal his cards...watching while the dirty vile corrupt Democrats are stumbling and revealing all their own cards of crimes and lies. He will walk back into the White House untouched, grab his clubs, and go make his early tee time; par the course and then give an ad hoc hour long press conference focused on MAGA BABY.
captkirk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
nortex97 said:

I am confused though. If he has them…why hasn't he released a bunch?

The whole theory that he is sitting on these makes sense in terms of driving them mad, but it doesn't in terms of 'wtf is he sitting on them 4 years later?'
Insurance against the big steal?
First Page Refresh
Page 1406 of 1406
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.