Quote:

---

Merrick Garland will either heavily redact it or not allow it to be released to the public at all, Hawg will summarize the report and dumb it down for us, and a few people on TexAgs F16 will understand how the Clinton campaign conspired, with the aid of the FBI, to take down a duly elected President. The media will largely ignore it. Lather. Rinse. Repeat.

---

Seriously doubt Garland will allow its release. Or if it is it will be so severely redacted it will be useless

Note, unindicted co-conspirators are hardly ever directly named. So few people were actually indicted by Durham, that means there are a ton of people who could fall into that category.

aggiehawg said:

---

Quote:

---

Merrick Garland will either heavily redact it or not allow it to be released to the public at all, Hawg will summarize the report and dumb it down for us, and a few people on TexAgs F16 will understand how the Clinton campaign conspired, with the aid of the FBI, to take down a duly elected President. The media will largely ignore it. Lather. Rinse. Repeat.

---

Seriously doubt Garland will allow its release. Or if it is it will be so severely redacted it will be useless

Note, unindicted co-conspirators are hardly ever directly named. So few people were actually indicted by Durham, that means there are a ton of people who could fall into that category.

---

I knew the first part.
I didn't know the last part.
Doesn't change all that much. The Swamp is going to circle the proverbial wagons to protect itself no matter what.
Still luvya, Hawgie. Eff that puto from the previous page, naymsayin?

Fox News: "The real story is not Danchenko, not Michael Sussmann. The real story, even though there’s acquittals, the 2 cases brought to light how gullible the FBI was, how much that they cooperated with
Clinton." pic.twitter.com/djbwnlSV7I

— Becker News (@NewsBecker) October 18, 2022

Benedict Arnold was just gullible

Not sure I can ever trust a lawyer in any capacity or any representative of the DOJ after this...with a lone exception (Mrs. Hawg)

This is the first time I've not gotten extremely angry, just disappointed. I guess that makes me a cynic, although I can't imagine me anymore cynical than I've become.

I've often heard here, and elsewhere most of my life "the truth will always come out". I'm not sure that's the case, either here or elsewhere in history. I realize a lot of unknown information came out in both trials, but does anyone believe that information will be used for the benefit of the law.

I'm not without hope, but I am sad and mildly fearful for the future.

I guess the next big roadblock to justice will be the Hunter Biden/Joe Biden/James Biden trial. I'm very concerned about the incompetence of Republicans, as I know the FBI will tip toe around the serious issues.

Moral of the Durham trials: Jurors won't convict sources if the FBI wanted their bait https://t.co/d0l4vOAcMK

— Just the News (@JustTheNews) October 19, 2022

whatthehey78 said:

---

Not sure I can ever trust a lawyer in any capacity or any representative of the DOJ after this...with a lone exception (Mrs. Hawg)

---

I'm retired and from a bygone era when being an attorney was actually a profession populated with professionals. Those days are over.

And I never worked for DOJ in any capacity.

NEW: Obama DOJ official says Attorney General Merrick Garland should put a "pause" on releasing John Durham's report, warns findings may "unfairly tarnish" FBI officials and suggests prosecutor should not have the "final word." https://t.co/iOqT6cnwoD -- @dcexaminer

— Daniel Chaitin (@danielchaitin7) October 19, 2022

fasthorse05 said:

---

I've often heard here, and elsewhere most of my life "the truth will always come out". I'm not sure that's the case, either here or elsewhere in history. I realize a lot of unknown information came out in both trials, but does anyone believe that information will be used for the benefit of the law.

---

There is a court where yes the complete and total truth WILL come out and justice will be swift and final. Prepare for a very long future.

NM.

ravingfans said:

---

fasthorse05 said:

---

I've often heard here, and elsewhere most of my life "the truth will always come out". I'm not sure that's the case, either here or elsewhere in history. I realize a lot of unknown information came out in both trials, but does anyone believe that information will be used for the benefit of the law.

---

There is a court where yes the complete and total truth WILL come out and justice will be swift and final. Prepare for a very long future.

---

fasthorse05 should prepare for a very long future? What does that have to do with this court of which you speak?

Are we talking about a supernatural court which punishes political sins differently from other sins because we're on F 16 - and the highest judge is fully engaged in nation state politics and ready to render some swift and final justice as envisioned by message board posters?

That seems like a more useful religion than having to be endlessly good in some sort of reincarnation cycle.

No worries, guys.

I was just a tad frustrated, well, more than a tad, but frustrated nonetheless. I was wondering what my knowledge and views would have been if we had access to the webs when I was growing up (born in '62). Between LBJ's great society, civil rights acts, voting rights acts, Agnew and Nixon kerfuffles, Nixon's pardon, etc..

I'm assuming, of course, I would have the same passion for knowledge of facts I have today. I'm certain I'd see things differently, but probably with a different perspective, as getting accurate information is just as difficult today.

Durham flipped the entirety of MSM facts they been feeding the lemmings for the past 5 years.
On their head and broke necks.

Worthless with ZERO MSM coverage and no conviction. No justice, sad.

TRADUCTOR said:

---

Durham flipped the entirety of MSM facts they been feeding the lemmings for the past 5 years.
On their head and broke necks.

Worthless with ZERO MSM coverage and no conviction. No justice, sad.

---

Sadly, the MSM coverage is "no convictions, the witch hunt failed."

aggiehawg said:

---

whatthehey78 said:

---

Not sure I can ever trust a lawyer in any capacity or any representative of the DOJ after this...with a lone exception (Mrs. Hawg)

---

I'm retired and from a bygone era when being an attorney was actually a profession populated with professionals. Those days are over.

And I never worked for DOJ in any capacity.

---

Was/are aware of all that...just impressed with your knowledge and chutzpah. Keep it up!!

will25u said:

---

Moral of the Durham trials: Jurors won't convict sources if the FBI wanted their bait https://t.co/d0l4vOAcMK

— Just the News (@JustTheNews) October 19, 2022

---

Durham needs to write a book.

Quote:

---

Durham needs to write a book.

---

Would wager DOJ would block or heavily redact what they would allow to be published.

John Durham Exposed the FBI’s Misconduct - our @NRO editorial ... https://t.co/aCOab2EyTf

— Andy McCarthy (@AndrewCMcCarthy) October 20, 2022

Consolation prize anyone?

John Durham lost again in court, but the special counsel has already won the larger battle to expose the dirty political machinations behind the FBI’s Russia collusion probe. https://t.co/AG8vCKXA4M via @WSJ

— Kimberley Strassel (@KimStrassel) October 20, 2022

Interesting events unfolding.

I think Durham is done, but I also think there is something more than just a report coming [not indictments].

RyanM58699717 said:

---

Interesting events unfolding.

I think Durham is done, but I also think there is something more than just a report coming [not indictments].

---

Welcome back. What do you think might be coming?

RyanM58699717 said:

---

Interesting events unfolding.

I think Durham is done, but I also think there is something more than just a report coming [not indictments].

---

Great to see you back

"A member of Trump’s team—reported to have been Gen. Michael Flynn—asked whether the FBI had dug into Steele’s sub-sources. If the questions were indeed posed by Flynn, it may have precipitated his subsequent demise at the hands of Comey."

New @EpochTimeshttps://t.co/d2ugx7jb38

— Hans Mahncke (@HansMahncke) October 24, 2022

The US media’s repeated references to the Trump-Russia ‘Dossier’ as ‘discredited’ are sloppy journalism. Despite a blow torch of politically-motivated criticism, the main tenets of it, including on collusion, have held up well. And few, if any, of the details have been disproven.

— Christopher Steele (@Chris_D_Steele) October 27, 2022

What a greasy piece of ****

There is only democrat political justice in DC or related area.

Amazes me...sooooooo many are willing to believe outright, blatant lies as long as it suits their agenda. And soooooo many are willing to propagate them. The REAL pandemic is "senseless gullibility".

The FBI finally admitted they were given images of Seth's personal laptop, but today claim no one ever looked at it.

They also claim sources and methods would be revealed regarding how they got it?😂

A DC grand jury requested/subpeona'd it, AUSA Sines gave it to them. FFS!

— Mccabe's Porsche on Blocks (@Larry_Beech) October 27, 2022

will25u said:

---

RyanM58699717 said:

---

Interesting events unfolding.

I think Durham is done, but I also think there is something more than just a report coming [not indictments].

---

Welcome back. What do you think might be coming?

---

Special counsel regulations require that if AG Garland interfered that it gets reported to Congress once Durham is finished. That could be coming.

Could be something like that, which could have a Saturday night massacre impact.