The court will hear arguments December 8th on any outstanding issues raised in Sussmann's motion for bill of particulars.

— Ryan M (@RyanM58699717) November 24, 2021

This is a hard and detailed look at some of the NY Times and Washington Post reporting on Trump-Russia. To say that reporting does not hold up well is an understatement. This is a catalog of bad journalism, most of it still uncorrected. https://t.co/MalKfyg84g

— Brit Hume (@brithume) November 24, 2021

Another Jones entity than paid $680k to Fusion & Yonder to spread disinformation to impact the 2020 election.
Yonder was caught pretending to be Russian trolls interfering in the 2017 Alabama Senate race. Wonder if they were the Russian trolls in 2016 too?https://t.co/GCEvZh3XIe

— DawsonSField (@DawsonSField) November 29, 2021

Austin, TX - makes sense to me.

will25u said:

---

FJB said:

---

will25u said:

---

Boasberg again? 😬 pic.twitter.com/FALk7XE2Hr

— Whispers of Dementia (@mgEyesOpen) November 16, 2021

---

Conflict of interest perhaps?

---

Re Carter Page case v. Comey et. al.

Judge Boasberg recused himself earlier today, and the case was reassigned.

The new judge who will preside over the case -- Hon. Timothy Kelly.

— Dr. Shipwreckedcrew.substack.com (@shipwreckedcrew) November 17, 2021

Trump appointee.

---

I'll take any small victories as they come.

Is this real life? Mueller spent millions, and years and found NOTHING, but Russia WAS involved with Trump?

New explainer: It’s become clear that the Steele Dossier was unreliable & unworthy of the attention it received. But it was also a largely tangential distraction from the actual Russia investigation, despite misleading attempts to conflate them. https://t.co/iowj7izfYK

— Charlie Savage (@charlie_savage) December 1, 2021

Fake but accurate.

/Dan Rather

The Blue Anon followers who still believe in the Collusion Delusion are just as insane as the Qtards.

So the "legit" part of the Russia investigation was based on…..

The also fraudulent Alfa bank allegations?

The Hillary campaign dropping other hints at collusion separately from the dossier, because they had a history of doing this to opponents?

Other fraudulent DNC operative sources like MS Chalupa?

MouthBQ98 said:

---

So the "legit" part of the Russia investigation was based on…..

The also fraudulent Alfa bank allegations?

The Hillary campaign dropping other hints at collusion separately from the dossier, because they had a history of doing this to opponents?

Other fraudulent DNC operative sources like MS Chalupa?

---

Yeah, it is amazing how many times she and her cronies have cried "Russia" against their opponents and everybody still goes for it every time they do it. The one group that has solid bulletproof evidence of Russian collusion against them is the Clinton Foundation, but somehow everybody in the media always believes them when they accuse somebody else of working for Russia.

txags92 said:

---

Fake but accurate.

/Dan Rather

---

"Yeah, well, I made that up, but I am sure he has done much worse that I cannot prove. That makes this OK to do."

About Charlie Savage, a "journalist" for the garbage rag the New York Times, from Wikipedia

Quote:

---

Born in Fort Wayne, Indiana, in 1975, Savage earned an undergraduate degree in English and American literature and language from Harvard College in 1998 and a Master of Studies in Law (MSL) in 2003 from Yale Law School, where he was a Knight Foundation journalism fellow.

Savage is believed to have written the first mainstream media story about the Dark Side of the Rainbow, the practice of listening to Pink Floyd's album The Dark Side of the Moon while watching the film The Wizard of Oz, in August 1995, while working as a college intern at The Journal Gazette in Fort Wayne.[url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlie_Savage#cite_note-2][2][/url] He went on in 1999 to work as a staff writer for the Miami Herald, where, under the byline "Charles Savage", he covered local and state government[url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlie_Savage#cite_note-3][3][/url] and occasionally reviewed movies.

---

He should have stuck to movie reviews because he is a complete idiot.

richardag said:

---

About Charlie Savage, a "journalist" for the garbage rag the New York Times, from Wikipedia

Quote:

---

* * *
Savage is believed to have written the first mainstream media story about the Dark Side of the Rainbow, the practice of listening to Pink Floyd's album The Dark Side of the Moon while watching the film The Wizard of Oz, in August 1995, while working as a college intern at The Journal Gazette in Fort Wayne.[url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlie_Savage#cite_note-2][2][/url] He went on in 1999 to work as a staff writer for the Miami Herald, where, under the byline "Charles Savage", he covered local and state government[url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlie_Savage#cite_note-3][3][/url] and occasionally reviewed movies.

---

He should have stuck to movie reviews because he is a complete idiot.

---

Is he really better at them?

Quote:

---

Since then, movie and music fans have endlessly debated. Does it really synch up? Did Pink Floyd do this on purpose? Some are absolutely convinced that the answer is yes on both counts. Never mind that everyone who worked on "Dark Side of the Moon" has categorically denied that any of it was intentional. Producer Alan Parsons laughed at the whole thing, pointing out the mind-boggling difficulty of the task, especially given that videotapes weren't available in 1972.

---

Does 'Dark Side of the Monn' really synch with 'The Wizard of Oz'?

VegasAg86 said:

---

richardag said:

---

About Charlie Savage, a "journalist" for the garbage rag the New York Times, from Wikipedia

Quote:

---

* * *
Savage is believed to have written the first mainstream media story about the Dark Side of the Rainbow, the practice of listening to Pink Floyd's album The Dark Side of the Moon while watching the film The Wizard of Oz, in August 1995, while working as a college intern at The Journal Gazette in Fort Wayne.[url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlie_Savage#cite_note-2][2][/url] He went on in 1999 to work as a staff writer for the Miami Herald, where, under the byline "Charles Savage", he covered local and state government[url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlie_Savage#cite_note-3][3][/url] and occasionally reviewed movies.

---

He should have stuck to movie reviews because he is a complete idiot.

---

Is he really better at them?

Quote:

---

Since then, movie and music fans have endlessly debated. Does it really synch up? Did Pink Floyd do this on purpose? Some are absolutely convinced that the answer is yes on both counts. Never mind that everyone who worked on "Dark Side of the Moon" has categorically denied that any of it was intentional. Producer Alan Parsons laughed at the whole thing, pointing out the mind-boggling difficulty of the task, especially given that videotapes weren't available in 1972.

---

Does 'Dark Side of the Monn' really synch with 'The Wizard of Oz'?

---

Point taken and agreed. Probably not any better at movie reviews but this thread would be in the entertainment forum not here.

richardag said:

---

VegasAg86 said:

---

richardag said:

---

About Charlie Savage, a "journalist" for the garbage rag the New York Times, from Wikipedia

Quote:

---

* * *
Savage is believed to have written the first mainstream media story about the Dark Side of the Rainbow, the practice of listening to Pink Floyd's album The Dark Side of the Moon while watching the film The Wizard of Oz, in August 1995, while working as a college intern at The Journal Gazette in Fort Wayne.[url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlie_Savage#cite_note-2][2][/url] He went on in 1999 to work as a staff writer for the Miami Herald, where, under the byline "Charles Savage", he covered local and state government[url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlie_Savage#cite_note-3][3][/url] and occasionally reviewed movies.

---

He should have stuck to movie reviews because he is a complete idiot.

---

Is he really better at them?

Quote:

---

Since then, movie and music fans have endlessly debated. Does it really synch up? Did Pink Floyd do this on purpose? Some are absolutely convinced that the answer is yes on both counts. Never mind that everyone who worked on "Dark Side of the Moon" has categorically denied that any of it was intentional. Producer Alan Parsons laughed at the whole thing, pointing out the mind-boggling difficulty of the task, especially given that videotapes weren't available in 1972.

---

Does 'Dark Side of the Monn' really synch with 'The Wizard of Oz'?

---

Point taken and agreed. Probably not any better at movie reviews but this thread would be in the entertainment forum not here.

---

Politics is entertainment because it's all theater and optics. The movie "Wag the Dog" was 100% spot on.

How time flies.

On this date exactly 4 years ago:

NYT's and WaPo report Strzok was removed from Mueller team for questionable text messages.

The day after Flynn plead in court before soon to be recused judge Contreras.

— Mccabe's Porsche on Blocks (@Larry_Beech) December 2, 2021

will25u said:

---

How time flies.

On this date exactly 4 years ago:

NYT's and WaPo report Strzok was removed from Mueller team for questionable text messages.

The day after Flynn plead in court before soon to be recused judge Contreras.

— Mccabe's Porsche on Blocks (@Larry_Beech) December 2, 2021

---

What a waste of 4 years.

sicandtiredTXN said:

---

richardag said:

---

VegasAg86 said:

---

richardag said:

---

About Charlie Savage, a "journalist" for the garbage rag the New York Times, from Wikipedia

Quote:

---

* * *
Savage is believed to have written the first mainstream media story about the Dark Side of the Rainbow, the practice of listening to Pink Floyd's album The Dark Side of the Moon while watching the film The Wizard of Oz, in August 1995, while working as a college intern at The Journal Gazette in Fort Wayne.[url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlie_Savage#cite_note-2][2][/url] He went on in 1999 to work as a staff writer for the Miami Herald, where, under the byline "Charles Savage", he covered local and state government[url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlie_Savage#cite_note-3][3][/url] and occasionally reviewed movies.

---

He should have stuck to movie reviews because he is a complete idiot.

---

Is he really better at them?

Quote:

---

Since then, movie and music fans have endlessly debated. Does it really synch up? Did Pink Floyd do this on purpose? Some are absolutely convinced that the answer is yes on both counts. Never mind that everyone who worked on "Dark Side of the Moon" has categorically denied that any of it was intentional. Producer Alan Parsons laughed at the whole thing, pointing out the mind-boggling difficulty of the task, especially given that videotapes weren't available in 1972.

---

Does 'Dark Side of the Monn' really synch with 'The Wizard of Oz'?

---

Point taken and agreed. Probably not any better at movie reviews but this thread would be in the entertainment forum not here.

---

Politics is entertainment because it's all theater and optics. The movie "Wag the Dog" was 100% spot on.

---

Oh man! Was the Clinton admin mad about that movie!! Dustin Hoffman and Robert DeNiro? It still was trashed and went to video pretty damn fast.

And the last scene when the Dustin Hoffman character was killed off by a "heart attack"???? Must have hit too close to home for the Clintons.

Was a good movie, though.

aggiehawg said:

---

sicandtiredTXN said:

---

richardag said:

---

VegasAg86 said:

---

richardag said:

---

About Charlie Savage, a "journalist" for the garbage rag the New York Times, from Wikipedia

Quote:

---

* * *
Savage is believed to have written the first mainstream media story about the Dark Side of the Rainbow, the practice of listening to Pink Floyd's album The Dark Side of the Moon while watching the film The Wizard of Oz, in August 1995, while working as a college intern at The Journal Gazette in Fort Wayne.[url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlie_Savage#cite_note-2][2][/url] He went on in 1999 to work as a staff writer for the Miami Herald, where, under the byline "Charles Savage", he covered local and state government[url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlie_Savage#cite_note-3][3][/url] and occasionally reviewed movies.

---

He should have stuck to movie reviews because he is a complete idiot.

---

Is he really better at them?

Quote:

---

Since then, movie and music fans have endlessly debated. Does it really synch up? Did Pink Floyd do this on purpose? Some are absolutely convinced that the answer is yes on both counts. Never mind that everyone who worked on "Dark Side of the Moon" has categorically denied that any of it was intentional. Producer Alan Parsons laughed at the whole thing, pointing out the mind-boggling difficulty of the task, especially given that videotapes weren't available in 1972.

---

Does 'Dark Side of the Monn' really synch with 'The Wizard of Oz'?

---

Point taken and agreed. Probably not any better at movie reviews but this thread would be in the entertainment forum not here.

---

Politics is entertainment because it's all theater and optics. The movie "Wag the Dog" was 100% spot on.

---

Oh man! Was the Clinton admin mad about that movie!! Dustin Hoffman and Robert DeNiro? It still was trashed and went to video pretty damn fast.

And the last scene when the Dustin Hoffman character was killed off by a "heart attack"???? Must have hit too close to home for the Clintons.

Was a good movie, though.

---

Even now more than ever. This Administration has literally erected a professional sound stage, complete with a Lincoln Room replica, a fake media room, and an Oval office, next door in the Eisenhower Building next to the real White House. You cannot make this up.

This piece by @LeeSmithDC is so far the definitive account about the end of so-called #journalism in America and the corruption of federal law enforcement

— Ron Coleman (@RonColeman) December 2, 2021

Quite a good review of much of the information accumulated in this thread.

Alternative Mueller Report incoming!

Ridiculous.

JUST IN: Feds locate ‘alternative’ Mueller report mentioned by Andrew Weissmann in his book. Parts of the compendium could go public soon. First review should be done next month, feds say https://t.co/KSHb6MM2yq #FOIA

— Josh Gerstein (@joshgerstein) December 3, 2021

will25u said:

---

Alternative Mueller Report incoming!

Ridiculous.

JUST IN: Feds locate ‘alternative’ Mueller report mentioned by Andrew Weissmann in his book. Parts of the compendium could go public soon. First review should be done next month, feds say https://t.co/KSHb6MM2yq #FOIA

— Josh Gerstein (@joshgerstein) December 3, 2021

---

Fits in with the Alternate Universe they live in.

Even Senile Lyin' Bob gave up on prosecuting Trump for anything, hard to believe work product on an investigation that didn't lead to more charges would be released by the DoJ to harm uncharged defendants reputations when that is directly contra policy, but it is the Garland injustice department after all.

Also, LOL at politico quietly noting they can't release grand jury information due to 'legal restrictions.' Yeah, there are those pesky legal limits.

These guys had 3 years to smear Trump with anything they could cook up, an open secret mission, a vindictive FBI, and came up with 'well, some fake russian front companies were indicted, until they showed up in court and we moved to dismiss the charges.' Pathetic to dream about revisiting this as some sort of future smear heading toward 2022-2024. Weisman's book should have been 1 page; 'Outside my purview."

nortex97 said:

---

Even Senile Lyin' Bob gave up on prosecuting Trump for anything, hard to believe work product on an investigation that didn't lead to more charges would be released by the DoJ to harm uncharged defendants reputations when that is directly contra policy, but it is the Garland injustice department after all.

Also, LOL at politico quietly noting they can't release grand jury information due to 'legal restrictions.' Yeah, there are those pesky legal limits.

These guys had 3 years to smear Trump with anything they could cook up, an open secret mission, a vindictive FBI, and came up with 'well, some fake russian front companies were indicted, until they showed up in court and we moved to dismiss the charges.' Pathetic to dream about revisiting this as some sort of future smear heading toward 2022-2024. Weisman's book should have been 1 page; 'Outside my purview."

---

Yep, there are so many transgressions from the politicized FBI and their accomplices in the left wing media, it is infuriating to think none of the law breakers will pay any significant penalty.

So there going to dump even more unconfirmed, uncorroborated BS that they were so unconfident to bring the first time when it really mattered.

If you've ever read/seen "The Stepford Wives," this weekend might be the revenge of The Ste(CC)Pford Wives...starting with MM's wife.

I know you can decipher all that.

CyclingAg82 said:

---

nortex97 said:

---

Even Senile Lyin' Bob gave up on prosecuting Trump for anything, hard to believe work product on an investigation that didn't lead to more charges would be released by the DoJ to harm uncharged defendants reputations when that is directly contra policy, but it is the Garland injustice department after all.

Also, LOL at politico quietly noting they can't release grand jury information due to 'legal restrictions.' Yeah, there are those pesky legal limits.

These guys had 3 years to smear Trump with anything they could cook up, an open secret mission, a vindictive FBI, and came up with 'well, some fake russian front companies were indicted, until they showed up in court and we moved to dismiss the charges.' Pathetic to dream about revisiting this as some sort of future smear heading toward 2022-2024. Weisman's book should have been 1 page; 'Outside my purview."

---

Yep, there are so many transgressions from the politicized FBI and their accomplices in the left wing media, it is infuriating to think none of the law breakers will pay any significant penalty.

---

Yeah at this point I think I'm going to stop following this stuff. There are no more good guys left.

93MarineHorn said:

---

So there going to dump even more unconfirmed, uncorroborated BS that they were so unconfident to bring the first time when it really mattered.

---

I know it was some time ago but I remarked at the time as Bill Barr was being confirmed and the Mueller Report was nearing completion, the DC Circuit Court of Appeals issued a decision that protected all grand jury information to the exceptions contained with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

That decision is the "restriction" of which Weissmann was complaining about in his book. or one of them, anyways. The other was the prohibition on indicting of a sitting President from the OLC from DOJ.

That "alternative report" was a hit piece, likely illegally using grand jury material that was cherry picked and taken out of context.

Fusion GPS has "found" some additional files not previously turned over to Fridman in their lawsuit.

In defense, FGPS lawyers claim they were unaware of Joffe's relevance to the case.

Also states Rodney Joffe was "working at Perkins Coie's direction." And had privilege.

— Ryan M (@RyanM58699717) December 3, 2021

Is it just coincidental that Rodney Joffe a known expert in detecting malware and holder of 10 patents in his field. who has a really cozy relationship with the FBI so cozy that he was the first civilian to be awarded the FBI Director's Award for Cybersecurity, by Bob Mueller.

Now we find out that he was working with Perkin Coie during the time this Dossier garbage appears, through Fusion GPS, who's funding was coming from Hillary Clinton via Perkins Coie, and now since Durham is starting to trot out indictments that hit very close to home, since sussman worked for Perkins Coie, suddenly FGPS remembers files it has from Joffe that it didn't turn over under discovery in the Fridman v. Buzzfeed case.

The water is boiling and the crabs are trying to crawl out of the pot.

sicandtiredTXN said:

---

Is it just coincidental that Rodney Joffe a known expert in detecting malware and holder of 10 patents in his field. who has a really cozy relationship with the FBI so cozy that he was the first civilian to be awarded the FBI Director's Award for Cybersecurity, by Bob Mueller.

Now we find out that he was working with Perkin Coie during the time this Dossier garbage appears, through Fusion GPS, who's funding was coming from Hillary Clinton via Perkins Coie, and now since Durham is starting to trot out indictments that hit very close to home, since sussman worked for Perkins Coie, suddenly FGPS remembers files it has from Joffe that it didn't turn over under discovery in the Fridman v. Buzzfeed case.

The water is boiling and the crabs are trying to crawl out of the pot.

---

So how long before we find out that Mueller was in on it from the beginning? These little isolated circles keep intersecting and it is clear now that he and his people knew almost from the very start that the whole thing was BS. The only reason to keep going as long as he did was to make sure the dems carried the midterms and to see to it that Trump spent most of the time in office under a cloud of suspicion. If they had found anything at all of value to them during all their time and effort spying on Trump, it would have come out in one of the impeachment efforts. The fact that it didn't says more than their report. Trumps tax returns are the same way...we heard all this squawking about them...but now that they have them...nothing. If there was anything in those tax returns to use against Trump, it would have leaked by now and been a front page story.

Joffe was knee deep in this going back to Sussman in 2016 and the origin of the 'pee tape' lies ostensibly dug up by fellow ham radio hobbyist Nellie Ohr; claiming they (Fusion GPS atty's) didn't know he was involved/no idea is just…another bold face lie.

Quote:

---

The origin of the Michael Cohen in Prague is even more convoluted. However, that story connects to the recently highlighted connection between Perkins Coie lawyer Michael Sussmann and Rodney Joffe. While working for Perkins Coie, Sussmann also represented Rodney Joffe, a cybersecurity expert referred to in Durham's indictment as "Tech Executive-1." In 2016, Joffe, who has not been previously identified, worked with researchers to collect internet data about the Trump Organization that Sussmann took to the FBI. {Go Deep} You'll see where Joffe surfaces toward the end.

---

Quote:

---

In October of 2018 Mrs. Nellie Ohr was questioned by a House committee about her involvement with Fusion-GPS while working as a paid contract agent for the firm. Additionally, she was questioned on: her relationship with the dossier origination; her contacts with Christopher Steele; her role and responsibility within Fusion as it related to the Trump project; and the nature of the communication between herself and the participating players inside and outside of government.

Mrs Ohr invoked spousal privilege to protect any communication between herself and her husband.
We now know that in 2016 a cybersecurity expert named Rodney Joffe was under contract with Perkins Coie and collaborating with researchers to collect internet data about the Trump Organization that Clinton Lawyer Michael Sussmann took to the FBI.

So we know the FBI was getting research information from Nellie Ohr via Chris Steele, and from Rodney Joffe via Michael Sussmann.

What do Nellie and Rodney have in common? They are both HAM Radio operators. What a coincidence.

---

Quote:

---

There is every indication the Michael Cohen visiting Prague story originated from Nellie's research and was passed along to Chris Steele becoming a point in his dossier. An unfortunately named art dealer from New York was likely mistaken for President Trump's lawyer.

Former Senate Intelligence Committee lead staffer Dan Jones was working with Glenn Simpson at Fusion-GPS. Fusion-GPS contracted with Nellie Ohr in "late 2015". This is the exact same time when thousands of unauthorized "contractor searches" were taking place within the NSA/FBI database. This is where the Ham radio comes in handy to receive, share and discuss information from database extraction.

Nellie Ohr then sends research outcomes to Chris Steele for the dossier assembly; and the dossier is then laundered back to Bruce Ohr and FBI for use in their operation against the Trump campaign. Meanwhile, Simpson and Jones are leaking to the media who are writing articles. Nellie then captures those articles to validate material in the dossier; puts the citations on a thumb-drive and gives it to Bruce. Again, it's the same damn origin.

Chris Steele is not defending his lies, he is defending the mistaken research of Nellie Ohr.

For obvious reasons, Chris Steele cannot reveal where he got both points of erroneous information without exposing himself to the legal ramifications that accompany a group of political operatives successfully weaponizing the FBI against a U.S. presidential candidate. This is not conspiracy theory, this is a factual conspiracy.

---

Of course, it's all just a coincidence she/Joffe developed a mid-life sharp interest in shortwave radio transmissions, and oh by the way is a Stalin apologist;

Quote:

---

That brings us to Nellie Ohr, holder of amateur radio call sign KM4UDZ. Ohr graduated from Harvard University in 1983 with a degree in history and Russian literature. She studied in the Soviet Union in 1989 and obtained a PhD in Russian history in 1990.

For those of you who may be tempted to read her 400-plus page PhD thesis, here's a spoiler alert: in murdering untold millions, Joseph Stalin may have engaged in some "excesses" which, in her words, "sometimes represented desperate measures taken by a government that had little real control over the country." Translated into simple English, she meant, "Hey, cut the guy some slack. Creating a proletarian paradise can be tough and anybody can get carried away."

She is said to be fluent in the Russian language and an expert on cybersecurity. Her husband is Bruce Ohr, the former number four official in President Obama's Justice Department.

According to a sworn court filing by Fusion GPS co-founder Glenn Simpson, she was hired by that firm to conduct opposition research on behalf of the Clinton campaign against candidate Donald Trump. In his statement, Simpson acknowledged bank records reflect that Fusion GPS contracted with her "to help our company with its research and analysis of Mr. Trump."

At the same time, Fusion GPS retained the services of former British spy and FBI informant Christopher Steele to obtain derogatory information from his Russian sources about Trump. The final Fusion GPS product became the now-discredited eponymous Steele dossier, which James Comey's FBI and Obama's DOJ used to obtain Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act warrants to spy on a Trump campaign member.
Who Are Nellie and Bruce Ohr?

The so-called Nunes memorandum by the Republican majority on the House Intelligence Committee states Nellie Ohr was "employed by Fusion GPS to assist in the cultivation of opposition research on Trump" and added that her husband "later provided the FBI with all of his wife's opposition research." Sen. Lindsey Graham has stated publicly that she "did the research for Mr. Steele."

We now know that, before the House Intelligence Committee, Simpson disclosed that he met personally with Bruce Ohr "at his request, after the November 2016 election to discuss our findings regarding Russia and the election." That committee also learned that during the election campaign, Bruce Ohr met with Steele, the dossier's author.

It has also come out that Bruce Ohr failed to report the source of his wife's income from Fusion GPS on his DOJ ethics disclosure forms. Such disclosure is mandatory, and Ohr's omission raises many questions.

For example, under the law, such an omission could be considered evidence tending to prove his consciousness of guilt. Why would he, in effect, conceal by omission his wife's employment by the firm that produced the meretricious Steele dossier that his own employer, the Obama DOJ, submitted under oath to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) for authorization to spy on the Trump campaign and presidency? Was he trying to hide his connections with Fusion GPS? If so, why? And what inference should a jury draw from such concealment?

He is not alone in this regard. What about Nellie Ohr's ham radio license?

Why Did Nellie Ohr Suddenly Become a Ham in 2016?

Ohr is a member of Women in International Security, which describes itself as supporting "research projects and policy engagement initiatives on critical international security issues, including the nexus between gender and security." She has done cybersecurity consulting for Accenture, a politically connected firm, for which she gave a presentation on "Ties Between Government Intelligence Services and Cyber Criminals Closer Than You Think?"

Did she develop an overwhelming middle-aged desire to talk to geeks over the radio?

It is apparent that, between her own professional experience and her marriage to a top DOJ official, she was well aware of the ability of the National Security Agency to intercept and store every communication on the Internet. Did this knowledge have anything to do with her mid-life decision to become a ham radio operator and communicate outside cyberspace?

What Was Happening When Nellie Ohr Got Her License

On May 23, 2016, she received a technician-level amateur radio license. The timing is significant. The presidential campaign was underway and she and her employer, Fusion GPS, were digging for dirt in Russia to use against Trump. Given her cybersecurity knowledge, was Nellie Ohr hoping to use non-cyber short wave communications to hide her participation in that nefarious effort from the NSA?

Recall that, in early 2016, NSA head Admiral Mike Rogers became aware of "ongoing" and "intentional" violations and abuse of FISA surveillance, which he subsequently exposed in testimony before Congress. Thereafter, pressure mounted within the Obama administration to fire him.

---

If I, a pedestrian frustrated citizen tracking a few blogs/amateur media sites, could put all of this together a few years ago, I'd like to think our geniuses running the Durham investigation etc. might have figured it all out by now, but I hold out no hope they want to/would admit to it if they did.

Mind the gap pic.twitter.com/oYX3Tn7t0b

— FOOL NELSON (@FOOL_NELSON) December 3, 2021

I think the ruthless efficiency with which the technical eggheads on the geek fringe right and in alternative right independent media unearthed this data without all the special powers and vast resources of the MSM, the FBI/DOJ, and other related government agencies, and made them look like incompetent boobs or revealed they are lackeys of the state or ideological co-conspirators seriously startled and concerned them, hence the dragging out of this until the political left could push Biden over the line and give them breathing room. I really think they've been surprised how fast SOME people were able to unravel and expose their conspiracies and coverups, even if those persons had inadequate power to do anything about it.